💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 156 22.5%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 276 39.8%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 93 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.4%

  • Total voters
    694
AFAIR Kurt and Sean sent C&D to the Supertips LLC (or whatever) - so, it's MELTON, not Nick, who backed down. Nick was against that and wanted to reinstate the Kurt voice.
OK but, Kurt's voice is still there styled as "Depressed Incel Lawyer" so they aren't super intimidated, just enough not to put his name there.
Crackieta is gonna be in a blind furry tonight
I will admit that I read this typo and was tempted to feed it to an AI image generator, and it seems plausible enough anyway.
After seeing Runkle in the live chat in a couple of Nick's streams lately, it's difficult to give him a pass
I was giving Runkle benefit of the doubt, thinking that Runkle made a bad decision because he was sleep deprived and maybe isn't too dialed in on Nick's general status. But learning from your comment that he's been in Nick's chats recently, I change my mind.
Runkle knew exactly who he was getting into bed with.
Runkle, you lay down with dogs, you get up with fleas.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 8176471View attachment 8176480View attachment 8176482
Even the usual suspects fail to appear to Balldoguard for this unforced error. Comments are 100% negative.
Suffer Nick.
View attachment 8176486
We're back to "Fuck off alog"-posting, previously from the November 2024 schizoposting arc and June/May post-sentencing career stagnation arc, we're so in for future Rekieta kino.
View attachment 8176492View attachment 8176496
I can feel the tempo rising, the drum beat ever so slightly increasing everyday.
"Kino Is Coming" - House Stark-iwi
“YOU haven’t been in the privacy of MY marriage” - Nick

True nuff. But we know **has** !!
> mandy
> all the wine moms on locals
> romaine and that other guy
> some whore in Jamaica
> Aaron Imholte
> April
> Matt
> also that other Matt
> Ethan Ralph?

… I’m sure I’m missing people I am only a inconstant follower of Rekeita lore but what I’m getting at is that Nick should really not invoke the private sanctity of Our Marriage
Can someone give me a rundown on Nick's new...uh...."style"? Is it suits and glasses now? That's what we are running with?
Thrift shop -core is how I figure it. Nick picks some sports coats and loud glasses and lurid shirts and mixes n matches towards however he imagines pimps dress like.
 
Ahh, Nick Rekeeta and Jack Doherty, the two most punchable fuckwits on the planet. Makes sense.

EDIT: You forgot Star Trek Ian, @Stan , I'm sure he knows more than he'd like too.
 
Does he not realize drug dogs exist?
As someone who hasn't touched drugs in nearly 30 years, drug dogs are the biggest bullshit in law enforcement. The number of times that a drug dog has "alerted" on my vehicles when I get stopped and refuse to consent to a search, giving them the ability to search my vehicle without my consent is suspicious, if I'm being really charitable about it. Drug dogs mean fuck all. Fuck Jack Doherty, I don't give two shits about him, but drug dogs are absolute bullshit. They're probable-cause-on-demand.
 
It's not that I expect coherency from Nick, or any sort of non-hypocrisy, and you're free to argue different levels of hypocrisy or whatever. I get that yeah a dude in his 40s going after girls much younger than him, so on and so forth, I'm not arguing for Kurt, nor Nick's shitty fucking argument. But for Nick, a man who let other men fuck his wife, and continues to opine for his mistress, to the point of crying to the Rage Pig about how her new boyfriend doesn't let Nick engage with her. But he's gonna crow about how bad and creepy and adverse Nick is to Kurt offering a girl of age to come over to partake in dinner and wine (and most likely penetrative sex). You're gonna take a moral stance against that Nick, fucking really? Gay fucking nigger.
 
The church basement reception is OK if this isn’t your first marriage but if it is first marriage it would seem quite cheapskate imo.
I've been to church basement/gym receptions before. It makes sense to save money on the less pomp and circumstance part if you're strapped for cash.

However these families aren't...
 
BTW if anyone pressed him on this, he'd say that "Everyone in stearns county court and corrections know who he is" and "His case was disruptive and national news" are two separate sentences and the second isn't the reason for the first.
Could just be me, not being a lawyer and all that. I'm willing to agree that there's different levels of disruptive; but aren't most law violations some sort of disruption to society/law/town/state/etc? Obviously a speeding ticket isn't on the same level as rape or murder. But homeboy's case was showing a porngraphic image to someone else, against the photograph subject's consent; and even then, it was pushed by Nick being a hysterical faggot. Stop the fucking presses, hide yo kids, hide yo wife, we got a revenge pornographer on the fucking prowl in Stearns/Kanidyohi counties.

I've been to church basement/gym receptions before. It makes sense to save money on the less pomp and circumstance part if you're strapped for cash.

However these families aren't...
Most churches offer free or discount use of the building if you're a member. You generally have to pay the pastor/officiator, but most churches love/celebrate marriage and as long as you give enough of a warning and no one else is using the chapel, they're pretty generous to let you use the chapel, and maybe a common area for after celebration fellowship. It's not uncommon to see older people related to neither party helping out, because they're so damn happy people are getting married. I'm not trying to cast negative aspirations towards Nick or Kayla, but having it in the church basement and not the chapel is very odd... and I'm willing to accept that maybe the roof caved in or had a leak, and the chapel was currently full of mold or something else.
 
They're probable-cause-on-demand.
Yeah that's why if you have weird pills in an "aspirin" bottle and they call the drug dogs over and they bark, you're getting searched, and then that shit's getting identified.

Do you understand that's why Nick's dumb ideas are retarded, or do I have to explain it again?
 
Yeah that's why if you have weird pills in an "aspirin" bottle and they call the drug dogs over and they bark, you're getting searched, and then that shit's getting identified.

Do you understand that's why Nick's dumb ideas are retarded, or do I have to explain it again?
Nick thought feeding his kid cocaine would produce a favorable result. Nobody here thinks Nick is of sound mind or has sane ideas.
 
Outta curiosity and since its a long running source of wonderment by onlookers, do you know whether the large family was Kayla or Nick's idea? I seem to remember, but could be wrong, that either or Kayla had said they wanted more than 5 at one point but Kayla's health issues prevented it.

Kayla seems the type to want a large family (but not the associated work) and Nick seems like he has zero interest in being a father, but I don't think its a 5D trust maxing move.

I think they're just both stupid and lazy.
I'm sorry, I don't have any insight on whose idea it was to have a large family. I'll see what I can find out though.
Kayla came from a large family and always wanted one herself. Pretty sure Nick has said this a bunch before the downfall and Kayla might’ve said this herself on streams. Either way, this was well known. Though who knows if it’s fully true.
I appreciate the clarification. Are those the texts that she read on her YT channel or are there screenshot?

The information I have does not come from April via Keanu, it's from Kayla and Nick.
It was speculated from when Nick and April were both on twitter, where April would vague tweet and be pretty heavily hinting towards it. Her and Nick as star crossed lovers with someone keeping them apart, shading Kayla’s cooking, and begging Nick for phone calls/text replies while telling him she knew it wasn’t his fault.

Keanu said it multiple times in the weeks/months before she went ahead and read the texts. At some point during that shit show, including when they argued on stream, Nick confirmed everything like he always does. That’s why April was kicked out of the main home, because of Kayla, so Nick adjusted the plan to having her in the other side house and he’d just go fuck her whenever. Keanu also said some of this a long time before leaking every text fully, which was partly why April cut her off which Nick directly referenced as something he was present for. At this point it’s all a bit blurred for me, but that’s close enough.
 
It was speculated from when Nick and April were both on twitter, where April would vague tweet and be pretty heavily hinting towards it. Her and Nick as star crossed lovers with someone keeping them apart, shading Kayla’s cooking, and begging Nick for phone calls/text replies while telling him she knew it wasn’t his fault.
I tried to search for it but couldn't find it - we have some piece of evidence that Kayla demanded April be exiled from the bunker, I feel like it could have been a Keanu text reading but I don't remember exactly. We also have Nick saying he thought he was going to get divorced, but I think he hand-waived how that didn't occur. Nick made it seem like April merely was his back up if Kayla divorced him. @StarTrak 's confirmation is the first solid piece of evidence we have behind Kayla making an ultimatum between either April getting the boot or Nick getting divorced. But my memory could be wrong on this.
 
I've been to church basement/gym receptions before. It makes sense to save money on the less pomp and circumstance part if you're strapped for cash.

However these families aren't...
I have known faith communities where how dare you not hold every part of the wedding: wedding shower, the wedding ceremony and the reception at the church. It would be considered an insult.
 
To CR:

I can't fathom what it's been like for you these past few years, dealing with all the legal and social media drama, but you've managed to keep the family together and prove your character as the true head of household. And you've done it like a man. But today you're eighteen. You're no longer like a man, today you ARE a man. Whatever the last chapters looked like, from today onward they are yours to write. I'm confident you'll make good decisions, especially after living through the results of so many bad ones. Keep leading the family forward.

Happy Birthday, Man!

Nick's oldest, his pride and joy, his first born Son, turned 18 today.

...and Nick stayed up past 5 in the morning last night making fun of a middle aged autistic bald man in Texas to an audience of maybe 50 people. Way to have your priorities straight, Nicky.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kayla came from a large family and always wanted one herself. Pretty sure Nick has said this a bunch before the downfall and Kayla might’ve said this herself on streams. Either way, this was well known. Though who knows if it’s fully true.

That was my memory of it but with how often people claim its because Nick wants trust money, I figured if Nick had said something to that effect in private they would have heard about it.

Nick overshares everything, so I am sure that it really was Kayla wanting a large family before their marriage fell apart.
 
In all fairness, I don't watch Runkle and I don't seriously know if he knew all the intricate minutiae that was going on between Nick and Kurt, but he knows what Nick is and invited him on anyway. As far as I'm concerned, he brought this on himself. Suffah, Canadian.
 
I was wrong earlier about my recollection of Nick's side of the story re: The Ultimatum. According to Nick, there was no Ultimatum. Nick thought he was getting divorced. Then, one day, Kayla approached him and asked if they could work it out. Nick, then, because "I don't half-ass anything", decided entirely on his own to kick April to the curb. I got this clip from a Scarebro tweet contemporaneous with the Kik/Nick stream

1763436889329.png




So his side of the story definitely didn't involve an ultimatum or him being a BITCHMADE PUSSY and letting his skeletal corpse bride boss him around.
 
That was my memory of it but with how often people claim its because Nick wants trust money, I figured if Nick had said something to that effect in private they would have heard about it.

Nick overshares everything, so I am sure that it really was Kayla wanting a large family before their marriage fell apart.
As far as I'm concerned, the miscarriages are proof that Kayla desperately wanted a large family. I don't think anyone's greedy enough to keep on rolling the dice after miscarriage #2, just to upgrade the trust disbursement from "3 kids' worth" to "4 kids' worth". I mean, we're talking serious health risks here, and you can't spend the money if you're dead.
 
Nick's oldest, his pride and joy, his first born Son, turned 18 today.

...and Nick stayed up past 5 in the morning last night making fun of a middle aged autistic bald man in Texas to an audience of maybe 50 people. Way to have your priorities straight, Nicky.
Maybe it's for the best he's not doing anything with his legal age son....
 
Back
Top Bottom