US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png ​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
Sammich said:
we had to spend millions to reverse engineer the stuff, because we had no idea how it was made, no idea how it worked exactly, and ai wasn't advanced enough to figure it hte fuck out.
Click to expand...

i kinda agree with this.

espionage is real. from ussr and ccp. If there are not secrets in a fault somewhere to steal and no institutional knowelge it cant get out.

fogbank was basically a form of aerogel.
 
Smashed & Slamed said:
The US is the least likely developed nation to go full retard.
Click to expand...
I think the one purpose posts about civil war has is it acts as a sort of general plan incase things do get bad enough. If things do eventually collapse it is probably better people have the idea of "oh it is time to restore order and replace the old rotting system" rather than being caught completely off guard and wasting the opportunity. The main threat is that alot of the tools used to kill off whites are also meant to maintain a somewhat comfortable system. Immigrants are brought in not only to replace whites but also in an attempt to make it so whites don't have to do the cheapest and most unpleasant labor. I think the system going off without a hitch looks less like how it is now and more like whites are at worst tradesmen who have to work with their hands or low level office workers while Pablo cleans the floors and lays the brick.

I think the main hiccups they ran into is whites are alot less motivated to strive for higher employment in gay nigger world and individual actors will try to further milk the system for value further alienating or obstructing white males, and I think they poorly balanced all their goals I think they pictured dei for instance having more nons and women at the top but white males sort of inbetween them and common non white laborers but I think they calculated and planned it very poorly. I think thats why moderate anti-immigration politicians focus less on the racial or cultural angle and more on an economic one. I also think they didn't realize the white male demoralization and the female\non-white empowerment would change society in ways that precluded society's adjustment to their plans. I don't think they pictured the dating market collapse happening for instance I think in their minds what would have happened is women would be fine dating men below them economically and that men would be more okay with women having more money than them in the relationship and the entitled attitude that comes with that.

All this to say I think tptb might not want to totally collapse things, I think they just overestimated non-white's ability to run parts of western civilizations and a big unseen threat is them adjusting things to successfully make the system comfortable enough to placate whites, make them relax until the frog is boiled, while whites contribute to a system that while comfortable will ultimately kill them off.
 
Martian High Command said:
Is it true that there's only like 6 years supply left of floppy disks globally? Because you people would be horrified at how much tech infrastructure still needs those little magic squares.
Click to expand...
If they cut a notch on the other side with a hole puncher, it'll be a 12 year supply.


t. user who's old enough to have learned on a Commodore PET and has a lot of experience making floppies double sided. I yearn to bring that skill back.
 
MeltyTW said:
and that men would be more okay with women having more money than them in the relationship and the entitled attitude that comes with that.
Click to expand...
they would
what's preventing it from playing out like this is that women really detest the idea of being the main breadwinner or bigger contributor to household finances
 
DumbDude43 said:
they would
what's preventing it from playing out like this is that women really detest the idea of being the main breadwinner or bigger contributor to household finances
Click to expand...
maybe, it is still an obstacle or boundary for a portion of men, definitely more women against the idea than men though from their general entitlement and not having been bombarded with messaging telling them to give up any perks from the traditional role of their sex like men have been.
 
Something I've gotten sick of seeing recently is talk of "a new gilded age" as if, during the gilded age, there were tens of millions of niggers who were purposely unemployed, eating crab legs on the tax prayer dime. The existence of the welfare state precludes the possibility of "a new gilded age".
 
Betonhaus said:
While it would be nice to start from scratch and build a new civilization from a blank slate, that's simply not possible
Click to expand...
fucking plato wrote about this shit 1000s of years ago.

The tear it down impulse is very annoying. The system and the people who interact with it have some push and pull, the western systems the british imported into their colonies dont work because the people using them dont understand what makes them work.

Also the western system did come from a whole cloth, you couldnt go back to roman or greece the progenitors of western thought and tell them all the min max rules, because their cultures would still be in conflict.

history is not a straight line, things can go backwards just look at the aftermath of the ussr. And the post rules order aka globalism.
 
babadook said:
[rains in your basement]
Click to expand...

moocow said:
Ya rly.
View attachment 8554573
Click to expand...
Yes, books can be destroyed, as can optic and magnetic storage. If everything about a subject or record was in one book, it would be lost as easily as if all info about something was on one hdd.

But unlike those formats, books can last hundreds of years and be readable. They also need no special technology which can be lost to read them.

So again, :smug:
 
MeltyTW said:
maybe, it is still an obstacle or boundary for a portion of men, definitely more women against the idea than men though from their general entitlement and not having been bombarded with messaging telling them to give up any perks from the traditional role of their sex like men have been.
Click to expand...
It's not an "idea." It's an issue of primal attraction. Women are attracted to strength, power, and dominance. A man who is dependent on them might as well lock his dick in a cage and tattoo "NEVER FUCK ME" on his forehead. You cannot message, educate, or enculturate women into being attracted to subordinate males. They do not masturbate to stories of billionaires whisking them away to sex dungeons because of cultural messaging.
 
The Ugly One said:
It's not an "idea." It's an issue of primal attraction. Women are attracted to strength, power, and dominance. A man who is dependent on them might as well lock his dick in a cage and tattoo "NEVER FUCK ME" on his forehead. You cannot message, educate, or enculturate women into being attracted to subordinate males. They do not masturbate to stories of billionaires whisking them away to sex dungeons because of cultural messaging.
Click to expand...
Why young women don't matter politically in the long term.
 
The Ugly One said:
You cannot message, educate, or enculturate women into being attracted to subordinate males.
Click to expand...

Doomscroll enough on any of the apps with reels and you'll come across whatever latest podcast or "street interview" about guys asking women what they make and/or what they expect out of a partner.

Not a single time does the woman ever yearn for a guy making less money than them. They instead want that 0.1% male that doesn't even exist.

Even just looking at relationships I know in real life, if the man is a stay at home or had a bitch job compared to the wife, you can just see theresyno love or desire there and it'll end up in a loveless open marriage or ultimately divorce.
 
You're MDNWU said:
Doomscroll enough on any of the apps with reels and you'll come across whatever latest podcast or "street interview" about guys asking women what they make and/or what they expect out of a partner.

Not a single time does the woman ever yearn for a guy making less money than them. They instead want that 0.1% male that doesn't even exist.

Even just looking at relationships I know in real life, if the man is a stay at home or had a bitch job compared to the wife, you can just see theresyno love or desire there and it'll end up in a loveless open marriage or ultimately divorce.
Click to expand...
My cousin is dealing with this problem. She's early 40s, 200K salary(midwest) and is dealing with the men she likes date younger.
 
The Ugly One said:
It's not an "idea." It's an issue of primal attraction. Women are attracted to strength, power, and dominance. A man who is dependent on them might as well lock his dick in a cage and tattoo "NEVER FUCK ME" on his forehead. You cannot message, educate, or enculturate women into being attracted to subordinate males. They do not masturbate to stories of billionaires whisking them away to sex dungeons because of cultural messaging.
Click to expand...
You know, I see a lot of those young zoomer fellas thinkin' they did a funny or a gotcha on girls when the girl asks 'em if they wanna go out. The guys will say "Only if you're payin" and genuinely think it's something of great humor. I have witnessed this with my own eyeballs
 
You're MDNWU said:
Doomscroll enough on any of the apps with reels and you'll come across whatever latest podcast or "street interview" about guys asking women what they make and/or what they expect out of a partner.

Not a single time does the woman ever yearn for a guy making less money than them. They instead want that 0.1% male that doesn't even exist.

Even just looking at relationships I know in real life, if the man is a stay at home or had a bitch job compared to the wife, you can just see theresyno love or desire there and it'll end up in a loveless open marriage or ultimately divorce.
Click to expand...

If women actually wanted equality, they'd stop rewarding men for achieving wealth, power, and fame. Those bombshells riding Leonardo Dicaprio's dick wouldn't give him the time of day.

Hojicha said:
You know, I see a lot of those young zoomer fellas thinkin' they did a funny or a gotcha on girls when the girl asks 'em if they wanna go out. The guys will say "Only if you're payin" and genuinely think it's something of great humor. I have witnessed this with my own eyeballs
Click to expand...

Zoomer women are well-known to use dates solely to get free meals.
 
Mister Fister said:
My cousin is dealing with this problem. She's early 40s, 200K salary(midwest) and is dealing with the men she likes date younger.
Click to expand...

Making that much money in the Midwest and in her 40s? She's doomed. Her counterparts are fucking the 20-30 year olds and not even looking her way.

She's destined to be single till she dies or like most women I've come across in that similar vein, dates men a decade younger than her. Not as much money, but she can still show off to her friends.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom