Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Uncle Buck]

Let's pretend for a moment that he's not lying about his current address. (I know, work with me here.) Google tells me that the closest public library is a 4 minute drive away (hell, it's only a mile, even I could walk that in about 15-20 minutes, let alone Google's estimated 24 minutes), and every public library in Clark County has a computer lab that's available to use for free (they just ask that you reserve a time, which of course is probably too much to ask, considering "thinking ahead"). Not to mention that Google Docs/Drive is also free, and has plenty of storage for any documents or electronic evidence that a person might need to archive. There's literally no reason for Rusty to be doing everything on his phone, and yet... he perseveres?

I dunno, (besides the obvious) maybe he's worried about someone looking over his shoulder and stealing his brilliant legal theories and strategies?

You're suggesting that a man who is truly and honestly the next big thing in music - or would be, if not for all the people "discriminating" against him - not to mention a pioneer in advocacy for legal prostitution and the expansion of adult entertainment industry and the greatest published author since Fatprick S. Loblinson actually has time to walk to the public library to handle something as unimportant is this so-called "landmark" litigation?

Shirley, you jest.

 

[Bloodthirsty Nosenigger]

Someone else said this resembled the long-ass title of those isekai type mangas

I've been filing frivolous lawsuits for 300 years and got reincarnated as a retarded slime monster!

 

[FamicomGorby]

Let's pretend for a moment that he's not lying about his current address. (I know, work with me here.) Google tells me that the closest public library is a 4 minute drive away (hell, it's only a mile, even I could walk that in about 15-20 minutes, let alone Google's estimated 24 minutes), and every public library in Clark County has a computer lab that's available to use for free (they just ask that you reserve a time, which of course is probably too much to ask, considering "thinking ahead"). Not to mention that Google Docs/Drive is also free, and has plenty of storage for any documents or electronic evidence that a person might need to archive. There's literally no reason for Rusty to be doing everything on his phone, and yet... he perseveres?

I dunno, (besides the obvious) maybe he's worried about someone looking over his shoulder and stealing his brilliant legal theories and strategies?

Greer is way too lazy for that, remember that part of the reason his Gilman lawsuit was dismissed so quickly was because he couldn't be bothered to check his mail for like a month.

 

[The Dude]

Greer is way too lazy for that, remember that part of the reason his Gilman lawsuit was dismissed so quickly was because he couldn't be bothered to check his mail for like a month.

He can't even be fucked to check his emails, which go to his phone that is presumably right there in his pocket.

 

[cromit]

every public library in Clark County has a computer lab that's available to use for free (they just ask that you reserve a time, which of course is probably too much to ask, considering "thinking ahead").

It would also require Russ to not be banned from the public library for his general greasiness/lack of hygiene, leaving the biohazard of his drool on the keyboard that can’t be scoured with mere bleach wipes, and hitting on a poor young lady who just got her MLS and thought she’d be hosting story time for preschoolers instead of helping a creepy, homeless-appearing 30-something get him his dick sucked by “helping him with the computer” which is bizarrely keeping him from accessing brothel and escort sites.

 

[Seymour Duncan]

Tbf, when you have enough emails in a chain, Gmail starts to break down like crazy even on PC. But, I mean, that's when it reaches hundreds and even then it doesn't always break. I could see how he would have trouble, but at that point, just request Mr. Hardin to make a new email chain (or do so yourself)

The "conversation view" in email is a fucking mistake.

 

[Summary Judgment]

Unadjudicated Motions

Date	ECF No.	Party	Description	Notes	Replies (ECF Nos.)
04/15/25	274	Defense	Motion to Dismiss	Hardin later suggested (not motioned) that the Court's ruling wait until the SCOTUS decision in Cox v. Sony. ECF No. 359.	288, 344, 359, 360
05/18/25	299	Plaintiff	Motion for Sanctions	Seeks Rule 11 sanctions for Hardin's investigation of Greer's personal and business dealings.	298, 302, 303, 306
05/22/25	313	Defense	Motion for Leave to View ECF No. 1	Pursuant to Hardin's investigation into Greer's potentially fraudulent claims of poverty in ECF No. 1 (IFP application).	315, 317, 323, 318, 319, 320
05/22/25	314	Plaintiff	Motion for a Protective Order	Seeks a Rule 26 order (governing discovery) to block Hardin's investigations. However, discovery is already stayed. ECF No. 283,	316, 324, 322
06/05/25	330	Defense	Motion for Sanctions	Seeks Rule 11 sanctions for the subpoena Greer improperly obtained while discovery was stayed pursuant to ECF No. 283.	339, 426, 427
06/05/25	331	Plaintiff	Motion for "Clarification" and Modification of ECF No. 283	Seeks to modify the discovery stay at ECF No. 283 so Greer can subpoena Null for user information to serve two new defendants.	332
07/15/25	346	Plaintiff	Motion for Sanctions	Again seeks Rule 11 sanctions for Hardin's investigations. Seeks attorney's fees despite Plaintiff's pro se status.	348
07/31/25	350	Defense	Motion to Revoke Plaintiff's Access to Electronic Filing and Service	Argues that Greer's abuses the electronic filing system. Reminds the Court that Greer is using a false mailing address.	353, 354
10/15/25	367	Plaintiff	Motion for Extension of Time	Re: ECF No. 362, which ordered Greer to show cause for failing to provide the the Utah restraining order application. Untimely filed.	368, 370
10/16/25	369	Plaintiff	Motion for Extension of Time	Largely duplicates ECF No. 367, but includes Greer's proposed response. Untimely filed.	372
11/23/25	385	Plaintiff	Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document	Seeks to file "private non-party information" and "other sensitive details" supposedly related to the order at ECF No. 227.	392, 393
11/24/25	387	Defense	Motion to Strike and/or Reservice of ECF No. 385	Greer did not serve the Defense an unredacted version of ECF No. 386, which he filed for leave to file under seal at ECF No. 385.	389
12/04/25	394	Plaintiff	Motion for a Protective Order and Sanctions	Again seeks a Rule 26 order to block Hardin's investigation and a witness disclosure. Also seeks sanctions under Rule 37.	395, 396
12/06/25	397	Defense	Motion to Proceed by Pseudonym for Natalie Banks	Seeks to allow a potential witness to proceed under her pseudonym to protect her from Plaintiff's retaliation.	399, 401
12/08/25	400	Plaintiff	Motion to Disqualify Counsel	Due to Hardin's investigation of Greer.	403, 425, 428
12/09/25	402	Defense	Motion to Strike ECF No. 400, and Alternative Motion for an Extension of Time and Evidentiary Hearing.	Seeks to strike as in bad faith or an attempt to evade Rule 11 service requirements. Court did not rule on request for an extension of time. Arguments preserved for the record at ECF No. 425.	404, 405, 407
12/10/25	406	Plaintiff	Motion to Strike Witness Disclosure	Re: disclosure of Waylon Huber, a Winnimuca realtor.	408, 410
12/12/25	411	Plaintiff	Motion to Strike Witness Disclosure	Re: Natalie Banks, a former NV prostitute.	413, 415
12/12/25	412	Defense	Motion for a Preservation Order	Re: evidence of Greer's Venmo and Zelle payments, which may be relevant to Greer's claims of poverty and ECF No. 313.	414, 416, 418
12/15/25	417	Defense	Motion to Complete the Record	Seeks to compel Greer to produce his entire book into the record, which was partially introduced by Greer in ECF No. 415.	419, 429
12/20/25	423	Plaintiff	Motion to Strike Witness Disclosure	Re: Roger Baylocq, a Winnimuca businessman.	430, 432
12/20/25	424	Plaintiff	Motion for Sanctions	Seeks Rule 31 sanctions for Defense's witness disclosures.	431, 437
01/06/26	433	Plaintiff	Motion to Strike Witness Disclosure	Re: Suzette Cole, the GM of the Moonlight Bunny Ranch.
01/06/26	434	Defense	Motion for an Extension of Time and to Stay All Future Motions	Seeks to stay Plaintiff's motions until the Court rules on pending motions (incl. dispositive motions like ECF No. 274).	436

Unresolved Court Orders

Date	ECF No.	Description	Replies (ECF Nos.)
02/10/25	227	Grants ECF No. 219 (Defense motion to compel production of restraining order application).	243, 250, 283, 294, 295, 296, 326, 327, 365, 381, 382, 384, 385, 386, 387, 389, 392, 393
09/30/25	361	Grants ECF No. 234 (Defense motion for monetary sanctions re: false accusations against counsel). Defense requested an award of $4620. The actual award is TBD by the court.	364, 366, 371, 376, 378, 380, 383, 391
09/30/25	362	Orders Plaintiff to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for failure to comply with ECF No. 227 (order to compel production of restraining order application).	367, 368, 369, 372

@AnOminous I've been playing around with the table. I shortened some descriptions for brevity, added a column documenting the various replies, and linked ECF numbers to their respective PDFs on courtlistener. I also added a table for "unresolved" court orders, by which I mean orders that have not yet been obeyed due to the inaction of a party or the court itself. (You might know a better adjective for this.)

I've put the BB code for the tables below. Hope this code is less janky than the first attempt!

Spoiler: BB Code

[B]Unadjudicated Motions[/B]
[TABLE width="100%"]
[TR]
[th width="5.9409%"]Date[/th][th width="2.8902%"]ECF No.[/th][th width="5.6198%"]Party[/th][th width="24.8555%"]Description[/th][th width="44.894%"]Notes[/th][th width="13.465%"]Replies (ECF Nos.)[/th]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]04/15/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.274.0.pdf']274[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Defense[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion to Dismiss[/td][td width="44.894%"]Hardin later suggested (not motioned) that the Court's ruling wait until the SCOTUS decision in [I]Cox v. Sony[/I]. ECF No. [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.359.0.pdf']359[/URL].[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.288.0.pdf']288[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.344.0.pdf']344[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.359.0.pdf']359[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.360.0.pdf']360[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]05/18/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.299.0.pdf']299[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Plaintiff[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion for Sanctions[/td][td width="44.894%"]Seeks Rule 11 sanctions for Hardin's investigation of Greer's personal and business dealings.[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.298.0.pdf']298[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.302.0.pdf']302[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.303.0.pdf']303[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.306.0.pdf']306[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]05/22/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.313.0.pdf']313[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Defense[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion for Leave to View ECF No. 1[/td][td width="44.894%"]Pursuant to Hardin's investigation into Greer's potentially fraudulent claims of poverty in ECF No. [URL='https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68847149/greer-v-moon/?order_by=desc&page=3#entry-1']1[/URL] (IFP application).[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.315.0.pdf']315[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.317.0.pdf']317[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.323.0.pdf']323[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.318.0.pdf']318[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.319.0.pdf']319[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.320.0.pdf']320[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]05/22/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.314.0.pdf']314[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Plaintiff[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion for a Protective Order[/td][td width="44.894%"]Seeks a Rule 26 order (governing discovery) to block Hardin's investigations. However, discovery is already stayed. ECF No. [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.283.0.pdf']283[/URL],[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.316.0.pdf']316[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.324.0.pdf']324[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.322.0.pdf']322[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]06/05/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.330.0.pdf']330[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Defense[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion for Sanctions[/td][td width="44.894%"]Seeks Rule 11 sanctions for the subpoena Greer improperly obtained while discovery was stayed pursuant to ECF No. [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.283.0.pdf']283[/URL].[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.339.0.pdf']339[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.426.0.pdf']426[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.427.0.pdf']427[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]06/05/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.331.0.pdf']331[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Plaintiff[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion for "Clarification" and Modification of ECF No. 283[/td][td width="44.894%"]Seeks to modify the discovery stay at ECF No. [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.283.0.pdf']283[/URL] so Greer can subpoena Null for user information to serve two new defendants.[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.332.0.pdf']332[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]07/15/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.346.0.pdf']346[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Plaintiff[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion for Sanctions[/td][td width="44.894%"]Again seeks Rule 11 sanctions for Hardin's investigations. Seeks attorney's fees despite Plaintiff's [I]pro se[/I] status.[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.348.0.pdf']348[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]07/31/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.350.0.pdf']350[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Defense[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion to Revoke Plaintiff's Access to Electronic Filing and Service[/td][td width="44.894%"]Argues that Greer's abuses the electronic filing system. Reminds the Court that Greer is using a false mailing address.[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.353.0.pdf']353[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.354.0.pdf']354[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]10/15/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.367.0.pdf']367[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Plaintiff[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion for Extension of Time[/td][td width="44.894%"]Re: ECF No. [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.362.0.pdf']362[/URL], which ordered Greer to show cause for failing to provide the the Utah restraining order application. Untimely filed.[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.368.0.pdf']368[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.370.0.pdf']370[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]10/16/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.369.0.pdf']369[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Plaintiff[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion for Extension of Time[/td][td width="44.894%"]Largely duplicates ECF No. [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.367.0.pdf']367[/URL], but includes Greer's proposed response. Untimely filed.[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.372.0.pdf']372[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]11/23/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.385.0.pdf']385[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Plaintiff[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document[/td][td width="44.894%"]Seeks to file "private non-party information" and "other sensitive details" supposedly related to the order at ECF No. [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.227.0.pdf']227[/URL].[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.392.0.pdf']392[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.393.0.pdf']393[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]11/24/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.387.0_1.pdf']387[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Defense[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion to Strike and/or Reservice of ECF No. 385[/td][td width="44.894%"]Greer did not serve the Defense an unredacted version of ECF No. [URL='https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68847149/greer-v-moon/?order_by=desc&page=1#entry-386']386[/URL], which he filed for leave to file under seal at ECF No. [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.385.0.pdf']385[/URL].[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.389.0.pdf']389[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]12/04/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.394.0.pdf']394[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Plaintiff[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion for a Protective Order and Sanctions[/td][td width="44.894%"]Again seeks a Rule 26 order to block Hardin's investigation and a witness disclosure. Also seeks sanctions under Rule 37.[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.395.0.pdf']395[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.396.0.pdf']396[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]12/06/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.397.0.pdf']397[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Defense[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion to Proceed by Pseudonym for Natalie Banks[/td][td width="44.894%"]Seeks to allow a potential witness to proceed under her pseudonym to protect her from Plaintiff's retaliation.[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.399.0.pdf']399[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.401.0.pdf']401[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]12/08/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.400.0.pdf']400[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Plaintiff[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion to Disqualify Counsel[/td][td width="44.894%"]Due to Hardin's investigation of Greer.[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.403.0.pdf']403[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.425.0.pdf']425[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.428.0.pdf']428[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]12/09/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.402.0.pdf']402[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Defense[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion to Strike ECF No. 400, and Alternative Motion for an Extension of Time and Evidentiary Hearing.[/td][td width="44.894%"]Seeks to strike as in bad faith or an attempt to evade Rule 11 service requirements. Court did not rule on request for an extension of time. Arguments preserved for the record at ECF No. [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.425.0.pdf']425[/URL].[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.404.0.pdf']404[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.405.0.pdf']405[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.407.0.pdf']407[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]12/10/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.406.0.pdf']406[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Plaintiff[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion to Strike Witness Disclosure[/td][td width="44.894%"]Re: disclosure of Waylon Huber, a Winnimuca realtor.[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.408.0.pdf']408[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.410.0.pdf']410[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]12/12/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.411.0.pdf']411[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Plaintiff[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion to Strike Witness Disclosure[/td][td width="44.894%"]Re: Natalie Banks, a former NV prostitute.[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.413.0.pdf']413[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.415.0.pdf']415[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]12/12/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.412.0.pdf']412[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Defense[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion for a Preservation Order[/td][td width="44.894%"]Re: evidence of Greer's Venmo and Zelle payments, which may be relevant to Greer's claims of poverty and ECF No. [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.313.0.pdf']313[/URL].[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.414.0.pdf']414[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.416.0.pdf']416[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.418.0.pdf']418[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]12/15/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.417.0.pdf']417[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Defense[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion to Complete the Record[/td][td width="44.894%"]Seeks to compel Greer to produce his entire book into the record, which was partially introduced by Greer in ECF No. [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.415.0.pdf']415[/URL].[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.419.0.pdf']419[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.429.0.pdf']429[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]12/20/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.423.0.pdf']423[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Plaintiff[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion to Strike Witness Disclosure[/td][td width="44.894%"]Re: Roger Baylocq, a Winnimuca businessman.[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.430.0_1.pdf']430[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.432.0.pdf']432[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]12/20/25[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.424.0.pdf']424[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Plaintiff[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion for Sanctions[/td][td width="44.894%"]Seeks Rule 31 sanctions for Defense's witness disclosures.[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.431.0.pdf']431[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.437.0.pdf']437[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]01/06/26[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.433.0.pdf']433[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Plaintiff[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion to Strike Witness Disclosure[/td][td width="44.894%"]Re: Suzette Cole, the GM of the Moonlight Bunny Ranch.[/td][td width="13.465%"][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.9409%"]01/06/26[/td][td width="2.8902%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.434.0.pdf']434[/URL][/td][td width="5.6198%"]Defense[/td][td width="24.8555%"]Motion for an Extension of Time and to Stay All Future Motions[/td][td width="44.894%"]Seeks to stay Plaintiff's motions until the Court rules on pending motions (incl. dispositive motions like ECF No. [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.274.0.pdf']274[/URL]).[/td][td width="13.465%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.436.0.pdf']436[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[B]Unresolved Court Orders[/B]
[TABLE width="100%"]
[TR]
[th width="5.2746%"]Date[/th][th width="7.0809%"]ECF No.[/th][th width="62.5%"]Description[/th][th width="25.0000%"]Replies (ECF Nos.)[/th]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.2746%"]02/10/25[/td][td width="7.0809%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.227.0.pdf']227[/URL][/td][td width="62.5%"]Grants ECF No. [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.219.0.pdf']219[/URL] (Defense motion to compel production of restraining order application).[/td][td width="25.0000%"]243, [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.250.0.pdf']250[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.283.0.pdf']283[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.294.0.pdf']294[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.295.0.pdf']295[/URL], [URL='https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68847149/greer-v-moon/?order_by=desc&page=1#entry-296']296[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.326.0.pdf']326[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.327.0.pdf']327[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.365.0.pdf']365[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.381.0_1.pdf']381[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.382.0.pdf']382[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.384.0.pdf']384[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.385.0.pdf']385[/URL], [URL='https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68847149/greer-v-moon/?order_by=desc&page=1#entry-386']386[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.387.0_1.pdf']387[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.389.0.pdf']389[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.392.0.pdf']392[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.393.0.pdf']393[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.2746%"]09/30/25[/td][td width="7.0809%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.361.0.pdf']361[/URL][/td][td width="62.5%"]Grants ECF No. [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.234.0_1.pdf']234[/URL] (Defense motion for monetary sanctions re: false accusations against counsel). Defense requested an award of $4620. The actual award is TBD by the court.[/td][td width="25.0000%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.364.0.pdf']364[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.366.0.pdf']366[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.371.0.pdf']371[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.376.0.pdf']376[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.378.0_1.pdf']378[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.380.0.pdf']380[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.383.0.pdf']383[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.391.0.pdf']391[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="5.2746%"]09/30/25[/td][td width="7.0809%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.362.0.pdf']362[/URL][/td][td width="62.5%"]Orders Plaintiff to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for failure to comply with ECF No. [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.227.0.pdf']227[/URL] (order to compel production of restraining order application).[/td][td width="25.0000%"][URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.367.0.pdf']367[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.368.0.pdf']368[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.369.0.pdf']369[/URL], [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.372.0.pdf']372[/URL][/td]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

 

[HackerX]

@AnOminous I've been playing around with the table. I shortened some descriptions for brevity, added a column documenting the various replies, and linked ECF numbers to their respective PDFs on courtlistener. I also added a table for "unresolved" court orders, by which I mean orders that have not yet been obeyed due to the inaction of a party or the court itself. (You might know a better adjective for this.)

Hopefully a court clerk stumbles on this as a handy reference. I couldn't imagine how anyone would where to begin even if they had this table, much less if they were directed to figure out WTF what's pending action from a blank slate perspective.

Also, just looking at the party and description column while scrolling down, you'd assume Plaintiff and Defense were flip flopped. Basically everything Russ files is in reply to Hardin moving some aspect of this case forward besides the baffling subpoena requests that randomly came out of nowhere. Him immediately getting his hand slapped, along with a new motion for sanctions, probably scared Greee off from ever prosecuting this case again.

 

[ConSluttant]

Unadjudicated Motions

The sheer number of these just always boggles the mind.

Unresolved Court Orders

How on earth does the court not rush to ensure that it doesn't continue to embarass itself over these outstanding orders it has issued I will never understand. Shamefur dispray.

 

[The Dude]

The sheer number of these just always boggles the mind.

How on earth does the court not rush to ensure that it doesn't continue to embarass itself over these outstanding orders it has issued I will never understand. Shamefur dispray.

Because that would mean doing more actual work. If they continue like they are, they get more down time and more time to work on cases that actually matter. In the grand scheme of things, this case doesn't really impact anyone outside of this website and one saggy-faced pervert living in Las Vegas.

 

[Summary Judgment]

Hopefully a court clerk stumbles on this as a handy reference. I couldn't imagine how anyone would where to begin even if they had this table, much less if they were directed to figure out WTF what's pending action from a blank slate perspective.

I'd assumed (maybe incorrectly) that the clerks already make tables like this one. It seems like the obvious thing to do. They're drafting decisions for the judges, those decisions summarize the procedural history, and that summary has to come from somewhere. Even starting from scratch, I'd guess this would take less than a workday to create. That time would be longer for a clerk totally unfamiliar with the case, or shorter if they have an AI tool to help.

If the court had the will and such a table, then I don't think these motions are too hard to disentangle. They aren't "knotty." If you were draw a directed acyclical graph with each motion as a head node and each reply as a child node, then most motions would look like untangled spaghetti. You can just eat the individual strands. Plus, Hardin does an excellent job laying out the procedural history in his briefs (making it even easier for the clerks to follow.)

E.g., the motion to complete the record would look like 417 -> 419 -> 429. Notice none of these nodes are in any other graphs. Eat your spaghetti, judge!​

 

[Bridgeburner]

I wonder what will be the total number of unajudicated motions when the Judges remember they have a job. Maybe that should be the next poll? I think no less than 40.

 

[cherrysour]

Even starting from scratch, I'd guess this would take less than a workday to create. That time would be longer for a clerk totally unfamiliar with the case, or shorter if they have an AI tool to help.​

It would take very little time at all. ECF permits the user to generate a list of pending motions (and associated responses) by case.

 

[AnOminous]

I've put the BB code for the tables below. Hope this code is less janky than the first attempt!

I was trying to figure out a WYSIWYG editor for BBcode (actually a few) but all the ones I found kind of suck. Are you using one or just editing the code manually?

Anyway, I've updated the link in the OP as well as adding one to the top of the OP as well as a credit for the assist.

 

[Summary Judgment]

Are you using one or just editing the code manually?

When the table is copy/pasted into the reply box for this thread, it renders in a WYSIWYG fashion. From there, I just use the table/text editing options to modify it as desired. (E.g., I click the buttons to add rows, add columns, add links, etc.) I never directly edit the BB code itself. I just generate it at the end since you wanted it. So far, the table has been simple enough that I haven't tried any external editors to edit the code directly. The normal reply editing tools worked well enough. Edit: Thank you for the shout out in the OP!​

 

[AirMail]

"I Goof'd Up And Got Sent To Another World With My Lawfare Nemesis, And Now We Have To Live Together!?"

"I Goof'd Up And Got Sent To Another World, Now I Must Sue The Demon Lord Null With My Rudimentary Paralegal Knowledge To Survive!?"

I would totally read it. He even has a "cheat skill" of Tard Shielding.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

Definitely one of those mangas that never ever ever progresses, and the characters always end up where they started until it’s suddenly cancelled.

 

[obsdj]

Wow, the rules really are different this year I guess.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

ECF 443

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

This pleading indicates that Mr. Greer was able to pay, in January 2026, a filing fee of $405 to initiate new federal litigation. Despite the Nevada Court expressly providing Mr. Greer the opportunity to seek in forma pauperis status, Mr. Greer did not do so and paid the full filing fee for his latest litigation.

and

Mr. Greer’s decision to initiate new prostitution-related litigation in Nevada rather than comply with orders in this existing litigation in Utah is further evidence of Mr. Greer’s bad faith litigation tactics and willful defiance of this Court’s orders.

is the meat and bones