Debate SSJ ness if a 13 year old girl, a pedophiles victim, should be called a slut or not . - SSJ NESS HAS HIS MIDLIFE CRISIS DEBATE THREAD , please be patient with him he is childless womanless haggot

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Well well well SSJ-Ness. Looks like the shoe is well and truly on the other foot.
You used to say that I was in the wrong for saying that child molesters should be killed but pointing out that a loving, life-long child marriage is ok.
You claimed that what I said did not meet "modern" standards
But look at you now.

BTW, I would like to inform you all :
Child molesters should be dissolved in acid in order to rid the world of their corruption.
But a loving, life-long marriage between an adult and a minor , as happened some of the time in all parts of the world before the last century, is ok.
The thing that's immoral is deflowering a young maiden and robbing her of her innocence then discarding her.
Getting married to a young girl and cherishing her as your wife until the end of your days together however is not immoral.
This is why leftist pedophile demons all seek to molest and rape children but none of them wish to marry them .
I hope no child is ever left alone near you.
 
you are fucking psychotic dude, dont marry a child

i dont care what retard niggers did in last century, its not kids fault what some retards did a 100 years ago, a kid doesnt have to be raped because you simp for that or whatever
child marriage was a semi-regular occurrence in the whole world for much of human history, not just in africa or muslim countries.
When you assume, you make an ass out of you and me.
 
so? why the fuck does that matter?
why the fuck does kids have to be raped because your autistic ass know that adults having sex with children was normal in the nigger middle ages
 
so? why the fuck does that matter?
It shows that your unfounded insinuations and smears about only africans doing it are wrong.

Think about it. If a man and a maiden are united in holy matrimony and he loves and cherishes her as his beloved wife until the end of his days and vice versa and they raise a family together until they are both old, how exactly is she "harmed" or "violated" ? Are you going to try and tell happy old grandmothers and great-grandmothers throughout human history that infact they're not happy at all, they're actually tormented and irreparably harmed without realising it? Absurd
On the other hand violating a child and using her purely for sex , robbing her of her childhood and innocence and discarding her when girls are evolved to pairbond most deeply with the man who first seduces them, that's what harms children and is a crime that should be punished with death.
This is what leftoid demons exclusively want to do.
Take this an another illustrative example Leftoid professor campaigns to put children in the foster care of known child molester homosexuals
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/...t-that-placed-foster-children-with-pedophiles
 
child marriage was a semi-regular occurrence in the whole world for much of human history, not just in africa or muslim countries.
When you assume, you make an ass out of you and me.
i’m willing to bet money you’re a filthy fucking brown. here in the western world, we tend to not like people who call children sluts.
 
Niggers are always on about how the overton window shifted and one day liberals woke up and discovered they were now considered conservatives, but I woke up one day and discovered I was now considered a centrist! At best!
The easiest way to sour on a political ideology is to interact with people who believe in it.

This is why leftist pedophile demons all seek to molest and rape children but none of them wish to marry them .
So you want pedophiles to marry children before they rape them?
 
Last edited:
It shows that your unfounded insinuations and smears about only africans doing it are wrong.

Think about it. If a man and a maiden are united in holy matrimony and he loves and cherishes her as his beloved wife until the end of his days and vice versa and they raise a family together until they are both old, how exactly is she "harmed" or "violated" ? Are you going to try and tell happy old grandmothers and great-grandmothers throughout human history that infact they're not happy at all, they're actually tormented and irreparably harmed without realising it? Absurd
On the other hand violating a child and using her purely for sex , robbing her of her childhood and innocence and discarding her when girls are evolved to pairbond most deeply with the man who first seduces them, that's what harms children and is a crime that should be punished with death.
This is what leftoid demons exclusively want to do.
Take this an another illustrative example Leftoid professor campaigns to put children in the foster care of known child molester homosexuals
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/...t-that-placed-foster-children-with-pedophiles
i dont give a nigger ass fuck about what some old ass granny says about right and wrong

DONT - FUCK - CHILDREN
 
Well well well SSJ-Ness. Looks like the shoe is well and truly on the other foot.
You used to say that I was in the wrong for saying that child molesters should be killed but pointing out that a loving, life-long child marriage is ok.
You claimed that what I said did not meet "modern" standards
But look at you now.

BTW, I would like to inform you all :
Child molesters should be dissolved in acid in order to rid the world of their corruption.
But a loving, life-long marriage between an adult and a minor , as happened some of the time in all parts of the world before the last century, is ok.
The thing that's immoral is deflowering a young maiden and robbing her of her innocence then discarding her.
Getting married to a young girl and cherishing her as your wife until the end of your days together however is not immoral.
This is why leftist pedophile demons all seek to molest and rape children but none of them wish to marry them .
I get what you’re trying to convey, but the medieval era where children were routinely married to adults for political and dynastic reasons has come and gone.

You are probably thinking of something along the lines of the marriage between Edmund, Duke of Edinburgh, and Princess Leia of Hungary, but what normies hear when they think of “child bride” is horrors beyond comprehension or rational thought… though ideally, the rational thought really is “kill the nonce on the spot right now”. Unless you actually believe that marriage with a child bride should be consummated when the child bride is still a child in which case, to the woodchipper, go.
 
i’m willing to bet money you’re a filthy fucking brown. here in the western world, we tend to not like people who call children sluts.
you would lose that bet. I'm white .
Also, I'm denouncing SSJness for his behaviour. I'm saying that he was previously condemning me for saying that child molesters deserve death but that a lifelong, loving marriage between an adult and a child is ok, but yet here he is tacitly apologising for the actions of a child molester , claiming he doesn't deserve death and that the child was a slut.

I'm with you guys! We're dunking on SSJ-ness together!
I get what you’re trying to convey, but the medieval era where children were routinely married to adults for political and dynastic reasons has come and gone.

You are probably thinking of something along the lines of the marriage between Edmund, Duke of Edinburgh, and Princess Leia of Hungary, but what normies hear when they think of “child bride” is horrors beyond comprehension or rational thought… though ideally, the rational thought really is “kill the nonce on the spot right now”. Unless you actually believe that marriage with a child bride should be consummated when the child bride is still a child in which case, to the woodchipper, go.
Glad to see someone has some sense around here.
 
Princess Leia of Hungary
I can't believe Hungary is ripping off Star Wars. Fucking nerds.
Fuck muhammad, fuck Vishnu
p,s. no ill will to Hindus I just want to provide some reassurance to those who doubt I'm white. I have lots of ill will to muslims.
Oh, so you're running cover for this, for just like, the love of the game? Fuckin' hell.
 
Well well well SSJ-Ness. Looks like the shoe is well and truly on the other foot.
You used to say that I was in the wrong for saying that child molesters should be killed but pointing out that a loving, life-long child marriage is ok.
You claimed that what I said did not meet "modern" standards
But look at you now.

BTW, I would like to inform you all :
Child molesters should be dissolved in acid in order to rid the world of their corruption.
But a loving, life-long marriage between an adult and a minor , as happened some of the time in all parts of the world before the last century, is ok.
The thing that's immoral is deflowering a young maiden and robbing her of her innocence then discarding her.
Getting married to a young girl and cherishing her as your wife until the end of your days together however is not immoral.
This is why leftist pedophile demons all seek to molest and rape children but none of them wish to marry them .
child marriage was a semi-regular occurrence in the whole world for much of human history, not just in africa or muslim countries.
When you assume, you make an ass out of you and me.
It shows that your unfounded insinuations and smears about only africans doing it are wrong.

Think about it. If a man and a maiden are united in holy matrimony and he loves and cherishes her as his beloved wife until the end of his days and vice versa and they raise a family together until they are both old, how exactly is she "harmed" or "violated" ? Are you going to try and tell happy old grandmothers and great-grandmothers throughout human history that infact they're not happy at all, they're actually tormented and irreparably harmed without realising it? Absurd
On the other hand violating a child and using her purely for sex , robbing her of her childhood and innocence and discarding her when girls are evolved to pairbond most deeply with the man who first seduces them, that's what harms children and is a crime that should be punished with death.
This is what leftoid demons exclusively want to do.
Take this an another illustrative example Leftoid professor campaigns to put children in the foster care of known child molester homosexuals
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/...t-that-placed-foster-children-with-pedophiles

Dude's just on his hands and knees grovelling before Noool to get banned.
 
Child molesters should be dissolved in acid in order to rid the world of their corruption.
But a loving, life-long marriage between an adult and a minor , as happened some of the time in all parts of the world before the last century, is ok.
The thing that's immoral is deflowering a young maiden and robbing her of her innocence then discarding her.
Getting married to a young girl and cherishing her as your wife until the end of your days together however is not immoral.
This is why leftist pedophile demons all seek to molest and rape children but none of them wish to marry them .
"Paedophilia is bad, okay. But paedphilia is ok, ahctheuhleeh."

Nice appeal that rape makes child fucking bad, but if it's 'consensual'™ then it's a OK.
Now everyone who got mad that Epstein or the rest of his ilk coerced minors to massage them for money can shut the fuck up, because according to faggot over here it was beautiful and shit.
 
Back
Top Bottom