💰 Grifter Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The Gene Genie said:
This kind of stuff is lucrative. All of the ad hits that will inevitably get fed into the program via the groypers who will watch anything with Nick Fuentes' name attached to it boosts revenue. These people don't have princples. They have dollar signs where their brains should be.
Click to expand...
The ad money today doesn’t come close to paying off a year+ of constant media coverage from a ton of journalists.

A few years ago you could buy a HuffPo or Rolling Stone writer ($2500 and $4000 respectively) and you’ll be buried on the website. That’s one shot. The coverage that Fuentes got this past year is probably past $300k. Those journalists aren’t going to wait around for the payouts on viral videos. It’s cash in hand before they ever type the first word.
 
You guys are going to hate me, but that interview was pretty good imo. I didn't really disagree with anything. Downdoots to the right.

That said I don't follow NF at all, don't care about him, and remember when he burned a right wing guy way back that had to drop off the internet. I also remember him saying vote for kamala.

But everything they discussed in the interview was pretty good. If that was the entirety of his position, it was solid. Do people disagree?
 
Ludicrous Moneybags said:
You guys are going to hate me, but that interview was pretty good imo. I didn't really disagree with anything. Downdoots to the right.

That said I don't follow NF at all, don't care about him, and remember when he burned a right wing guy way back that had to drop off the internet. I also remember him saying vote for kamala.

But everything they discussed in the interview was pretty good. If that was the entirety of his position, it was solid. Do people disagree?
Click to expand...
I haven't watched the interview, but it doesn't really matter to me if Nick sounded good or not. I've been aware of him for basically a decade now. Over that time, I've seen again and again how much of a poisonous, destructive narcissist he is. You mention how you remember him running some other right wing guy off the internet. The thing is, Nick did that to a LOT of people post-Charlottesville. That was so long ago that most of his current fans aren't aware it even happened. But I still remember how he gleefully tried to ruin people that were on the same side as him just to increase his views and paypig donos. I also remember how he eventually drove off everyone that put their faith in him and consequently tried to destroy them, too.

So I don't care if he came off well during the Tucker interview. The guy is a walking cloud of toxic waste and the Dissident Right/former Alt-Right/whatever you want to call it, would be far better off without him.
 
I suppose it's time that newcomers learn about who Nicholas really is, and not from us, but from his former friends. This might be a good place for them to start.

 
Last edited:
Fruit Merchant said:
Hey Nick, what do you think about courting a woman?
nick_juice4.mp4
...Oh.

Befriending manosphere grifters was the worst thing to happen to Nick. They told him he was a genius for intuiting the "true nature" of women without ever dating one, and Nick, being stupid and narcissistic, believed them. It's pretty funny watching him bounce his blackpill talking points off of an extremely skeptical Tucker Carlson.

Lots going on here. Nick defends Andrew Tate, explains that "you have to love your wife as your wife," (Tucker says "as opposed to what? Your mom?"), Nick says he is not the type of freak who would yell "Shut up, woman!" and Tucker unironically says "happy wife, happy life" (unfortunately we can't see Nick's facial expression in response to this).
nick_tucker_andrew_tate.mp4

Tucker explains how he "just noticed" (what, in the last 2 hours?) that "men who stay unmarried for too long become kind of fragile." His expression at the end is funny.
nick_tucker_marriage2.mp4

"When you say you don't fully understand women, to me, I feel like women are very simple."
"Have you ever lived with one?"
"No, I haven't lived with them, but..."
nick_tucker_women_are_simple.mp4

The wives are the villains of The Sopranos and Breaking Bad because they don't hero-worship their husbands. Nick wants a woman who tells him he's God's gift to Earth and bakes him cookies (so... his mom).
nick_media_literacy_level_-999.mp4

Timestamps: 01:42:12 - 02:05:20
nick_tucker_porn_and_marriage.mp4
Click to expand...
I didn't really get from that segment about Tate that he was defending him. From what he was saying, it sounded like he's more of a product of what happens when Christian men aren't being masculine enough. So people like tate fill the void, thats what i got from it at least.
 
Jayquan Ledarius IV Jr said:
Those same refugees have also become politicians in Florida so they support them and let them through legally and illegally. So they can protect each other politically and financially.
Click to expand...
More Politically, is more failed tries to be "New Right-wing influencers" and try to earn money with this type of propaganda:
1762091269375.png
post
 
geckogoy said:
The government, obviously
Click to expand...
Honestly, I don't even know what's going on with Tucker anymore. The guy was just sucking off the Communist dictator of Venezuela for having "conservative values". I'm assuming he's just making some kind of anti-war anti-regime change argument. But he could just say that instead of sucking the dude off like a complete retard.
Candace has always been a stupid bitch but she's really gone off the deep end after leaving the DW.
 
Shazam said:
Honestly, I don't even know what's going on with Tucker anymore. The guy was just sucking off the Communist dictator of Venezuela for having "conservative values". I'm assuming he's just making some kind of anti-war anti-regime change argument. But he could just say that instead of sucking the dude off like a complete retard.
Candace has always been a stupid bitch but she's really gone off the deep end after leaving the DW.
Click to expand...

My take on Candace is that she was in some serious trouble (maybe lawsuits, maybe death threats?) before the sudden arranged marriage with British homosexual and centimillionaire George Farmer. Now she has both physical and financial security, and so she is free to let her mind take her wherever it wants to go. And where has she chosen to go? As you said, straight off the deep end - into magical thinking, the analysis of dreams, clairvoyance, just trusting her every whim... She is sliding toward insanity, and I think George is too weak of a husband to rein her in.
 
GreaterHacaryguaspear said:
More Politically, is more failed tries to be "New Right-wing influencers" and try to earn money with this type of propaganda:
View attachment 8112905
post
Click to expand...
Israel was hailed for its slick propaganda for so long-- even by its opponents. But it turns out they're actually about as smooth as the average jeet. The instant there was **one** social media outlet they couldn't censor, their whole house of bullshit fell apart.

That "Woke right" line is the perfect symbol of it. A bunch of Jews-- the most aggressively and unashamedly in-group preferenced ethnicity in the world-- telling White people that noticing they have group interests makes them "woke" is just hilarious. Add to that the fact that they almost universally refuse to debate anyone like Fuentes because that would be "platforming him", while endlessly crying about their oppression only makes it funnier. I mean, who's "woke" again?
 
Last edited:
I posted about this before but somebody is obviously splurging money around to get Nick in front of the cameras becase he's being groomed for the same function Richard Spencer played during the first Trump term: As a focus point/boogeyman/"official spokesperson" they can trot out whenever they need some soundbite to frighten the normies/mobilize the libtard base.
Functionally there is zero difference between Nick and those r/antiwork mods or "Ketchup" from the OWS protests.
 
ihaveelbows said:
"platforming" doesn't really matter. The powerful people of the world killed Charlie Kirk and made an extremely close assassination attempt on Donald Trump.

Fuentes will be around for a minute but I can't see him doing very much other than bloviating on topics spergs care about.
Click to expand...
He's already done all he needed to do. He was talking about the actual problem at the moment that people were trying to make sense of an ideology that obviously didn't make sense anymore. He pointed out the fact that "Conservatives" never conserved anything, and "conserving" what we have now makes no sense. Conservatives are and always were just controlled opposition, kyke-slave faggots. Fuentes pointed a whole generation at the actual enemy and they see it. That's not going away, but the Boomers are.
 
I still think Nick getting platformed again and all of this new attention is a psy-op. They are using him to crush the right once Trump is out of office. They can point to an utter loser like him and paint the whole right-wing movement as just as toxic as him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom