Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[teriyakiburns]

Russ, you keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means

Is this a new cite or has he used it before? The decision seems to contradict his use of the citation.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Oh, if only that were the case...

 

[Plum Smuggler]

So surely, we must bring in Mr Jerry Leach to confirm these assertations?

Mr. Leach is a state employee. So it can just be FOIA'd.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

I guess Crusty is too fucking stupid to realize that Leach being "involved in a lawsuit" is probably hia own action against ViaTRON, and has nothing to do with his "copyright" lawsuit and KF? He's such a fucking retard, it is almost astounding. Almost.

Also, why does he continue to refer to the e-mails of potential witness disclosure as "filings"? They aren't "filings" in any sense of the word. They are e-mail notifications. They aren't part of the official docket (yet), them showing up in the docket is purely the result of Greeee's retardation.

 

[filthypenguin]

I guess as long as we have to sit here and complain that the judges have fucked off and won't do their jobs, it's nice to know that Greer is having the same frustration.

Is there a point where Greer can use the excuse of absent Judges to avoid paying fees? In theory, every motion Greer's made since the first time he tried to strike a witness disclosure could have been avoided if the Judges had ruled on the first one and told him he can't strike disclosures because they're not part of the docket yet.

 

[UncleTusky]

Or the $605, or $600. Some Circuits specifically say mandamus is the lower amount but the 10th doesn't say specifically, but does list "Petition for Review" at the lower amount and "Appeal" at the higher amount.

View attachment 8477748View attachment 8477747
Russ, you keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means.

Or the $605, or $600. Some Circuits specifically say mandamus is the lower amount but the 10th doesn't say specifically, but does list "Petition for Review" at the lower amount and "Appeal" at the higher amount.

View attachment 8477748View attachment 8477747
Russ, you keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means.

Phonex relates to a motion for disqualification that was granted in part: The court disqualified one attorney to protect confidential information, while it declined to disqualify a firm for alleged conflicts of interest. Alleged lies and serial violations of the rules do not appear in the ruling. Russ is, once again, lying.

ETA: Phonex emphasizes (via cites to older caselaw) that disqualification is only to be used when the attorney's presence would taint the trial. It is not a 'super sanction' for serial violations that do not reach this threshold.

 

[somevan]

He really loves to use that word.



"Yur honnor, can you banish Mr. Hardship to the shadow realm?"

 

[DavidS877]

Is this a new cite or has he used it before? The decision seems to contradict his use of the citation.

A quick search of the docket doesn't show it, but I'm not 100% confident in CourtListener's search.

It's pretty common that 50% of his/the AI's citations show the exact opposite of what he claims.

Also, I was picking on his/the AI's use of "filed" which doesn't apply to disclosures as they're not "filed" with the court.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

Mr. Leach is a state employee. So it can just be FOIA'd.

Now that, I don't know. It is a public office, and he is a public employee, but when discussing a disability, it might fall under information that can be excluded under FOIA. But, I'm not an expert on FOIA, so we need someone that knows it well to tell us about that one.

 

[a hapless toad]

Russ, you keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means.

He doesn't understand that the witness disclosures haven't been filed with the court (nor that HE then makes them part of the record when he files his retarded motions and includes them as exhibits).

He also doesn't seem to understand that the "citizenship" in question is as a citizen of Nevada, not of the US.

 

[Pelican Bones]

A website, a state politician, his former employer. Now would be the perfect time for him to sue another 2 or 3 people. This stupid fucker could single-handedly bring down the entire judicial system when all of these cases start infinitely citing and re-citing each other.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

A website, a state politician, his former employer. Now would be the perfect time for him to sue another 2 or 3 people. This stupid fucker could single-handedly bring down the entire judicial system when all of these cases start infinitely citing and re-citing each other.

I'm waiting for him to bring a lawsuit against Hardin for defamation.

 

[Hunter Hearst Helmsley]

Plaintiff fears filing motions

By the way, I'm aware of the irony of appearing on TV in order to decry it, so don't bother pointing that out.

 

[Apteryx Owenii]

Hardin's grand plot to make Greer start filing emergency motions (and risk the wrath of napping judges) has succeeded

Em dashes are back, baby. Ai'd to the gills

View attachment 8477770

By god he's done it again - asserted another persons actions as statement of fact. So surely, we must bring in Mr Jerry Leach to confirm these assertations?
what a fucking MONG

He's also (again) trying to claim that defense counsel is doing him sort of active reputation damage or committing defamation by... emailing disclosures to Russell Greer alone, who then publishes these otherwise undistributed communications to the entire world via court documents so we can all read them.

 

[DHugo]

"ICE deports a tax-evading real estate millionaire"
Huh

 

[Retarded INTP]

Best,

The very formal, neutral, dry style of Mr Hardin being immediately followed by pages and pages of some unhinged rando shitting himself in fear and fury will always be one of the funniest shit ever on the Farms. My sides are in Greenland.

 

[lol cow supreme]

Maybe its the file system and I can't find it, but how many witness disclosures has Hardin filed with this court?



0 is an abusive amount.

 

[Silver Coin Anon]

My understanding of civil court cases is that, if you want to motion to have the court ignore or dismiss other counsel's filings on grounds they are irrelevant, you only argue the relevancy and not the matter of the filing's contents or you've basically consented to the matter being relevant to the court in your filing and lose any reasonable right to it being ignored. In this case, Hardin hasn't even filed any of these things being discussed and Greer puts ALL of them in, willingly and voluntarily, as supporting evidence for HIS MOTIONS, making them relevant the the proceedings and essentially demanding a response from Hardin that makes even MORE PEOPLE and MORE DOCUMENTS relevant!!!

OH GOD THIS CASE HAS GONE PARABOLIC WHERE ARE THE JUDGES AHHHHH we will see 86 filings on Greer's penis size before the year is out.

 

[Thomas Talus]

He probably should have paid a bit more attention to how Christensen v. Graco Fishing and Rental Tools ended up for the plaintiff:

DOCKET TEXT ORDER. The court has carefully reviewed 32 Report and Recommendations, and 35 Objection to 32 Report and Recommendations, and other relevant filings. Although Plaintiff's objections are not a model of clarity, the court gleans two concrete objections from Plaintiffs submission: 1) that Plaintiff's action is not a derivative action but is instead based on the loss of value to Plaintiff's leases; and 2) that Plaintiff did plead specific facts supporting his fraud claim. The court concludes that these objections are not well taken. Plaintiff did seek to allege a loss of value to his leases in his proposed amended complaint, but he did not include such allegations in his original complaint. And although Judge Bennett held that the original complaint improperly sought to assert derivative claims, Judge Bennett did not rely on this rationale in denying Plaintiff leave to file the proposed amended complaint. In addition, the supposed factual allegations that Plaintiff purports to identify in his objections and that he argues support his fraud claim do not actually appear in either his original complaint or his proposed amended complaint. The court accordingly OVERRULES 35 Objection to Report and Recommendations and ADOPTS 32 Report and Recommendations. 15 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. 16 Motion to File First Amended Complaint is DENIED. Defendant's request for sanctions, which was included in 15 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, is DENIED. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr., on 6/9/2021. (jcp) (Entered: 06/09/2021)

DOCKET TEXT ORDER. Having carefully reviewed 33 Report and Recommendation and 36 Objection to 33 Report and Recommendations, the court concludes that Plaintiff's objections are not well taken. The court accordingly overrules 36 Objection to 33 Report and Recommendations and adopts 33 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff is hereby designated as a restricted filer and shall be subject to the restrictions set forth in 33 Report and Recommendation. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr., on 6/9/2021. (jcp) (Entered: 06/09/2021)

ETA: Christensen involved Bennet as the magistrate judge recommending restricted filing status (i.e. vexlit).

 

[Kosher Dill]

Oh, this is good, Greer's pulling the fire alarm again!
Didn't the last "EMERGENCY!!!"" filing just get immediately shut down with a red-text docket entry saying "No it's not"?

The best part of this filing is Greer citing to a decision Bennett himself made. I'm sure it'll go over well when he tries to explain to the judge that he knows better about what that decision really meant.