The Easy to Track Username Hall of Shame - Reading warning labels are for chumps.

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Null said:
Big congrats to this awesome thread and its awesome users for doxing the child nieces and nephews of a random user from 2018 for no apparent reason.

When a person dies, the bacteria in his bowels start to digest his own corpse.
Click to expand...
Why not just add a rule you can't halal someone unless they're a lolcow? I see no reason to allow needlessly phonebooking some random person and their family just because they showed their profile picture on the site once. You've already stated you immensely dislike this in a Crabshack so why not just ban people from doing it?
 
NiggerDeathRay said:
Why not just add a rule you can't halal someone unless they're a lolcow? I see no reason to allow needlessly phonebooking some random person and their family just because they showed their profile picture on the site once. You've already stated you immensely dislike this in a Crabshack so why not just ban people from doing it?
Click to expand...
We have that rule, but this user chose to post in this thread to circumvent that rule, which puts me in a situation where I have to figure out what to do with this 625 page thread.
 
Null said:
We have that rule, but this user chose to post in this thread to circumvent that rule, which puts me in a situation where I have to figure out what to do with this 625 page thread.
Click to expand...
How is this representative of the whole thread?

Most of it is still doxing random retards for shits and giggles. There are even attempts to prevent spawn camping, but no real set of rules most users refer to that I know of.

If you want to make hard rules, I am sure most can deal with that, but please don't close it.
 
Users dox each other all the time here. I am pretty sure though that there is a rule about posting the personal information of minors. So regardless of him using this thread to avoid mod permission, it is still a rule to not post personal information of underage people on the forum.
 
Null said:
We have that rule, but this user chose to post in this thread to circumvent that rule, which puts me in a situation where I have to figure out what to do with this 625 page thread.
Click to expand...
Edit minor references out and leave it. The user did attention worthy things, while drawing attention to their accounts and leaving an easy trail for someone to follow and make the post. Is that not what is done in this thread?

I don't understand why this one is special? I don't think she's gonna sleep with you dude. She seems a little thin for your tastes.
 
neamhbhuan said:
I don't understand why this one is special? I don't think she's gonna sleep with you dude. She seems a little thin for your tastes.
Click to expand...
no you don't understand we absolutely must drive every user who's been here longer than 2 years off the site. to disagree with this is definitely motivated by SEX. I definitely want to fuck this married prostitute.
 
Null said:
no you don't understand we absolutely must drive every user who's been here longer than 2 years off the site. to disagree with this is definitely motivated by SEX. I definitely want to fuck this married prostitute.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't ask a question if I didn't want the reply. Or clearly say I didn't understand but thanks for the confirmation?

The ending bit was was a wise-crack, but to me it seems like out of 625 pages you have chosen this user to defend, and as you said, she's a married prostitute, so I was just curious, why her out of all the posts to get upset enough over that you tell us you're considering the future of the thread.

I'm sorry that oldfags are doing stupid shit, but people got spawn camped and you didn't come to defend them. I can't see this user's profile to see old posts to figure out why she's so important. That's all.
 
neamhbhuan said:
I'm sorry that oldfags are doing stupid shit, but people got spawn camped and you didn't come to defend them. I can't see this user's profile to see old posts to figure out why she's so important. That's all.
Click to expand...
click her name where shes tagged in the tgread and click the post count. profile is private not post history.
 
Null said:
We have that rule, but this user chose to post in this thread to circumvent that rule, which puts me in a situation where I have to figure out what to do with this 625 page thread.
Click to expand...
I feel like making rules for the thread is extremely easy and would prevent stuff like this happening.

There used to be a massive problem in this thread of people refreshing the newest members tab to search their usernames. This doesn't happen anymore because people yelled at the people doing that shit until they stopped doing it.

Here's what I would suggest:
1. You must show how you found the information you're posting.
2. No involving family members unless they're involved in the booking process (Not a halal, but the Kiki Pyon-Pyon phonebook is a good example.)
3. If the person being put in this thread is a minor, then the most that should be posted is usernames/real name and maybe emails. Nothing school related, no phone numbers, no addresses.
4. A reason for the post. Are they a tranny? Helplessly addicted to hentai? Do they take away from KF by frequently slapfighting, cowtipping, or PA requesting? "I did it because I can" is a dumb reason to cannibalize over.

This thread has some of the highest peaks on the site, however it's been ruined by low quality posts and endless slapfights with retards who got doxed years ago. I think moving slapfights to spergatory/archive would help majorly with this thread becoming less dogshit.
 
neamhbhuan said:
I wouldn't ask a question if I didn't want the reply. Or clearly say I didn't understand but thanks for the confirmation?

The ending bit was was a wise-crack, but to me it seems like out of 625 pages you have chosen this user to defend, and as you said, she's a married prostitute, so I was just curious, why her out of all the posts to get upset enough over that you tell us you're considering the future of the thread.

I'm sorry that oldfags are doing stupid shit, but people got spawn camped and you didn't come to defend them. I can't see this user's profile to see old posts to figure out why she's so important. That's all.
Click to expand...
13 posts in 2 years, 100% over tor, only wakes up to justify chasing off old users. i'm sure you aren't some bad actor with a dozen accounts at all.
 
Null said:
13 posts in 2 years, 100% over tor, only wakes up to justify chasing off old users. i'm sure you aren't some bad actor with a dozen accounts at all.
Click to expand...
All I wanted to know, is why is ONE user so important that you would threaten the thread for them. I only have one account and lurked for years. If I was a bad actor I'd have a bunch more posts. You also tell us to use tor and now I get shit for it? Make up your mind. You're trying to redirect. I am seeing favoritism, and asking why, you seem to be getting your panties in a twist over it. It's your website, you do you.
 
It probably doesn't help the case of those in favor of keeping the post that discussion of the dox is outside of its containment thread.

Earl of Slander said:
And you're the absolute retard who cheated on her husband to be in a porn with James Deen and showed your KF profile on stream.

Earl of Slander

Post in thread 'The Easy to Track Username Hall of Shame'

ALEXANDRA ROSE MARINKOVICH​

aka Dark Entries | Girl_X | FetusInTheNude | AnAdultGoth | @QUEEN OF DENIAL ​

Alex, this is kiwifarms, Kiwifarms, this is Alex.​

COW.png
YouTuber Dark Entries is a failed OnlyFans "model" and porn actress, a failed wife, Gorl World enthusiast, Queen Cobra NAL wannabe, and is apparently speedrunning trying to get her own thread. She's been having a rough go of things lately, crashing out on lives, in various discord servers, and showing a lot of things she shouldn't be in her DMs. I mean...
Reactions:Informative x 57 Winner x 9 Like x 5 Semper Fidelis x 2 Dumb x 3 Lol x 2 Mad at the Internet x 1 DRINK! x 1 Agree x 1 Thunk-Provoking x 1 Autistic x 1 Horrifying x 1
Click to expand...

Pathos said:
Heh, you couldn't just stay away could ya?


They didn't, I did. Is it also true that you've been going around trying to get the dox of someone that has done nothing to you?

But you entertain their bullshit, why did you do that?

That's quite the serious accusation, one that potentially can lead to life ruination. Why don't you do the responsible thing and present evidence/data or shut the fuck up and stop playing games with serious baseless accusations?

Why not just make a thread on all these people and put together all your evidence there instead of wasting people's time expecting them to know who the fuck Tar Man is?
Click to expand...

Theongogablogian said:
@Earl of Slander has shared doxes before. But as far as I know, none of them were minors, and everything he used was publicly available. Those people were reckless with their information and constantly antagonizing others on and off the Farms. From what I’ve seen, he just connected the stuff they’d already put out there themselves.

Edit: I don’t get why you mentioned Tar Man. Yeah, he’s fag, but as far as I know, he’s not connected to any of this.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom