💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[Midnight Energy Drink]

 

[KiwiChud]

View attachment 8201549

I didn't see anyone else make the easy layup, so I busted out my 420 hours of MSPaint experience.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

View attachment 8201006
bruh even AI nose

"It was absolutely devastating for things not to go my way NOW"
"That was a really tough time for me, spent a lot of times not eating and sulking"
"People have this fantasy/romanticism I did a LOT of substances, I DO do a lot of them I'm not trying to undersell that. BUT there's a whole lot of people who do a whole LOT more and for a whole lot longer!"
"But like also you know people build up a mental picture of what things were like and let me just tell you pretty frankly, up until the day of the arrest, my life looked normal to basically everybody. It wasn't normal but it looked normal."
"If you came into our house, pretty much any day what you would see is a family of people getting kids to school, making food running aarons, doing all the shit you just normally do. and people got this idea that there was this crazy drug filled orgy 24hrs a day. I said no, in fact no! No that's not what was going on."

Nick’s life was so normal that a community, including his own sister in law, didn’t suspect he was on coke. Nor was he suspected of neglecting his children because they were hungry and stank. And he certainly didn’t stream absolutely wasted on drugs and alcohol because he lost a motion in court to Montegraph.

No it was all 5 star days.

Nick and Kayla isolated from much of their community such that almost no one would notice their behaviour. It was the church where they attended weekly that actually outed them because they could not avoid regular contact. The house would have been a giveaway, and almost no one was there visiting regularly.

I recall early streaming days with interruptions due to friends and friends' children, but that stopped shortly before Rittenhouse.

- He'd love to discuss Christianity more openly but he gets misunderstood. "God gives us a ton of grace"

This topic is my autism trigger, but he just wants to spout heresy and do what he wants.

- He'd love to have a regular streaming schedule but his life is still very chaotic.

Driving them keeds!

- He has a vitamin B12 deficiency due to his drug use but it could have been caused by his depression afterward when he wasn't eating right. Otherwise he has no negative health issues from the drug use.After his arrest he spent lots of days just "sulking".

This is a symptom of alcohol abuse.

- Coke has a risk of high blood pressure due to vascular constriction. The bigger issue is that it makes you able to tolerate alcohol and other drugs easier.

Drugs increase your alcohol tolerance! It was 'here' but now it is up 'here'!

- Nicholas Rekieta G. P. (Unlicensed)

- 'Love the sinner, hate the sin' doesn't work when the sinner does not feel loved. Nick gets criticized every day and it makes him feel less loved.

Have you tried not saying it in a faggy way?

- Nick

He is repeating all his old excuses.

Pretty sure that's how men have been doing it for centuries.

It was mainly money and resources, but yes.

This guy dresses like a flaming homosexual, SPECIFICALLY to draw attention to himself, and when kids at the gas station call him "zesty" (2025 version of calling someone a faggot), he takes it as a compliment.

The Rekieta children (per Nick) categorised the comments as 'zesty'. We never got a quote from the petrol station youths.

https://embed.kiwifarms.st/threads/...ally-criminal-nickrekieta.53871/post-22786802

1. It was frankly refreshing to see him harshly criticizing a redpill/manosphere guy. I've seen other clips of Wilson and he is an idiot. He makes Andrew Tate look like a genius. Nick was trying to analyze a guy who seems to be pretty low IQ and in his fee fees.
2. It was all ironic considering Nick's objectively off-the-charts immorality - by almost anyone's standards, Christian or athiest.

(Btw, I understand why MGTOW and the manosphere exist. 3rd wave feminism can be absurd. It's just rare to see another right-wing man confront one of them. The WhateverPodcast is absolutely brainless. I've no idea why it has the viewership it does.)

Nick is not right-wing. He is a disgusting hedonistic degenerate with no morals except those he apes for social acceptance.


Also, the content exists due to the polarising divide between the sexes that has been enlarged over the last few decades.

 

[A Very Big Fish]

Absolutely insane of Nick Rekieta to bait Andrew Wilson of all people into a debate when, first of all, Andrew Wilson already has an open door policy that if you want to debate him, just ask, and secondly, Andrew Wilson will destroy Nick's ego so badly that Nick might cut off the stream mid-sentence and start fist fighting a sleeping child to repair the narc injury he'll be sustaining.

I really don't know what he thinks the best case scenario is going to be. Obviously, it involves Nick and Andrew on a stream together, but then what? Nick masterfully debates one of the top Internet debaters in human history, defeats all of Andrew's arguments, and restores his own career overnight? Fat motherfucking chance. More likely, Andrew mops the floor with Nick from the jump, Nick tries to make it weird and sexual, and Andrew completely shuts it down and exposes Nick as a charlatan.

I watched a debate the other day with Andrew calling Muslim's cousin fuckers, so I would love to see him have a chat with Mr. Rackets.

 

[Melty Butter]

Absolutely insane of Nick Rekieta to bait Andrew Wilson of all people into a debate when, first of all, Andrew Wilson already has an open door policy that if you want to debate him, just ask, and secondly, Andrew Wilson will destroy Nick's ego so badly that Nick might cut off the stream mid-sentence and start fist fighting a sleeping child to repair the narc injury he'll be sustaining.

I really don't know what he thinks the best case scenario is going to be. Obviously, it involves Nick and Andrew on a stream together, but then what? Nick masterfully debates one of the top Internet debaters in human history, defeats all of Andrew's arguments, and restores his own career overnight? Fat motherfucking chance. More likely, Andrew mops the floor with Nick from the jump, Nick tries to make it weird and sexual, and Andrew completely shuts it down and exposes Nick as a charlatan.

Oh, I really disagree - respectfully. Nick's ready for a fight, and he's sober-ish. He'd take 3 Adderalls, enjoy the attention, and destroy Andrew Wilson.

Wilson was in his feels about his wife being called out for having 3 baby daddys - which is hilarious. The man (Wilson) does not get to scream at 20 yo dumb OF whores as a career and claim that it's Christ's mission.

Christ would never want this.

 

[Shig O'nella]

Christ would never want this.

He's probably asking his dad right now if a gamma burst counts as a flood ... in theory, of course.

I'm kinda confused by this Wilson guy who seems to be both a midwit and a devastating debater according to people here. That doesn't bode well for the standards of right wing online discourse.

 

[Not Who You Think]

So Nick acknowledges that April wants nothing to do with internet drama or him, yet keeps her name, image and voice on his Supertips.

Nick also describes himself as "mildly pretty" which is reminiscent of April's repeated/conspicuous use of the word "pretty" last November while ranting on social media (some examples below):





Due to his exhibitionist nature, Nick is a slave to having open secrets. It isn't surprising for Nick to find as many ways to reference April as he could in spite of Kayla keeping them apart.

 

[TexOffender]

Nick also describes himself as "mildly pretty" which is reminiscent of April's repeated/conspicuous use of the word "pretty" last November while ranting on social media (some examples below):

View attachment 8202519

View attachment 8202520

Due to his exhibitionist nature, Nick is a slave to having open secrets. It isn't surprising for Nick to find as many ways to reference April as he could in spite of Kayla keeping them apart.

She totally tweeted that herself. No way Nick took her phone and did it lol

 

[Sock Cucker]

Neck, Nick.

This is the bottom line for this thread, thank you.

 

[Sneed Force One]

Its fun to know in hindsight thanks to Nick's own admissions and @StarTrak's leaks, this November schizo-saga was Kayla ejecting the whore in her home and April was desperately trying to regain her million dollar meal ticket.

 

[daffodils]

Nick is live right now

- brilliant new ethics board defense: If he is a lawyer, he's not falsely representing himself as a lawyer; if he isn't a lawyer, they have no jurisdiction over him.

 

[Sneed Force One]

brilliant new ethics board defense: If he is a lawyer, he's not falsely representing himself as a lawyer; if he isn't a lawyer, they have no jurisdiction over him.

lol wut?
another win for da @RaptInPlastic.

Schrödinger's Disciplinary Committee. Nick's licence is in a quantum state of both being bound to an ethical framework and inability to punish him for breaking it.

 

[Red Dye #5]

I'm kinda confused by this Wilson guy who seems to be both a midwit and a devastating debater according to people here. That doesn't bode well for the standards of right wing online discourse.

Wilson largely debates really stupid people, and his tactic is to basically know about 2 or 3 facts about a subject. Which is more than most people will know.

Since a large amount of online discourse since the rise of the smartphone has been “thing I don’t like bad”, someone who can push back on that idea makes a lot of people crumple.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

none of his children tested positive for drugs.

Nick should neck over that alone. The fact he chose to give his kid a fucking lot of cocaine (The labs don't lie) means ANY claim for Nicky Rackets the Rail King to be a good father is an absolute Goddamned lie and he deserves to pay for that manifest failure until the end of time.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Nick is live right now
https://youtube.com/watch?v=pQwd9oNQ0lc
- brilliant new ethics board defense: If he is a lawyer, he's not falsely representing himself as a lawyer; if he isn't a lawyer, they have no jurisdiction over him.

It's still live, and I didn't know where to rewind to to hear that, but: It's still a violation of law to hold oneself out as a lawyer if one is not a lawyer. That is in a general statute, not just the professional rules of responsibility for lawyers, and violating it is a misdemeanor.

But professional-responsibility-wise, his license is under their "jurisdiction." They can suspend his license in a variety of ways (and his current status doesn't make him "not a lawyer"; it makes him administratively suspended/ unauthorized to practice) or disbar him either way. And if he wants to be an actual, authorized lawyer, he will have to answer to the ethics inquiry.

Tl; dr: he's an idiot.

 

[RaptInPlastic]

It's still live, and I didn't know where to rewind to to hear that, but: It's still a violation of law to hold oneself out as a lawyer if one is not a lawyer. That is in a general statute, not just the professional rules of responsibility for lawyers, and violating it is a misdemeanor.

But professional-responsibility-wise, his license is under their "jurisdiction." They can suspend his license in a variety of ways (and his current status doesn't make him "not a lawyer"; it makes him administratively suspended/ unauthorized to practice) or disbar him either way. And if he wants to be an actual, authorized lawyer, he will have to answer to the ethics inquiry.

Tl; dr: he's an idiot.

Also the complaints that already escalated into disciplinary proceedings against him aren't wishy washy or vague or whatever they were black and white straightforward questions he refused or failed to answer and stuff they had him dead to rights on. It's not some foggy weird doubtful thing it's clear cut and they would never have gone this far otherwise. They've actively asked people for links, screenshots, testimony and so on. This is not muh CLE muh I need to write a letter. They could care less about a fucking letter from this faggot at this point.

 

[Sneed Force One]

Remember the "I'm going to do my CLEs so I can sue Aaron personally for damage to RekietaMedia" schtick. How time flies.

He won't do it via paid representation, because he knows its a worthless case. His only desire is to encumber Aaron with legal fees for the length it takes to dismiss it.

 

[Swole McPole]

I don't think they caught him with drugs in the car

I know they didn't, but if they can confiscate your $100k car for using it to transport a gram of coke, why would you ride around with coke in your Mustang? If you had any intelligence/self control at all, wouldn't you just take a fucking uber or something? Ride around in a $1000 shit wagon?

The guy was pretending to be a lawyer at the time, FFS. What lawyer wouldn't advise their client not to carry cocaine in a $100k car if there was any prospect that it could be confiscated?

 

[AnOminous]

- brilliant new ethics board defense: If he is a lawyer, he's not falsely representing himself as a lawyer; if he isn't a lawyer, they have no jurisdiction over him.

As usual, completely wrong. Bar members who are not authorized to practice law are disciplined all the time. How is he such a stupid ignoramus?

Much like many more clever lawyers before him, he has not discovered the "one weird tip" to avoid bar discipline.

 

[Dimension Sniper]

- brilliant new ethics board defense: If he is a lawyer, he's not falsely representing himself as a lawyer; if he isn't a lawyer, they have no jurisdiction over him.

That's like a sovcit argument but against the fucking state ethics board. Is he going to ask them to establish subject matter jurisdiction? Will Fort Grounz rise again?