🐮 Lolcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / Russell Greee / Russle / Brothel Prince / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Harvey Danger said:
I really, really hope he explains that he didn't pay the filing fee to sue the NVSoS, it was his very separate and totally segregated PAC funds that paid it.
Click to expand...
While also not actually suing on behalf of his LLC, no matter how it looks to everyone else. Just let him explain how he’s doing everything to the letter of the law! Totally. And if you disagree then you just hate the disabled, and will be sued under the ADA.
 
I was curious about who else has sued Mr. Aguilar and how service was handled. It appears that Gree is the only non-incarcerated individual to sue Aguilar:

Aguilar PACER.png

It seems that the District of Nevada only screens IFP complaints when the petitioner is incarcerated because in the majority of the cases, Aguilar (among others) was terminated from the complaints on the merits (not that prison IFP lawsuits generally have any to begin with). However, in both "Meadows" cases, the Nevada AG / DAG accepted service on behalf of Aguilar, but I suspect @DavidS877 is correct here:
DavidS877 said:
I'm curious what happens here. The court could toss it on their own. But I suspect the Secretary Of State sent a note to the AG's office informing them. There's probably some poor paralegal in Carson City watching these sorts of cases and if the court seems like it's going to entertain an injunction or default judgement they'll have a lawyer pop up and move for dismissal for improper service.
Click to expand...
After accepting service, Aguilar et al never filed an answer despite being "required" to do so by the court. I suspect that "Meadow's" failure to prosecute plays a role in this, but I think the majority of the reason they are not doing so is that because "Meadows" is actually Roy James Trost AKA "Harley Quinn" AKA "Daisy Lynn Maxey" AKA "PUDDIN" a 38 year old pedophile and rapist who apparently trooned out in prison and is serving life for the 2008 sexual assault of a child and a nurse in the parking lot of a Nevada hospital (Link). I was unable to get either site to archive correctly, so here are the screenshots:

lasvegassun.com_news_2009_jun_09_hospital-sued-over-security-after-parking-lot-sex-_ (2).png

ofdsearch.doc.nv.gov_.png

In Trost's only active case involving Aguilar (2:23-cv-00214), there hasn't been any substantive movement since July of 2025 save for a scheduling order setting due dates for motions and discovery for later this spring. I don't see Russel's case going anywhere productive (as usual), but it will be interesting to see if he's actually able to get Aguilar to respond.
 
Mamimi said:
Like someone mentioned a few pages back, it's funny how pretty much every ambition he has is unrealistic due to his disability. He has a severe speech impediment but he wants to sing. His hands and feet are misshapen but he wants to play piano and dance. He's uncharismatic, hideous, and boring but he wants to be a lothario and rub elbows with celebrities. Telling '90s kids that they could be anything they wanted did him no favors.
Click to expand...

If it were a person who was a good person at heart and didn't choose to define their life based on that disability, such a person could sing and play the piano to the delight of many. Not because they would be exceptionally amazing at it or perhaps even moderately good, but because they could bring a unique perspective to it that's almost impossible for anyone else to emulate because it lacks the genuineness of the original. The sort of rare person who wouldn't mind having something like Moebius syndrome because they realize that so many people have it far, far worse and can be grateful for what they have instead of envious over what they don't. A benevolent soul who lifts up everyone else around them and evokes a desire in others to do the same in kind. A true net positive for the world.

However, such a person is the polar opposite of everything Russell Greer actually is. As others have pointed out many times before, Russ would still be every bit the same miserable wretch he is now even if he were born without his disability. His rotten personality would lead him to ruin any opportunities he might get and drive away anyone in his life who might otherwise care for him. The only difference is that he would be capable of falling from much greater heights. Perhaps his disability is a blessing in disguise. It's sad that God wasted it on someone who cannot appreciate it and will only despise Him for His mercy.
 
Sexy Senior Citizen said:
A key argument of Greer's (in Greer v. Moon) is that he's a broke pro se retard being bullied by that dastardly Joshua Moon. It's why he has a panic attack whenever Hardin brings up him paying for other cases, why he whines that, "This isn't relevant to a copyright case Yuh honah!"
Click to expand...
"Your honor, PLEASE! I'm trying to explain my suit for copyright infringement! Ahem...

"Anyways, after I left high school, it was hard to get me my penis shucked, and harder when Ariana wouldn't join me to make the beast with two backs in her changing room, so I decided to go to brothels..."

[edited for clarity and brevity.]
 
I have some very cogent legal arguments here.

Suck some cocks, GREEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

Just suck them REAL HARD!
 
reptile baht spaniard rid said:
It's just going to derail (see what I did) into a discussion if Greer's disability means he lacks the ability to suck a mile of cocks.
Click to expand...

Shit-Lips is so dysgenic and unappealing that even prisoners with life sentences wouldn't run a train on him if given a chance. Also, his caboose is flat and saggy. His face looks like thirty miles of rough track.
 
Cheesegirl78 said:
Dumb question, but is that illegal?
I know absolutely nothing about PAC funds or any of that type of stuff.
Click to expand...
reptile baht spaniard rid said:
There’s a bunch of rules around LLCs and PACs not being able to represent themselves; needing a lawyer.
Click to expand...
I am neither a lawyer nor accountant, so take this list as a generic summary rather than legal advice.

Keep in mind that Russ is explicitly suing the SoS as "an individual", not as a PAC, even though he named the PAC in his mailing address.

It would be legal for a PAC to sue someone and pay for it out of its own funds. But like @reptile baht spaniard rid said, it would be illegal for Greer to represent a PAC (or any corporate entity) pro se.

It would be legal for Greer to sue someone pro se and pay for it out of his own bank account. But then the Greer vs Moon judges will ask why he keeps pleading poverty about the $80. Greer's bullshit excuse so far is that he is totally complying, but he keeps filing requests for reconsideration, extensions, clarifications, etc, and he's just waiting for "clarification" to proceed.

It would sometimes be legal for the PAC to incur an expense, and Greer to pay for it out of his personal funds. But he would need to record that as a contribution, the PAC would need to do accounting and reporting, etc. (I don't know the specific requirements, just the general rule.)

It would likely not be legal for Greer to sue someone and the PAC to pay his fees. There may be a way to structure it properly, but a PAC shouldn't directly be paying for personal expenses.

It would definitely not be legal for Greer to incur a personal expense somewhere, and the PAC to pay for it out of their separate funds. That includes rent, whores, and document retrieval fees in copyright lawsuits.

It would be extremely and hilariously illegal for Greer and his PAC to share funds in a single bank account, paying for anything that comes up in either realm, without any attempt at segregation or accounting. From the filings in Greer v Moon, and the paperwork we've seen on his LLCs, it sounds like this might be what he's been doing.

TL;DR There is supposed to be separation of funds between personal and PAC money, rigorously accounted for. Russ is not that kind of careful, scrupulous operator.
 
reptile baht spaniard rid said:
Aren't there regulations and forms that PACs have to file yearly? Aren't those public?
Click to expand...
Yes and they all show $0 for contributions and expenditures.

This is not hard proof of anything though; the last report was published before he paid the filing fee and contributions/expenditures under $1k need not be reported. Unless the process server took him for a ride or he paid the filing fee against Null out of PAC funds I don't see how his litigation expenses clear that threshold.

IMO the most likely explanation is that he uses his personal account as the PAC account, he probably does not realize why commingling funds is unwise and even if he did he is arrogant enough to think * he * won't get burned for it.

ETA: Yes there are mandatory disclosures and yes they are public, the above was only based on the summary pages, the details are much more interesting.

Because Russ is mathematically incompetent, he listed a set of donations that add up to $600 from a 'private' donor (as in, $600 from one anonymous person spread across multiple contributions) in the entry for contributions that add up to $1,000:

A-Safer-Nevada-2021-Report-Excerpt-1.PNG

Russ propping up his own PAC seems like the most likely explanation with Waylon Huber or some wannabe brothel owner using Russ as a useful idiot coming in second.

In-kind contributions in the form of printing, the name and address line up with a print shop in Vegas:
A-Safer-Nevada-2021-Report-Excerpt-2.PNG

Only expense was the PAC paying itself, note that category 'A' is office expenses. This cuts against my initial hunch that Russ commingled personal and PAC funds, if this isn't a typo or flat-out lie I suspect this is Russ reimbursing himself for the PAC's expenses and treating the payer/payee as the PAC since he is an officer.
A-Safer-Nevada-2021-Report-Excerpt-3.PNG

Then for some reason the next few reports are for Q1 of 2022, Q2 of 2023, and Q1 of 2024 before going back to a full-year report for 2025. I suspect but cannot prove this is because these are the only times he got donations; while the Q1 of 2024 and full-year 2025 reports are empty donations only need to be reported if they exceed $1,000. If I am reading some of the entries correctly the $1,000 limit is for contributions from a single donor (whether one donation or spread across multiple donations), not the PAC's total receipts.

Q1 of 2022, just like 2021 in its entirety, reported $600 spread across multiple contributions from anonymous donors:
A-Safer-Nevada-Q1-2022-Report-Excerpt-1.PNG
With no in-kind contributions or expenses at all.

Q2 of 2023 had anonymous donations, this time for only $50.00:
A-Safer-Nevada-Q2-2023-Report-Excerpt-1.PNG

And the PAC paid itself $100 yet again, this time for Category 'D' (advertising) spending:
A-Safer-Nevada-Q2-2023-Report-Excerpt-2.PNG
Again, Russ paying himself and getting clever by calling it the PAC seems likely.

The reports for Q1 2024 and whole-year 2025 list no contributions or expenditures at all.

ETA x2: There was also a report for Q4 of 2021 but it only contains information that was already in the full-year report.

ETA x3: The PAC's address moved from a PO Box to the 10409 Pacific Palisades address some time in the first ~four months of 2022, did we know this before?

ETA x4: Given the amounts and dates on the expenses they can't possibly be for any of his federal litigation: The expenses were incurred in December 2021 + April 2023 while his federal litigation costs were incurred in May 2020 (final Taylor Swift lolsuit), May 2025 (losing IFP in the lolsuit against Null, coincidentally 5 years to the day after he paid the fee in the Swift case), and January 2026 (lolsuit against the Nevada SoS). The arbitration costs for ViaTron don't fit the timeline either. This just leaves the 'odds and ends' suits like the defamation suits/restraining orders against randos and defending against the collection suit from the payday loan company. Could he have used PAC funds for that? Maybe, I can't prove it either way, but the filing fee in Vegas is only about $70 so I don't think the expenses are smoking gun proof he used PAC funds for his litigation.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Last edited:
I know it’s extremely unlikely to happen, but I’d love for these judges to see what Greer posted about Taylor’s mom.
 
Irene and 22 others said:
they could bring a unique perspective to it that's almost impossible for anyone else to emulate
Click to expand...
You mean like Lost Voice Guy? I don't think Russ is aware of him, but the malding would be magnificent.
He won Britain's Got Talent in 2018 and has a successful career. I highly recommend his radio sitcom.

BGT audition
 
Bill Evans 45 said:
You mean like Lost Voice Guy? I don't think Russ is aware of him, but the malding would be magnificent.
He won Britain's Got Talent in 2018 and has a successful career. I highly recommend his radio sitcom.
Click to expand...
Lost Voice Guy is definitely kicking disability's ass... well, I guess it'd be arse, because Bri'ish.
 
Prokhor Zakharov said:
Can you see this shit going to the SCoTUS for a resolution of the circuit split? That would be fucking hilarious!
Click to expand...

It would be, but the SCoTUS has very specific requirements for briefings submitted to the court and can easily cost thousands of dollars. There's no way a retard who gets evicted on a yearly basis because he can't make monthly rent payments or who can't pay even $80 (or figure out it would only cost him a little more than $20) to produce a document pays those fees.

A man can still dream though. Imagine what Justice Thomas would have to say about shitlips filing AI slop in the Supreme Court. Imagine oral arguments where Russ believes that he has a license to explain because Ketanji Brown Jackson asked him to help her understand something.

ScooterL said:
WOMEN. If there's one thing Russell hates more than anything, it's being told "no" by a woman. Hilarity incoming.
Click to expand...

God, please let Russell Greer think it's a good idea to file a motion asking for both judges to be recused because they're women and biased against prostitution.
 
Irene and 22 others said:
who can't pay even $80 (or figure out it would only cost him a little more than $20) to produce a document
Click to expand...
He can pay, he just refuses. This is either his arrogant stupidity in full effect or because there's something in there that he really doesn't want on the public record. Given what he freely admits to without shame, this enquiring mind wants to know what that is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom