Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Sep 15, 2020
  • Terminated
    Apr 22, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Aug 6, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Aug 6, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 May 15, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 Apr 28, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 Apr 25, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 Apr 25, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    Oct 26, 2021
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    Oct 15, 2023

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)

# Date Description Filing
10010936535 Oct 15, 2023 Case termination for opinion
10010794067 Jan 5, 2023 [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785 Jan 2, 2023 [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728 Dec 1, 2022 [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140 Nov 30, 2022 [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    Mar 19, 2024
  • Terminated
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Oct 16, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Oct 16, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 Oct 15, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) PDF
131 Jul 10, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) PDF
130 Jun 10, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) PDF
129 Jun 10, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Apr 27, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
473 Apr 27, 2026 RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) 1
472 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
471 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
470 Apr 13, 2026 Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469 Apr 13, 2026 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) 1

Greee was told in Barlow's filing EARLIER TODAY that his "empty-head, pure-heart" isn't an excuse in this case, not anymore.

In-case anybody needs a refresher:

Screenshot 2025-11-03 180129.png

And Greee is still doing it.

The "not made in bad faith" argument is pointless, because Greee refused to do the barest-of-fucking-minimun of legwork to check if his star witness even had a pulse.

The lack of due diligence IS BAD FAITH. There is such a thing as civil and criminal punishments for neglect.
 
Last edited:
On the subject of Dead Steve:
1762213713434.png

There WAS reliance by the Court on your patently false statement, fucktard. They relied on your assertion that he was eager to testify on your behalf, and transferred the case back to Utah as a direct result.
 
I'm not sure what's worse; he didn't proofread this, licked the stamp and sent it or he did proofread it and completely missed how bad this line of defense is.
You got to the references I was looking for, but is a bold faced lie in this motion acceptable? Hasn't he, in like 20 other fucking motions besides this, also SPECIFICALLY admitted to NOT ever reading the SPO's? Am I remembering wrong that he has said he never read them?

When he thought NOT reading them was a defense, he didn't read them. Now that not reading them is not a defense, he has read them. BOTH! This is an absolute disgusting lie beyond anything we've seen.
 
personally find it quite difficult to review and rely on both versions of the standard SPO if I did not have access to one of them. Greer quotes both SPOs in this document, so he had somehow gained access to them by this date, but he makes it pretty clear that he didn't have access to at least one version of the SPO during the events that actually got him sanctioned.

I'm not sure what's worse; he didn't proofread this, licked the stamp and sent it or he did proofread it and completely missed how bad this line of defense is.
He said Mr. Hardin violated SPO before reading it, and the Judge specifically references a filling where Greer says "hey, didn't read spo, plz want copy"
Screenshot_20251104_015031_Firefox.jpg
As you can see, there was at least a month between Russ first accusation about SPO without reading it and the time when Russ said "hey, maybe I should actually read this"
 
but he makes it pretty clear that he didn't have access to at least one version of the SPO during the events that actually got him sanctioned.
It is Schrodingers SPO.
It is both read and not-read, depending on whether Greee exists in this temporal reality or if he is with Schrodingers Witness, Steve; who is both alive and dead.
Greee's Quantum Motion.
 
View attachment 8117574
This is wonderfully euphoric, like getting two heroin doses straight into my eyeballs.
The Great Tard Wall collapses.
The Greeetard had a good thing going with the court. They'd pretend it was raining every time he'd piss on their legs as long as he wasn't so blatantly obvious about it. He failed to uphold his end of the deal so now the courts have to pretend they have some modicum of self respect.
 
I wonder if the obviously chat gpt written filings made Judge Barlow decide to jump in. This all could have been handled by Judge Bennett right?
No. Greer submitted his objections to Bennett’s Sanctions Order to Barlow expecting him to tard guard again. Greer put it on Barlows desk and docket himself. It didn’t work this time. Greer is incapable of reading the temperature and tone in the room. Whenever Barlow gets pulled in he is getting steadily more annoyed.
 
I did enjoy the random highlighting.
2025-11-03_16-12.png
Dear god, go to the local poor people computer place and get them to give you a cheap laptop so your filings don't suck as much.
 
Russ filed a 31 page (only 5 of them have any arguments) document disagreeing with the District Judge and asking him to reconsider
Why is it assigned to Bennett when it is specifically a motion for the only judge in a position to reconsider to reconsider? How could Bennett possibly reconsider Barlow's ruling?
The "not made in bad faith" argument is pointless, because Greee refused to do the barest-of-fucking-minimun of legwork to check if his star witness even had a pulse.
They literally changed Rule 11 over 40 years ago specifically because of malicious shitheads like Russhole claiming their objectively bogus filings were made in good faith.
 
Should Hardin start tabulating all his fees in the sanction requests to begin with?

Because so far, every time a sanction's been granted it comes with a blurb about "Sanctions granted, but can't be granted yet because defendants didn't ask for a specific amount, so we need to wait two weeks for you and Greer to argue about it and then another two weeks for Hardin to post his bill and then 2-5 weeks for Russell to respond after several retroactive extensions and then another two weeks for Hardin to respond to that and another 3-5 weeks for Russell to respond to that before you wait months for one of the judges to even look at any of it so we can start the "two more weeks until he has two more weeks to pay" mambo!"

The Judges phrase it like it's odd and unexpected for Hardin not to put the attorney's fees right in the motion, and as if this whole dance results because of it
 
That this case is still ongoing is proof the US legal system is terminally retarded and needs to be reworked.
Every time I see this case poop up Greer is making an even bigger mockery of the legal process.

Hilarious, but sad.
 
That this case is still ongoing is proof the US legal system is terminally retarded and needs to be reworked.
Every time I see this case poop up Greer is making an even bigger mockery of the legal process.

Hilarious, but sad.
A few law abiding citizens is a small price to pay for the government to say 'See? Even the least of us can have a go' in clown world.
Vexatious defense, indeed.
Greer was honest about this from day one: I'm here to bankrupt Null, nothing less.
The system is ill.
 
Should Hardin start tabulating all his fees in the sanction requests to begin with?
He did that for the subpoena one. But as this one shows it can cost him quite a bit of time to figure out exactly what Green's fuckery costs, so for the complex ones it's likely better to wait until it's approved before wasting Null's money.
 
Why is it assigned to Bennett when it is specifically a motion for the only judge in a position to reconsider to reconsider? How could Bennett possibly reconsider Barlow's ruling?

I'm guessing because he didn't specifically direct the filing to the District Judge (as he did with his objection)? So the clerk automatically entered it as referred to the Magistrate?
1762216347668.png
 
I'd say that is an order from one pissed-off judge. The language is tellingly terse and grumpy. The "standard" section is dismissively short. The full sentence that blows Russell out of the water is "It is not".

Think caps lock is shouting? Look at this judge using italics when he types "in judicial proceedings", or putting "eager" in scare quotes.

Mr Green has not pleased the court.

he now assumes Greer will start acting right
From the tone of this document, I believe he now assumes Greer is a total fucking cunt.

Would he dare take this up to the appeals court? :story:
If it wouldn't cost Null money, I'd be saying Dear Lord in Heaven please let this happen.

Hopefully he doesn't accidentally delete the list he's surely keeping of what he needs to appeal.
Come on, be fair, he needs to make room on his phone for tweets at ewhores.
 
Magistrate judge orders sanctions? Russel objects to the district judge and attempts to have it overturned.
District judge denies the objection and agrees with the magistrate judge? Russel objects to the magistrate judge to have it overturned.

This fucking guy. How in the fuck does he think this is going to work? They've both come to the same conclusion fucktard, you lied and are getting sanctioned. I hope Hardin doesn't even have time to file a response to this AI drivel before it gets ruled on first thing tomorrow with no docket text, just a big fat DENIED.
 
Back
Top Bottom