Official Kiwi Farms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

  • 🔧 Issue with uploading attachments resolved.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Enjoy the low effort rage bait meme
1767131057641.png
 
It's not that complex.

When a woman uses "I'm retarded" as an excuse, it's a good thing™️ because she benefits.
When male feminists say that women are too stupid to be held responsible for something negative, it's a good thing™️ because women benefit.

When you and I say "she's retarded" as a reason for not taking women seriously, it's super mean giga-hatespeech moid misogyny and we should be thrown into a prison cell 100km below the surface of the earth and tortured by an AI trained on the medical experiments of Goebbels and Unit 731 for decades before being electro-disintegrated by an Auschwitz disintegration floor and having our remnant gasses collected and ejected into Saturn where we'll never trouble a female again by daring to do anything but serve them selflessly and without complaint.

Because, you know, women didn't benefit from it, or something like that. At least, that's what I've learned from about two decades of dealing with the various varieties of radfems.
 
This is so laughably unrealistic. There probably aren't more than a couple dozen guys in the entire world that fit that description.
I could hit 2 of 4. Maybe 3 if you go with a broader definition of "muscular" and narrower definition of "masculine".

Problem is I expect you to work, not sit around at home doing nothing, or wasting time on minor tasks like taking care of chores or cooking, things we can both do in our free time. Preferably also work at a position with the same level of education and responsibility because I have a hard time relating without a similar professional background.

No excuses for staying home raising children either, that's what babysitters, daycares and educational institutions are for.

Come at me ladies.
 
Problem is I expect you to work, not sit around at home doing nothing, or wasting time on minor tasks like taking care of chores or cooking, things we can both do in our free time. Preferably also work at a position with the same level of education and responsibility because I have a hard time relating without a similar professional background.

No excuses for staying home raising children either, that's what babysitters, daycares and educational institutions are for.
Men having standards is literally rape, be better.
 
It's high school. Their ideal society is high school. It's a bunch of low effort, easy tasks that they can get immediate and affirmative praise for; no real responsibility beyond kitschy 'fun' things like yearbook, or club organising or drama societies. They can be with their 'besties' have constant social activities.
I don't think women being that way is necessarily wrong, we are meant to fulfill different roles, women are better at raising children since they are better attuned to provide for the emotional and caregiving needs of a child, they are more social than us helping maintain a good social circle for support, they are better at playing with children and they have stronger emotional connections.

We men are all about getting stuff done without being emotional(not all of us are like this but that's our role), our role is different, the term manchild exists only for men and not for women because women act like children their entire lives, I don't think women being like this is a bad thing because it makes them better at raising kids, it is understandable that women focus is on gossiping, travelling and doing crafts, fun stuff in general, the problem is that most women refuse to be mothers and housewives, and only start thinking of having children when they are 30, the women that realize what their role is get married young.
 
we should be thrown into a prison cell 100km below the surface of the earth and tortured by an AI trained on the medical experiments of Goebbels and Unit 731 for decades before being electro-disintegrated by an Auschwitz disintegration floor and having our remnant gasses collected and ejected into Saturn where we'll never trouble a female again by daring to do anything but serve them selflessly and without complaint
All that, and we still can't put black rapists in jail because that would be mean.

I don't think women being like this is a bad thing because it makes them better at raising kids

I've seen many times how women can play with babies in a way that makes them light up like sunshine. I don't have the instinct for it. I've always done my best, but I don't have the instinct to sing songs, clap my hands, make silly faces, and do all the things that make a baby really go. This instinct women have is a good thing. But this instinct also didn't come with an instinct to not vote for the destruction of society.
 
I've seen many times how women can play with babies in a way that makes them light up like sunshine. I don't have the instinct for it. I've always done my best, but I don't have the instinct to sing songs, clap my hands, make silly faces, and do all the things that make a baby really go. This instinct women have is a good thing. But this instinct also didn't come with an instinct to not vote for the destruction of society.
Even most of the don't want kids/didn't have kiss would happily kiss a baby or make silly faces at them. I think I've only ever seen one woman who did no such things. She is the most chronically neurotic and person I know. I think she may have sublimated her maternal instincts to cats.

On top of all that, she still likes socially destructive policies like faggotry of all forms and infinity niggers.
 
>Women who take drugs while pregnant should be executed
I only found out a few weeks ago that SSRIs are considered strictly contraindicated during pregnancy.

Since around 25% of American women are on SSRIs, and most probably don’t know this either and will go on “but-but-but I need this to hecking function, how dare you???” tangents if you suggest they should go off it, imagine how many millions of the next generation are being poisoned in the womb by selfish wahmonz
 
I only found out a few weeks ago that SSRIs are considered strictly contraindicated during pregnancy.

Since around 25% of American women are on SSRIs, and most probably don’t know this either and will go on “but-but-but I need this to hecking function, how dare you???” tangents if you suggest they should go off it, imagine how many millions of the next generation are being poisoned in the womb by selfish wahmonz
that explains a lot honestly
 
only found out a few weeks ago that SSRIs are considered strictly contraindicated during pregnancy.
They aren’t strictly contraindicated, they will prescribe them, sertraline is considered the least bad one I think at the moment. This for example is current policy in one nhs area: https://nhssomerset.nhs.uk/wp-conte...SRIs-and-SNRIs-in-pregnancy-and-lactation.pdf
They do have risks, and fairly significant ones Imo and it also shows the real hypocrisy and agenda in the advice given to pregnant women. The stance is basically ‘absolutely nothing unless society deems it OK’ rather than genuine evidence.
This leads to insane advice given to pregnant women.
- you’re told off if you have short but hot baths (heat is bad! And yes it is bad but a quick hot shower isn’t bad ) , eat rare steak or runny eggs, in a country where all the hens are vaccinated and the eggs are fine
- but SSRIs are fine, and gotta get that Covid shot (heat is bad? No silly woman, Covid shot fevers are fine!)
The advice around alcohol is also crazy. There’s no safe dose known of alcohol, it’s a teratogen. But there’s a whole push to convince women that some is ok (bloody emily oster and her ‘expecting better’ book.)
Evidence based medicine is dead and has been replaced by convenience and feelings and political ideology.
SSRI overprescribing will be something we look back on with horror.
 
Evidence based medicine is dead and has been replaced by convenience and feelings and political ideology.
It doesn't really matter anyway. No western country even prohibits the consumption of alcohol during pregnancy, despite the consequences for the child.
 
Woman moment anecdote: a chick at work gets knocked up. To her credit it's not with a complete degenerate, he's stayed with her so far and they both want to keep the baby, but the chick always struggled with planning ahead, and from the conversations I've had with this chick I get the impression the guy is too immature and pussywhipped to stop her from being retarded.

This chick's job doesn't rain money but it's low stress, and it doesn't just have medical insurance benefits but also would have given her a couple months unpaid maternity leave with medical insurance retained throughout. If she wanted to quit, she could have kept a stiff upper lip, powered through until delivery, taken maternity leave, kept ahold of that insurance through a high-risk period, and then put in her two weeks notice as soon as maternity leave ended.

What does she do instead? Quit on short notice, just over halfway through the pregnancy.

This follows a pattern of astounding executive incapacity that made itself obvious long before getting knocked up, so I'll be surprised if she'll successfully manage a household even given her undivided attention.

The only saving grace to this is that if her child inherits her intellect, they won't have the capacity to dread the future she's going to put them into.
 
Too much time in day care causes elevated cortisol levels and permanent neurological damage in babies. If you think your wife is doing better for the family by generating GDP instead of caring for the children, you have no clue how children work.
 
It doesn't really matter anyway. No western country even prohibits the consumption of alcohol during pregnancy, despite the consequences for the child.
I can see why - if you can mandate what someone can and cannot consume, then you’re on a very slippery slope. Such a law would have been gleefully used to forcefully give pregnant women the Covid shots and then it would have expanded to dictate what anyone can or cannot consume. I don’t think a law to ban anyone from drinking is the way to tackle this, once you start to rule on that you’re on some very dodgy ground. I don’t know what the solution is - much better public health messaging would help, and of course bars should be able to deny service for any reason.
 
Babies are awesome and you're missing out if you don't have any. A young woman who says she doesn't want kids is no different than a teenage boy who says he never wants to move out of mom & dad's house and get a job. It's a childish opinion that should be discarded, and we as a society have done a grievous error by treating immature young people's opinions as important and letting them ruin their lives.

I can see why - if you can mandate what someone can and cannot consume, then you’re on a very slippery slope. Such a law would have been gleefully used to forcefully give pregnant women the Covid shots and then it would have expanded to dictate what anyone can or cannot consume. I don’t think a law to ban anyone from drinking is the way to tackle this, once you start to rule on that you’re on some very dodgy ground. I don’t know what the solution is - much better public health messaging would help, and of course bars should be able to deny service for any reason.
I seem to remember seeing data that nearly all FAS cases are in mothers who drank heavily, something on the order of a bottle of wine a day. Yes, any alcohol slighly raises the chance of FAS, but it's marginal.
 
seem to remember seeing data that nearly all FAS cases are in mothers who drank heavily, something on the order of a bottle of wine a day. Yes, any alcohol slighly raises the chance of FAS, but it's marginal.
Full on FAS yes, but there’d also FASD (disorder) which is the milder end of the spectrum. A lot of kids have that and it’s subtle but it does cause damage. The reality is probably that everyone metabolises it a bit differently and you don’t know if you’re going to be unlucky. So while the odd beer probably doesn’t do catastrophic damage, it’s better just to not drink. I don’t like the idea of legislating what someone can and can’t intake, that seems like a law that will go downhill real fast.
Happy new year anyway!
 
Back
Top Bottom