💰 Grifter Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Everyone's being way too charitable about Tucker about this. This was a softball and probably the crowning moment of the rehabilitation tour.
 
Sandshrew said:
Then, he denies that there's anything suspicious about the Kirk shooting, just to "own Candace Owens" because Candace thinks Israel is involved.
Click to expand...
I honestly agree with Nick on this point. A radicalized leftist idiot with a tranny boyfriend murders a major right-wing political figure because he was told he was a Nazi and you're going to scream about Israel conspiracy theories instead of that actual issue? That's retarded.
 
Kassy Dillon (now Akiva) has responded to the lore. She says the break up had nothing to do with Nick's views on Israel but that he was nasty to fellow conservatives. She also says that she didn't send the clips to Media Matters, screenshot shows that they were monitoring Nick's original online network, Right Side Broadcasting.

(Both deny there was anything sexual, as if anyone ever thought such.)

kassy.png
 
MikeyNohMore said:
In the past two months, Nick went from being the notorious Holocaust-denying, woman-bashing, Jan 6th-involved, incel-worshipped Nazi and the "Most Canceled Man on the Internet" to being on Sam Hyde's show, Bradley Martyn's Raw Talk, the PBD Podcast, Gavin McInnes's show, Red Scare, Alex Jones' show, Dave Smith's show, and Tucker Carlson's show. Completely organic that all these people from all across the political spectrum (several of which have publicly shit on him in the past) out of nowhere decided to have him on their programs so they can ask him softball questions that conveniently rehabilitated his image and "sane-washed" him for their large audiences. Nothing weird going on here at all.

Can't wait to see Nick on with Joe Rogan and Gavin Newsom next month! 😺😺😺
Click to expand...
I'm not saying he's not a fed, but generally speaking it wouldn't be surprising. People with podcasts have a continual need to have topics to talk about. When someone who draws plenty of eyeballs goes on a big show and the show isn't attacked for it, why wouldn't you invite him?

And then you want to offend as few people from both audiences, so you have an interest in touching the controversial topics (=views) without offending anyone (=never saying anything too substantive).
 
I tried to give the interview a fair shake but after Nick and Tucker's fight of "Well you attacked me!" was interrupted by what felt like the 7th ad break I noped right out of it. The impression I got was that Tucker only knew about Nick what the news told him and Nick skinwalks as this "I'm just a widdle whyte boi who wubs my whyde pepo making big waves UwU". It felt like a Rogan interview but with 150% more ads and Tucker should've know better.
 
Ralph Barnhardt said:
I tried to give the interview a fair shake but after Nick and Tucker's fight of "Well you attacked me!" was interrupted by what felt like the 7th ad break I noped right out of it. The impression I got was that Tucker only knew about Nick what the news told him and Nick skinwalks as this "I'm just a widdle whyte boi who wubs my whyde pepo making big waves UwU". It felt like a Rogan interview but with 150% more ads and Tucker should've know better.
Click to expand...
Install sponsorblock and they get skipped automatically.

---

What's the source for Nick being on the no-fly list for how he dealt with a stewardess?
 
Fake Steve Franssen said:
Kassy Dillon (now Akiva) has responded to the lore. She says the break up had nothing to do with Nick's views on Israel but that he was nasty to fellow conservatives.
Click to expand...
I feel like it's half-and-half: Nick definitely said some wild shit about Israel (he's confessed this was around the time he starting getting into Holocaust denial stuff) that bothered Kassy, but that would've been at least somewhat "tolerable" if he wasn't also a giant cunt. What Nick never realized about politics which is obvious to literally everyone else is that you can be the controversial guy, you can be the hard-to-work-with guy, you can be the Israel-skeptic/anti-AIPAC guy, but you can't be all three at once and still expect to be successful in modern US politics. MTG is a crazy, conspiracy theorist bimbo who openly talks shit about both Israel and AIPAC. She gets away with it because she's genuinely popular with voters and works well with her fellow Conservatives.

Nick has always been under the delusion that his public speaking ability and political knowledge would be enough to carry him and he could just get away with treating others like this, but getting along with other people (or at least getting them to hate you less than your opposition) is like 80% of politics, and Nick sucks at it because he is a giant cunt by nature. Being a giant cunt for really no reason has been the most consistent thing about his character for the past decade.

That and being a fag.
 
Last edited:
The Gene Genie said:
Everyone's being way too charitable about Tucker about this. This was a softball
Click to expand...
I have learned my lesson about "softball" interviews. I used to get upset that we didn't get a hard hitting knuckles fight in the interview.

But people just won't show up to interviews like that where they expect to get their shit pushed it. But with a "softball" interview, the interviewee is at ease and will run their mouth much more than if they were getting pressed. Just look at the Prince Andrew interview where he claimed he didn't sweat. We got plenty from that softball interview.

Fake Steve Franssen said:
Kassy Dillon (now Akiva) has responded to the lore. She says the break up had nothing to do with Nick's views on Israel but that he was nasty to fellow conservatives. She also says that she didn't send the clips to Media Matters, screenshot shows that they were monitoring Nick's original online network, Right Side Broadcasting.

(Both deny there was anything sexual, as if anyone ever thought such.)

View attachment 8093848
Click to expand...

MikeyNohMore said:
getting along with other people (or at least getting them to hate you less than your opposition) is like 80% of politics, and Nick sucks at it because he is a giant cunt by nature. Being a giant cunt for really no reason has been the most consistent thing about his character for the past decade.
Click to expand...

Hmmm.... if both accounts are true, then Nick's worst attributes of attacking close allies, targeting former allies once they walk away and just being a general cunt have been their from his early college days. I expect that predates any potential cooption from any Feds.

So what I took to be activity indistinguishable from being a Fed asset can instead be ascribed to a horrible case of narcissism.

Well I guess I can forgive him a little bit for that. But at the end of the day, he will still try to destroy everyone who helps him out no matter how close their views are to him, or how quietly they try to leave.
 
I actually kind of like Tucker enough for the most part considering who he is, I think his biggest problem through the years is that he can be extremely naive, and this Nick Fuentes interview is a shining example of this. He seems mostly unaware of the most unappealing aspects of Nick's past which is a shame because I imagine Tucker would be very interested to know those things but he admittedly doesn't use the internet or have a tv so that's on him (how the fuck does Tucker even get his news anyway without tv or the internet?). Naivety aside I think the biggest reason this interview went the way it did is because Nick Fuentes is mentally a teenager and Tucker didn't want to punch down on someone.

We all expected this to be like the Ted Cruz interview but that was a completely different situation because while they weren't equals necessarily, they were at least two grown men looking each other in the eye and having an honest debate and having grown up conversations. With Nick Fuentes, it was like Tucker was trying to be a surrogate father to Nick for two hours. I found that to be completely fucking hilarious too because most episodes of Tuckers show is about deep dive discussions about politics or conspiracy theories between adults but the Nick Fuentes episode Tucker is trying to explain to this gay mentally stunted mexican guy that it's actually a good thing to be married to a woman and to interact with women and that no actually not every woman is a feminist slut lmao. It's so bizarre.

It seemed like Tucker maybe just wanted to point the guy in the right direction and end it there because they are two completely different weight classes lol, honestly mostly a waste of Tucker's time aside from the hilarity of how gay Nick sounded near the end of the interview, "women are simple minded while men are complex thoughtful creatures that want to rule the universe" "Have you ever actually lived with a woman?" "no, never" Holy fuck what a flamer! I really mostly just wish Tucker didn't apologize for calling Nick gay because he was clearly correct to call him what he is.
 
"Why is that date important to you?"

" Teehee I admire Stalin :shit-eating:"

>Tucker trying to give a softball rehab inter view : :stress: "OoooKay. we'll circle back to that"

He did not circle back to fuentes' admiration of Stalin.
 
Laughing Putin said:
The "I love Stalin" moment was classic Nicholas spergery. It simply cannot be contained. The boy is not normal.

Definitely a record scratch moment.
Click to expand...
Well, there are three red flags (no order in particular):
  • IVF Baby;
  • Being a sodomite;
  • Marrano & Castizo;
So yeah, he definitely he isn't normal. Add in the "lunacy" of nowadays, it's a recipe for disaster
 
Sicko Hunter said:
Multiple people have already pointed out the Black Rifle coffee thing but I just wanted to remind people why that company is so reviled within the online right-wing. After the Kenosha shooting during the Floyd riots Black Rifle went out of their way to use their platform to denounce Kyle Rittenhouse for defending himself against leftists who quite literally wanted to murder him dead in the street.
Click to expand...
Guessing cause half the military is black and the only real life black rifle shop I've ever seen is near an AFB. It makes sense
 
BullfrogBill said:
I actually kind of like Tucker enough for the most part considering who he is, I think his biggest problem through the years is that he can be extremely naive, and this Nick Fuentes interview is a shining example of this.
Click to expand...
Tucker isn't naive. It's like Nick's hetereosexuality. Purely performative.

I mean he is naive in the sense that he is a boomer and doesn't know what something like hoeflation is.

But his intention isn't to grill Fuentes. If they're both feds, it's just an op. And if they're not, then he wants his audience (and vice versa). You don't get them if you're too adverserial. And though the catboy stuff and homosexuality is luridly interesting, it's more informative to learn some personal stuff.
 
1761732371294.png

Lemmingwiser said:
it's more informative to learn some personal stuff.
Click to expand...
Like that Senor Nicholas editor is jewish lmfao


Also I would like to point out, the Tucker interview just goes to show that Senor Nicholas is more that willing to throw identitarians under the bus just to curry up some favour with his majority non-white audience and with establishment figures.

Considering Senor Nicholas constantly hates on trump (so much so he endorsed kamalajeet), he sure seemed fine to act like he's trumps #1 fan in tuckers presence. Also, lmao, that Stalin thing was just gold, however I am very disappointed in my beaner friend for not showing Pinochet some more love. I also would have loved for tuckers team to do 2 seconds of research to find out Senor Nicholas silly little escapades such as his crippling addiction to catboys, and how he got his back blown out by Destiny lmfao.

Either way the whole interview was just was about as hard was Nicks dick when he sees a woman, and was pretty much just him running optics to try and capture a bit of Tuckers audience, and will probably just feed into Senor Nicholas delusions of being mainstream or a future US president to his brown fans.
 
BullfrogBill said:
I actually kind of like Tucker enough for the most part considering who he is, I think his biggest problem through the years is that he can be extremely naive, and this Nick Fuentes interview is a shining example of this.
Click to expand...

harbringer883 said:
Also I would like to point out, the Tucker interview just goes to show that Senor Nicholas is more that willing to throw identitarians under the bus just to curry up some favour with his majority non-white audience and with establishment figures.
Click to expand...

Tucker Carlson is going through the same process as John Tron.​

What is going on?​

    • Being charitable, Tucker currently is going through what most people go through once they believe they find a hidden truth, that turns current reality on its head (Ie: Learning that criticising Israel isn't the end of the world and is ok to do).
    • They want to tell everyone and anyone that will listen and will consume/engage with media/people/ideas that seemingly align with this new worldview, or they think is further down the learning path and hopes that incorporating them will accelerate their journey to proslatize it to everyone.
    [*]

John Tron went through something similar​

    • Since we all know online lolcows and events, let me take an example of this, John Tron's Race, Iq and crime correlations.
    • John found a hidden truth that seemingly explains what was known as the unexplainable.
    • Instead of being able to hold back, internalize this truth, learn from it, and present it correctly, he instead wanted to get this information into the hands of people by presenting the statistics without providing a convincing context/narrative around them.
    • Using Plato's Cave analogy
      • This made him look like an Sperg that does not empathize with people that have not discovered his truth yet, and has no way to put himself in their shoes and guide them through mental darkness to the light.
      • Instead, he yells at the exit that they are stupid to not know what the outside of the cave looks like. And disappointed they did not exit the cave with him at the same time.
    • Without going through the process of internalizing and reviewing your new beliefs, you believe that showing people the end point of it will be enough to convince them, because it now (after you went through your own journey without knowing it) convinces you, the believer.
    [*]

What are the effects of Tucker going through this?​

    • The above segment ties to Tucker as it is the same process he is going through now. After learning about Israel and allowing criticism of it, Tucker wants and has been (if you look at his Channel) taking on anyone who agrees with him or is further down the pipe.
    • Every roadblock / strong opposition that proves this new stance is more grounded in the "new reality" only emboldens him more to seek more extreme ideas/tactics, (not saying wrong) to fight the roadblocks.
    • Look at Tucker's complete disdain for Ted Cruz after his interview with Tucker on Israel. A complete and total 180 on the prior relationship, with new lenses to see Ted now as one of the gatekeepers who keep people from knowing Tucker's new personal truth.
    [*]

Why Nick, with all his baggage?​

    • Nick is a popular figure that is seen by people that, Tucker now believes are his enemies, as a great evil.
    • Tucker to strike back against them wants to normalize this enemy to create more discord for his rivals.
    • This means that Nick will get the most softball questions, that allows Nick to continue his Rebrand Tour that I mentioned in my post below.
    • The issue here is while Nick will present himself as the next logical step for Tucker fans to incorporate in their daily lives, (follows on TikTok, watching streams, etc..) Tucker has effectively led his own fans into a viper's nest.
    • Because Tucker does not want to criticise his new ally he creates a blind spot that will be easily exploited in the future by democrats if Nick becomes more mainstream.
      • His pedo, Ali Alexander
      • Holocaust denial remarks
      • Extreme Trump hate
      • Gay Catboy drama
      • Not going to jail on J6 despite being on camera ordering followers to enter the capital
      • etc...
    • Promoting Nick as the next big figure for Conservatives to move to after Charlie's Death, (Which make no mistake, is what Tucker and Nick are doing explicitly). Is teeing up the easiest homerun for anyone on the left with a little bit of reach/memability to tear down and embarrass the right wing.
    [*]
    FunkTism said:
    Well the point is that Nick is trying to rebrand himself as "Trump Critical / Anti-Peter Thiel".
    The biggest uphill battle here is that his Trump Critical points are either:
    1. Completely untrue: In the Trump Review section of the video. He claims we have not received any deportation figures in 6 months. When the fact is we do get a massive amount of information concerning not only deportation but (self deportation, border crossings, arrests at the border, ICE detainees, etc...). The result of this is that anyone informed on the real politics of the world and is not a loser who gets all their news from Nick can see that it is not criticism but instead, out-in-out anti-Trump propaganda.
    2. Anti-Win stance / Demoralization: Whenever something good happens or something that the right voted for gets enacted, Nick is always there to tell you not to believe your lying eyes and to not celebrate your wins. For example, in Nick's mind, we are completely controlled by Israel and will go to war for them 100 times out of 100. But then the perfect situation strikes, (literally) Israel strikes Iran in the midst of our negotiations. Did we go to war with them, did a single American solider die, or did Trump pull off a master-class of poltical and military strategy and successfully descalate the situation to the point where America gets everything we want, and Israel loses everything they want, (Their Iron Dome shown to the world as imperfect, no regime change, and no war with Iran). But people like Nick would have you believe that this means that, you lose.
    3. Never Enough / Moving Goalposts: Any gain towards what the right wants is never enough. Nick seems to think that instead of making gains and inroads with the American people across all spectrums, (Which Trump has with the highest Latino and Black vote in Republican history with it only growing as we push further rightward), we should just jump into the deepend with no-laws enacted, no hearts and minds won over, no political inroads made, and no lasting iron clad hard to remove changes impleted. Instead of a Run-don't-Walk falacy of the Turtle and the Hare, Nick has the idea of Teleport to pulto and wait for everyone else to want to come over while you tell them to fuck-off and you hate them.
    4. Nick has the same mindset as the Neo-Cons "Lose with Dignity": Instead of seeing the deportation of Anti-Isreal immigrants as what it actually is, (an amazing excuse to deport more 3rd worlders and anti-Whites [because they do conflate Israelies with Whites] out of America. With bipartisan support), Nick would like to keep the Antifa Soros puppets in America to continue to brainwash the young masses in college to ruin their lives. (And yes that one student who was tied to British intelligence was very old compared to his fellow students. Anyone with a brain knows that his real job was as a political recruiter and saboteur of America's youth.) But because they said something anti-Jew we should never deport them. If an illegal screams "Free Palestine!" we should not be allowed to deport them. This is the AF mindset.
    Charles or Nick (Sam's friend not the gay kid in his basement), really needs to take Sam aside and tell him that he is doing the same self-destructive actions that got their show canceled. Sam hangs around many unfunny low-T Zoomers that worship the ground he walks on. The issue is that Sam, someone with no wife and children, wants to feel young and hang with the Zoomer crowd. These people are very likely pushing Sam to make his poltical podcast like show as we all know every Zoomer at one-point thinks they should get into poltical podcasting. These people also probably sold Sam a bag of shit when they compared Nick's deplatforming (something very suspicious since if he really was blacklisted, then why doesn't YT or other hosting sites pull down videos he stars in on their site.) to his own Blacklisting. Sam probably felt some sort of kinship with this and decided to do this interview months ago, (since Nick does not bring up Tucker Carlson we can assume this to be fact. Especially since Nick's ego is so inflated it would have been the main topic dejour.)

    Sam really does need to decide if he wants to go down this poltics route if so, he should start to challenge his guests or do more research on them. Because after watching his show a few times the most he ever does is unfunny remarks or non-sequeters and never makes any insights or challenges at all, UNLESS the guest is complimenting a people/group he does not like, for example, his boomer episode is the only time I heard him correcting a guest and getting mad when she disagreed. Sam does not have the chops to be a political figure for the masses and is relying on Zoomers to superimpose their entire belief system on him, much like they do with Nick.
    Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom