🐮 Lolcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / Russell Greee / Russle / Brothel Prince / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
the khat quaffer said:
>SAT tests are basically IQ tests
>graduating college means you're over 100
Click to expand...
They're different tests testing different things, but there's actually a pretty strong correlation.
Some LessWrong autist said:
A search of ‘SAT to IQ’ on google results in being presented with the website ‘iqcomparisonsite.com’. This man has directly converted the SAT percentiles to IQ scores, which is not what should be done. Tests like the ACT and SAT correlate with IQ at about 0.8-0.85 [rca], [my analysis], [emil article], [scholarly article].
Click to expand...

I usually wouldn't cite a LessWrong type autist but they're pretty obsessed with IQ autism so I'd tend to give it some credence (although I wouldn't necessarily endorse the specific number).
Napoleon III said:
This is slightly off topic so I'll keep it short. Its not a perfect estimator but there is a reason that Universities stopped using test scores in admissions.
Click to expand...
The overwhelming majority of universities still use SAT scores. I'm not aware of any using IQ tests, if that's what you mean though. IQ tests also have a strong statistical correlation with future academic success and future financial success. You still have high IQ retards who flame out spectacularly and people with well lower than average measured IQs who go on to have great success.

I'd estimate Russhole at about 80 or lower, but his absolute inability to learn things makes him functionally retarded.
 
Last edited:
Napoleon III said:
Melinda Scott is a great contrast in this regard. Greer manages to actually state a claim when he files his lawsuits, Melinda Scott couldn't even manage that.
Click to expand...
The only reason Greee manages to start a seemingly valid claim is because of his cargo cult mentality. I suspect he copied a lot of homework and tests from his fellow students when he was a kid, but never got told off because going easy on the tards was the style at the time.

Melinda and Greee are just as retarded as each other, and I'd be genuinely shocked if either of them had an IQ above 90 (and I agree with the consensus that Greee has a circa 85 IQ). It's just that Melinda's retardation comes with a generous side serving of BPD whereas Greee's is bundled with NPD, hence Melinda appears to be dumber than Greee as narcs can give off the vibe of someone who, on a surface level at least, knows what they're doing.
 
AnOminous said:
The overwhelming majority of universities still use SAT scores. I'm not aware of any using IQ tests, if that's what you mean though. IQ tests also have a strong statistical correlation with future academic success and future financial success. You still have high IQ retards who flame out spectacularly and people with well lower than average measured IQs who go on to have great success.
Click to expand...
Colleges and universities use things like SAT scores because high school diplomas are worthless and there's too many damn applicants. The original SAT (iirc) even had subject matter knowledge which has been whittled down time and time again.

Either way, the LSAT and GRE are substantially more "big boy" than the joke that is the modern SAT.

As usually, both got ruined by niggers and then by jeets.
 
AnOminous said:
I usually wouldn't cite a LessWrong type autist but they're pretty obsessed with IQ autism so I'd tend to give it some credence (although I wouldn't necessarily endorse the specific number).
Click to expand...
They're kind of guilty of abusing the concept as much as anyone, but it is their autism, I suppose.

I mean, most people most people would overestimate Einstein's IQ. In a city the size of New York there are hundreds, maybe even a few thousand people with his IQ. Still comfortably genius level, but he would have been a sped in the modern world as a kid due to his learning disabilities, yet he defines modern theoretical physics outside of a few things he refused to accept on concepts we couldn't hope to prove or disprove until well after his death. Meanwhile, you have uber-autismos with effectively obscene IQs, with all the communication skills of a lump of dirt, who have such an intuitive grasp of patterns that they can play some of the most complex piano music on a single listen because they pick up all the patterns and what the keys represent they don't need to build the muscle memory normal pianists do.

I think its only useful in the way BMI is useful in predicting health - only for the most general things.
 
Prokhor Zakharov said:
That is not really true of the SAT. It has some decent logical elements, but until the revamp in recent years, it focused heavily on geometry and trig in the math section, which has nothing to go with general IQ. The ACT is the only generalized test that I am aware of that has any mapping to general intelligence, and it's still not that great.
Click to expand...
The old SAT was more correlated to IQ than the ACT (something like 0.88 to 0.77).

Purely anecdotally and very small sample size Ive found a decent correlation* for both old sat and recent-day act (not sure if/ when it's changed) taken cold, no prep.

*depending on methodology used. I've seen a bunch of them and some are garbage** or work for the lower/ middle range but lose accuracy toward the higher end.

**unless you believe in a top score of 285 iq, lol.

AnOminous said:
The overwhelming majority of universities still use SAT scores.
Click to expand...
Will consider? Sure. But very few require SAT/ACT scores (though I did read that they might be making a minor comeback; a couple ivies and some others reinstated the requirement for next year). About 80% do not. Here's a complete list of schools that required this year.
 
kcbbq said:
Still comfortably genius level, but he would have been a sped in the modern world as a kid due to his learning disabilities, yet he defines modern theoretical physics outside of a few things he refused to accept on concepts we couldn't hope to prove or disprove until well after his death.
Click to expand...
His learning disabilities have been greatly exaggerated by a bunch of glurge "that retarded child: Albert Einstein" type anecdotes, many of them made up. He was probably dyslexic, and he is often reported as having been bad at math, although he wasn't. He didn't LIKE math much, but he was actually good at it. Even his famous equation showed absolute brilliance at math, that is, reducing something incredibly complicated to 5 characters that explained converting matter to energy in a way that even a person of normal intelligence could understand it (and hey realize you could turn it into a bomb to blow up the world but whatever).

But yes, I doubt his measured IQ would have been Sidis-level, a massively high-IQ autist who achieved absolutely nothing. I doubt the "300 IQ" bullshit because results that high are nearly meaningless, but he probably had an IQ well over that of Einstein.

At least among IQ autists, Einstein is generally thought to have been something like an average genius and mainly achieved what he did by doing the work.
 
reptile baht spaniard rid said:
Colleges and universities use things like SAT scores because high school diplomas are worthless and there's too many damn applicants. The original SAT (iirc) even had subject matter knowledge which has been whittled down time and time again.

Either way, the LSAT and GRE are substantially more "big boy" than the joke that is the modern SAT.

As usually, both got ruined by niggers and then by jeets.
Click to expand...
Can't speak for the subject tests but the regular GRE is a joke, the primary difference compared to the SAT is that your percentile in a given section is likely to be lower unless you ace it due to self-selection. From what I remember the math section might even cover less than the SAT. Before you say "well the subject tests account for that" engineering majors do not take those and even a sharp engineer would not have the requisite background (e.g. a chemical engineering degree does not include enough chemistry to take the chemistry GRE).

This was over a decade ago when I was looking into graduate programs, hard to believe it's improved since then.

ETA: SAT moved subject matter knowledge into a series of separate tests (one for biology, one for history, and so on). I'm not sure if they were dumbed down or were never difficult in the first place but they were pretty easy (as in, easier than regular tests in high school) when I took them.

ETA x2: To understand how easy the GRE is and why it got that way remember that English majors don't necessarily take math beyond Algebra 2/trigonometry, and math majors don't necessarily take English beyond 100-level writing/literature. The net result is that the only way to have a one-size-fits-all exam for grad school applicants is to have it stop at material an average college freshman should know.
 
Last edited:
kcbbq said:
Still comfortably genius level, but he would have been a sped in the modern world as a kid due to his learning disabilities, yet he defines modern theoretical physics outside of a few things he refused to accept on concepts we couldn't hope to prove or disprove until well after his death.
Click to expand...
His learning disabilities have been greatly exaggerated by a bunch of glurge "that retarded child: Albert Einstein" type anecdotes, many of them made up. He was probably dyslexic, and he is often reported as having been bad at math, although he wasn't. He didn't LIKE math much, but he was actually good at it. Even his famous equation showed absolute brilliance at math, that is, reducing something incredibly complicated to 5 characters that explained converting matter to energy in a way that even a person of normal intelligence could understand it (and hey realize you could turn it into a bomb to blow up the world but whatever).

But yes, I doubt his measured IQ would have been Sidis-level, a massively high-IQ autist who achieved absolutely nothing. I doubt the "300 IQ" bullshit because results that high are nearly meaningless, but he probably had an IQ well over that of Einstein.

At least among IQ autists, Einstein is generally thought to have been something like an average genius and mainly achieved what he did by doing the work.
Friend of Dorothy Parker said:
Will consider? Sure. But very few require SAT/ACT scores (though I did read that they might be making a minor comeback; a couple ivies and some others reinstated the requirement for next year). About 80% do not. Here's a complete list of schools that required this year.
Click to expand...
Why would anyone not include such scores unless they vastly diverged from a superior academic record? They may say they don't require them, but if you don't include them, it's sort of like being a party in a case and not testifying. They may tell the jury not to take that into consideration, but they do.
reptile baht spaniard rid said:
Either way, the LSAT and GRE are substantially more "big boy" than the joke that is the modern SAT.
Click to expand...
I'd say slightly more. I scored 98-99 percentile in most of these standardized tests (not due to incredibly high intelligence but just being good at taking standardized tests). I was only about 91 or so on the LSAT. I think this was partly because I was up against a higher class of competition, but the other was I was practically retarded on those logic puzzles.
 
AnOminous said:
Why would anyone not include such scores unless they vastly diverged from a superior academic record? They may say they don't require them, but if you don't include them, it's sort of like being a party in a case and not testifying. They may tell the jury not to take that into consideration, but they do.
Click to expand...
Idk, but I do know a lot of zoomers who didn’t and got into competitive schools of their choice. I think the schools legit don't care, in a huge number of cases. They also have way shorter essays/ fewer essay questions "these days.". I have no idea how schools can possibly evaluate candidates.
 
Friend of Dorothy Parker said:
Idk, but I do know a lot of zoomers who didn’t and got into competitive schools of their choice. I think the schools legit don't care, in a huge number of cases. They also have way shorter essays/ fewer essay questions "these days.". I have no idea how schools can possibly evaluate candidates.
Click to expand...
That just comes down to differences between how schools prioritize applicants. Some colleges care a ton about grades, some care a ton about test scores, some care a ton about extracurriculars, and most care about a mix of the three.

Incidentally, law schools are the same way. Some upper-tier schools care way, way more about your score on the LSAT than your college GPA. That, or if you get a good enough LSAT score they just look past subpar grades.

Unfortunately you need to excel in something to be an appealing law school applicant, and being limited to filing frivilous lawsuits as an extracurricular and having shit test scores and middling grades is kind of a bad look.
 
Botchy Galoop said:
At this point, I am less curious about Russell Greee's I.Q.
and
Seriously worried about the I.Q. of the Judge.
Click to expand...
I only asked about IQ of Rusell Greer as an attempt to figure out how he would do on the LSAT. Which by the way I think he will end up taking. I just hope he shares his score with the world so we can see how badly he does.

The reason I think he will take it is I think Russel Greer gets these fantasies in his head. Like how he thought suing Taylor Swift would somehow endear him to her and she'd fall in love with him. It's similar to how Greer is dead set on owning a brothel even though that is something he could likely never accomplish with his funds and his abilities. But he has this fantasy.

This also explains Greer's attachment to hookers and sexual relationships as an end in life. For most normal people hookers are empty meaningless pleasure that lasts a couple minutes and then is over. But having his fantastical image of himself fulfilled is the end.

AnOminous said:
The overwhelming majority of universities still use SAT scores. I'm not aware of any using IQ tests, if that's what you mean though. IQ tests also have a strong statistical correlation with future academic success and future financial success. You still have high IQ retards who flame out spectacularly and people with well lower than average measured IQs who go on to have great success.

I'd estimate Russhole at about 80 or lower, but his absolute inability to learn things makes him functionally retarded.
Click to expand...
Many still do but test scores especially at elite universities have been deemphasized especially in places like California. Universities don't want to accept students based on any kind of merit based system. They want to do so in a way that increases their own political power as much as possible.

I didn't want to derail the thread with the SAT stuff I just wanted to use it as a separate metric in case Russel Greer ever talked about it publicly and someone knew.
 
Prokhor Zakharov said:
I think Crusty just really gets off on the idea of controlling pussy and access to it. Having that level of control over women is something he likely drools over (more so than usual). Also, being able to deny people access to rent-a-pussy is something he has always wanted to do because he has been denied access to any non-whore pussy (and even whore pussy on many occasions) his entire life, which he thinks is unfair and discriminatory (which is demented). He's also convinced that it's his deformity that prevents women from wanting to fuck him, when it likely couldn't be further from the truth, his personality is 100x more repulsive than his face is, but he will never understand that. It's clear to see that Greeee only sees women as objects that are something to control and do things for him, and that's it. He is incapable of understanding them as human beings.
Click to expand...
I don't get how a brothel run by Russell would make money considering he's been known to become possessive of hookers he has his eye on.

This one posted multiple "testimonials" from customers on Instagram, each receiving a thumbs down from Russell. Bear in mind Russ never even met this woman.

20191116_071846.jpg 20191116_074122.jpg

A flirty conversation between another hooker Russell has never met and a potential client on Twitter resulted in plights for Russell. He told her not to see him because somebody with children should not be frequenting escorts.

1561466427478.png 1561469073837.png

Bearing in mind Russell gets "jealous" over women who lick balls for a living potentially seeing other men, how the fuck would running a brothel work? He'd fall in lust with every woman in his employ and forbid them from seeing clients. Also, married men or men with children would not be allowed, and the place is smoke and alcohol free. Not a great business plan.
 
Polexia Aphrodisia said:
Is this the one he tried to lure to come and sleep on his couch cover?
Click to expand...
Yeah that's her.

Give up whoring in New Zealand to come sleep on an Amazon couch cover/used loveseat in Utah that he found on Craigslist.

I remember he thought she'd go for that since he was under the impression that her parents in the US wouldn't let her stay with them because they didn't approve of her having tattoos. Somehow I doubt that was the reason.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom