I was just thinking about his latest Notice of False Statement. If you take Greer at his word, he genuinely can not keep track of email chains and what Hardin is talking about, even when provided multiple re-sends and explanations. The exhibits from him and Hardin show Greer spawning multiple new threads at random points in a conversation, confusing both Greer and the record.
There's enough evidence now to say Greer is incapable of handling a lawsuit by email. I don't know if that's a helpful argument for Hardin's motion to revoke electronic filing access at
ECF 350, but it may be worth a supplemental notice. Add on Greer's repeated missing of important notices and rulings in his inbox, and this is as objectively true a characterization as a Court can get.