*Latrinx
It has to be an image not encumbered by copyright, which can be hard to find. A lot of Wikipedia portrait images are terrible because of this. A prominent example is Nick Fuentes.
Thank goodness nobody takes Wikipedia seriously. Good luck trying to archive shit without Archive.today btw, I'm sure that will go well, especially when these sites get overloaded all of a sudden with new traffic(or they have their links removed, like Wayback Machine often does).
If anything good comes out of this, maybe someone will spend the time and money to start another archive service. Since we need as many as we can get.
You'd think with all that donation money and the enormous slush fund that they'd be able to create their own high quality external content archiving service for Wikipedia instead of relying on the Wayback Machine or archive.today.
And you'd trust it?
Maybe they don't wanna be seen as biased and self citing (lol)
Aren’t they already that, though?
No, but it'd be internally consistent at least lol
My personal favorite was when the editors had no idea what to do for Kim Jong-Un's info box picture for nearly a decade so they used either a cartoon sketch
Note that this would just coincidentally prevent all those yucky chuds from providing evidence that some woke idiot changed an article after the fact when they're trying to rewrite history and the chuds are refusing to let them. Surely a happy accident, that.
You don't get it. If you've ever "wrongthinked" on Wikipedia you would know that Wikipedia actively does NOT want people to be able to save or archive their pages. Particularly talk pages and userpages. You know how Wikipedia has pages where you can view edit history? They can and will purge stuff from there if you say or do anything that they don't like. I know, because they've done it to edits I've made before.
Their article on Reviewbrah used to have a shitty 3D render of him as the lead image
