Debate with Woody on if Niggers are violent

[WoodyWoodpecker]

You wanna go on race, retard? Let's go. I'm Dominican, but considered White. I'm directly descended from Desiderio Arias, have Portuguese ancestry and Wilfrido Vargas is my great uncle. I personally know of decent African professional men, including a therapist that wants to implement drum therapy to help the people in his own country. I have an uncle that entertained the Chinese with Merengue and presently cousins in the military in Japan.

I guess you're one of those Dominicians that hates blacks for no reason. Kys. You got no reason to hate us.

Your disgusting bloodline would piss itself at the greatness and nobleness of mine, and for the record d4vid was a shitty singer.

You have no reading comprehension. If you actually read my response to you and my responses in this thread, you'd know that at no point did I defend that retarded pedophile.

No, what I hate is Kiwifarmers utilizing racism, saying "nigger", and saying shit like "thank god d4vd's victim wasn't white" on some unemotional shit. That's sickening. If you don't see what's wrong with that, you're beyond help.

As for your claims that 'kiwis suck ass at history derp derp': SPEAK FOR YOURSELF. I have made above the 98 percentile in my History finals in my old State.

Nobody gives a fuck about your school grades, poindexter.

You are nothing more than a little ragebaiter, whereas I can at least give out relevant information in threads.

You serve no purpose here, and don't even bother retorting to me on your ad hoc and YouTube embeds.

You sound pretentious and retarded.

 

[Sneaky lurker]

No, what I hate is Kiwifarmers utilizing racism, saying "nigger", and saying shit like "thank god d4vd's victim wasn't white" on some unemotional shit. That's sickening. If you don't see what's wrong with that, you're beyond help.

How come you don't see what's wrong with rape?

 

[Mister Fister]

Scared about what? I'm not scared of anything. I think you guys are mentally retarded and your retardation has driven you to this foolish form of racism. It's funny that here with this statement, you're defending Trump's government shutdown, praising the supposed "gibs" for ending because of a billionaire's politically divisive regime and the administration's inability to properly agree on political procedure. I'm simply just calling your ignorance out. Trump isn't doing this to appeal to you racists. He's just incompetent and authoritarian.

It's the democrats stopping the funding bill, because of the lack of gibs for illegals. I'd figure you'd be against the money that could go to Blacks being sent to illegals.

 

[WoodyWoodpecker]

So, you are BLACK, you are a muslim, a socialist, a racist and a rapedo. It's all true.

Nope. None except black. I do know that you ARE racist though.

There's a huge gap between a stoning and a rape. But I don't think your brain can calculate that.

You admitted you'd kill her. That's a little worse than a rape. At least the rape could be pleasurable heh heh. But that's fucked up either way. Like I said, proves my point. You're playing defense for the dyke, but you'd discard her in the dump at no delay.

Do you really think black people were some kind of enlightened pacifists? The only reason they didn't invade other continents was because they did not the technology for that, neither the intellect to start making such tech. Get it through your skull, black people do not have a moral high ground for being primitive.

Black people aren't primitive. We had different resources than what Europe had as far as materials go, but we were not primitive. Also we are peaceful. You met a Jamaican? Just smoke da weed, mon.

You really have the mind of child. "Har har har, I the white man will enslave these poor, pacifist utopian creatures who are one with nature for FUN!!!".
Black people are not special. It wasn't an act of cruelty to enslave your people, but an act of business, they did not care about you enough to think that way. They needed free labor and blacks just happenend to be suited for the task.

It was a cruel and immoral act of business and that is why I am calling you out. Your ancestors ravished in their devious mindsets while millions of people suffered. The fact that you try to defend this by saying "uh it doesnt matter anyway if they treated you like shit cause they didnt care" proves how fucked up it truly is. You can't justify slavery. It's bad either way. No matter if a white dude does or a black dude.

Why do you think white people should have any interest or obligation to help you?

You caused the issue and said issue effects your economic conditions as well.

 

[WoodyWoodpecker]

It's the democrats stopping the funding bill, because of the lack of gibs for illegals. I'd figure you'd be against the money that could go to Blacks being sent to illegals.

You do realize that Republicans have both the Senate and the House, right? Democrats don't have majority power. You also realize that the whole of the government shutdown is on arguments wherein the Republicans are trying to actively take away government assistance and subsidies from lower income individuals as well as those who need the assistance, right? Democrats aren't even primarily arguing for money to send to illegals (albeit I do agree that their priorities are skewed and retarded and they are a prime reason why the black condition hasn't been fixed) in this situation. It's about government assistance as a whole.

 

[Mister Fister]

You do realize that Republicans have both the Senate and the House, right? Democrats don't have majority power. You also realize that the whole of the government shutdown is on arguments wherein the Republicans are trying to actively take away government assistance and subsidies from lower income individuals as well as those who need the assistance, right? Democrats aren't even primarily arguing for money to send to illegals (albeit I do agree that their priorities are skewed and retarded and they are a prime reason why the black condition hasn't been fixed) in this situation. It's about government assistance as a whole.

Republicans are voting yes on the funding bill, democrats are stopping it. Why are you lying and coping?

 

[WoodyWoodpecker]

How come you don't see what's wrong with rape?

Rape is bad. I agree.

But on a white supremacist dyke who would probably rape me if she had all the essence of a man poured into her vessel? Oh naaaaah. Aint bad when ya gotta use it to fight back.

 

[WoodyWoodpecker]

Republicans are voting yes on the funding bill, democrats are stopping it. Why are you lying and coping?

The bill is retarded. There's been multiple disagreements about the republican approach and stripping all the public funding. You're acting as if the bill is justified.

 

[Sneaky lurker]

You admitted you'd kill her. That's a little worse than a rape. At least the rape could be pleasurable heh heh. But that's fucked up either way. Like I said, proves my point. You're playing defense for the dyke, but you'd discard her in the dump at no delay.

How do you expect to prove the decency of black people saying shit like this? If we take you as an example, why would anybody believe that?

Black people aren't primitive. We had different resources than what Europe had as far as materials go, but we were not primitive. Also we are peaceful. You met a Jamaican? Just smoke da weed, mon.

How come they lived in mud huts and didn't have alphabets or any technology when the europeans came? Where is the african advancement? Besides, it's easy to "be peaceful" when you are injecting a metric ton of drugs up your ass. And no, black people are not peaceful, otherwise, there wouldn't be stereotypes about you being violent. And you didn't refute my point that the only reason they didn't commit violence on the scale of European civilizations is simply because they didn't have the tech to do so.

Your ancestors ravished in their devious mindsets while millions of people suffered

I doubt that happened. I don't think europeans thought of your people highly enough to feel that way. As I said, it was only business. If I enslaved a bunch of people and took them back to my farms to work, I wouldn't give a shit about seeing them suffer simply for the sake of seeing them suffer. I'd only be concerned with them working.
To put it simply: your vision of "har har we are evil and we do evil things" of white enslavers emply the whites had hard feelings for black people, like they were long time enemies or some shit, while I don't think they had that sentimentality. Try to separete your moral outrage from utilitarian historical choices other people made in the past.

You caused the issue and said issue effects your economic conditions as well.

It's YOUR issue though. White people are not your parents, it's not their job to deal with your issues. By that logic, shouldn't blacks also pay for all the evil they do to white people? I want to see the day black people will be expected to separate a percentage of their income to cover the cost of the tragedies rabid niggers cause to white people.

a white supremacist dyke who would probably rape me

Don't flatter yourself nigga, no woman wants you that bad.

But on a white supremacist dyke who would probably rape me if she had all the essence of a man poured into her vessel? Oh naaaaah. Aint bad when ya gotta use it to fight back.

Rape is bad, until I want to do it!!
>Raping to fight back a hypothetical male dyke

 

[CrazyRandomZyn]

I guess you're one of those Dominicians that hates blacks for no reason. Kys. You got no reason to hate us.

Nice projection. I won't kill myself for your worthless existence. At least I hail from a pacifistic line unlike you. You just proved that Blacks are violent.
At least my mother and I get along with peaceful and intelligent muslims; I'm sure you wouldn't last an hour in other countries with your Neanderthal ways and lack of manners.

 

[WoodyWoodpecker]

How do you expect to prove the decency of black people saying shit like this? If we take you as an example, why would anybody believe that?

Breh says he'd stone her. Thus proving my point of you guys simping for a dyke supremacist.

How come they lived in mud huts and didn't have alphabets or any technology when the europeans came? Where is the african advancement? Besides, it's easy to "be peaceful" when you are injecting a metric ton of drugs up your ass. And no, black people are not peaceful, otherwise, there wouldn't be stereotypes about you being violent. And you didn't refute my point that the only reason they didn't commit violence on the scale of European civilizations is simply because they didn't have the tech to do so.

They lived in houses, had their own dialects and letters and symbols (see Swahili), and African heavily advanaced agriculture and industry to such a degree that whites wanted to take all of their resources and utilize their workers for slave labour.

Also, you're absolutely retarded because Africans never had any intentions to invade Europeans. It's not because they couldn't, they just did not want to. Give me any writing or philosophy from an African king or politican stating their want to invade Europeans prior to slavery. You have none. I don't need to refute a point made by a braindead retard.

I doubt that happened.

So why did Thomas Jefferson have kids with his slave?

I don't think europeans thought of your people highly enough to feel that way. As I said, it was only business. If I enslaved a bunch of people and took them back to my farms to work, I wouldn't give a shit about seeing them suffer simply for the sake of seeing them suffer. I'd only be concerned with them working.
To put it simply: your vision of "har har we are evil and we do evil things" of white enslavers emply the whites had hard feelings for black people, like they were long time enemies or some shit, while I don't think they had that sentimentality. Try to separete your moral outrage from utilitarian historical choices other people made in the past.

This is an evil mentality. You realize that Europeans were malicious in their actions in invading a territory that had no qualms or prior written intentions to invade them. Your justification of stripping them of their land and culture is "uh its just business and our culture is superior anyway, lol". You constantly downplay African culure and history so that you can then justify slavery and Jim Crow discrimination as "oh it's just business who gives a fuck". This isn't moral outrage, it's you trying to avoid accountability by saying "oh it doesnt really matter because uh we're superior" on some retard shit. If it was your own people, we wouldn't hear the end of it, 1/6 defender.

It's YOUR issue though. White people are not your parents, it's not their job to deal with your issues. By that logic, shouldn't blacks also pay for all the evil they do to white people? I want to see the day black people will be expected to separate a percentage of their income to cover the cost of the tragedies rabid niggers cause to white people.

There'd be no issues if white people didn't bring over slaves. Black people have not done any evil as bad as the white man putting them on boats and shit. Any external thing that happens to white people as far as them getting murdered and killed is a result of your ancestors, according to your logic, saying "oh well, we dont think highly of them, we might as well just rape them, beat them, and send them to the field". It all plays into each other.

Don't flatter yourself nigga, no woman wants you that bad.

15 is the body count.

Rape is bad, until I want to do it!!
>Raping to fight back a hypothetical male dyke

Rape is bad even when I do it against a white supremacist dyke. Also male dyke? All dykes are female. You think I'm justifying rape? Nah. I'm justifying raping those who would gleefully laugh if a white man raped a black female cousin or mine. That's all.

Nice projection. I won't kill myself for your worthless existence. At least I hail from a pacifistic line unlike you. You just proved that Blacks are violent.

I told you to kill yourself. That doesn't mean I'm gonna do it. I ain't violent. I'm saying you should do it because you're one of those retarded Dominicians that actually has no justifiable reason to hate black people. So I'm saying you should fucking jump off a cliff and kill yourself because you're going to use stupid reasons to justify years of hatred for no reason when the white man will never respect either of us regardless. Why the fuck do you spend time hating on Africans? There was no fucking war where we tried to fuck you. So shut the fuck up with your retard racism and be quiet, you faggot spic. Unalive yourself.

 

[Sneaky lurker]

Breh says he'd stone her.

Nothing you could possibly say will turn the tables bro, you want to rape white women.

African heavily advanaced agriculture and industry to such a degree that whites wanted to take all of their resources and utilize their workers for slave labour.

I highly doubt they did anything revolutionary for any industry other than being free labor for greater civs. What are these advancements? Are you talking about egyptian agriculture? They ain't black, stop claiming them.

So why did Thomas Jefferson have kids with his slave?

Because he wanted to nut, possibly?

You realize that Europeans were malicious in their actions in invading a territory that had no qualms or prior written intentions to invade them.

You never listen. I think I repeated this point about 5 times now: It is not a matter of morality, europeans wanted cheap labor for their plantations, and blacks happened to be suited for the task.

This isn't moral outrage, it's you trying to avoid accountability by saying "oh it doesnt really matter because uh we're superior" on some retard shit. If it was your own people, we wouldn't hear the end of it, 1/6 defender.

I don't need to justify anything because I already explained to you I don't see how slavery is immoral. There's greater civilizations and lesser civilizations. The greater ones dominate the lesser ones.

There'd be no issues if white people didn't bring over slaves.

I agree, but the issue wouldn't be gone. If blacks were never brought over, they would continue to be barberic in their own continent. So nothing changes for your people really, only for whites.

Any external thing that happens to white people as far as them getting murdered and killed is a result of your ancestors, according to your logic, saying "oh well, we dont think highly of them, we might as well just rape them, beat them, and send them to the field". It all plays into each other.

"Black people are not violent criminals, but even if they are, white people deserve it."
How slavery happening centuries ago justify your people continuing to terrorize whites in their own homelands?

15 is the body count.

Of times you were raped? By BBC? I believe you.

Rape is bad even when I do it against a white supremacist dyke.

But you keep making excuses for it.

Also male dyke? All dykes are female.

It's a joke on your earlier fantasy of being raped by the dyke.
"If only she was a big sweaty blond dude! She'd rape me for sure! "

You think I'm justifying rape?

I'm justifying raping those who would gleefully laugh if a white man raped a black female cousin or mine. That's all.

Yes, you are justifying rape. And you are not smart enough to gaslight people. You threatened to rape a woman because she said blacks are rapists.

that actually has no justifiable reason to hate black people.

You just discard all the reasons and then say they don't exist.

 

[WoodyWoodpecker]

Nothing you could possibly say will turn the tables bro, you want to rape white women.

You wanna genocide black people.

Also one crazed dyke supremacist does not equal white women in their entirety.

I highly doubt they did anything revolutionary for any industry other than being free labor for greater civs. What are these advancements? Are you talking about egyptian agriculture? They ain't black, stop claiming them.

Say goodbye to sugar, coffee, bananas, watermelons (yea i know those last two come off as stereotypical), yams, and all kinds of wheat technology. This aint even Egyptian. Shit was Nubian.

Because he wanted to nut, possibly?

Yea there's no justification for that, my guy. They wanted black women on that sexual tip and they abused them with no regard for what would happen if the same were to occur to their wives.

You never listen. I think I repeated this point about 5 times now: It is not a matter of morality, europeans wanted cheap labor for their plantations, and blacks happened to be suited for the task.

"Slavery is such an atrocious debasement of human nature, that its very extirpation, if not performed with solicitous care, may sometimes open a source of serious evils. The unhappy man who has been treated as a brute animal, too frequently sinks beneath the common standard of the human species. The galling chains, that bind his body, do also fetter his intellectual faculties, and impair the social affections of his heart… To instruct, to advise, to qualify those, who have been restored to freedom, for the exercise and enjoyment of civil liberty… and to procure for their children an education calculated for their future situation in life; these are the great outlines of the annexed plan, which we have adopted." - Ben Franklin, 1789

I don't need to justify anything because I already explained to you I don't see how slavery is immoral. There's greater civilizations and lesser civilizations. The greater ones dominate the lesser ones.

Using your fellow man for cheap unpaid labour is immoral and denying their ability to make means off their own contribution of production. Don't give me this hiearchical bullshit to justify it. Historically, it is evil.

I agree, but the issue wouldn't be gone. If blacks were never brought over, they would continue to be barberic in their own continent. So nothing changes for your people really, only for whites.

As if Europeans like Alexander The Great weren't conquering other European territories.

As if Hitler wasn't purposefully invading other European territories.

Black people are not violent criminals, but even if they are, white people deserve it."
How slavery happening centuries ago justify your people continuing to terrorize whites in their own homelands?

You downplay slavery (and Jim Crow which only ended 50 or so years ago) by saying "it happened in the past it doesnt matter" when effectively it fucked black people's generational wealth. Whereas the white man can trace their wealth to the days of the colonies, the black man has to trace it back to when Thomas Jefferson had a thing for some Regina King looking chick.

Of times you were raped? By BBC? I believe you.

So I'm the raped now instead of the rapist? Odd.

But you keep making excuses for it.

I am making no excuses for immorally fornicating with a white supremacist dyke nonconsensually. Simply put,

It's a joke on your earlier fantasy of being raped by the dyke.
"If only she was a big sweaty blond dude! She'd rape me for sure! "

A hypothetical is not a fantasy.

Yes, you are justifying rape. And you are not smart enough to gaslight people. You threatened to rape a woman because she said blacks are rapists.

Nah. See that's that mob mentality misinterpetation. I threatened to rape because she said she was a white supremacist who was also a lebsian and you know what, the idea of raping a white supremacist lesbian is fucking funny.

You just discard all the reasons and then say they don't exist.

Because none of those reasons have to do with the fact that black people posed no threat or any sort of violence to white people prior to white people treating them like shit.

 

[Scipio Neomericanus]

Nah, you're just being semantically retarded. I use the term plaintiff cause I use it everyday.

That term is common knowledge. People who have no exposure to the legal field know what a prosecutor/DA is. Semantically retarded is using legal terms of art where they don't belong, which you've been doing consistently this whole time.

I would like to see more cross examinations in other studies.

You can't educate the niggerbrain out of a nigger, I guess.

Lol, convicted felons in a system that puts black people in bad housing environments and social conditions that then make them go outta wack.

Sure, keep telling yourself that. While poverty is criminogenic, there's just as strong of a correlation between blackness and crime, irrespective of income level. They're independent concerns.

Also we are peaceful.

lol. So peaceful that the Kingdom of Dahomey's economy relied on warring for slaves to sell to Europeans. So peaceful that the Haitians burn their country to a crisp every Tuesday and feast on the flesh of dey (black) opps. So peaceful that we have records of African wars before substantial European contact. Dumb nigger.

Some correctional officers do if they wanted to go into law initially, but then again your narrowminded white vision is dumb.

If thinking that makes you sleep better at night, who am I to keep pushing the point?

Jobs are still merit based.

lol, ok.
They have always been merit-based, that much is true. The question is how much merit factors in. We're opposed to race playing a part in the selection process, and that's been going on for decades.

 

[WoodyWoodpecker]

That term is common knowledge. People who have no exposure to the legal field know what a prosecutor/DA is. Semantically retarded is using legal terms of art where they don't belong, which you've been doing consistently this whole time.

I was talking in regards to plaintiff parties and defendant parties, you clod. You are extrapolating a different concept entirely in the criminal sense, retard.

You can't educate the niggerbrain out of a nigger, I guess.

And you can't take the retard outta racist.

Sure, keep telling yourself that. While poverty is criminogenic, there's just as strong of a correlation between blackness and crime, irrespective of income level. They're independent concerns.

"Strong of a correlation"

On some bullshit /pol/tard infographic meme that you guys use to laugh and mock black people to feel better about your shitty lives.

lol. So peaceful that the Kingdom of Dahomey's economy relied on warring for slaves to sell to Europeans. So peaceful that the Haitians burn their country to a crisp every Tuesday and feast on the flesh of dey (black) opps. So peaceful that we have records of African wars before substantial European contact. Dumb nigger.

Haiti was the first country to abolish slavery and all of these corrupt events occurred due to the fact that Haiti was colonized by the Europeans who prided off of slavery for trade, so yea. It's the white man's fault.

If thinking that makes you sleep better at night, who am I to keep pushing the point?

White vision.

lol, ok.
They have always been merit-based, that much is true. The question is how much merit factors in. We're opposed to race playing a part in the selection process, and that's been going on for decades.

Diversity scholarships exist for all cultures and there are multiple types of scholarships in all majors, fields, and essays that anyone can receive as long as you fit certain criteria. None of this proves that this is used to discriminate because there are multiple scholarships offered for all races and those that live in a variety of areas.

Even so, the chances of receiving one of these scholarships is rare. The system is merit based regardless. You have not proven otherwise with your article link.


Also having these types of scholarships, as long as they include all people which they do, is good. Paying for college is expensive. Europeans don't have to pay for college because the government pays it for them, but Americans do thanks to private industry and loan culture. So pipe down.

 

[CrazyRandomZyn]

@WoodyWoodpecker holy generalization. Damn. Didn't know you hated me that much.

 

[Sneaky lurker]

Say goodbye to sugar, coffee, bananas, watermelons (yea i know those last two come off as stereotypical), yams, and all kinds of wheat technology. This aint even Egyptian. Shit was Nubian.

You are saying somehow the black shamans of Africa summoned new species of plant into existence through magic? Awesome. I still don't see how that is a huge advancement in any industry. Literally all groups of humans on Earth can engineer crops to become better over generations. Weak claim.

Your ancestors ravished in their devious mindsets while millions of people suffered.

Yea there's no justification for that, my guy. They wanted black women on that sexual tip and they abused them with no regard for what would happen if the same were to occur to their wives.

So you claim that one guy nutting in a negress once is evidence of white people's malice...how? You never said he raped her, you say they had kids, meanwhile you are over here endorsing rape in real time.

Also one crazed dyke supremacist does not equal white women in their entirety.

And Thomas Jeferson also doesn't represent all whites, therefore your claim of him sexing up a niggerete doesn't say anything either.

"Slavery is such an atrocious debasement of human nature, that its very extirpation, if not performed with solicitous care, may sometimes open a source of serious evils. The unhappy man who has been treated as a brute animal, too frequently sinks beneath the common standard of the human species. The galling chains, that bind his body, do also fetter his intellectual faculties, and impair the social affections of his heart… To instruct, to advise, to qualify those, who have been restored to freedom, for the exercise and enjoyment of civil liberty… and to procure for their children an education calculated for their future situation in life; these are the great outlines of the annexed plan, which we have adopted." - Ben Franklin, 1789

Why do you think I care about Ben Franklin's opinion on the matter?

Using your fellow man for cheap unpaid labour is immoral and denying their ability to make means off their own contribution of production. Don't give me this hiearchical bullshit to justify it. Historically, it is evil.

"fellow men" there is no such thing. Humanity is not a single organism, it is made up of different civilizations and different peoples with varying degrees of worth. There is no reason to believe an european man and a chinese one are aligned just because they are human.
You'd need to convince me the concept of hierarchy is evil.

As if Europeans like Alexander The Great weren't conquering other European territories.

As if Hitler wasn't purposefully invading other European territories.

Black people don't conquer anything, they act more like rust.

"it happened in the past it doesnt matter"

You say white people need to pay because of things they did in the past. Based on that logic I questioned why black people shouldn't pay for the damage they cause whites in the present.

So I'm the raped now instead of the rapist? Odd.

They are not mutually exclusive.

A hypothetical is not a fantasy.

You made up a hypothetical scenario that is also your sexual fantasy.

Nah. See that's that mob mentality misinterpetation. I threatened to rape because she said she was a white supremacist who was also a lebsian and you know what, the idea of raping a white supremacist lesbian is fucking funny.

Is the mob in the room with us? You did justify rape.

Because none of those reasons have to do with the fact that black people posed no threat or any sort of violence to white people prior to white people treating them like shit.

Even if your idea is true, they are a danger now, and that's a reason to hate them.
Logic isn't your game nigga.

 

[an retard]

They had fights amongst their own people, but they never went after whites in the way whites went after them through the Trade.

I strongly suspect you are reducing "Africans" to a very base stereotypical concept and not really considering it's a continent that's had hundreds of kingdoms throughout their history. It wasn't a sort of bubble that wasn't burst until the introduction of the colonial powers, there were interactions throughout history between Europe, Africa and the Arab world and to characterise all of it as "the africans didnt do nothin" is probably a sign you don't really know shit about the place you are talking about.

The Berbers raided the coasts of European countries for centuries, the Arabs interacted with African kingdoms for years before the whites for slaves. The reason why you don't see central or southern African kingdoms going far up north is mostly due to limits of their sailing technology (and there was a big fucking desert in the way preventing much foot travel northward), it wasn't about any moral high ground because a lot of the shit you're acting holier than thou about are largely inventions of modern media and academia.

Did the Berbers and the Arabs lack the rigour and logistical force of the European and American colonial powers that made the Atlantic slave trade as big as it was? Also, did the kingdoms below the Sahara lack the means to actually engage in any kind of slave raiding in Europe? Sure on both, I guess. I don't see what point you could be making about this other than "white boys do it better", which I doubt is what you're trying to say there.

 

[Gravekeeper's Vassal]

15 is the body count.

How many consented tho?

 

[Jacknife]

lso we are peaceful. You met a Jamaican? Just smoke da weed, mon.

At this point you gotta be trolling

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_Jamaica