💰 Grifter Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Non passing troon said:
They had to choose someone who is bizarro Benny boy Shapiro. Instead of fertility you have faggotry instead of Judaism you have Catholicism instead of education you have a dropout instead of a shitty RW cringe company that is successful in the griftosphere you've got rumble and fags who superchat him instead of pseudo intellectualism you get zero intellectualism instead of muh leftists muh niggers and muh Mudslimes you get muh Jews and muh white womens they're both 5'1 nasally fast talking verbose faggots.
Click to expand...
When you think about it Senor Fuentes really is just a ben shapiro (without a hot sister) for browns and 14 year olds who just discovered politics.
 
Ben Shapiro is also angry.

He's saying "it's not cancellation to stop promoting Fuentes or Tucker Carlson"


It's so obvious people used the word cancel instead of censor to make it sound softer. And now that cancel means censor again, he's again trying to find a softer way to say the same thing.

At least what Shapiro does right is make a long list of things Fuentes says that sounds bad.

Almost all the comments are asking Shapiro to debate Fuentes. That must hurt.
 
harbringer883 said:
Watching this jew seeth somehow makes Senor Fuentes slightly more likeable.
Click to expand...
Yeah. It seems the best use of Nick is to let him keep on doing what he is doing, but make sure to warn young impressionable teens from getting close or involved with Nick. No need to sacrifice their futures on the alter of Nick's ego, gay ops and possible fed puppeteering.

Nick is moving the Overton Window.

Lemmingwiser said:
He's saying "it's not cancellation to stop promoting Fuentes or Tucker Carlson"

https://youtube.com/watch?v=OaRJlL5mOF8
Click to expand...
Damn. Nick Fuentes owns Ben Shapiro. Rent free in his head.
 
We need someone to stop the rise of homosexual nationalism in the west, someone must stop Fuentes.
Does anyone know Chief Splitcock's warcry?
1762260337597.png
 
A second puff piece has hit the New York Times (link | archive)
nyt_nick_charlie_successor.jpg
TL;DR Nick is Charlie Kirk's successor because the right stopped gatekeeping and embraced NETTR.

Rod Dreher: 30-40% of DC GOP staffers under the age of 30 are groypers.
roddreher_groyper_staffers.jpg
 
@Laughing Putin I always expect the New York Times to lie in this current age. The 30-40% groypers is a lie that can neither be proved or disproved.

It is a set up for future action.

"No really. Nick Fuentes is really a Nazi/racist/misogynist/antisemite! We have video proof this time! Oh, and 30-40% Republican staffers are Nazi/racist/misogynist/antisemites! Time to start to witch hunts can clear out any and all Republican staffers who have ever said anything which is even remotely racist/misogynist or does not support every demand from Israel, love them and kiss their ring!"

You see the set up carried through so often, the end game scenario becomes blatantly predictable.

The Republican establishment purges anyone who even sniffs of antisemitism or does not lick Israel's poopy butthole enthusiastically enough.

So the left has to bring Nick Fuentes to the fore front so they can actually have a real villain who matches their rhetoric they can take down and tar everyone else with.
 
Lemmingwiser said:
Ben Shapiro is also angry.

He's saying "it's not cancellation to stop promoting Fuentes or Tucker Carlson"

https://youtube.com/watch?v=OaRJlL5mOF8
It's so obvious people used the word cancel instead of censor to make it sound softer. And now that cancel means censor again, he's again trying to find a softer way to say the same thing.

At least what Shapiro does right is make a long list of things Fuentes says that sounds bad.

Almost all the comments are asking Shapiro to debate Fuentes. That must hurt.
Click to expand...
The fucking Zionists and neocon faggots having a full-on meltdown over the softball interview just made the whole thing worth it lol. I don't know why they're treating this gay Mexican manlet as the start of the Fourth Reich when he can't handle a Jewish grandma knocking on his door.
 
Lemmingwiser said:
Ben Shapiro is also angry.

He's saying "it's not cancellation to stop promoting Fuentes or Tucker Carlson"

https://youtube.com/watch?v=OaRJlL5mOF8
It's so obvious people used the word cancel instead of censor to make it sound softer. And now that cancel means censor again, he's again trying to find a softer way to say the same thing.

At least what Shapiro does right is make a long list of things Fuentes says that sounds bad.

Almost all the comments are asking Shapiro to debate Fuentes. That must hurt.
Click to expand...
Even with the fed allegations of Nick all the dumb shit he has done, it's truly a remarkably achievement to make Ben Shapiro shit himself like this, that needs some recognition. I can't think of any other shitposter making a kike kvetch for 41 minutes straight on a youtube video.

Not to mentioning, the retarded official xitter post. A kike talking about demoralization, cowards and anti-americanism is like a muslim taking about how to make pig bacon.
22.jpg
 
Ben Shapiro is 100% correct about Nick's interview though. Nick is 100% being astroturfed as "Charlie Kirk's successor" and Tucker Carlson is aiding in prettying him up. It was a softball interview designed to make normie Republicans think "oh I guess Nick isn't that bad." Tucker Carlson could have absolutely challenged Nick on his more radical positions or grilled Nick about his past, but he didn't.

Ben Shapiro's video wasn't made for Kiwi Farmers or anyone tuned into Nick lore. The worst part of the video was the fact that he never mentioned Ali. It was made for evangelical center-rightists who might have been willing to hear Nick out after his interview with tucker.

I myself don't really like Ben Shapiro, he's too much of a neocon for my tastes. But it's pathetic to start sheepishly defending Nick just because the Truth comes from a source we don't like.
 
john marston said:
I myself don't really like Ben Shapiro
Click to expand...
But did you know his wife's a doctor? And his sister has tits just slightly bigger than her nose?

Anyway, Nick is a gay catboy fed plant. He's telling some truths, yes, but they're so fucking obvious they're up there with stuff like "don't drive the wrong way on the freeway."

He's not leading a new America First movement in any legitimate sense.
 
Last edited:
john marston said:
Ben Shapiro's video wasn't made for Kiwi Farmers or anyone tuned into Nick lore. The worst part of the video was the fact that he never mentioned Ali. It was made for evangelical center-rightists who might have been willing to hear Nick out after his interview with tucker.
Click to expand...

I'm telling you, noone will touch it. The GOP is riddled with pedophiles more than the Twin Towers were loaded up with thermite in the summer before 9/11. And they are just as destructive.

MunsterCheeseJr said:
@Laughing Putin I always expect the New York Times to lie in this current age. The 30-40% groypers is a lie that can neither be proved or disproved.

It is a set up for future action.
Click to expand...

I agree with this. The influence of "the groypers" has always been overblown. Actual groypers never leave their house.
 
I know that the latest arc involving Fuentes is 100% astroturfed, but even normies that I’ve known who didn’t care much about politics are now liking Nick Fuentes clips on TikTok and Instagram. I don’t blame them for being ignorant on Fuentes’s long and convoluted lore. Most of Fuentes new fans tend to be brown Johnny-come-latelys who only discovered Fuentes after October 7th and aren’t privy to his prior history of backstabbing, treacherous behavior, or shady associations with undesirable individuals.
 
If people aren't watching him on these podcasts, they see the heckin based clips of him on TikTok and xitter. They do not see Fuentes' constant sperg outs, hatred of white women, love for brown people, faggotry, or how he HATES his donators. It is crazy how hostile he is to people giving him money, I have never seen anything like it. Nick is somehow suprised by the audience he has cultivated and despises them.
 
john marston said:
Ben Shapiro is 100% correct about Nick's interview though. Nick is 100% being astroturfed as "Charlie Kirk's successor" and Tucker Carlson is aiding in prettying him up. It was a softball interview designed to make normie Republicans think "oh I guess Nick isn't that bad." Tucker Carlson could have absolutely challenged Nick on his more radical positions or grilled Nick about his past, but he didn't.

Ben Shapiro's video wasn't made for Kiwi Farmers or anyone tuned into Nick lore. The worst part of the video was the fact that he never mentioned Ali. It was made for evangelical center-rightists who might have been willing to hear Nick out after his interview with tucker.

I myself don't really like Ben Shapiro, he's too much of a neocon for my tastes. But it's pathetic to start sheepishly defending Nick just because the Truth comes from a source we don't like.
Click to expand...
I don't think they believe he's Charlie's successor because he's not white, he's short, he's a castizo, he's a faggot, not married etc. he's more like an anti- Charlie. Charlie got astroturfed back in the day. Not Nick. I'll give the Mexican faggot that. He built this shit up and now he's in the goddamn NYT and has every Weekly Standard right wing neocon Jew left in DC and New York shitting themselves. The old neocon order is literally dying as Zio Goy Shot that Nigga in the face Darth Cheney is now dead today. Anyway I'm not defending the catboy faggot at all. But AIPAC is a problem and yeah Jews control our middle east policy and only a boomer ziocuck doesn't know it in the year 2025.
 
Jershua Coomer Troon said:
It is crazy how hostile he is to people giving him money, I have never seen anything like it. Nick is somehow suprised by the audience he has cultivated and despises them.
Click to expand...
This is why I don't believe Nick is viable as "the successor to Charlie Kirk" in the long term. First he's hostile little shitgremlin and second he cannot help himself and it's a matter of time until he blurts out another highly clippable piece of edgelordery.
Non passing troon said:
Charlie got astroturfed back in the day. Not Nick. I'll give the Mexican faggot that.
Click to expand...
If you think back to the Optics Wars ('memba that? 'memba when Nick was screaming and ridiculing open antisemites like Patrick Little?) and how he profitted from all "wignats" getting banned and the clearly astroturfed TradCath push that was all the rage back then I'd say it's safe to say that Nick had powerful friends for a long time.
 
Ashkenazi Porn Actress said:
This is why I don't believe Nick is viable as "the successor to Charlie Kirk" in the long term. First he's hostile little shitgremlin and second he cannot help himself and it's a matter of time until he blurts out another highly clippable piece of edgelordery.

If you think back to the Optics Wars ('memba that? 'memba when Nick was screaming and ridiculing open antisemites like Patrick Little?) and how he profitted from all "wignats" getting banned and the clearly astroturfed TradCath push that was all the rage back then I'd say it's safe to say that Nick had powerful friends for a long time.
Click to expand...
Once you pick your nose on camera for posterity and eat the booger, and you don't disappear except as a punchline, there's nothing you can't do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom