it is very simple—i will compare male to female with female to male with greater molecular control over development we are increasingly capable of producing novel phenotypes— more feminine men, by blocking testosterone receptors (or castration) and, at the same time, increasing estrogen production—the one bocks male features, the second encourages female features more masculine women—heavy testosterone dosage—incredible external effects, heavily bearded men, you would never guess they had a female bone in their body first kind—male -> female is 4 times more frequent than female -> male the first is attractive—he is a woman with a cock, so that if your fantasy is to suck a man's dick, otherwise you are completely heterosexual, it would be much nicer if the rest of the organism is female, then you get the best of both worlds so many transsexual women are very attractive and easily make money which in turn they assert promotes their prostitution since they have to pay hefty fees for injections every week, but they are sexually happy,--once you have reached manhood even castration does not prevent the sensation of organism contrast the poor female to male versions, they are unhappy and lonely—they are men with mum-pums, the worst of both worlds if you like smelly masculine men, you want that hard cock that comes with the show—you do not want one of nature's more complex and variable structures, the pum-purn—that is an acquired tasted—and not with a man there are 100's of female Trans videos and websites, i have never seen a male one BTW we are now pushing the intervention earlier--so you notice your 3-year old son has trans tendencies, so now you intervene with hormones—i would be frightened to do that—but who knows ?"
, and mention that there's a US congressional election this year.
