🌟 Internet Famous David Steel / LazerPig / Ricewynd / Malquistion - Pathological Liar, Reddit Historian, Femboy Thirster, and Vore Connoisseur

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
WelperHelper99 said:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=jdBgK9AGw2sLocal archive will be gotten shortly
BuT tAnKs ArE oUtDaTeD bEcAusE dRoNeS!1.mp4

The title is:

BuT tAnKs ArE oUtDaTeD bEcAusE dRoNeS!1

Technically this should be an easy W for him. I am curious how he will fuck this up. Already listening to it, he is glazing the western tanks hard though.
Click to expand...

His description is highly islamic
Another video where we explain to people that former army officers writing on their blogs don't qualify as experts in Geo-Global politics, webslop clickbait articles aren't "a source", and just because your mom read it on Facebook doesn't mean its true.You'd think this would be obvious but propaganda works because you want it to be true, so you ignore the obvious red flags.Kind like when a hot guy starts flirting with you, I mean yeah he drinks way too much, his accent is odd, and he keeps asking you leading questions about NATO supply movements but you ignore all that because you want to lick taramasalata off him later.
Click to expand...
 
WelperHelper99 said:
I don't think it's his worst video, but that's because the topic is easy. No the tank isn't dead. We know
Click to expand...
The problem with these sorts of videos is that they tend to downplay the role of drones. Tank is dead as much as the infantry is dead. Basically it's NOT dead. But drones have changed warfare at least in this instance and is causing the frontlines to be extremely static. Drones are 100% a major reason as to this. It isn't because Ukrainians are super soldiers or anything else. Drones are also the reason why Ukraine is incapable of carrying out their own offensives without massive casualties. Essentially, the traditional roles of tanks, infantry, IFVs, recon, artillery, etc has been altered due to drones. Having to play it safe whenever possible. Otherwise, they get destroyed. Each offensive is a massive commitment in terms of vehicles and manpower because eventually drones are going to whither the offensive away.

However, the tank is still very much necessary. They can survive multiple drones, more with the right cage set up. Some of those barn tanks even survive up to 20-45 drones before going down. Will drones be a facet of every war, probably not. But they will be a facet of any wars that are industrialized and have the money to buy or produce their own and can establish their own supply lines. As well as those with wealthy backers. This is a valid issue entire armies, not just tanks, need to address whether through organization or some technological innovation. Tanks get all the headlines, but IFVs, APCs, AAs, SPGs, MRAPs, etc are all affected the same.
 
DNNS-2 said:
The problem with these sorts of videos is that they tend to downplay the role of drones. Tank is dead as much as the infantry is dead. Basically it's NOT dead. But drones have changed warfare at least in this instance and is causing the frontlines to be extremely static. Drones are 100% a major reason as to this. It isn't because Ukrainians are super soldiers or anything else. Drones are also the reason why Ukraine is incapable of carrying out their own offensives without massive casualties. Essentially, the traditional roles of tanks, infantry, IFVs, recon, artillery, etc has been altered due to drones. Having to play it safe whenever possible. Otherwise, they get destroyed. Each offensive is a massive commitment in terms of vehicles and manpower because eventually drones are going to whither the offensive away.

However, the tank is still very much necessary. They can survive multiple drones, more with the right cage set up. Some of those barn tanks even survive up to 20-45 drones before going down. Will drones be a facet of every war, probably not. But they will be a facet of any wars that are industrialized and have the money to buy or produce their own and can establish their own supply lines. As well as those with wealthy backers. This is a valid issue entire armies, not just tanks, need to address whether through organization or some technological innovation. Tanks get all the headlines, but IFVs, APCs, AAs, SPGs, MRAPs, etc are all affected the same.
Click to expand...
I remember reading 50s cope about how airplanes would end tanks. They didn't but they certainly ended any ideas of superheavy tanks.
I think the frontlines are more static due to neither side having real air power, more than drones.
 
vanessa683525 said:
I remember reading 50s cope about how airplanes would end tanks. They didn't but they certainly ended any ideas of superheavy tanks.
I think the frontlines are more static due to neither side having real air power, more than drones.
Click to expand...
The terrain doesn't get talked about nearly enough in the RussoUkro war. The entire country is mostly flat and cleared of top cover, very little strategic or tactical depth, which is a massive boon to recon assets. Furthermore both the Russian and Ukrainian militaries are (or at least were, Ukros seem to have mostly NATO gear now) using Soviet derived equipment and Soviet derived doctrine, which, by the 1980s, had become almost purely defensive.
 
WelperHelper99 said:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=jdBgK9AGw2sLocal archive will be gotten shortly
BuT tAnKs ArE oUtDaTeD bEcAusE dRoNeS!1.mp4

The title is:

BuT tAnKs ArE oUtDaTeD bEcAusE dRoNeS!1

Technically this should be an easy W for him. I am curious how he will fuck this up. Already listening to it, he is glazing the western tanks hard though.
Click to expand...
Well I suffered though it and Piggy has taken a safe assumption others have safely made and done it poorly. Mostly out of laziness. There are parts that were obviously put together with a script over multiple days that were carefully done, those parts being decent and parts done in a day half drunk and I'm not talking about the mid edit asides and corrections.
The video is rambly, poorly put together, meanders into pointless and most importantly un fun tangents. Piggy I know you're reading this. Stop going on about muh X Y Z is a Russian propaganda super weapon. I didn't even hear the Lansit name before you mentioned it in the video you don't have to DEBUNK every random thing a slav groid made. Nor do you have to go on about dogshit websites nobody reads and how they are Russian propaganda, nobody fucking cares.
I think the most telling fuck up is comparing the destroyed Chally 2 with the T-64. The difference doesn't have to be autistic cat mouse games of the Russians hiding shit drones in good drone bodies. It could just have been a glancing hit vs a straight on hit.
 
WelperHelper99 said:
This nigga is saying he builds drones and sends them over to Ukraine. I'm pretty sure thats what i heard. Can we get a fact check? LOL.

Gross
Click to expand...

The Pig was part of a group of Tubers who raised money for trucks for Ukraine. As part of that, they all went to Ukraine together to deliver the trucks and see things for themselves. As part of that trip they got to meet some of the troops, got to meet people building FPV drones, fly some inert practice drones, help assemble them, and go to the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone. I'm fairly certain that is what he is referring to.
 
DNNS-2 said:
The problem with these sorts of videos is that they tend to downplay the role of drones. Tank is dead as much as the infantry is dead. Basically it's NOT dead. But drones have changed warfare at least in this instance and is causing the frontlines to be extremely static. Drones are 100% a major reason as to this. It isn't because Ukrainians are super soldiers or anything else. Drones are also the reason why Ukraine is incapable of carrying out their own offensives without massive casualties. Essentially, the traditional roles of tanks, infantry, IFVs, recon, artillery, etc has been altered due to drones. Having to play it safe whenever possible. Otherwise, they get destroyed. Each offensive is a massive commitment in terms of vehicles and manpower because eventually drones are going to whither the offensive away.

However, the tank is still very much necessary. They can survive multiple drones, more with the right cage set up. Some of those barn tanks even survive up to 20-45 drones before going down. Will drones be a facet of every war, probably not. But they will be a facet of any wars that are industrialized and have the money to buy or produce their own and can establish their own supply lines. As well as those with wealthy backers. This is a valid issue entire armies, not just tanks, need to address whether through organization or some technological innovation. Tanks get all the headlines, but IFVs, APCs, AAs, SPGs, MRAPs, etc are all affected the same.
Click to expand...
Drones are in a spot right now where effective countermeasures are still being developed. Some stuff works well, like SPAGGs, some stuff is way too fucking expensive, like MANPADS, and then you got shit like shotguns, which is a countermeasure, just a primitive one. The tank ain't dead, but it's going to be a minute before an effective and cheap solution is introduced
Smashed & Slamed said:
I think the most telling fuck up is comparing the destroyed Chally 2 with the T-64. The difference doesn't have to be autistic cat mouse games of the Russians hiding shit drones in good drone bodies. It could just have been a glancing hit vs a straight on hit.
Click to expand...
The challenger 2 cope was funny. It's like bro, sometimes the drone hits different. The chally just got it fucking bad.
The Dude said:
The Pig was part of a group of Tubers who raised money for trucks for Ukraine. As part of that, they all went to Ukraine together to deliver the trucks and see things for themselves. As part of that trip they got to meet some of the troops, got to meet people building FPV drones, fly some inert practice drones, help assemble them, and go to the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone. I'm fairly certain that is what he is referring toto.
Click to expand...
Ah. Now that makes sense. He didn't actually do anything, but he got to fly a drone for a day after raising money for pickup trucks. I see. That was his great contribution. Lol. Underwhelming.
 
Smashed & Slamed said:
I think the most telling fuck up is comparing the destroyed Chally 2 with the T-64. The difference doesn't have to be autistic cat mouse games of the Russians hiding shit drones in good drone bodies. It could just have been a glancing hit vs a straight on hit.
Click to expand...
Lazerpig is just retarded and coping making up bullshit in his head to justify what happened. The lancet's warhead isn't strong, like at all. It's equipped with a KZ-6 demolition charge that can penetrate up to 200-250mm of armor steel.

Lazerpig was claiming that they're hiding drones as lancets??? How are they able to hide a regular quadcopter type drone is a pusher prop style drone. There are lancet like drones, but if I had to guess this isn't what he's referring to.

Lazerpig also claims that the Russians are putting out contradictory stories as to how and by what were these drones destroyed. Which isn't true, it's just something he made up either to lie or because he's just retarded. The first CR2 that was killed was claimed to be killed by a Kornet. We even have video of the incident, and while it's shit quality it can be geo located to the exact same place. The second kill was with a Lancet and we have the geolocated video of the Lancet diving into the tank. He should know this, he was the first to cope and post about them but the alcohol must have put some holes in his brain.

Also yes, the difference between that T-64BV hit and the CR2 kill, is that the 64 recieved a glancing hit on its ERA and the CR2 was hit on top of the turret where it's mostly minimally protected.
 
DNNS-2 said:
Lazerpig was claiming that they're hiding drones as lancets???
Click to expand...

That wasn't what he said at all. He said because of Russia's shortage of drones, they are calling Lancets "drones" for propaganda purposes. Please actually pay attention so I don't have to keep defending this fat fuck because you misunderstood what he was saying. It makes me feel icky.
 
It's people like LazerNig why most sperging about gear is pointless as unless it's a deathtrap, a mediocre to subpar weapon in mass will trounce any superior weapon anyway if it's not too technologically behind. Another thing that makes a war like this drag as it's a war between two doctrinally defensive armies, it's flat meaning it's easy for drones to spot, and logistics trucks are now far easier to target on either side.

Though how does Piggy cope with the fact that Ukraine is having severe manpower issues due to attrition and especially desertions? I know numbers reporting on either side is worth fuck all until the war is over and decades has passed for honest reporting, but countless videos of Ukrainian defensive positions being abandoned or held by dangerously small amounts of soldiers are becoming increasingly common.
 
Kyria the Great said:
Though how does Piggy cope with the fact that Ukraine is having severe manpower issues due to attrition and especially desertions? I know numbers reporting on either side is worth fuck all until the war is over and decades has passed for honest reporting, but countless videos of Ukrainian defensive positions being abandoned or held by dangerously small amounts of soldiers are becoming increasingly common.
Click to expand...
If NAFOids have been of any indication, they are either completely ignoring the manpower issue as a Russian propaganda talking point or think that they simply can deport all fighting-aged men who left to the EU back to Ukraine in the hope that a manpower surge can turn the tide. Then again as anyone who has followed the whole war knows, nobody actually gives a shit about the average Ukrainian, except as a proxy against Russia.
 
The Dude said:
That wasn't what he said at all. He said because of Russia's shortage of drones, they are calling Lancets "drones" for propaganda purposes. Please actually pay attention so I don't have to keep defending this fat fuck because you misunderstood what he was saying. It makes me feel icky.
Click to expand...
Unless we are referring to different segments of the video, at 15;40 he claims that there's a rumor of the "Russians flying regular drones disguised as lancets to make it look like the weapon is far more numerous than it actually is" which is retarded. He isn't claiming that they're calling drones lancets but that they're literally disguising them as lancets

I've never seen such a claim repeated elsewhere nor do I understand the purpose of such a disguise or why lazerpig would potentially make this up.

Watching this video you can tell that Lazerpig has a very on/off health bar videogame view of the war. For example, he seems to think there's "strong drones" and "weak drones". And not drones having different types of warheads with varying levels of explosives. He also seems to think that tanks have all around equal protection because only "stronger" drones can destroy a tank and not the fact that a drone with a weaker shaped charge warheads is able to hit a vulnerable significantly less armored area. As well as thinking that the severity of the Challenger's destruction was due to the sheer energy unleashed by the Lancet, or whatever he thinks it was killed by instead of the Lancet getting lucky and managing to directly detonate the HESH warheads present inside.

He's still very much a pseud who can't be bother to learn about the intricacies. No one should really care about learning all this, it's very autistic and there's still a deeper level one can dive that even most people are ignorant about, but don't make a video on their topic if you know nothing, even the most shallowest areas of the topic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kyria the Great said:
It's people like LazerNig why most sperging about gear is pointless as unless it's a deathtrap, a mediocre to subpar weapon in mass will trounce any superior weapon anyway if it's not too technologically behind. Another thing that makes a war like this drag as it's a war between two doctrinally defensive armies, it's flat meaning it's easy for drones to spot, and logistics trucks are now far easier to target on either side.

Though how does Piggy cope with the fact that Ukraine is having severe manpower issues due to attrition and especially desertions? I know numbers reporting on either side is worth fuck all until the war is over and decades has passed for honest reporting, but countless videos of Ukrainian defensive positions being abandoned or held by dangerously small amounts of soldiers are becoming increasingly common.
Click to expand...
he did say in a video that there were more than enough young men in Ukraine while in Lwów https://youtu.be/cDyq95F49BQ?si=oNlH2LqQPXsuGT5b&t=682
Mediocre weapons have a massive cost, a lot more logistics for the same effect, which as you yourself pointed out is an issue. "and logistics trucks are now far easier to target on either side."
DNNS-2 said:
Unless we are referring to different segments of the video, at 15;40 he claims that there's a rumor of the "Russians flying regular drones disguised as lancets to make it look like the weapon is far more numerous than it actually is" which is retarded. He isn't claiming that they're calling drones lancets but that they're literally disguising them as lancets
Click to expand...
What i get is that Russia (/pro russia agents) are claiming that kills by non lancets as kills by lancets to make it seem like a wonder weapon that can be produced en masse.
 
vanessa683525 said:
I remember reading 50s cope about how airplanes would end tanks. They didn't but they certainly ended any ideas of superheavy tanks.
I think the frontlines are more static due to neither side having real air power, more than drones.
Click to expand...
The biggest issue is the inability to mass forces.

The insane amount of surveillance from drones leads to any massed formation getting smoked by MLRS or other drones pretty quickly.

Even when the Russians were making it rain JDAMs earlier in the year they couldn't marshal enough units to exploit. 2023 in another great example except it wasnt drones but concentrated artillery and area denial weapons that prevented massed forces
 
Smashed & Slamed said:
I think the most telling fuck up is comparing the destroyed Chally 2 with the T-64. The difference doesn't have to be autistic cat mouse games of the Russians hiding shit drones in good drone bodies. It could just have been a glancing hit vs a straight on hit.
Click to expand...
Comparing the Challenger 2 to the T-64 is a huge disservice... To the humble T-64 which has been one the most effective tanks in Ukrainian service.
The Grognard said:
If NAFOids have been of any indication, they are either completely ignoring the manpower issue as a Russian propaganda talking point or think that they simply can deport all fighting-aged men who left to the EU back to Ukraine in the hope that a manpower surge can turn the tide.
Click to expand...
Why don't they join the Ukrainian army? I mean, they hate Russia so much and are such fervent supporters of Ukraine that you'd think they'll be lining up outside of recruiting stations.

They could also join some other service or just go to Ukraine and volunteer for something else like their equivalent of civil defense? Or work in some workshop building FPV drones? Helping repairing vehicles in some motorpool? Something productive and actually valuable to the Ukrainian war effort, you know. I don't think being an annoying faggot on the Internet really helps with the frontlines.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom