UK Pornography depicting strangulation to become criminal offence in the UK - Legal requirement to be placed on tech platforms to prevent users from seeing such ‘choking’ material

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://www.theguardian.com/society...gulation-to-become-criminal-offence-in-the-uk
https://archive.ph/E0B2W
Porn featuring strangulation or suffocation – often referred to as “choking” – is due to be criminalised, with a legal requirement placed on tech platforms to prevent UK users from seeing such material.

Possessing or publishing porn featuring choking will become a criminal offence under amendments to the Crime and Policing bill tabled in parliament on Monday.

In a separate amendment, victims of intimate image abuse will also have longer to come forward, with the time limit to prosecute extended from six months to three years.

The government said this would help break down unnecessary barriers victims face when reporting a crime, “improving access to justice for those who need it the most”.

The choking ban comes after a recommendation from a government review into pornography which found it has contributed to establishing strangulation as a “sexual norm”.

The independent porn review, conducted by Baroness Gabby Bertin, which was commissioned by former prime minister Rishi Sunak and published in February this year, recommended a ban on porn featuring strangulation.

Research shows strangulation is never a safe practice, despite a widespread belief it can be performed safely. Though it often leaves no visible injury, oxygen deprivation, even for very short moments, causes changes to the fragile structures of the brain.

Multiple studies have specifically shown brain changes in women who have been repeatedly “choked” during sex, including markers for brain damage and disruptions in brain hemispheres linked to depression and anxiety.

Due to these dangers, non-fatal strangulation and non-fatal suffocation were made a criminal offence as part of the Domestic Abuse Act 2021, after concerns that perpetrators would often avoid punishment because they leave no visible marks.

Under the new amendment, platforms will be required to take proactive steps to prevent users from seeing illegal strangulation and suffocation content.

The choking ban is set to become a priority offence, meaning porn sites and tech platforms will have a legal requirement to ensure UK users do not see this material.

The Ministry of Justice said this could include companies using automated systems to pre-emptively detect and hide images, moderation tools or stricter content policies to prevent abusive content from circulating.

Those who fail to take action will be subject to fines of up to £18m from Ofcom.

Bernie Ryan, chief executive of the Institute For Addressing Strangulation, said the organisation welcomed the ban. “While consenting adults have the right to explore their sexuality safely and freely, we must recognise the serious risks posed by unregulated online content, especially to children and young people.

“Strangulation is a serious form of violence, often used in domestic abuse to control, silence, or terrify. When it’s portrayed in pornography, particularly without context, it can send confusing and harmful messages to young people about what is normal or acceptable in intimate relationships. Our research shows there is no safe way to strangle.”

Minister for Victims and Tackling Violence Against Women and Girls, Alex Davies-Jones said online misogyny had “devastating real-life consequences for all of us”. Every day, women and girls have their lives turned upside down by cowards who hide behind screens to abuse and exploit them.

“This government will not stand by whilst women are violated online and victimised by violent pornography which is allowed to normalise harm.

“We are sending a strong message that dangerous and sexist behaviour will not be tolerated.”

It follows a UK government-commissioned review in 2020 that highlighted “substantial evidence of an association between the use of pornography and harmful sexual attitudes and behaviours towards women”.

A separate survey of children the same year found that most of them had come across violent or aggressive pornography that they found upsetting or disturbing, with some of them copying the behaviour they had seen online. Children who watched porn were between three and six times more likely to have “potentially dangerous behaviour” around consent, the research by the British Board of Film Classification found.
 
It isn't. I had the weird misfortune of spending my college years surrounded by BDSM girls who constantly complained that it's impossible to find a heterosexual male sadist (besides schizos who are obviously gonna kill you). They were so tired of trying to "train" normal dudes who could never get it right.
I swear women had a meeting in about 2003 and decided that everything goes.

Prior to then, everything was so much more vanilla.

After then, they were asking to be beaten and have things stuck in their butts.

I don't know what happened (it was before online porn was really a thing, at least in my world), but it was a really rapid change.
 
Look strangulation porn is something that is not exactly new. The fact its getting banned is more proof that importing the third world is going to suck for the coomers out there.
Look if you want tolerance of trannies long term, gun rights, and even universal Healthcare vote for the far right lol.
If you want porn banned, sharia law and religious only instutions vote labor.
 
like Japanese porn does to private parts,
Really? This seems a bit counterproductive somehow.
Choking, while still a horrible idea and exclusively for dopamine-starved degenerates who should get themselves to a nunnery, is an order of magnitude "safer" than strangulation.
The issue is less blocking air and more that it’s very easy to crimp a vessel or dislodge a bit of plaque that then goes into the brain. It’s not something you can do safely, ever.
We need to back to times when just regular old sex was fun. You don’t need all the weird shit. Young people ‘needing’ to do this to get off are doomed, it always escalates and you’re never going to enjoy normal fun sex.
 
Honestly, probably a good thing.
Pornbrained Zoomettes are really into that shit and it freaks me out.
I don't like using "muh kids" arguments because that's what they used to get the online safety bill passed but the fact is that kids have more access to porn now more than ever so its probably good to stop them from getting hooked on basically fantasy rape early on. The problem isn't really with girls moreso the young boys who will see it and think that's just what sex is and nearly strangle someone during their first time
 
Young people ‘needing’ to do this to get off are doomed, it always escalates and you’re never going to enjoy normal fun sex.
So many kids are so porn brained it's genuinely sad, back in the day the most you would see was a large bush and tits in your dads porn stash now they can view the most depraved shit you can imagine without their parents even knowing, I like the idea of restricting kids access to the internet but that inevitably turns into a dystopian nanny state
 
Really? This seems a bit counterproductive somehow.

The issue is less blocking air and more that it’s very easy to crimp a vessel or dislodge a bit of plaque that then goes into the brain. It’s not something you can do safely, ever.
We need to back to times when just regular old sex was fun. You don’t need all the weird shit. Young people ‘needing’ to do this to get off are doomed, it always escalates and you’re never going to enjoy normal fun sex.
Sex was always kinky my dude, like if you go back in history you find nazis crossdressing, flappers engaging in sexual activities, and shit if I go back to rhe Victorian era and how many steam powered devices and dildos were made so people can pleasue ones self.
 
Sex was always kinky my dude, like if you go back in history you find nazis crossdressing, flappers engaging in sexual activities, and shit if I go back to rhe Victorian era and how many steam powered devices and dildos were made so people can pleasue ones self.
Not like this. People have always gotten up to all sorts of stuff but it was vaguely taboo to be open about it. Porn wasn’t in children’s faces from a young age. It’s the universal availability of the hardcore stuff that’s an issue. When I was young if you wanted to see anything hardcore you’d need to go to a specialist shop or order via a magazine and there was a great deal of shame/taboo about it. That was a barrier. You’d be shamed senseless if you admitted to being into feet or dressing as an animal - have people always done it? Yes. But nobody was celebrating it and punishing anyone who objected.
The issue isn’t people doing the weird sex, it’s the availability and universality of it, and the availability to people so young their brains are still building, and the removal of all the brakes society used to impose, like shame.
 
Sex was always kinky my dude, like if you go back in history you find nazis crossdressing, flappers engaging in sexual activities, and shit if I go back to rhe Victorian era and how many steam powered devices and dildos were made so people can pleasue ones self.
the kinkiness from the past is overblown from fujoshis who think that some roman emperor and his rape slave were just like in their wholesome yaoi manga

Victorians used to give women vibrators to make them less stressed, it wasn't really seen as sexual until 2nd wave feminism, what people need to understand about sexuality in the past is contraception is a relatively recent development, back then if you had sex it likely resulted in a child so people tended to just do it with their spouse or the neighbour so there is plausible deniability, kinks and shit definitely did exist but they probably viewed it very differently to how we see it today
 
issue is less blocking air and more that it’s very easy to crimp a vessel or dislodge a bit of plaque that then goes into the brain. It’s not something you can do safely, ever.
We need to back to times when just regular old sex was fun. You don’t need all the weird shit. Young people ‘needing’ to do this to get off are doomed, it always escalates and you’re never going to enjoy normal fun sex.
Isn’t the British government full of liberals and shit, I’m not pro degenerate sex but wasn’t the whole point of allowing gay people because what happens in the bedroom isn’t the governments business.
Seems odd when the British government is literally banning certain types of depictions of sex. Therefore interfering with what goes on in the bedroom between two adults.
 
Not like this. People have always gotten up to all sorts of stuff but it was vaguely taboo to be open about it. Porn wasn’t in children’s faces from a young age. It’s the universal availability of the hardcore stuff that’s an issue.
kids used to jack off to the call on me music video and old 80s exercise tapes because that's the most erotic stuff they could get their hands on, with the internet it's so easy to get your hands on stuff that was illegal to sell even 30 years ago

also still a good song
 
Isn’t the British government full of liberals and shit, I’m not pro degenerate sex but wasn’t the whole point of allowing gay people because what happens in the bedroom isn’t the governments business.
Seems odd when the British government is literally banning certain types of depictions of sex. Therefore interfering with what goes on in the bedroom between two adults.
It's mostly the "muh kids" argument, they're scared that the more normalised it becomes, the more likely that people who don't know what they're doing will try it while fucking and someone will get hurt

I don't labour at the best of times but you can see the logical throughline with it at the very least
 
Not like this. People have always gotten up to all sorts of stuff but it was vaguely taboo to be open about it. Porn wasn’t in children’s faces from a young age. It’s the universal availability of the hardcore stuff that’s an issue. When I was young if you wanted to see anything hardcore you’d need to go to a specialist shop or order via a magazine and there was a great deal of shame/taboo about it. That was a barrier. You’d be shamed senseless if you admitted to being into feet or dressing as an animal - have people always done it? Yes. But nobody was celebrating it and punishing anyone who objected.
The issue isn’t people doing the weird sex, it’s the availability and universality of it, and the availability to people so young their brains are still building, and the removal of all the brakes society used to impose, like shame.
People in the middle ages used to fuck in front of their children, most people used to share beds together as the norm unless you were nobility until the 1800s.
Again welcome to societal decadence when societies reach their peak and their zenith they start to decline in themselves.

the kinkiness from the past is overblown from fujoshis who think that some roman emperor and his rape slave were just like in their wholesome yaoi manga

Victorians used to give women vibrators to make them less stressed, it wasn't really seen as sexual until 2nd wave feminism, what people need to understand about sexuality in the past is contraception is a relatively recent development, back then if you had sex it likely resulted in a child so people tended to just do it with their spouse or the neighbour so there is plausible deniability, kinks and shit definitely did exist but they probably viewed it very differently to how we see it today
Yeah porn is way more avaliable now is the main issue. You can log on and get instant porn and the consequences of that are problematic. But at the end of the day were addicted to porn because its part of the modern bread and circuses. We don't revolt because we have mass porn and vidya games.
 
Really? This seems a bit counterproductive somehow.
I guess so but they have to blur genitals due to obscenity laws or something so you get memes like this.
1762331682184.jpeg
 
Seems odd when the British government is literally banning certain types of depictions of sex.
Well it’s the British government so you can safely assume it a mixture if two things.
1. Appearing to ‘do something’ that actually does nothing at all
2. Putting a law in place that can be used for other things entirely to remove our freedoms in future.
They’d be far better off simply prosecuting people who use rhe rough sex defence to get away with murder
 
Well it’s the British government so you can safely assume it a mixture if two things.
1. Appearing to ‘do something’ that actually does nothing at all
2. Putting a law in place that can be used for other things entirely to remove our freedoms in future.
They’d be far better off simply prosecuting people who use rhe rough sex defence to get away with murder
I agree, I just don’t like these weird double standards.
You should either be able to restrict sex between two adults or not.
With this logic, the government could ban gay sex or certain types of sex because of the strain it puts on the healthcare system.
 
Well it’s the British government so you can safely assume it a mixture if two things.
1. Appearing to ‘do something’ that actually does nothing at all
2. Putting a law in place that can be used for other things entirely to remove our freedoms in future.
They’d be far better off simply prosecuting people who use rhe rough sex defence to get away with murder
This is definitely 1. What they're banning was already banned under section 7 of the criminal justice and immigration act 2008 (choking constitutes a danger to someone's life), so this is a complete pointless virtue signal and an obvious attempt to distract people from just how utterly incompetent the government is.
 
Back
Top Bottom