💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 157 22.5%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 277 39.7%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.5%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%
  • Total voters
    697
From Rumble's POV, signing Nick kinda made business sense at the time. He had huge numbers from the Johnny Depp case, he had previously done huge numbers with Rittenhouse, and ok numbers on other trials. The law and crime (heh) segment of the viewing population does huge numbers on youtube and still does well on cable. It's a market and demo you want on your video website. Also, Nick had been rather publicly kicked off youtube, and while he was reinstated, it was clear he was disgruntled.

Rumble's failure was in having, apparently, very little to no conditions on the creator's side of the contract. Most creators have a need to perform because they aren't beneficiaries of a trust fund, and if they're on any drugs, it's usually uppers. Once they have 10,000-100,000 viewers on peak, they usually build up a staff around them to support the enterprise. There's a fair amount of social incentive (keeping your employees fed), in addition to the financial one (making dat keesh).

But WHOA BUDDY! Not Nick Rekieta. He took the money and ran, and apparently the schmucks at Rumble either didn't have any way to cancel the contract for failure to perform, or they just decided it would be cheaper to run the contract out than risk litigation.

Which... seeing how Nick has been with Aaron, that was probably the right move on their part, if this was the case. Nick wasn't barred from practicing law at that point, and since he wasn't streaming, he had nearly infinite time to cause issues. But he also had nearly infinite drugs at that point, which wasn't 100% obvious in 2023. The cheaper route was almost certainly running out the clock, which they did.

Hopefully the Rumble contracts that continue to exist have some performance goals attached to them. But given they continue to keep Ralph on their platform, I'm not so sure of that.
 
Dixieland Buckaroo said:
Hopefully the Rumble contracts that continue to exist have some performance goals attached to them. But given they continue to keep Ralph on their platform, I'm not so sure of that.
Click to expand...
They have a standard deal anyone can get where for a certain number of viewers, you get paid for ads. They've mostly done away with the "free million dollars up front to be a drugged out loser all year and get no viewers" thing that Nick burned them on.
 
Dixieland Buckaroo said:
From Rumble's POV, signing Nick kinda made business sense at the time. He had huge numbers from the Johnny Depp case, he had previously done huge numbers with Rittenhouse, and ok numbers on other trials. The law and crime (heh) segment of the viewing population does huge numbers on youtube and still does well on cable. It's a market and demo you want on your video website. Also, Nick had been rather publicly kicked off youtube, and while he was reinstated, it was clear he was disgruntled.

Rumble's failure was in having, apparently, very little to no conditions on the creator's side of the contract. Most creators have a need to perform because they aren't beneficiaries of a trust fund, and if they're on any drugs, it's usually uppers. Once they have 10,000-100,000 viewers on peak, they usually build up a staff around them to support the enterprise. There's a fair amount of social incentive (keeping your employees fed), in addition to the financial one (making dat keesh).

But WHOA BUDDY! Not Nick Rekieta. He took the money and ran, and apparently the schmucks at Rumble either didn't have any way to cancel the contract for failure to perform, or they just decided it would be cheaper to run the contract out than risk litigation.

Which... seeing how Nick has been with Aaron, that was probably the right move on their part, if this was the case. Nick wasn't barred from practicing law at that point, and since he wasn't streaming, he had nearly infinite time to cause issues. But he also had nearly infinite drugs at that point, which wasn't 100% obvious in 2023. The cheaper route was almost certainly running out the clock, which they did.

Hopefully the Rumble contracts that continue to exist have some performance goals attached to them. But given they continue to keep Ralph on their platform, I'm not so sure of that.
Click to expand...
The thing is Nick is disorganized, and lazy he got a little bit of clout and crashed out. DSP has a lot of issues, but he’s actually able to stick to a streaming schedule.
 
Highlights

- he's planning "occasional dives into Aaron Imholte's content"
- he wants to comment on how Aaron is very wrong about things like the Gamestop stock market incident
- it's nice to "have a roster" of people like Kurt and Aaron
- Restraining order completely frivolous, but he can't talk about it
- Nick is a millionaire "on paper"
- sexual NDAs
- price of Ketamine
- cokestream
- Dallas blackout story
 
Last edited:
daffodils said:
- he's planning "occasional dives into Aaron Imholte's content"
- he wants to comment on how Aaron is very wrong about things like the Gamestop stock market incident
- Restraining order completely frivolous, but he can't talk about it
Click to expand...
"I can't talk about the thing that tells me to not harass Aaron, so instead, I'm gonna harass Aaron."
 
daffodils said:
Highlights
https://youtube.com/watch?v=L-v8DH6G4vw
- he's planning "occasional dives into Aaron Imholte's content"
- he wants to comment on how Aaron is very wrong about things like the Gamestop stock market incident
- it's nice to "have a roster" of people
- Restraining order completely frivolous, but he can't talk about it
- Nick is a millionaire "on paper"
- sexual NDAs
- price of Ketamine
- cokestream
- Houston blackout story with more details
Click to expand...
Nick's probably a millionaire. The house is over $800k and unless he is super giga retarded he was maxing out 401k contributions (over $50k a year for self employed) for those few years he was really successful on YouTube, which would make up the other $200k. I think he had some liquid savings, probably in an investment account or something, that he's used to not have to work for the last 1.5 years.

But that money has clearly run out. His hard push for memberships, lowering himself to Aaron's level and allegedly wanting to make a nightly goal, and complaining about things being expensive shows he's flat broke at this point. There were signs earlier - his Mommy paying his property taxes, for example, and him not being able to afford to get the body damage to the Crustang fixed. He can't afford a Nanny, he can't afford the $5k snack budget.

He's POOR!

1762532784671.png
 
Melty Butter said:
Nick's eldest daughter is the most like him. (Age 12, I believe.) She's getting in trouble "constantly". She got detention on her first day at school for acting up on a school bus. She sometimes calls people fat just like Nick does but she's not a bully. She's Nick's "homie". She demands that Nick take her shopping and his wallet feels the pain.
Click to expand...
This actually makes me MATI, Anyone who've worked in or knows someone who's worked in the school system know exactly the type of problem-child Nick and Kayla are raising. They are the ones that'll trash a classroom a few times a week and utterly ruin any chance of learning for the rest of that class over and over while the teachers stand by unable to do a thing about it. And of course when the parents are called to pick up the kid for being a giant pest, it's 100% the school who's at fault, not their precious little angel who can do nothing wrong. I fucking hate parents like Nick and Kayla, they'll ruin those 5 kids (maybe the oldest can get out of that rat nest in time), but not once will they take any accountability for the consequences.

Melty Butter said:
Btw, the last 25% of the stream is interesting. He re-tells the snorting ketamine (vs cocaine) story in the hours after the legendary coke stream. This time he admits that he and April passed out onto the carpet. Kayla had gone to sleep earlier. More details this time around.
Click to expand...
It's a god damn puzzle for the ages trying to figure out how that child got into some coke. Must be corrupt cops!
 
Pentamidine said:
But that money has clearly run out.
Click to expand...
Agree. People ''round here overestimate Nick's cash and underestimate how normal trusts work. Bob & Celeste have about $5M in real estate assets, between FL and MN. That's not a lot to distribute.

They're still kicking in their 60s, another 30 years to live, traveling the world. Is Celeste sitting on millions more? I don't fucking know. Her father had $30M, right? A lot of that went to the Catholic church, 2 brothers, and a hospital.

My point: Nick is cash poor. It's clear. He's sold the second home, whines about Rx prices, and his newest fave daughter who wants to go shopping.

Is Nick fine? For sure. But he's streaming for a reason.
 
A Nick money problems arc would be delicious, desperate Nick is some of his best content and any mind of stress caused him to get extra unhinged.
 
Pentamidine said:
and unless he is super giga retarded he was maxing out 401k contributions (over $50k a year for self employed) for those few years he was really successful on YouTube
Click to expand...
Ah yes, I'm sure the man who bought tens of thousands of dollars worth of shitty art that he left on the floor, and who lost his second home leveraged his debt by not paying the fucking mortgage (that he absolutely had no need to take out in the first place), and who regularly leaves his traffic tickets to go to collections, definitely was making smart decisions like maxing his 401k.
 
The Aaron alogs are turning on Girl Friday because she’s questioning the wisdom of today’s much-hyped inmate interview (archive). She is asserting that Melton and Nick are risking criminal charges if they go through with this. I hope THAT doesn’t stop them.

IMG_4975.jpeg
IMG_4976.jpeg

The funniest thing to me is that as much as Club Foot Karl, Hefty Homely Haley, Melton and Moody shit on the legal chops of @Potentially Criminal, they seem to have been even more emboldened by his prediction that Aaron’s HRO case was on a hiding to nothing.
 
Melty Butter said:
Btw, the last 25% of the stream is interesting. He re-tells the snorting ketamine (vs cocaine) story in the hours after the legendary coke stream. This time he admits that he and April passed out onto the carpet. Kayla had gone to sleep earlier. More details this time around.
Click to expand...
Nick: Passed Out
April: Passed Out
Kayla: Passed Out
Nanny: Abandoned by
Drugs: Out in the open
Guns and ammo: Unsecured
House: Trashed
Toe: Gone
Spaghetti-O's: Unopened
Kids: Dirty and hungry
Rumble contract: Lapsed
Sunny: Trapped in the bathroom

Never forget what the Scandinavian prudes have taken from you
1762535582642.png
 
Strix454 said:
Doesn't Ralph have a custody hearing on maybe friday? His previous ultimatum to Nick had a saturday deadline which I thought might be Ralph trying to avoid stirring things up before his hearing. I want to hope that this time Ragepig's pig rage over this is big enough that he isn't going to let it drop. I mean there is a certain logic to Ralph seeing this absurd slapflight over this trash ho to be his "this will not stand" moment.
Click to expand...
Beavis said:
I think Ralph is scared to drop the dirt he has on rekieta, if you wanna know the truth about it!
Click to expand...
Looseleaf Paper said:
The fact that Ralph has not already dropped the dirt means he never will.
Click to expand...
Depressed_Oni said:
While I want to believe you’re right, I think Ralph might have at least something, vague threat to disavow her via X here, and how Nick acted in the Elissa clip makes me think he knows something (or the rage pig did his usual work but Nick is so Swiss cheese brained that he believes it)
Click to expand...

Not that it matters since Nick will cuck the content by inevitably folding to the Ralphamale's high-noon ultimatum at exactly 11:59:59 AM tomorrow like the weak little bitch that he is, but whatever it is that Ralph would have revealed in the hypothetical absence of that inevitable surrender, he's already been privately spilling deets juuust enticing enough to lure in a distinguished guest on tomorrow's illustrious Killstream:


Ralph in fact talked to me. He invited me onto the illustrious Killstream, in fact, and I think I'm gonna make it. So, if Ralph has what he think- what he told me he has, it's going to be very, very interesting. ... I can't answer too many questions about it though, because I think Ralph is keeping it to himself. ... Do you think I should do it, chat? I've already tentatively agreed to it, though, so... I am curious to see what he has to say. It sounds like it's gonna be very interesting.
Click to expand...
If Ralph doesn't drop what he says he's got, then I'm gonna leave though, because that's what I'm interested in.
Click to expand...
[Timestamp 1:12:03]

Nothing ever happens, but at least it sounds serious enough that someone would even want to be there for it just in case.

:optimistic:
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom