- Joined
- Aug 8, 2024
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I could hit 2 of 4. Maybe 3 if you go with a broader definition of "muscular" and narrower definition of "masculine".This is so laughably unrealistic. There probably aren't more than a couple dozen guys in the entire world that fit that description.
Men having standards is literally rape, be better.Problem is I expect you to work, not sit around at home doing nothing, or wasting time on minor tasks like taking care of chores or cooking, things we can both do in our free time. Preferably also work at a position with the same level of education and responsibility because I have a hard time relating without a similar professional background.
No excuses for staying home raising children either, that's what babysitters, daycares and educational institutions are for.
I don't think women being that way is necessarily wrong, we are meant to fulfill different roles, women are better at raising children since they are better attuned to provide for the emotional and caregiving needs of a child, they are more social than us helping maintain a good social circle for support, they are better at playing with children and they have stronger emotional connections.It's high school. Their ideal society is high school. It's a bunch of low effort, easy tasks that they can get immediate and affirmative praise for; no real responsibility beyond kitschy 'fun' things like yearbook, or club organising or drama societies. They can be with their 'besties' have constant social activities.
All that, and we still can't put black rapists in jail because that would be mean.we should be thrown into a prison cell 100km below the surface of the earth and tortured by an AI trained on the medical experiments of Goebbels and Unit 731 for decades before being electro-disintegrated by an Auschwitz disintegration floor and having our remnant gasses collected and ejected into Saturn where we'll never trouble a female again by daring to do anything but serve them selflessly and without complaint
I don't think women being like this is a bad thing because it makes them better at raising kids
Even most of the don't want kids/didn't have kiss would happily kiss a baby or make silly faces at them. I think I've only ever seen one woman who did no such things. She is the most chronically neurotic and person I know. I think she may have sublimated her maternal instincts to cats.I've seen many times how women can play with babies in a way that makes them light up like sunshine. I don't have the instinct for it. I've always done my best, but I don't have the instinct to sing songs, clap my hands, make silly faces, and do all the things that make a baby really go. This instinct women have is a good thing. But this instinct also didn't come with an instinct to not vote for the destruction of society.
I only found out a few weeks ago that SSRIs are considered strictly contraindicated during pregnancy.>Women who take drugs while pregnant should be executed
that explains a lot honestlyI only found out a few weeks ago that SSRIs are considered strictly contraindicated during pregnancy.
Since around 25% of American women are on SSRIs, and most probably don’t know this either and will go on “but-but-but I need this to hecking function, how dare you???” tangents if you suggest they should go off it, imagine how many millions of the next generation are being poisoned in the womb by selfish wahmonz
They aren’t strictly contraindicated, they will prescribe them, sertraline is considered the least bad one I think at the moment. This for example is current policy in one nhs area: https://nhssomerset.nhs.uk/wp-conte...SRIs-and-SNRIs-in-pregnancy-and-lactation.pdfonly found out a few weeks ago that SSRIs are considered strictly contraindicated during pregnancy.
You need to be very rich to afford quality babysitting and daycare.No excuses for staying home raising children either, that's what babysitters, daycares and educational institutions are for.
It doesn't really matter anyway. No western country even prohibits the consumption of alcohol during pregnancy, despite the consequences for the child.Evidence based medicine is dead and has been replaced by convenience and feelings and political ideology.
AZNs overprescribe antibiotics. Therapists on west overprescribe SSRI and other antipsychotics. Things are rather fuckedSSRI overprescribing will be something we look back on with horror.
I can see why - if you can mandate what someone can and cannot consume, then you’re on a very slippery slope. Such a law would have been gleefully used to forcefully give pregnant women the Covid shots and then it would have expanded to dictate what anyone can or cannot consume. I don’t think a law to ban anyone from drinking is the way to tackle this, once you start to rule on that you’re on some very dodgy ground. I don’t know what the solution is - much better public health messaging would help, and of course bars should be able to deny service for any reason.It doesn't really matter anyway. No western country even prohibits the consumption of alcohol during pregnancy, despite the consequences for the child.
I seem to remember seeing data that nearly all FAS cases are in mothers who drank heavily, something on the order of a bottle of wine a day. Yes, any alcohol slighly raises the chance of FAS, but it's marginal.I can see why - if you can mandate what someone can and cannot consume, then you’re on a very slippery slope. Such a law would have been gleefully used to forcefully give pregnant women the Covid shots and then it would have expanded to dictate what anyone can or cannot consume. I don’t think a law to ban anyone from drinking is the way to tackle this, once you start to rule on that you’re on some very dodgy ground. I don’t know what the solution is - much better public health messaging would help, and of course bars should be able to deny service for any reason.
Full on FAS yes, but there’d also FASD (disorder) which is the milder end of the spectrum. A lot of kids have that and it’s subtle but it does cause damage. The reality is probably that everyone metabolises it a bit differently and you don’t know if you’re going to be unlucky. So while the odd beer probably doesn’t do catastrophic damage, it’s better just to not drink. I don’t like the idea of legislating what someone can and can’t intake, that seems like a law that will go downhill real fast.seem to remember seeing data that nearly all FAS cases are in mothers who drank heavily, something on the order of a bottle of wine a day. Yes, any alcohol slighly raises the chance of FAS, but it's marginal.