Trump is very right in reacting to this as sedition. We kill people who do this for a reason. A Government in open revolt against itself's BEST CASE response is to collapse. The worst case scenario would be the next Trump-like just starts shooting these smug fuckers when they try it and replacing them.
I keep telling people this, but people don't want to believe that Trump is the best case scenario, and if things continue there will be a leader with all of Trump's charisma, none of his restraint, and a lot of people will end up dead. Its happened time and time again when a detached and delusional elite caste fuck things up too badly.
It is an issue that I consider extremely important, which is the way that the Democrats/Uniparty/Marxists are constantly and obviously undermining the foundations of a peaceful, civil society. Frankly, they simply do not recognize the fragile nature of institutions, and believe they have infinite inertia to exist forever while subverted. This is because they exist entirely within very complex academic sophistry that insulates them from both reality and second order effect because they
reject reality and substitute their own. They ironically believe in the
tabulas rasa for not just people, but all reality, and if they tear down the existing framework they will be left with...nothing, a blank canvas on which to paint what they want.
What these insane people forget is that the legal and social systems are not some constructed framework that came in existence
ex nihilo, they are
abstractions derived from the fundamental nature of reality and are palatable substitutions to forestall the violence that is inevitable in that reality and its system of limited resources. They operate as a means to resolve social conflict without resorting to violence though mutually agreed upon systems. If these abstractions are distorted or 'gamed' to the point of uselessness, they will be discarded and the old order of violence will re-emerge.
Continually undermining trust in these systems by subverting them to avoid consequences has a cost, and that penalty is the removal of that system from the choices for conflict resolution. When everything else collapses, it all comes down to which group has better organization and more guys with weapons and the will to use them. "Stop quoting laws to us, we carry swords!" - Pompey the Great
Eventually all avenues of peaceful resolution are cut off from the people, because those in power do not want to change or surrender their positions. This does
not make those people or their grievances vanish, however, it only prevents their
peaceful expression. The elites that love their academic sophistry think they can just define the problem away, because if it doesn't exist in their perfectly tailored mental construction which they have engineered with rules and definitions that end with them winning.
Image a board game where the 'game master' continually changes the rules every time they may lose a piece or an advantage. Eventually the game is locked into a 'you lose/they win' scenario - and at your local game store that might result in some choice words and resolve to not play with them again. If the player's life is on the line, if his kid's lives are on the line, if his entire community's future is riding on him winning though......well. He's going to flip the table and strangle the life out of the prick gaming the rules
because he was given no other choice.
I only wish the chaos to come after they smash all the rules would backlash to them only, but I know that many innocents will suffer and die for the arrogance of madmen.
