Debate SSJ ness if a 13 year old girl, a pedophiles victim, should be called a slut or not . - SSJ NESS HAS HIS MIDLIFE CRISIS DEBATE THREAD , please be patient with him he is childless womanless haggot

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Here @Perfectly Innocent. Let me use this as an excuse to quote one of my favorite posts I've ever made, which has some parallels to the current topic (one of them being that it's also from a debate user thread starring Ness).
Tablet County said:
Do we really need to intellectualize and analyze every single aspect of our existence? Is it not enough to accept that people generally like cats and would resist killing them for food if there were other options? Why must every conversation in thunderdome devolve into these retarded pseudo-philosophical debates?
Will we next debate the intellectual and moral quandary of shitting in the street vs shitting in a toilet? After all, the human digestive tract is designed for popping a squat out in the middle of a field, so artifices such as a toilet, an outhouse, or a privy are not only divorcing the human animal from his natural state, but it's also the less efficient form of shitting.
Click to expand...
I'm feeling like Diogenes with a plucked chicken over here.
 
Tablet County said:
Here @Perfectly Innocent. Let me use this as an excuse to quote one of my favorite posts I've ever made, which has some parallels to the current topic (one of them being that it's also from a debate user thread starring Ness).

I'm feeling like Diogenes with a plucked chicken over here.
Click to expand...
He can't tell the difference between a literal pest and an animal you have emotional attachment towards? Is he a psychopath?
 
pollution jim said:
He can't tell the difference between a literal pest and an animal you have emotional attachment towards? Is he a psychopath?
Click to expand...
In fairness I think it was part of a larger conversation about the ethics of hunting which spiralled into a conversation about whether an animal's life was worth more than a human's which spiralled into autism.
Ultimately I feel like the issue was the same, overphilosophizing and getting lost in the weeds of debate instead of taking a step back and wondering if there's already an answer which doesn't require mental gymnastics. And seemingly failing to understand that people tend to protective of "weaker" beings, whether they be thirteen year olds or housecats.

EDIT:
Android raptor said:
Idk, wanting to rape animals is pretty fucked. Not really any better than wanting to diddle kids.
Click to expand...
SSj_Ness (Yiffed) said:
That's an insane take. It's like saying "wanting to kill a cat is not really any better than wanting to kill a kid".
Click to expand...
Lol. Lmao even.
 
Last edited:
Perfectly Innocent said:
What is the actual debate question this thread is based on? Or is this just going to be a circlejerk of self-righteousness?

For example: “Is it appropriate to call someone underage engaging in what they consider to be consensual sexual intercourse with many different people a slut for doing so?” is a very different question to “Is it appropriate to call an underage rape victim a slut?”

Only one of those hypothetical example debate questions has scope for a useful discussion involving statistics of certain happenings, as well as changes to make certain happenings less consequential while accepting that yes, teenagers can and do sleep around but that they do it a lot less today because… well experts are still debating that too!

On the other hand, unconditionally refusing to willingly consent to having sex with someone is the very opposite of slutty behaviour, and therefore, being raped is quite possibly the unsluttiest thing which can happen to anyone, irrespective of their age, common sense says there’s not a lot of useful debate to be had there.
Click to expand...
dis nigga thinks mass deboots is for debooting :story:
 
Even if a child is willingly partaking in promiscuous behavior, it's inappropriate to call them a slut because that is a derogatory term that implies they are at fault when it's well known that children who are hypersexual are almost always being abused.
Exactly how when boys are abused by adult women, it diminishes the crime when it's implied the boy wanted it or he is lucky. A child cannot be a slut because they don't comprehend the ramifications of sex.
Comparing sexual behavior to thievery or murder is ridiculous. Minors know to not steal or hurt others. That behavior doesn't suddenly become okay past a certain age, while sex is a normal part of life.
I had to write this out because it's so fucking simple I had to see if there was something I was missing. I'm seeing a pattern of men who call minors sluts have a grudge against girls they knew personally, who would sleep with older men but not them.
 
Perfectly Innocent said:
What is the actual debate question this thread is based on? Or is this just going to be a circlejerk of self-righteousness?

For example: “Is it appropriate to call someone underage engaging in what they consider to be consensual sexual intercourse with many different people a slut for doing so?” is a very different question to “Is it appropriate to call an underage rape victim a slut?”

Only one of those hypothetical example debate questions has scope for a useful discussion involving statistics of certain happenings, as well as changes to make certain happenings less consequential while accepting that yes, teenagers can and do sleep around but that they do it a lot less today because… well experts are still debating that too!

On the other hand, unconditionally refusing to willingly consent to having sex with someone is the very opposite of slutty behaviour, and therefore, being raped is quite possibly the unsluttiest thing which can happen to anyone, irrespective of their age, common sense says there’s not a lot of useful debate to be had there.
Click to expand...
Fuck yes, let's go 4/4, this thread has been amazing in being able to attract pedophile retards like flies on shit. :story:
 
Justa Grata Honoria said:
THIS THREAD SUPPOSED TO BE FOR ONE PEDO NOT 4

:lossmanjack:
Click to expand...
Why complain tho? The more pedos get kicked off the Farms, the better.

It's funny, I had almost considered leaving the farms because of how un-fun it had gotten.... but this thread makes me feel like things might improve. Especially since at least one of the people hit is one of the people I thought was making the Farms a worse place.
 
Starting to feel like "Debate X about pedophilia" threads are this forum's equivalent of a purge. Find out who has a "niche" opinion on the age of consent and act accordingly.
 
These are always a fucking treat to read because the moment you think you've witnessed the most braindead horrifying garbage deviant retard take come out of someone on this forum that can't be topped and the dust is starting to settle, some faggot comes out of the woodwork to one-up the original degenerate with an even worse take in the exact same thread. We should give this phenomenon a name because it keeps happening.
 
skykiii said:
These threads also just make me wonder, what IS it with people needing to broadcast all their skeevy beliefs and personality aspects? You would think these people would've learned to hide that shit. Especially on a forum that is known for uncovering people's dark secrets.
Click to expand...
On a forum that is known for its userbase being beyond autistic I guess it attracts the type of antisocial autist with skeevy beliefs who just wants to find friends. SSJ Ness IMO is just a pathological debatebro who had nothing better to do than, say, post pages after pages of Great Text Walls of (barely legal) China in the "is lolicon cp" thread.
Isn't it ironic that the guy who hold the stance that loli is 100% cp somehow doesn't find anything wrong in calling little girls sluts?
skykiii said:
I almost wonder if pedos outing themselves is some sort of cry for help?
Click to expand...
Legit pedos can't control themselves, it's a compulsion for them. I remember a case of a pedo begging the police to lock him in prison because, in his own words, he can't just stop doing it and will offend sooner or later.
No, it's not a "sexuality", it's a mental illness.
 
demicolon said:
On a forum that is known for its userbase being beyond autistic I guess it attracts the type of antisocial autist with skeevy beliefs who just wants to find friends. SSJ Ness IMO is just a pathological debatebro who had nothing better to do than, say, post pages after pages of Great Text Walls of (barely legal) China in the "is lolicon cp" thread.
Isn't it ironic that the guy who hold the stance that loli is 100% cp somehow doesn't find anything wrong in calling little girls sluts?
Click to expand...
I think he is far more of a psychopath with no regard for human life rather than an actual paedo. Those two things overlap significantly but can be mutually exclusive.
 
Last edited:
Poppavalyim Andropoff said:
wow weirdo pro-life bible thumper is also a sex pest pervert? colour me shocked

you mean besides the 1000s of priests who suck fuck & jerk off little boys all in the name of Christ? Yeah perverts all right
Click to expand...
as opposed to the public school teachers who do the same in the name of the state, in much greater volume, and enjoy even more institutional protection. they shouldn’t have to compete with the priests for their young meat they hold authority over

Edit: imagine rating dumb because your “lol conservatard own” fails when held up to scrutiny, classic
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom