Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread - Gorl Tawk's very own DMZ (De-Moidified Zone)

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Were men really any better *before* wide spread porn?
Answering strictly with regard to pornography and not other things such as attitudes towards women's right to vote, etc:

It depends on how you look at it. For example, men born in the 1940s would at most have been exposed to photos of pin-up models or erotic novels growing up. While it's not something children should be exposed to, a photo of a pin-up model or an erotic novel is not going to wire a child's brain in the same way that gang bang videos in 4K are wiring the brains of children born in the 2010s as we speak. The first sexual experience of a 1940s man would likely precisely have been sex with a woman. A boy born in 2010 may have seen hundreds, if not thousands of pornographic videos of women having the most horrific things done to them before he even gets the chance to touch a woman. So yes, in that sense a 1940s man would be better than a 2010s man.

That being said, if men who were born in the 1940s had had access to widespread internet pornography growing up, would they have been able to handle it any better than children born in the 2010s? No. There's a remote Amazonian tribe called the Marubo that only got internet access through Starlink a few years ago, and even they are now having issues with young scrotes and minors fighting pornography addiction. And ultimately, the porn industry didn't appear out of thin air in the late 60s and 70s – those who founded it were men born in the 1940s or earlier. So those bad sexual inclinations already existed within men, in some more than others (Marquis de Sade being a notable example and he did not have access to internet pornography in 4K).

What pornography has done is that it has amplified already existing problems and made them much worse. For example, while men with autogynephilia have been around for a long time, some of the men who are autogynephilic trannies in 2026 would've been less likely to become autogynephilic trannies if they'd been born in 1906 and hadn't had access to unlimited pornography they could wire their brains with.
 
Last edited:
the moids in a&n seem completely unaware that some birth defects mean you would give birth to a monster (a cyclops in the example I gave) with no chance of it staying alive or experiencing joy. Being able to opt out of that matters to the majority of women, & men just assume they're being whores who want to kill children.
Oh they are perfectly aware, they just don't give a shit because as I said before in this thread, they have baby level object permanence when it comes to things that don't affect them until it does. They are able to have the privilege of holding the opinion that babies with birth defects that require 24/7 care being valuable and a blessing, because they're not the ones who is going to carry that disabled baby for 9 months in their bodies and will be wiping that disabled child's ass since birth up to adulthood (if it even manages survive that far) or thinking about the finances for the medical things, it's the mother that will do that. Meanwhile they'll get all the brownie points for being a proud (absent) parent of disabled child because having children whether they're healthy or not is a status symbol for men and because they can just shift blame for their child's disability on mother's genetics like men in the past did.

Despite waxing poetically about how children are wholesome chunguses even in disabled ones, you can bet that in any scenario where they would be given a disabled child to look after, they would try instantly try to pawn the respondsibility off to the closest female relative regardless whether or not that female relative wants to take care of that child and had something else on their mind instead, much like how a child that bothers their parents to get them a pet instantly pawns off the respondsibility to the parents, despite promising them that they'd be the ones to look after it.

Many of these pro-birther A&N types love to wax hysterically about how women had disabled children "just fine" back in the past and how "modern women" are selfish harpies brainwashed by feminism because it taughts us to reject our "role" as nurturers and mothers for not wanting to commit to the life of taking care of a child that might not even live for that long and save themselves the emotional pain and endless financial struggle by having to finance a child that would require intense medical care; But if you start stomping on their feet by asking them really piercing questions like how many of these disabled children from the past managed to live past their adolescence, how many of them were able to have a decent childhood, how many of their parents were able to afford medical services, how many of these children were deprived of medical care that would help because of superstitous or religious parents and how many of them manage to become adults that are healthy both in mind and body, they'll get quiet and whip out the good ol' classical "Well my meemaw gave birth to a disabled baby in poverty and she loved every second of it so should you be fine with this too" anecdotes
 
Last edited:
Many of these pro-birther A&N types love to wax hysterically about how women had disabled children "just fine" back in the past
Some people straight up killed or abandoned infants in the 20th century out of desperation. Usually they are female infants or severely deformed. China is a good example. If I was born in that era I would have likely suffered the same fate.
 
Sorry I was more venting than anything and didnt think through every aspect of my post, im just tired and sad with the state of it all out there.
 
Yep. Sometimes there wasn't even anything "wrong" with the kid. But it was another mouth to feed, so into the river with a sack of rocks they went!
Or, like in ancient Rome, being literally left out with the trash. Baby girls left to die by exposure were either ripped apart by feral dogs, picked up to be raised in a household as slaves, or picked up by prostitutes to be raised in a brothel. The luckiest ones were adopted by childless couples who could pretend she was their baby all along. We have evidence of graffiti from various Roman businesses that translate to things like, "Please do not leave your children here--dogs are about." We also have surviving letters from Roman men writing to others with instructions like: "If my wife has a boy, be sure she names him after me or my father. If she has a girl, rid the household of her."

To this day, sex-selective postnatal infanticide is still practiced widely in MENA places, sometimes even rural China. There is no country on Earth that prefers daughters.
 
It was never about "murdering children ". Getting pregnant and having a child permanently alters your body, puts many under intense financial strain, and it will hold the woman back in life. Even more so if she is forced to carry and raise a drooling retard baby. It's always been a way to control women and rope them into a life long commitment they didn't ask for. Males get to walk away and call their baby mother "crazy" and a "whore". Males don't seem to understand that it takes two people to make a baby.

Why aren't males hold to the same standard?

And I love it when men on here talk down to us about what we should do with our own bodies when it comes to getting pregnant.

Most of the time it's a man on here doing it, let's be real here. You can tell when it's a man. They're argumentative, and they're condescending.

With the same kind of argument, maybe all men should get vasectomies to prevent accidental pregnancies.

I've read stories about claims that women are traumatized from abortions. Not true. What actually traumatized them, based on stories I've read from women in that situation, was having to give the baby up for adoption. They were way more upset over that and it psychologically messed them up more than abortion.
 
Last edited:
Yeah wait until males start making AI generated porn of classmates, colleagues, or any women they feel like... oh wait they already have been.



It was never about "murdering children ". Getting pregnant and having a child permanently alters your body, puts many under intense financial strain, and it will hold the woman back in life. Even more so if she is forced to carry and raise a drooling retard baby. It's always been a way to control women and rope them into a life long commitment they didn't ask for. Males get to walk away and call their baby mother "crazy" and a "whore". Males don't seem to understand that it takes two people to make a baby.

Why aren't males hold to the same standard?
Forgive me for posting another dworkin passage but it's relevant

To many men, each aborted pregnancy is the killing of a son—and he is the son killed. His mother would have killed him if she had had the choice. These men have a peculiarly retroactive and abstract sense of murder: if she had had a choice, I would not have been born—which is murder. The male ego, which refuses to believe in its own death, now pushes backward, before birth. I was once a fertilized egg; therefore to abort a fertilized egg is to kill me.

Women keep abortions secret because they are afraid of the hysteria of men confronted with what they regard as the specter of their own extinction. If you had your way, men say to feminists, my mother would have aborted me. Killed me. “... I was born out of wedlock (and against the advice that my mother received from her doctor), ” Jesse Jackson writes in fervent opposition to abortion, “and therefore abortion is a personal issue for me.

The woman’s responsibility to the fertilized egg is imaginatively and with great conviction construed to be her relation to the adult male. At the very least, she must not murder him; nor should she outrage his existence by an assertion of her separateness from him, her distinctness, her importance as a person independent of him. The adult male’s identification with the fertilized egg as being fully himself can even be conceptualized in terms of power: his rightful power over an impersonal female (all females being the same in terms of function). “The power I had as one cell to affect my environment I shall never have again, ” R. D. Laing laments in an androcentric meditation on prebirth ego. “My environment” is a woman; the adult male, even as a fertilized egg, one cell, has the right of occupation with respect to her—he has the right to be inside her and the rightful power to change her body for his sake.

This relation to gestation is specifically male. Women do not think of themselves in utero when they think either of being pregnant or of aborting; men think of pregnancy and abortion primarily in terms of themselves, including what happened or might have happened to them back in the womb when, as one cell, they were themselves.
 
I'd also abort a baby I knew was going to be born severely disabled because I don't want my own child to suffer, and I don't care who I offend by saying so. Not all life is better than no life, and I'm tired of pretending otherwise.

I've always said if I got pregnant and discovered that the baby had Down's, I'd abort it.

It's already expensive to take care of a baby and a child, and having to do that your entire life is even more difficult.

As for abortions, if someone tells me it's wrong because of their old fashioned religion based on outdated society views, I will tell them to shut the fuck up.

We don't all have your views. Don't force your beliefs on us.

And these are the same nutcases that end up killing abortion doctors.
 
but I truly believe BPD is SEVERELY underdiagnosed and underreported in males. I would bargain the majority of trannies/family annihilators/murder-suicide males have a combination of BPD and porn addiction.
Very much of a power level, but this is correct. Not just in my personal experience :cryblood: but even people in the medical field acknowledge these men get misdiagnosed under depression or bipolar.
 
I really hate how troons insert themselves into every woman centered subreddit. You can’t even talk about issues specific to women without some troon getting offended it doesn’t apply to them. To top it off, the troons on there are delusional enough to think being on HRT cycles is in any way comparable to getting a period. The worst part is Reddit is infested with libfem pickme’s that think catering to these troons is a good thing. The pickme’s catering to troons just dilute women’s issues, because troons are usually such attention whores that they’ll treat their problems as more severe than what real women go through.
Pretending to have endometriosis and saying getting catcalled is "gender affirming" was the final kicker for me. I've been dealing with endo since before puberty and to see these fuckin' basement dwellers pretend to have a uterine condition to help make their hentai funatari LARP seem real is finally what kicked me off the potential pooning out train.
 
I didn't believe that a woman has committed a mass shooting in Canada when I heard it on the news and sure enough, it's just a delusional cosplayer.
Canadian journalist misgenders transgender mass-killer Jesse Van Rootselaar as a "him" and RCMP inspector corrects her live on the air.


DeathToMoids.png
twitter link

There was never any doubt this shooter was a man, who law enforcement knew had access to guns, and severe mental health problems but oh noo gun rights are so so much more important then the right of 6 innocent children's right to live. I will never ever get over the insanity that is a troons right to be called she/her DESPITE having just murdered 8 people, its fucking insanity, take me out of this crazy world.
 
or do you live somewhere that makes it a felony to end a doomed holoprosencephaly pregnancy? the moids in a&n seem completely unaware that some birth defects mean you would give birth to a monster (a cyclops in the example I gave) with no chance of it staying alive or experiencing joy. Being able to opt out of that matters to the majority of women, & men just assume they're being whores who want to kill children.
This is what I'm talking about when I say "severely disabled." I know it differs depending on the person, but my line is "will they be able to experience any meaningful part of being human other than pure suffering?" I just don't see how it's kinder to let a baby with no chance at survival be born and then suffocate to death, or worse, survive several months or years with heavy medical intervention prolonging their suffering because their parents refuse to let go. We're nicer to animals than we are to human children.
 
This is what I'm talking about when I say "severely disabled." I know it differs depending on the person, but my line is "will they be able to experience any meaningful part of being human other than pure suffering?" I just don't see how it's kinder to let a baby with no chance at survival be born and then suffocate to death, or worse, survive several months or years with heavy medical intervention prolonging their suffering because their parents refuse to let go. We're nicer to animals than we are to human children.
Thanks, that thread is horrifying and further cements my belief that males want a baby the way a small child wants a puppy with no intention of caring for it.
 
Last time i went to the hospital for ovary related shit i was given ye olde male doctor and it went about as well as you expect.

Which is to say it didnt go well at all because of pigheaded men who think they know better about your own body than you do, despite the fact you've lived in it your whole life.

And also asked like 10 times if I was pregnant, in which there was no possibility thereof unless I was somehow the next Mother Mary because of the problems I was at the doctors for. But nooo. Let's just ask another nine more fucking times as if a baby has suddenly spawned in between.
 
Pornography is going to become dominated by AI, which will likely reduce trafficking by a lot.
This is an argument that sounds logical, but the opposite is true. Just like legalizing prostitution is proven to dramatically increase illegal trafficking because the demand exceeds the supply, AI won’t replace the thrill of real life rape on tape. Pornbrained moids are never satisfied by a simulation for very long. They’ll always go for the real thing if they can get it, and there will never be enough consenting women to fill that endless void of depravity.

If anything, the true appeal of AI porn is how it can be used to violate the consent of real life women. Now every female human being a moid knows exists, from an unattainable celebrity supermodel to his ex-girlfriend to his 6 year old niece, can be sexually degraded for his entertainment in ways that were previously thought impossible.
 
Last time i went to the hospital for ovary related shit i was given ye olde male doctor and it went about as well as you expect.

Which is to say it didnt go well at all because of pigheaded men who think they know better about your own body than you do, despite the fact you've lived in it your whole life.

And also asked like 10 times if I was pregnant, in which there was no possibility thereof unless I was somehow the next Mother Mary because of the problems I was at the doctors for. But nooo. Let's just ask another nine more fucking times as if a baby has suddenly spawned in between.

I'm incredibly sorry you experienced this, so many male doctors just don't get it at all and its just awful to deal with them. You are absolutely well within your rights to ask for a female practitioner and any good hospital will respect your request, if any moid doctor ever pushes back and says theirs only male doctors available just mention previous domestic violence/trauma whatever works, fight fire with fire your wishes are more important then their convenience.

Some doctors use asking abt pregnancy as a jumping off point to talk abt sexual health wayy to much, and aboustly get it so wrong, I've done my best to try and educate the regs i work with but sometimes i swear their all autsitc and can't understand subtly at all, this one reg asked this poor 14 year old if she was having regular sexual encounters with her parents still in the room WTF???

Some of this over focus on pregancy and menstruation is the result of education where it's heavily emphasised to ask the important questions to ensure every aspects of a woman's health is covered, but it leads to situations where every doctors asks the same questions over and over again which is just so frustrating but sometimes essential as not everything is written in the notes, or their not typed up yet. The medical system has a paranoid fear of tampons causing toxic shock syndrome.

If every doctor is asking u abt pregnancy theirs probably something in your notes about previously having a regular partner and sadly doctors are very risk adverse medicolegally so to cover all their bases will ask again and again and document to ensure their covered in case of a medical malpractice lawsuit.

side note I've had like 4 patients who have sworn up and down to me theirs no way their pregnant, and done a quick pregnancy tests just before they go off for a CT as per policy, only to find yep, they were absolutely pregnant, which is such a awkward thing to then tell a patient. Pregnancy is a big deal in healthcare and can form a key aspect of a doctors differential diagnosis, it changes how we treat you and what medications we can give you like Ondansetron/Zofran for example is the go to Antiemetics (anti-nausea) medication, is contraindicated in pregnancy due to an increased likelihood of you baby devloping a clef pallet.
 
Back
Top Bottom