US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
She immediately opens the door to tell the riders "it wouldn't stop!". Gotta set an alibi by blaming the train before checking if anyone got hurt.

They should stop calling them immigrants because they're not.
How about we start calling them colonists instead? They come here without permission from the locals and completely overtake them through violence, disease, and outbreeding.
 
Fannie Mae set to drop its 620 credit score minimum.Mortgage giant will instead use its own analysis of risk factors.Officials say they're easing barriers to borrowing."It's just the latest in a series of policy changes aimed at creating home ownership opportunities in the United States."
Here is an article on this:
Fannie Mae is lowering its minimum 620 middle credit score requirement for purchases and refinance loans—a move that could broaden access to homeownership for borrowers with thinner credit files or lower scores.

Following Freddie Mac’s lead, Fannie Mae is removing the threshold from its Desktop Underwriter (DU) eligibility determination system. While DU may no longer require a credit score, it will continue to evaluate loans using a comprehensive set of credit risk criteria to determine whether they qualify for sale to Fannie Mae.

The impact on homebuyers could be significant, even though Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac do not originate mortgages directly. These entities purchase loans from other mortgage lenders, but lenders often check borrower eligibility in DU and Freddie Mac’s platform before issuing loans.

The policy shift could especially benefit “near-miss” borrowers: those with consistent income or cash reserves but credit scores that previously fell just below the 620 cutoff.

Still, Fannie Mae will continue to weight multiple risks, including property attributes, occupancy status, whether the loan is a purchase or refinance, borrower debt levels, and available cash reserves.

An Older Homebuyer​

This change in eligibility criteria comes amid mounting challenges for younger consumers trying to buy homes. According to the National Association of Realtors, the median age of a first-time U.S. homebuyer has climbed to a record 40 years old—a sharp jump from 33 just five years ago.

At the same time, first-time buyers now account for less than a quarter of all home purchases, the lowest share in nearly 45 years.

Gauging the Risk​

Although removing credit scores from the mortgage eligibility equation could open the door for more buyers, credit scores are still a critical measure of borrowers’ ability to repay loans—and a key indicator of broader economic health.

Recent data from credit bureau TransUnion found a widening divide in consumer credit profiles, with borrowers classified as either super prime or subprime, leaving fewer in the mid tier. This polarization has been driven by long-term economic turmoil and rising household debt.

In addition to credit card debt, which has been hovering near all-time highs, more consumers are taking on unsecured personal loans, and auto loans have veered into delinquency. Since Fannie Mae and other mortgage lenders must still consider this debt when determining loan eligibility, it’s unclear whether removing the credit score requirement will meaningfully expand access to homeownership.
 
This seems intuitive, but I wonder if it's actually true. Lower monthly payments would make them less likely to go delinquent, and we can see that reflected in the fact that delinquency rates have been consistently falling since the GFC despite shorter term loans like the 15 year becoming a smaller and smaller portion of all mortgages.

Hell, thanks to the stilted amortization schedules, banks would stand to gain even more unless people completely change up their current habit of only staying in a house for an average of 12 years.
People are more likely to walk away from an asset if they have minimal equity in it (or not take care of it if they aren't planning to stay and know that the fact that they have virtually no equity means they don't much care about what it sells for).

A 50-year mortgage on a modest $200k note at 6% means a $1600ish/ month payment. After a year you've paid down $1000 of principal. It's 40 years before you've paid off even half the principal. That's a long time with minimal skin in the game. A 30-year term means a 30 yo will pay it off by or around/ before retirement and end of earned income. 50 years means you're banking on today's 30 yo putting aside enough money to keep up that payment a decade or two beyond the time when they are earning. And for a 50-yo, you know that person will never pay off the loan. A 50-year norm would either disincent people from bothering to buy, or would incent them to buy with no commitment to actually paying it off.

Also, in 30 years, you'll have to do major work on it once or twice (replacing systems, roof, appliances, etc.), but if a person does not keep up the house, it's possible for a foreclosing lender to sell it with a relatively minor discount for old systems (or putting in cheaper new), etc. But 50 years of failure to maintain renders the asset potentially critically diminished in value, so their recovery even in a foreclosure has to be discounted in the model.

Do I think 30 is the magic number? No (and it contributes to escalating home costs, vs if shorter terms were the norm - but 50 would accelerate that significantly). But it is a critical part of lenders' risk acceptance calculations, both bc the system/ govt is oriented around it and bc of human behavior - which is a meaningful part of those calculations.

The ACA is a terrible system. Buying healthcare sucks with the subsides ON, because if you're in the position of needing them, chances are you already can't afford it with your McJob. It's shit already.
That's not due to the ACA. Before Obamacare, if you didn't have employer-sponsored insurance, you paid full retail, if you could get it at all. The ACA has been a boon for insurers - and premiums stayed "low" for people previously unable to afford more than catastrophic insurance, if at all - bc the government has been subsidizing premiums for people buying on the market. With that going away (or heavily reduced), people on the individual market are seeing a more real picture of the cost of insurance (as are people on employer-sponsored plans, as I discovered last week reviewing my 2026 benefits options - premiums up, copays up, deductibles up; coverage down). The costs of healthcare, and healthcare insurance, are ridiculous, but that's not due to the ACA. It's due to providers and insurers and imprudent, politically-originated and near-mandated blanket coverage of certain types of specialty care while nickel & diming on more common healthcare needs.
if you ever catch me caring about the stupid ahistorical goyslop that a bunch of untalented leftist nepo screenwriters shit out for clout please shoot me in the head

this applies for both movies

Fannie Mae set to drop its 620 credit score minimum.Mortgage giant will instead use its own analysis of risk factors.Officials say they're easing barriers to borrowing."It's just the latest in a series of policy changes aimed at creating home ownership opportunities in the United States."
Christ. Subprime disaster, part deux.
 
if you ever catch me caring about the stupid ahistorical goyslop that a bunch of untalented leftist nepo screenwriters shit out for clout please shoot me in the head

this applies for both movies

Fannie Mae set to drop its 620 credit score minimum.Mortgage giant will instead use its own analysis of risk factors.Officials say they're easing barriers to borrowing."It's just the latest in a series of policy changes aimed at creating home ownership opportunities in the United States."
How bad do you have to be with cash to have a 620? I'm about to break 760 by the end of the year. 620 sounds fucking awful.
 
Genuinely every mainstream or mainstream adjacent commentator isnt hitting the actual core issue causing the problems with housing etc. Like it or not, and not to sound too socialist here, but I truly believe corporate america and that class is behind a lot of these problems. The left was right that illegals did make up a large part of the grunt work in america(definitely in my area at least). And really its the corporate class that stands to benefit the most from them coming in, because its a source of cheap labor that also will not unionize. If you legitimately dig into the history of corporate america and the shit they pull, most likely youll see that the entire group needs to face the wall. Doesn't mean you have to be a commie or anything, but these people are legitimately evil. Also, funnily enough deportations(if they're happening) i predict would actually make the housing crisis even worse. Because there wont be anyone actually building houses, and its not because americans arent willing to do those jobs, its housing development corporations utterly refusing to pay the higher labor cost.
 
Last edited:
I didn't know this was going on, but the House Rules Committee is meeting NOW on the Senate Amendment to the CR. Live video:
 
Back
Top Bottom