🌟 Internet Famous Turkey Tom / TomDark / @NotATurkey / TomDarkLive / anonbirdd / Thomas Larry Hanson - KiwiTuber, "Her Prostate" enjoyer, chronic shitstirrer, Destiny worshipper, pronouns respecter, Mr.Beast bootlicker, serial cheater, cuck, Kiwi Farms induced erectile dysfunction

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
God's strongest milkman said:
I can't speak on the movie but I will defend Lolita the book. extremely well written and is a distinctly anti pedophilia book which portrays pedophiles as self pittying excuse making pathetic monsters.

People fetishizing and sexualizing it are either insane or extremely suss.
Click to expand...
The lolita dressing girls who own it like Belle Delphine or Ellie clearly fetishize it.

Heck, even Lady Gaga had an interview about how she liked to imagine herself as the character lolita.
 
sacramento89 said:
Also the Lolita poster was in my best friends room, and I was calling her room goals because I thought her squishmallows are cute. Tom has been in my room multiple times and I did not have any lolita or lolicon related stuff in my room, so I think its odd he referenced that, especially considering Ellies room is filled to the brim with Lolicon figures, and he visited her IRL.

One thing he did not address is the fact that
Click to expand...
firefox_aoY3Hlc4sG.png

One thing you did not address is the fact that you asked him to watch the movie Lolita.

As a connoisseur of fine arts such as cinema and literature myself, I have to admit I am curious what you mean when you said Lolita was "for the girls".
What is your reasoning behind this statement? I find it intriguing, considering the subject matter. Have you read the novel that the movie was based on? Are you a fan of Nabokov?
 
mugsy said:
Late and gay to all of this, but read through the majority of this thread today and it was kind of blackpilling seeing all of the people that, initially, just accepted the girls' words at face value with no scrutiny. Especially disappointed at Null
Click to expand...
This is a website for the gathering and archiving of hilarious and memorable content of ridiculous individuals called lolcows and the people who interact with them. Sometimes that means interviewing people who have socially and physically decided these ridiculous individuals are the kind of people they wish to hang with and/or fuck. These will also be people who are of questionable character and background because why the fuck else would you want to be around this shit. I mean, fuck look at the userbase of this fucking forum.

In conclusion, anyone deciding that they know better how to maintain or curate the handling of a lolcow website is always welcome to start one, and only interview the most verified of gossiping bitches so they can be gunt guards and not laugh or have fun. Like the OnionFarms people. Try them maybe.
 
Wodanaz said:
View attachment 8513057

One thing you did not address is the fact that you asked him to watch the movie Lolita.

As a connoisseur of fine arts such as cinema and literature myself, I have to admit I am curious what you mean when you said Lolita was "for the girls".
What is your reasoning behind this statement? I find it intriguing, considering the subject matter. Have you read the novel that the movie was based on? Are you a fan of Nabokov?
Click to expand...
Tom STILL continued to date this whore after this fact, BTW.
 
Wodanaz said:
View attachment 8513057

One thing you did not address is the fact that you asked him to watch the movie Lolita.

As a connoisseur of fine arts such as cinema and literature myself, I have to admit I am curious what you mean when you said Lolita was "for the girls".
What is your reasoning behind this statement? I find it intriguing, considering the subject matter. Have you read the novel that the movie was based on? Are you a fan of Nabokov?
Click to expand...
>lolita
>black swan
I’m surprised this WHORE didn’t say “requiem for a dream” was one of her favorite movies to really lean into the red flags
 
Wodanaz said:
View attachment 8513057

One thing you did not address is the fact that you asked him to watch the movie Lolita.

As a connoisseur of fine arts such as cinema and literature myself, I have to admit I am curious what you mean when you said Lolita was "for the girls".
What is your reasoning behind this statement? I find it intriguing, considering the subject matter. Have you read the novel that the movie was based on? Are you a fan of Nabokov?
Click to expand...
Dude she's never seen the Dragon Tattoo one! I love the Dragon Tattoo one!
 
Wodanaz said:
View attachment 8513057

One thing you did not address is the fact that you asked him to watch the movie Lolita.

As a connoisseur of fine arts such as cinema and literature myself, I have to admit I am curious what you mean when you said Lolita was "for the girls".
What is your reasoning behind this statement? I find it intriguing, considering the subject matter. Have you read the novel that the movie was based on? Are you a fan of Nabokov?
Click to expand...
So at this point, it's likely that Rowan herself was a lolita fetishizer and that's probably another reason why Tom was with her, also Katie had a picture of herself managing a "hentai booth" at a con which likely contained loli stuff.

Yup, checks out.
 
Never trust a depressed e-girl who's only mission in life is being disgusting whores with horrible fetishes, got it. thanks Tom.
 
Blewberry Nausea said:
This is a website for the gathering and archiving of hilarious and memorable content of ridiculous individuals called lolcows and the people who interact with them. Sometimes that means interviewing people who have socially and physically decided these ridiculous individuals are the kind of people they wish to hang with and/or fuck. These will also be people who are of questionable character and background because why the fuck else would you want to be around this shit. I mean, fuck look at the userbase of this fucking forum.

In conclusion, anyone deciding that they know better how to maintain or curate the handling of a lolcow website is always welcome to start one, and only interview the most verified of gossiping bitches so they can be gunt guards and not laugh or have fun. Like the OnionFarms people. Try them maybe.
Click to expand...
What are you his speech writer?
 
Theodore Sheckler said:
What are you his speech writer or something
Click to expand...
No just tired of seeing this bullshit argument like ‘you shouldn’t investigate possible leads’ is a good take

Because the lead still led to him being a braindead idiot willing to ignore flashing red ‘I am going to try to ruin your life’ signs for a few months of sex.

Congrats Tom. Big win.
 
Xerxes_Kang_Of_Kangz said:
What I think people miss about this is that an interview does not equal an endorsement
Click to expand...
I hear what you’re saying and I mostly agree, but I think we can both agree Null gave them a lot of credit.

It’s not wrong to assume good faith when you put on an interview like this; if he was super incredulous all the time no one would come here to give their side of things. However, I do think it’s fair to say that he got so egged on by the “all women are whores” crowd that he maybe was a little too sure of what they said. He got lied to. I believed it too, I’m not ashamed to admit it.

Inversion is the essence of evil. If you go left when the most annoying people you know say right, you could wind up stepping in a little shit.
 
Blewberry Nausea said:
No just tired of seeing this bullshit argument like ‘you shouldn’t investigate possible leads’ is a good take
Click to expand...
Josh white knighting random online whores has caused him some embarrassment beyond the sphere of people who are obsessed with the internal politics of this website. It's not a good look and the solution being suggested is not that he stop looking into stuff online.
 
IMG_0599.jpeg
The whore will keep clinging to her 15 minutes of e-fame.
She will earn her very own Kiwifarms thread.
Tom will read it and regurgitate the information for a video.
He will not cite sources.
Ethics in lolcow journalism will remain irrelevant.
 
Blewberry Nausea said:
No just tired of seeing this bullshit argument like ‘you shouldn’t investigate possible leads’ is a good take

Because the lead still led to him being a braindead idiot willing to ignore flashing red ‘I am going to try to ruin your life’ signs for a few months of sex.

Congrats Tom. Big win.
Click to expand...
that's such a ignorant way of seeing the world in my humble opinion, not everyone perceives the world like me or you perceives, yeah he could've thought a little and backed down, but honestly, is not like sacramento or l4d were gonna say they were problematic to him.
 
Xerxes_Kang_Of_Kangz said:
She's not gonna change, he's not gonna change

Nothing ever happens. Even when you think something has "happened" because events are transpiring, you are wrong.
Click to expand...
I think part of the reason why men will see a BPD whore with so many obvious red flags that she looks like the Kremlin and still walk right into that trap is because it's all they're used to. If you grow up seeing your mom go BPD on your dad (and getting used as a chess piece for her to get one over on him), you're either going to grow up and hate women or grow up and get into another one of those relationships because you don't know any better. That's assuming you're just naive. Some men are truly too stupid and/or horny to think critically about a woman's behavior. These are the people who walk around with no inner monologue.

There are places in life that are free of BPD whores. Churches, for instance. Matchmaking services for marriage that specifically screen their clients to avoid gold diggers. The internet is not one of these places. If you date an e-girl despite all the cases on this very forum showing why that's a bad idea, I can't have a lot of sympathy for you.
 
Wodanaz said:
View attachment 8513057

One thing you did not address is the fact that you asked him to watch the movie Lolita.

As a connoisseur of fine arts such as cinema and literature myself, I have to admit I am curious what you mean when you said Lolita was "for the girls".
What is your reasoning behind this statement? I find it intriguing, considering the subject matter. Have you read the novel that the movie was based on? Are you a fan of Nabokov?
Click to expand...
That is certified nutso behavior. Also isn't black swan about a crazy lesbian or something?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom