- Joined
- Sep 22, 2019
Those were much more innocent times, to be sure.I kind of miss the days when it was just suspiciously wealthy furries like that macro falco guy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Those were much more innocent times, to be sure.I kind of miss the days when it was just suspiciously wealthy furries like that macro falco guy.
Eh, it still had a lot of zoophiles and such in it back then. Never forget that the zoosadists were all people who were in the sexual side of the fandom for a long time.i can personally confirm this, from around 2000 to maybe 2015 it was still that niche fandom but post 2015 it was basically invaded by troons and became one of the worst cesspits.
i can personally confirm this, from around 2000 to maybe 2015 it was still that niche fandom but post 2015 it was basically invaded by troons and became one of the worst cesspits. It very quickly went from "people hunting furries for sport, (including that gas attack back in 2014) with regular on topic drama" to "trans rights/my oc is altgender and my pronous are xe/xer, bash the fash". And this wasnt just controlled to the political chat areas it was EVERYWHERE including many fetish groups basically turning into grooming centers or just constant sperging about the president or their new gender identity nonsense.
for a normal straight person it would be like finding what looks like a normal hot woman and getting beaten over the head because that "woman" is actually a NB.
is it a case of like not all furries are zoophiles but all zoophiles are furries thing?An odd trend I've noticed recently is people getting really interested in "vintage" furry culture. Lavafox, a maker who made ugly ass fursuits in the 2010s, is suddenly back in vogue, for example.
The new furs want what the fandom once was without seeming to realize that the early furry fandom would loathe how open these kids are now.
Eh, it still had a lot of zoophiles and such in it back then. Never forget that the zoosadists were all people who were in the sexual side of the fandom for a long time.
It's moreso that, back then, they didn't celebrate what they were doing behind closed doors. Trannies encouraged deviency to be an open secret.
They certainly had a small presence, even as far back as the early 2000s. Around 2010, I noticed a small uptick of them in some niche parts of the fandom, but after Trump's first election they just exploded in number.I can't exactly pinpoint when the tranny menace really started to take over furry spaces, but the most definitive moment was when "herm" OCs (essentially an excuse to give an otherwise ordinary female OC a huge cocknballs) were suddenly trans and any mention of it just being a gooner thing/fetish fuel became taboo, same thing with futanari although that still gets used here and there (often with much groaning by troons). That probably was around '15 or '16.
No, they are two distinct things with a smallish but significant overlap.is it a case of like not all furries are zoophiles but all zoophiles are furries thing?
That number will get higher when you find out about feral.No, they are two distinct things with a smallish but significant overlap.
Most zoophiles are not furries, zoophilia has existed for roughly all of human history and the modern zoophile community is focused on sex with animals, not anthropomorphized cartoon characters.
Meanwhile most furries are not zoophiles (strictly speaking) but a decent number are. Research from decades ago found it to be about 14% of furries reported attraction to real animals. I don't know how that number might differ these days, all I can tell you is that it's still definitely present, though kept quieter due to louder condemnation of it by furries on social media. (Some would argue this is a case of "thou doth protest too much," of course.)
Not really. There are non-furry zoophiles, furries who are not zoophiles, and zoofurs. It's a mess.is it a case of like not all furries are zoophiles but all zoophiles are furries thing?
the fetish name is/was futa and was I think popularized by transformation porn. What I never understood is how it was like somone flipped a switch and suddenly futa was a slur. There was actually a point where transvestite was allowed but futa was not.the most definitive moment was when "herm" OCs (essentially an excuse to give an otherwise ordinary female OC a huge cocknballs) were suddenly trans and any mention of it just being a gooner thing/fetish fuel became taboo
I think in huge amount of cases it boiled down to the fetishes they enjoyed. The trannies coming into the fandom "flipped" a lot of people because it made sense to thier porn addled brain.Some of them were trannies who came to the fandom, but a shocking number of them were people who had been around forever, but suddenly turned tranny.
yea those ....things are a giant mess I thankfully rarely saw them first hand/they are usually banned on sight. So I focused more on the troonification of the fandom.Not really. There are non-furry zoophiles, furries who are not zoophiles, and zoofurs. It's a mess.
I have still seen a lot of guilty or convicted zoophiles still being allowed into conventions or interact with other furries if they don't preach about their sexuality. Their crimes are also swept under the rug alot.yea those ....things are a giant mess I thankfully rarely saw them first hand/they are usually banned on sight. So I focused more on the troonification of the fandom.
Holy shit a furry holding other furries accountable for their actions. I'm not dreaming their holding monsters accountable.Something strange I've noticed recently is that FurAffinity has started to delete the accounts of known zoophiles.
Blonde Dog, one of the zoosadists, was the first one i saw was gone. Today, I discovered the loud'n'proud zoophile Doberman Pinscher was also deleted.
Seens they're trying to clean up the dregs on there...
I wouldn't be so sure. FA wouldn't be doing that without some motive or something going on behind the scenes.Holy shit a furry holding other furries accountable for their actions. I'm not dreaming their holding monsters accountable.
Your right. Sounds too good to be true.I wouldn't be so sure. FA wouldn't be doing that without some motive or something going on behind the scenes.
Furries are no strangers to accountability but it's usually for retarded shit like racism instead of sick fetishes.Holy shit a furry holding other furries accountable for their actions. I'm not dreaming their holding monsters accountable.
Furries are no strangers to accountability but it's usually for retarded shit like racism instead of sick fetishes.
I am gonna feed this mentally challenged dogyou bigot meanie bigot.![]()
I suspect it's an effort to clean up their image. After all, having open zoos on your site, from a fandom that apparently hates zoos, is a choice.I wouldn't be so sure. FA wouldn't be doing that without some motive or something going on behind the scenes.