You actually think that there are agents that are being paid for YEARS by Israel or some other shadowy organization to subvert Trump supporters by sprinkling in Democrat talking points into blind Trump loyalty on a website that has nuclear heat for letting its users say whatever they want?
That's the more likely scenario, and not just people saying "You know, I agree with about 90% of what Trump says but here's what I disagree with" to you?
Because the latter scenario seems more realistic to me, and basically describes pretty much every independent voter I've ever met.
Am I misunderstanding what you're saying or has politics really made us all this paranoid?
Its a reality, and a massively profitable business model. Its about Trillions of dollars in financial streams, directly and indirectly. Its the 21st century version of financing yellow page rags, movies and Tv/radio-shows, buying advertising space and time in those to obscure the financial streams and bribes to influence public discourse, and with it voting and consumption behavior.
Latest after the massive coof charade failure of Mr. Gates, Mr. Schwarzl (Soros), Mr. Bloomberg, the Springers.... that spent Billions in risk liquidity buying up bankrupt "journalistic" outlets, and "public " agency feeding those and social media moguls with paid advertising on a public dime, that didn't manage to convince the majority of the population to go unquestionable along with their narratives, those financiers that have a very strong financial, political and ideological interests to get their ideals into the average Joes head, switched from mainly top down authoritative narratival control, the Boomers loved so much, to fake bottom up. Most people younger than 50 and by now even those over mainly read and build their opinion in a p2p way - reading comment sections rather than the articles, reading forums, reading the comments under a tweet, not the tweet itself. The mistrust in 20th century authoritative sources has never been that high across demographics outside of the dawn of the French Revolution, and that's a life ending risk for those intersts and power structures. Paying a bunch of NPO by neo-marxist "something with speech and marketing" degree opportunists to steer narratives p2p, is a small price.
Pages ago the entire excursion into the Bush era, was a very obvious feeling the temperature on, if the popularization of Trump is the new Bush would be a narrative to surf on for the Millennial, young GenX and Zoomer demographic, the now attempt to feel the temperature on Trumps comments regarding "batteries", same game.
That's not saying, that anybody that aligns to a certain degree with those narratives is fake, but checking the accounts, their post history, the narratives they were involved in, the often focus group approved terminology in use, lets an actor like me build pretty accurate stylometric fingerprints and identify with high certainty dishonest fals flagging niggers.
