💰 Grifter Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Long story short, the Deep State is in a civil war and Nick is being used by one of the factions who want to get the younger Americans against Israel for their own reasons. The Deep State is not a homogeneous blob, they are multiple warring factions based on religion, ethnicity, and ideology. Nick is being pushed as the example of how Israel has undue power over America and Americans, all this sudden mainstream exposure is propaganda.
“But if he a Fed, why he debanked?”, you may ask. Because while he’s an asset, he’s an asset for the anti-Israel faction and being punished by The Jews is part of what they’re having Nick sell to the public. There’s many people like Nick who have been debanked and deplatformed but you don’t hear about them because they aren’t controlled. Josh himself is a much better example of both of those things, and much better at explaining the issues in the system and how they are used to punish anyone the system doesn’t like. Very few know about Josh, many more know about Nick, and that’s by design.
Tinfoil sperg over.
 
Exactly. If we don't give Fuentes any credit, and always assume he's grifting and/or aping the bit of someone smarter (who we can't/won't cite) that'll stop his breakneck growth!
You should probably always assume Nick is grifting and thieving research. What makes less sense is the common deduction of "catboy said it, so it's wrong." That just isn't the game he plays.
 
Because while he’s an asset, he’s an asset for the anti-Israel faction and being punished by The Jews is part of what they’re having Nick sell to the public.
But Nicholas was not "debanked". And he was never really deplatformed, since a mysterious person swept in at the last minute and created Cozy.tv and handed Nicholas the keys!

Not debanked, not on the no-fly list, not considered a domestic terrorist, etc.

Nick is the exact opposite of being cancelled. Not only can he do and say whatever he wants online, he can also host a pedophile ring, incite riots at the Capitol, mace and physically assault elderly Jewish women, all with complete legal impunity. He's approaching Hunter Biden levels of glowing.
 
Not debanked, not on the no-fly list, not considered a domestic terrorist, etc.

Nick is the exact opposite of being cancelled. Not only can he do and say whatever he wants online, he can also host a pedophile ring, incite riots at the Capitol, mace and physically assault elderly Jewish women, all with complete legal impunity. He's approaching Hunter Biden levels of glowing.
Was he never on a no-fly list? I remember him bitching about being one, but I can definitely see this weasle making shit up.
 
Was he never on a no-fly list? I remember him bitching about being one, but I can definitely see this weasle making shit up.

According to him, he insists he was on the no-fly list because of January 6th. What actually happened was that he tard-raged at a stewardess during a flight, threatened to strangle her, and got temporarily placed on the no-fly list. There's no proof that he's still on it.

It's the same way that he lied about the government confiscating his crypto. What actually happened was that the government froze his crypto exchange account because he received large Bitcoin donations from some unknown party and they needed to confirm that it wasn't from a terrorist/criminal source. After they finished their investigation, they unfroze his account. Nick conveniently leaves out the fact that they gave his crypto back whenever he retells the incident. Likewise, he lies about being de-banked by the government. He was banned from opening an account with one particular bank because he ran afoul of their AML rules or some shit.

Basically, Nick does criminal shit, faces appropriate consequences, then acts like he's being oppressed for his political views.
 
Last edited:
Theres about a decade of TheRightStuff.biz lolcow lore that begs to disagree with you brother

EDIT: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/mike-peinovich-mike-enoch-the-right-stuff-therightstuff-biz.29186/
And when did the controlled RINO opposition around dicky spencer started to call themselves "Alt Right"
Yes, the moment Hillary Clinton gave the green light for the operation to go hot.
Comer on Pakistani, its no secrete, that RINOs and Clinton democrats are closer to each other than Rinos and Trump GOP, respective Clinton democrats and the Obongo wing of the demcorats and have shared interest in getting rid of the Trump GOP.
Are you Brock faggots going to larp for another decade?
 
That post wasn't about Fuentes being popular, it was about him being astroturfed after being "the most banned person on the Internet."
I understood that when I posted the response.

The factual accuracy of my post is unaffected by your pedantry.
 
Who are the type of people that watch these douchy podcast bro types where they wear their business suits and slick their hair back with one word at a time subtitles?
Who is the audience that buys this dumb grindset grift that Nick goes on all the time?
 
What is the supposed endgame of whitewashing (literally) this spic pederast? There's no way this ends well, right?
Having an acceptable and easy target to have a cassus belli against people that don't want Israel to genocide and/or ethnically cleanse palestine.

Present him well, get him more support, prod people towards him, then release all the bad stuff and tar other people with that same brush. Basically what happened january 6 more or less.

Especially with the Charlie Kirk shooting narrative falling apart.
 
Nick Fuentes is yet another perfect example of "If you keep giving this wally attention, you only legitimize him".
He's another Andrew Tate, another AOC, another Kanye West, Harry Sisson, David Hog, et cetera. Just another stupid fucking extremist asshole who is an embarrassment to America who should be shunned and ignored.
The media and the internet report about them, and give them legitimacy.
He should have been called out for being the deviant, little non white faggot he clearly is and we should have moved on. Now he's gaining traction because people like Tucker fucking Carlson are having him on his show and giving him legitimacy.
 
What is the supposed endgame of whitewashing (literally) this spic pederast? There's no way this ends well, right?
See, thats what I'm still trying to wrap my head around. My tinfoil hat is telling me that its probably some ploy (knee-jerk or planned, take your pick) to elevate Nick as a replacement for Charlie who, even with the white-washing of his takes he's been doing recently, would still push the younger right further rightward. Frog in the pot but with political ideology.
Who is the audience that buys this dumb grindset grift that Nick goes on all the time?
I stumbled into a friend group at my local Church of Groypers and what I've found is that when you press them on any Nick E-drama, they either don't know it at all, or only in the context of Nick's half-assed rebuttals.
 
i felt bad when they took out Charlie Kirk but if same thing happened to Nick i wouldn't shed one single tear, i really dislike the guy
That's why Fuentes is safe. Charlie Kirk got shot specifically because he was way too nice and getting way too popular. Campus Christian groups have been mostly assimilated by Left fascists or dissolved. Charlie Kirk threatened to reverse that trend.

Nick Fuentes is not nearly as popular. He is much closer to the stereotype that Left fascists are trying to cast on their critics. I wouldn't be surprised by hardcore Marxists helping Fuentes to get his message out.

most of his supporters want him to talk shit on Israel and on niggers and whatnot
Hasan Piker works his grifting niche. He isn't changing his tune. Nick Fuentes is at least as comfortably thick.

Nick Fuentes is yet another perfect example of "If you keep giving this wally attention, you only legitimize him".
He's another Andrew Tate, another AOC, another Kanye West, Harry Sisson, David Hog, et cetera. Just another stupid fucking extremist asshole who is an embarrassment to America who should be shunned and ignored.
No. We don't need a thoughtcrime babysitter. Throw him in the feed trough. Let the consumers decide.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom