😵‍💫 Skitzocow Naruhide / Naru / menherawhide - 🧮BAN COUNTER: Too many🧮 Professional schizoposter, sex pest, lolicon supporter, deathfat. Come watch a crazy person argue politics while swapping sides, topics, and personalities every other sentence!

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

What is Naru's weight?


  • Total voters
    112
I really wonder what this guy was doing in 2015. His posts are like a relic of that time. The debatebroing, the anime girls without any actual interest in the characters, the primal urge to own da libs with facts and logic epic style, the links to what I assume are either 1-4 hour video essays or ten minute rants by someone doing the "I'm skeptical of the left" bit, and even the "thread theme" style videos of anime girls dancing to some shitty song. He is very much the product of the synthesis of that era of 4chan pol and r/the Donald.

I didn't even notice that the post above this he used "winning," which is a very dated meme and very much fits the theory that he is stuck in the past.
 
I really wonder what this guy was doing in 2015.

Your mom.

The debatebroing, the anime girls without any actual interest in the characters, the primal urge to own da libs with facts and logic epic style, the links to what I assume are either 1-4 hour video essays or ten minute rants by someone doing the "I'm skeptical of the left" bit, and even the "thread theme" style videos of anime girls dancing to some shitty song.

POV: Kiwi Farms users are invited to see what Kiwi farms is really like by anime girls


He is very much the product of the synthesis of that era of 4chan pol and r/the Donald.

Worse things (such as the legalization of the propagandization of Americans by one Barak Hussein Obama) have happened.


I didn't even notice that the post above this he used "winning," which is a very dated meme and very much fits the theory that he is stuck in the past.

KIwi Farmer rolls 1d20 for perception: 3

Pictured: a cringe af self-proclaimed bard demolishing Kiwi Farms' support pillars one guitar swing at a time


Habakkuk 3:19
19 The Sovereign Lord is my strength;
he makes my feet like the feet of a deer,
he enables me to tread on the heights.
For the director of music. On my stringed instruments.


What is the significance of Jericho in the Bible?​

Answer


Jericho is believed to be one of the oldest cities in the world. In the Bible, Jericho is best known as the location of an astonishing miracle God performed. Jericho was the first city conquered by Israel after crossing the Jordan River and occupying the Promised Land (Joshua 5:13—6:23).

Jericho’s location was key to its significance. The city was situated in the lower Jordan Valley, just west of the Jordan River and about ten miles northwest of the Dead Sea. It sat in the broadest part of the Jordan plain more than 800 feet below sea level and nearly 3,500 feet below Jerusalem, which was only 17 miles away. This geographical detail explains why Jesus said in His parable that the good Samaritan “went down from Jerusalem to Jericho” (Luke 10:30).

In dramatic contrast to its desert surroundings, Jericho thrived as a fertile, spring-fed oasis. In the Old Testament, it was often called the “City of Palms” for its abundance of palm trees (Deuteronomy 34:3; Judges 1:16; 3:13; 2 Chronicles 28:15). Strategically located as a border city, ancient Jericho controlled important migration routes between the north and south, and the east and west. Eventually, the town became part of the allotment of the tribe of Benjamin (Joshua 18:12, 21).

After the death of Moses, God selected Joshua, son of Nun, to lead the people of Israel. Under the Lord’s direction, they entered Canaan and began to take possession of the land. The first city standing in Israel’s way was Jericho, a secure fortress with high, formidable walls. Joshua sent spies to investigate the city. Rahab the harlot, knowing that Israel’s God was going to overthrow Jericho, hid the spies and later helped them escape (Joshua 2).

Before the battle of Jericho, God gave Joshua specific instructions for the men of war to march in silence around the city once each day for six days. The priests were to walk with them, blowing ram’s horns and carrying the ark of the covenant as a sign of God’s presence among them. On the seventh day, they were to march around the city seven times. At the appropriate signal, the priests were to blow their trumpets, and the people were to give a mighty shout. They did exactly as Joshua commanded, and on the seventh day the walls of Jericho crumbled. The soldiers went in and took the city, destroying it completely. Only Rahab and her family were spared.

As the first city to fall in the conquest of Canaan, the whole of it was devoted to the Lord (Joshua 6:17). The people of Israel were to take no spoils of war; Joshua gave a clear command that “all the silver and gold and the articles of bronze and iron are sacred to the Lord and must go into his treasury” (verse 19). In this way, Jericho was a “tithe” to the Lord who gave them the victory. God’s people were to honor Him with the firstfruits of the conquest. Achan violated this order and brought ruin on himself and his family.

After the destruction of Jericho, Joshua placed a curse on anyone who might rebuild the city (Joshua 6:26). Jericho remained unoccupied until the time of the prophets Elijah and Elisha, about 500 years later. Then Joshua’s word was fulfilled when Hiel of Bethel rebuilt the city, at the cost of the lives of two of his sons (1 Kings 16:34).

Jericho is mentioned briefly in the book of Judges, which says that Jericho served as a provincial outpost for Eglon the King of Moab who held Israel under tribute for 18 years (Judges 3:13). In 1 Chronicles 19:5, King David sent word for his mistreated delegates to remain in Jericho until their beards regrew. In 2 Kings 2:4–18, Jericho appears to have been the home of a “school of the prophets.”

Also reported at Jericho was Elisha’s miraculous purifying of a spring (2 Kings 2:19–22). During the reign of Ahaz, a group of prisoners was spared, clothed, fed, and cared for at Jericho (2 Chronicles 28:15). The final Old Testament mention of events in Jericho was the capture of King Zedekiah after fleeing the Chaldean army (2 Kings 25:2–7; Jeremiah 39:5; 52:8).

Ezra 2:34 and Nehemiah 7:36 report that the number of Jericho’s inhabitants after the return from exile under Zerubbabel was 345. These “son of Jericho” participated in the rebuilding of the walls of Jerusalem.

Jericho played a minor role in the ministry of Jesus. The Lord healed two blind men near the city of Jericho (Matthew 20:29–34). He also encountered Zacchaeus, a chief tax collector, while passing through Jericho (Luke 19:1–10). When Jesus dined in the home of Zacchaeus, He was probably visiting one of the finest houses in Jericho. The gospels seem to indicate that Jericho, an affluent city in Christ’s day, had many beggars (Matthew 20:29–34; Mark 10:46–52; Luke 18:35–43).

The Jericho of New Testament times was built by Herod more than a mile to the south of the Old Testament location, at the mouth of the Wadi Qilt. Today, the modern city of Jericho includes both sites.


 
Naru the great Christian posting a video from a guy who is:
  • An alcoholic
  • A convicted domestic abuser
  • A demon worshiper
Nice one, Naru.

I'm definitely following Jesus's teachings by ingratiating myself with pagans and Kiwi Farmers.

So yeah. Not too shabby for one with a rebellious spirit as prodigious as mine!

What is the significance of Jesus eating with sinners?​

Answer


Soon after calling Matthew to follow Him, Jesus ate a meal with “many tax collectors and sinners” in Matthew’s house (Mark 2:15). Matthew had been a tax collector, and these “sinners” were his friends and acquaintances who were now spending time with Jesus. Matthew wanted to introduce people in his social circle to Jesus. The scribes and the Pharisees, who despised tax collectors, complained, but Jesus’ actions in spending time with sinners were in perfect accordance with His mission to seek and to save the lost (Luke 19:10).

In Jesus’ day, rabbis and other spiritual leaders enjoyed widespread respect and were held in high esteem in Jewish society. Almost everyone looked up to the Pharisees. They were strict adherents to the Law, they were the guardians of tradition, and they were the exemplars of piety. In their vaulted position, they avoided those whom they deemed “sinners”—those who did not follow their system of rules. Pharisees and the other religious class of Jesus’ day would definitely not have socialized with tax collectors, who were infamous for embezzlement and their cooperation with the hated Romans.

Jesus chose to eat with sinners because they needed to know that repentance and forgiveness were available. As Jesus’ ministry grew, so did His popularity among the social outcasts of society. Once Matthew was part of His inner circle, Jesus naturally had more contact with the pariahs of His society. Spending time with the tax collectors and sinners was only natural, since He had “not come to call the righteous, but sinners” (Mark 2:17). If Jesus was to reach the lost, He must have some contact with them. He went to where the need was because “it is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick” (Luke 5:31).

Sitting at Matthew’s feast, Jesus broke societal taboos and condemned the Pharisees’ legalistic system of attaining righteousness. The fact that Jesus ate with sinners shows that He looked beyond culture to people’s hearts. Whereas the Pharisees disregarded people because of their past behavior, Jesus saw their spiritual need.

All through Jesus’ ministry, He reached out to those who needed Him. He conversed with a despised Samaritan woman at a well—surprising even His disciples (John 4:27). He forgives an immoral woman in Luke 7, He helps a Syro-Phoenician woman in Mark 7, He touches a leper in Luke 5, and He enters Zacchaeus’s house and dines with him in Luke 19. Again and again, Jesus touched the untouchable and loved the unlovely.

Jesus came to save sinners. Tradition, cultural bans, and the frowns of a few do not matter when a soul’s eternal destiny is on the line. “God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him” (John 3:17).

Jesus saw individuals, not just their labels. He had compassion and sought to meet the needs around Him. In sharing the word of God, Jesus ate with sinners and spent time with them. Seeing all of this, sinners were no doubt inspired to know Him better. They recognized Jesus as a righteous man, a man of God—the miracles He performed bore witness to that—and they saw His compassion and sincerity.

Jesus didn’t let social status or cultural norms dictate His relationships with people. As the Good Shepherd, He sought the lost sheep wherever they had strayed. When Matthew hosted the dinner party, Jesus accepted the invitation. It was a wonderful opportunity to share the good news of the kingdom with those who most needed to hear (see Matthew 4:23). He was criticized for His actions by the self-righteous legalists of His day, but criticism did not deter Him.

Unlike the Pharisees, Jesus didn’t require people to change before coming to Him. He sought them out, met them where they were, and extended grace to them in their circumstances. Change would come to those who accepted Christ, but it would be from the inside out. The kindness of God leads sinners to repentance (Romans 2:4), and Jesus was full of kindness.

Jesus showed us that we shouldn’t let cultural norms dictate whom we evangelize. The sick need a physician. Lost sheep need a shepherd. Are we praying to the Lord of the harvest to send laborers into the field (Luke 10:2)? Are we willing to go ourselves?


 
Is defending lolicon because muh free speech also a teaching of Jesus?

I defend lolicon in anime because the demands for it's censorship have never been about the depiction of fictional characters in sexual acts.

It's called incrementalism, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that allowing incrementalism to continue unabated will result in calls for censorship of the Bible before long.

So in a word: yes.

 
I defend lolicon in anime because the demands for it's censorship have never been about the depiction of fictional characters in sexual acts.

It's called incrementalism, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that allowing incrementalism to continue unabated will result in calls for censorship of the Bible before long.

So in a word: yes.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=jEWhmQjeh_I
So, you need to defend pedophilia to defend the Bible? What a fascinating conclusion. Thank you.
 
So, you need to defend pedophilia to defend the Bible? What a fascinating conclusion. Thank you.

No, but you need to conflate drawings with the sexual exploitation of real children to justify the continued existence of this website.

What a fascinating conclusion Given this website's history with archiving photos of other people's children while harassing women with unsolicited dick pics. Thank you.
 
I defend lolicon in anime
Oh no. Oh nooooooo.

Naru, I'm sorry, but there is no coming back from stating that you're defending lolicon. If you can't understand why this is a problem, then I believe you are an actual danger to children and encourage you to seek out the nearest therapist and/or noose as soon as possible.
 
I defend lolicon in anime
1761276935479.png

I understand your modus operandi is being intentionally contrarian, but supporting a stance universally considered pedophilia-adjacent is something you should strongly reconsider.
 
View attachment 8071356

I understand your modus operandi is being intentionally contrarian, but supporting a stance universally considered pedophilia-adjacent is something you should strongly reconsider.

Lead by example, jannie.

Moon and his friends have repeatedly implied that Encyclopaedia Dramatica is an unreliable source. However, I have now checked and been able to verify the earlier quotes, with one exception. In 2012, long before MHN or ED took an interest, Moon was a member of the Blockland forum (a forum for an online lego style game). Users of Blockland expressed disgust and horror with Moon after he boasted of masturbating to Neko Shota (Japanese porn of underage boys, apparently). Post here, archive here.

In a thread speculating about whether Moon had been arrested
, user Stocking accuses him of threatening to murder, anally rape and genitally mutilate her (archive here). Using his account CityRPG (he has had many names on the site as he kept getting banned), Moon did not deny the allegation but responded, “I was really mad that day”.

It looks like Encyclopaedia Dramatica’s quotes are 100% accurate. In another previous article I also unearthed Moon’s admission that he fantasised about murdering his mother with a steak knife. ...
Deliberately Targeting Underage Children
Recently, Dynastia held a poll on Kiwi Farms as to whether it was okay to dox underage children (archive here). The vote passed 14 to 10. In case anyone was wondering if it was a joke the site has subsequently literally carried out the policy and doxxed children as young as 5, for example the child of Block Bot administrator Marian Aanerud (@MAMelby). Again, because of this the, ‘Nyberg Defence’ will not fly.

In ultra-creepy fashion, the Kiwi Farmers archived a (clothed) photo gallery of Aanerud’s young son. Nothing says, ‘no paedophiles here’ like creating a photo archive of someone else’s 5 year old. In this light Dynastia’s pious claims he is against harm to children are laughable. Whilst claiming to SWAT paedophiles he is helping stalk children.

Your author loathes Marian Aanerud, who was ‘laid off’ a few weeks after falsely accusing me of stalking. Even so, I am not going to link her Kiwi Farms thread here or the pictures of her children. Whilst there are legitimate criticisms of Aanerud and the Block Bot to be made neither I, nor any member of GamerGate has ever stooped to doxxing her child or running photos of him.

As noted above, such conduct is a specific offence in Florida. This must be especially upsetting to Aanerud given Moon’s previous statements about masturbating to Hentai containing underage boys. I will not provide links here but have provided them directly to law enforcement. Aanerud could do far worse than contact Sheriff Morgan (dmorgan@escambiaso.com).



Hey @Null how do you feel about your moderators calling you pedophile adjacent?

View attachment 8071356

I understand your modus operandi is being intentionally contrarian, but supporting a stance universally considered pedophilia-adjacent is something you should strongly reconsider.

Users of Blockland expressed disgust and horror with Moon after he boasted of masturbating to Neko Shota (Japanese porn of underage boys, apparently). Post here, archive here.

🤔


¯⁠\⁠_⁠༼⁠ ⁠•́⁠ ͜⁠ʖ⁠ ⁠•̀⁠ ⁠༽⁠_⁠/⁠¯
 
I'm talking about you. All you're doing is acknowledging your admission should be treated as a major point of concern.
 
I'm talking about you. All you're doing is acknowledging your admission should be treated as a major point of concern.

You're not talking about me. You're inciting stocastic terrorism against me by falsely labeling me as "pedophile adjacent" for defending the freedom of expression your very own boss self-reportedly masturbates to.

 
There isn't any false labeling, here.


This quote from you is an admission.

Then lead by example and condemn the owner of this website who granted you your moderator status for being pedophile adjacent, because this quote is from him is an admission.

Users of Blockland expressed disgust and horror with Moon after he boasted of masturbating to Neko Shota (Japanese porn of underage boys, apparently). Post here, archive here.

If you won't do that, then I'm afraid I must justly identify you as a pedophile, due to your refusal to condemn (what you consider to be) "pedophile-adjacent content" on a website (which also happens to archive photographs of other people's 5 year old boys in violation of Florida state law (a website that has also previously been deplatformed under allegations of hosting child pornography) which was created by the man who threatened a 15 year old girl with extreme sexual violence while self-reportedly masturbating to "Neko shota" that you refuse to condemn as one of his proud, handpicked moderators due to your creating this thread about me, wherein you continue to incite stochastic terrorism against me, presumably to deflect criticism from you and your boss's pedophile-adjacent tendencies.
 
Then lead by example and condemn the owner of this website who granted you your moderator status for being pedophile adjacent, because this quote is from him is an admission.



If you won't do that, then I'm afraid I must justly identify you as a pedophile, due to your refusal to condemn (what you consider to be) "pedophile-adjacent content" on a website (which also happens to archive photographs of other people's 5 year old boys in violation of Florida state law (a website that has also previously been deplatformed under allegations of hosting child pornography) which was created by the man who threatened a 15 year old girl with extreme sexual violence while self-reportedly masturbating to "Neko shota" that you refuse to condemn as one of his proud, handpicked moderators due to your creating this thread about me, wherein you continue to incite stochastic terrorism against me, presumably to deflect criticism from you and your boss's pedophile-adjacent tendencies.
I condemn it.

Now we can focus on you defending lolicon. You shouldn't do it, considering it is pedophile adjacent.
 
I condemn it.

Now we can focus on you defending lolicon. You shouldn't do it, considering it is pedophile adjacent.

I didn't ask you to condemn "it." I asked you to lead by example and explicitly condemn your boss's pedophile adjacent tendencies and those carried out on the website you moderate.

As far as I can tell, you are a pedophile. Opinion discredited. Straight to wood chipper (where you belong).

 
I didn't ask you to condemn "it." I asked you to lead by example and explicitly condemn your boss's pedophile adjacent tendencies and those carried out on the website you moderate.

As far as I can tell, you are a pedophile. Opinion discredited. Straight to wood chipper (where you belong).

https://youtube.com/watch?v=3qSJZnxjncY
Are you stupid? I condemn his pedophile adjacent tendencies, which is what "it" is referring to.

I also condemn your own pedophile adjacent tendencies. I don't budge on my own personal values when convenient. Once again, we are talking about you. Why do you defend lolicon?
 
Are you stupid? I condemn his pedophile adjacent tendencies, which is what "it" is referring to.

I also condemn your own pedophile adjacent tendencies. I don't budge on my own personal values when convenient. Once again, we are talking about you. Why do you defend lolicon?

I'm not stupid, but apparently you are.

You're a moderator here, are you not?

So why are you not doing anything to prevent the doxxing of 5 year olds on the website you're supposed to keep clean, or reporting your boss to the authorities for his pedophile-adjacent tendencies you have now confirmed in writing?

Seems like a pretty pedophile-adjacent thing to do to me.

Or is that you're just budging on your own personal values when convenient? 🤨

 
Back
Top Bottom