💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 156 22.4%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 277 39.8%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.5%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.3%

  • Total voters
    696
... hasn't Kurt generally been right on cases -- even when making unpopular conclusions? He was one of the people who said Maya Kowalski might lose on appeal, for example.
 
nick033-1.png
 
Nick still deserved far harsher than he got.

Unfortunately, the courts don’t exist to give people what they deserve. Nick seems to be a genuinely evil person with no remorse for anything he did wrong. He seems to actively hate his own family based on his callous actions, and may be a psychopath. He deserves Canadian Healthcare.

The court is there to carry out justice based on a crime. Unfortunately his crime wasn’t being a gigantic douchebag. It was possession of a moderate amount of cocaine. Based on that alone, 5 years probation is actually really harsh.

There’s a lot of overlap with Chris Chan’s post-Barb sentencing. He did over a year in jail, yet people think he deserved more. Unfortunately, the punishment for incest is…well, maximally about a year in prison. Does he also deserve something far worse for being a terrible person? Maybe, but the court can only really convict based on a charge, not a total evaluation of character.

(@Captain Manning I just quoted you to summarize the general gist over the past few pages, not to disagree specifically with you.)
 
Nick couldn't even dream of being considered to write a Supreme Court Petition for Certiorari, let alone being fired. His mocking of Kurt being removed from the case is the sourest of grapes.

Kurt has a professional reputation that allows him to be in the running for such important tasks. What professional history do you have Nick? Defending a pornography studio's abusive rapey contracts? Good job, faggot.
 
Last edited:

I had no idea Nick's ears were pierced.


Gold indeed. The first part is just pure straight liquid projection from Nick -

"He doesn't understand the basic principles of a lot of this stuff. His analysis is often lacking. He says it confidently which comes across as knowing what he's talking about but I find his analysis is often lacking critical points of the legal issues..."

I'll remind everyone that Nick swore up and down that he was 100% right on the Franks motion. He will look you in the face today and say there is no doubt that the application for the search warrant could not have met the probable cause standard because there is reasonable doubt that the Cog video hadn't been tampered with. I tried to find the tweets but he was going nuts on Twitter arguing with people about it after his motion dropped.

Found this though. Seems like he understood Probable Cause pretty well in 2022

1763064068694.png

link: https://x.com/RekietaLaw/status/1570201594058403841
archive: https://archive.is/CL97k
 
Last edited:
There’s a lot of overlap with Chris Chan’s post-Barb sentencing. He did over a year in jail, yet people think he deserved more. Unfortunately, the punishment for incest is…well, maximally about a year in prison. Does he also deserve something far worse for being a terrible person? Maybe, but the court can only really convict based on a charge, not a total evaluation of character.
I think part of it is a lot of people are unconvinced that that was *consensual* incest, which means we think the punishment was for the wrong crime entirely.
 

Elijah Schaffer vs. Kash Patel's Honeypot - Then, Breakfast Casserole​

1:35:57
Nakadashi says, "Are you using your pill press or can I buy it?" Threw it away actually.
1:36:03
So um neither. Neither one.
1:36:08
Why would you want it? What are you gonna do with it?
 
... hasn't Kurt generally been right on cases -- even when making unpopular conclusions? He was one of the people who said Maya Kowalski might lose on appeal, for example.
Yes, and I'd like to believe that fact pissed off Megan Fox to no end.

(Although I will add that is bittersweet, because I do feel sorry for Maya)

Kurt could have handled Megan better, sure, but he's not wrong that Megan is an airhead. Especially on legal matters.

The court is there to carry out justice based on a crime. Unfortunately his crime wasn’t being a gigantic douchebag. It was possession of a moderate amount of cocaine. Based on that alone, 5 years probation is actually really harsh.
That's great dude. I know all that. The CA still let him slide on two counts of child endangerment, and Balldoguarded him on the bodycam. I stand by what I said.
 
Nakadashi Tomodachi is deep into trolling Nick, they do it well.

If the AUS$ they’re using is actually their local currency, then we’ve got an Ocker in our midst, and Aussies are famous for their brutal ribbing.
1763065141090.png
If they’re just spoofing location with a VPN to game the currency and troll Nick for the lowest possible cost while still delaying his whippets fund, I respect that too.
 
"Running cover for some really inappropriate commentary."

Yo Nick, @elb clipped something else that you... based on a really dumb thing you recently did... clearly haven't reviewed in a long time, and probably didn't expect anybody else to. I think it's got some inappropriate commentary in it.


Somebody should split these three hours up and run a segment called "Creepin' with Nick."

I've googled around and checked the OP - is this photo from StarTrak new? I know there are a few images of young Nicky Rackets out there but I don't remember this one specifically.
No, it's been in this thread, and/or @Not Who You Think's Kayla thread. His edit of it is new though.
 

Elijah Schaffer vs. Kash Patel's Honeypot - Then, Breakfast Casserole​

1:35:57
Nakadashi says, "Are you using your pill press or can I buy it?" Threw it away actually.
1:36:03
So um neither. Neither one.
1:36:08
Why would you want it? What are you gonna do with it?
PillPress_a.mp4

Rekieta continues conversing with his Nakadashi Tomodachi. “Nakadashi” refers to ejaculating inside a partner, and “tomodachi” means friend. He keeps responding to these friends of his. Very interesting.
 
Back
Top Bottom