Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Sep 15, 2020
  • Terminated
    Apr 22, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Aug 6, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Aug 6, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 May 15, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 Apr 28, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 Apr 25, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 Apr 25, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    Oct 26, 2021
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    Oct 15, 2023

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)

# Date Description Filing
10010936535 Oct 15, 2023 Case termination for opinion
10010794067 Jan 5, 2023 [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785 Jan 2, 2023 [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728 Dec 1, 2022 [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140 Nov 30, 2022 [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    Mar 19, 2024
  • Terminated
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Oct 16, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Oct 16, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 Oct 15, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) PDF
131 Jul 10, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) PDF
130 Jun 10, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) PDF
129 Jun 10, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Apr 27, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
473 Apr 27, 2026 RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) 1
472 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
471 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
470 Apr 13, 2026 Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469 Apr 13, 2026 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) 1
I appreciate how he changed his font for this one
Screenshot 2025-12-15 194411.png
Screenshot 2025-12-15 194431.png
 
The reply to the response to the motion to reply to respond to move to strike Russell Greer out a window.

415 Images.
It appears my PDF to Image tool is broken as it came up with 38 pages...

415-01.png415-02.png415-03.png415-04.png415-05.png415-06.png415-07.png415-08.png415-09.png415-10.png415-11.png415-12.png415-13.png415-14.png415-15.png415-16.png415-17.png415-18.png415-19.png415-20.png415-21.png415-22.png415-23.png415-24.png415-25.png415-26.png415-27.png415-28.png415-29.png415-30.png415-31.png415-32.png415-33.png415-34.png415-35.png415-36.png415-37.png415-38.png

This filing was not checked for porn.
 
It's actually much dumber than that. Moving to Vegas was all part of his masterplan, along with spending another several grand on hiring musicians to do the actual performing, to audition for AGT so he could woo Heidi Klum with a song he wrote for her.
Fucking Goddamned hell in a bitch shitting basket. I completely forgot about the America's Got Talent gambit. See, judge? This is how little Greer boi, which rhymes with Queer boi, thinks of and respects you. Enjoy non-compliance, judicial child. I hope Bennett and whatever Grima Wormtongue clerk he has whispering into his ear are pantsed in the court locker room and given pink bellies by the fattest bailiffs in the county.
 
Oh Russ, you not so beautiful bastard. You didn't disappoint, outside not being able to file a single damn thing on time.
View attachment 8289601
"Ya honah, see I had deez billz n sheeeeeeeeeeeit. Ain't no judge gonna sit dere n say "Gimpa got billz n sheeeeeeeeeit so he ain't gone pay fees? Guilty motha fucka!" cuz if I do dat then I'ma do shit that's illegal n sheeeeeeeeeeeeit! You wan me break da law, ya honah? I didn't think so, bitch!"

Like...the dumb fucking mouth breather admits by his own account that he had money but he wanted to say he had no money so he could pay for a fucking U-haul so he could be, presumably, closer to paid sex. Why? Why in the ever loving hell would you admit that as some sort of excuse? Does the fact that I can turn my head and sip soup blind me to the answer?

and directly below that
View attachment 8289618
"In fact it was YOUR fault, stupid court, for not telling me I had to be poor forever!"
Oh Russ you Magnificent Bastard with this filing you just insured that the Judge has to Crack open ECF#1 to allow the Defendants to respond to your claims today. You would have been tactically better off not responding. Because by doing so you fuck yourself. Please do continue.

Once again you are admitting you used IFP not based on your actual income. But as a bridge loan because the statute of limitations was up and you had too many elective expenses.
 
This filing was not checked for porn.
I can happily confirm there are no stacked thots under the ludicrous images included in the filing FROM HIS FUCKING BOOK, holy shit whenever you think Greer can't get any crazier, he says "Hold my spit cup."
 
Is ECF 415 some sort of tard Hail Mary where he retardedly believes that he can cause a mistrial so he can just do the whole thing over again? This is so insane that I can't help but feel like I'm missing something.

WHY THE FUCK IS HIS BOOK IN COMIC SANS!?!?
 
Hardin should respond "plaintiff has yet again selectively edited his exhibits" and attach the entire book in his reply.
doctrine of completeness

Under Rule 106 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, when an incomplete writing or recorded statement is introduced in a trial by one party, the adverse party may require the introduction of any other parts or any other writing or recorded statement which ought, in fairness, to be considered contemporaneously with the writing or recorded statement originally introduced. This doctrine of completeness is to ensure the jury views the incomplete statement in its full context.

This additional evidence is called explanatory evidence, and its purpose is to qualify, explain or put the original piece of introduced evidence in context. Additionally, otherwise inadmissible evidence, such as hearsay, can be admissible under this rule if it is necessary to correct any confusion or wrongful impression created by the admission of the original evidence.
 
Back
Top Bottom