US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
livenowfox has some pricks lying about Section 230, saying there's nothing like it for any company
because phones don't exist
 
ok so someone explain this to me. We as a western society have determined that the Nazis and are 100% morally evil. (This might get my chud card removed but this is true) ok but at the same time we are NOT allowed to say that other despotic regimes or peoples older than the Nazis are also 100% morally evil? Like anytime I see someone bring up the Aztec or mongols etc, they always have to put an asterisk of “they weren’t as evil as the “insert white group here” like i dont get it most of what the Nazis did other similar groups much older than them did and yet we aren’t allowed to label them as evil? I know it most likely just boils down to “the Nazis were white and that’s why they get the 100% evil label but the others dont”
 
Today's entry in "the U.S is rapidly descending into a third world hellscape" a serial rapist in LA had his conviction thrown out because none of the jurors that convicted him could speak English and a judge ruled he didn't get a proper trial.
View attachment 8517308
You are a retarded gorilla nigger for not providing a link, and you are a lying jewish nigger because the conviction was overturned in appeals court not because "none of the jurors that convicted him could speak English," but because the judge failed to disclose concerns from the jury that one juror barely spoke English. The defendant is also being retried.
Archive: https://archive.ph/A527D
 
Last edited:
Good for him. The message needs to be sent that we're tired of foreigners in the Republican party and if it means tanking the party for an election to get them out, so be it. Something like a governorship in a red state is a good place to do this because the state house and senate will likely stonewall anything Acton tries to do, as opposed to pulling something like this in the presidency where it'd result in us all getting killed.

Still then I expect a large portion of the GOPe to double down and self-sabotage to ensure that the American right continues to stand for nothing but sending money to Israel and increasing boomer's net worth.
This is 'Zero Seats', but American.
 
ok so someone explain this to me. We as a western society have determined that the Nazis and are 100% morally evil. (This might get my chud card removed but this is true) ok but at the same time we are NOT allowed to say that other despotic regimes or peoples older than the Nazis are also 100% morally evil? Like anytime I see someone bring up the Aztec or mongols etc, they always have to put an asterisk of “they weren’t as evil as the “insert white group here” like i dont get it most of what the Nazis did other similar groups much older than them did and yet we aren’t allowed to label them as evil? I know it most likely just boils down to “the Nazis were white and that’s why they get the 100% evil label but the others dont”
Don’t even be so sure that Nazis are going to stay evil. You have a generation of leftards digging deeper to make more hip and Le hilarious comparisons to Trump.. once they start naming who Trump’s Rohm is, then it’s going to be Trump’s Leni Riefenstahl, they’re going to dig up who Hitler’s primary school teachers were, etc etc etc

Meanwhile trump is going to become WORSE than Nazis

Eventually Nazis will just be ok
 
ok so someone explain this to me. We as a western society have determined that the Nazis and are 100% morally evil. (This might get my chud card removed but this is true) ok but at the same time we are NOT allowed to say that other despotic regimes or peoples older than the Nazis are also 100% morally evil? Like anytime I see someone bring up the Aztec or mongols etc, they always have to put an asterisk of “they weren’t as evil as the “insert white group here” like i dont get it most of what the Nazis did other similar groups much older than them did and yet we aren’t allowed to label them as evil? I know it most likely just boils down to “the Nazis were white and that’s why they get the 100% evil label but the others dont”
Because the Nazis fought against jewish power and the Monguls or Aztecs didn't.
 
ok so someone explain this to me. We as a western society have determined that the Nazis and are 100% morally evil. (This might get my chud card removed but this is true) ok but at the same time we are NOT allowed to say that other despotic regimes or peoples older than the Nazis are also 100% morally evil? Like anytime I see someone bring up the Aztec or mongols etc, they always have to put an asterisk of “they weren’t as evil as the “insert white group here” like i dont get it most of what the Nazis did other similar groups much older than them did and yet we aren’t allowed to label them as evil? I know it most likely just boils down to “the Nazis were white and that’s why they get the 100% evil label but the others dont”
It's because WWII and the Holobunga are our current civilization's "founding myth" and thus occupy a unique contextual place in history to the average person, who believes the Nazis are more relevant to their life than any of those other examples, and has accepted opposition to Nazism in particular as part of their national identity, consciously or not. It makes me wonder if the Yankees/Confederates were viewed the same way in the century immediately after the Civil War, and the Br*tish before that
 
ok so someone explain this to me. We as a western society have determined that the Nazis and are 100% morally evil. (This might get my chud card removed but this is true) ok but at the same time we are NOT allowed to say that other despotic regimes or peoples older than the Nazis are also 100% morally evil? Like anytime I see someone bring up the Aztec or mongols etc, they always have to put an asterisk of “they weren’t as evil as the “insert white group here” like i dont get it most of what the Nazis did other similar groups much older than them did and yet we aren’t allowed to label them as evil? I know it most likely just boils down to “the Nazis were white and that’s why they get the 100% evil label but the others dont”
Because the more time passes, the more people realize that they kinda had a point in what they were fighting for and they (the left or whatever you want to call it) can't have that.

For the left, it's actually a great tool. How many times have you heard "to prevent the rise of nazism again, we HAVE to do this totalitarian thing, but it's ok because we are the good guys!".

Regardless of ideals, they have been a great scapegoat to exploit, like children's safety.
 
Casey "Beer Hall" Putsch Update:
View attachment 8517217
  • Casey says he meets the requirements to appear in the ballot—warns the Ohio GOP not to play games to keep him off it.
  • Casey says he could have run as an independent, but he's a Republican and wanted to run as the Republican nominee. (this reminds me of Trump in the 2015 primaries)
  • If Vivek is the nominee, not only will Casey not vote for him, he will make it his life's mission to destroy Vivek and purge Ohio of everyone who supported him. (He doesn't outright say he'll run as an independent though)
cAv63aLa8wAiV_kO.mp4
He needs a photo in a suit to use in some ads and official portrait shit.
 
Because the Nazis fought against jewish power and the Monguls or Aztecs didn't.
Pretty much this, it has been eternal jewish kvetching over something that may have not actually been that bad, even if the Holocaust was really as bad as they said it was with the skin lamps and jewish soaps they have ran it into the ground so much and use it as a club so hard agaisnt groups they dont like and as an excuse for their shitty behavior that i dont care anymore.

The files dont help either.
 
we have a meeting set up with their guys and our guys this Friday in Oman to bang out a deal and Rubio sounds optimistic
guess panic just sells clicks better
Well, given that the Maduro talks and the nuclear talks with Iran didn't go so well last year, its not surprising to see the media gin up a confrontation.

This is retarded political kabuki however since Iran plays these games to stall and buy time like they did last year. Theres zero chance of a deal happening, but the US just needs some pretense and show that it at least attempted talks for international reasons.
In other news, the economy continues to see steady improvement.
View attachment 8517324
Source | Archive
Only added jobs in education and health sector. Still not a good sign for the professional, college educated economy. Construction jobs are promising, illegals getting kicked out of the country appear to be working.
Said it here once, and I'll say it again-If Trump gets gas down to $1.25 or less a gallon republicans will win the midterms
Food prices gotta come down too.
 
Last edited:
ok so someone explain this to me. We as a western society have determined that the Nazis and are 100% morally evil. (This might get my chud card removed but this is true) ok but at the same time we are NOT allowed to say that other despotic regimes or peoples older than the Nazis are also 100% morally evil? Like anytime I see someone bring up the Aztec or mongols etc, they always have to put an asterisk of “they weren’t as evil as the “insert white group here” like i dont get it most of what the Nazis did other similar groups much older than them did and yet we aren’t allowed to label them as evil? I know it most likely just boils down to “the Nazis were white and that’s why they get the 100% evil label but the others dont”
The difference is the dust hasn't had enough time to settle. People get less passionate and more clear-sighted about things the further in the past they are, as the effects of those things on their immediate situation becomes hazier and less clear, and as the firsthand memories of the people directly connected to them die out and fail to be preserved. Whether or not one chooses to believe the Nazis were 100% morally evil, the further out from the 1940s we get, the more sober and evenheaded the way we look at what they did will be, and the more like other authoritarian regimes they will resemble in our discourse.
 
i thought, and was of course correct, that the george floyd one was pretty funny. full size.
View attachment 8517249

It's because WWII and the Holobunga are our current civilization's "founding myth" and thus occupy a unique contextual place in history to the average person, who believes the Nazis are more relevant to their life than any of those other examples, and has accepted opposition to Nazism in particular as part of their national identity, consciously or not. It makes me wonder if the Yankees/Confederates were viewed the same way in the century immediately after the Civil War, and the Br*tish before that
The American obsession with Nazis annoys me too, but the explanation for it is quite simple:

Too many viewings of Indiana Jones films.
 
Back
Top Bottom