- Joined
- Aug 21, 2018
Moral cowards who erode the legal fabric of our Union. It makes me a tad bit angry.The docket is over a thousand pages by this point, probably more than two thousand, and they have seen enough of Shitlips to know he is a recalcitrant, vexatious Greetard who is painful to deal with on a good day, and they don't want to deal with him. Worst of all though, when the case was kicked back down from the 10th Circuit due to the "merits" of the complaint, I'm sure they figured another dismissal would have to be bulletproof to survive the inevitable second appeal. And why would they bother? If you ignore the fact that this case is an endless money pit for the defendants, there isn't really any harm in ignoring the docket, sort of like the Acerthorn case. The complaint is never going anywhere, and they have only their precious time, sanity, and good boy points (something I imagine federal judges gossip about at cocktail parties), from getting the case revived yet again on appeal, to lose by actually dealing with it. I highly doubt many federal judges know what it is like to be a poorfag constantly getting sued by pro se in forma pauperis vexatious litigants forever and ever. They only see the insanity unfolding in the form of multiplying ECF numbers and simply choose not to address it because it is the path of least resistance.