Debate SSJ ness if a 13 year old girl, a pedophiles victim, should be called a slut or not . - SSJ NESS HAS HIS MIDLIFE CRISIS DEBATE THREAD , please be patient with him he is childless womanless haggot

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I think it's just a matter of being smart. Why risk violent encounter - very disadvantageous situation that can easily alarm other people or get you stabbed - when you can get what you want using nothing but words and always resort to violence if things don't go your way? It's a matter of intellectual superiority, not of moral superiority and in my opinion does not lessen the weight of this pedophile's actions.
I understand where you're coming from, but to me, anyone who threatens or engages in violence automatically makes whatever illegal behavior they're worse. If someone borrows $20 and never repays me I find that a preferable position to be in than being mugged at knifepoint. I'm sure a young girl would very scared and scarred potentially for life much worse if forced to endure that kind of abuse. Again, I should restate we're just arguing degrees of wrongdoings, I don't want more people twisting this as some kind of defense for anything it's not.

like you cant present any evidence or reasoning for why you think this 13 year old girl wanted to be molested by a 67 year old man?
Kill yourself
 
It could be sexual if someone perceives it that way, and though I don't feel like the director intended it to be viewed that way
You are either very naïve or very disingenuous, that's all I have to say.

In the world of adults scamming is less severe of a crime than extortion, but that's because adults are expected to not be gullible. Children are different, their reasoning hasn't developed yet, and their opinions do not matter. They don't have a developed sex drive either, when children are "sluts" it's through outside forces that they became that way. And sex crimes are greatly different from other crimes. Anyone who disagrees with any of those points are highly suspicious to me

Kill yourself
Have nothing else to say?
 
I understand where you're coming from, but to me, anyone who threatens or engages in violence automatically makes whatever illegal behavior they're worse. If someone borrows $20 and never repays me I find that a preferable position to be in than being mugged at knifepoint. I'm sure a young girl would very scared and scarred potentially for life much worse if forced to endure that kind of abuse. Again, I should restate we're just arguing degrees of wrongdoings, I don't want more people twisting this as some kind of defense for anything it's not.


Kill yourself
What if you use the 20 dollars to pay for a 13 year old girl?
 
I'm sure a young girl would very scared and scarred potentially for life much worse if forced to endure that kind of abuse. Again, I should restate we're just arguing degrees of wrongdoings, I don't want more people twisting this as some kind of defense for anything it's not.
I mean, there would be no debate if you said what you said here: that the girl was a victim, not a slut. Everybody would agree and we would've moved on hours ago.
 
I mean, there would be no debate if you said what you said here: that the girl was a victim, not a slut. Everybody would agree and we would've moved on hours ago.
Obviously Ness thinks she’s a slut for being raped by an ugly fat white man instead of the ideal Aryan man.
 
All my enemies are retarded.
1760815971039.png
 
You are either very naïve or very disingenuous, that's all I have to say.
Which part is disingenuous, how? I assure you I do not pleasure myself to Sonic's lithe, spikey, blue body.

In the world of adults scamming is less severe of a crime than extortion, but that's because adults are expected to not be gullible. Children are different, their reasoning hasn't developed yet, and their opinions do not matter.
True.

They don't have a developed sex drive either, when children are "sluts" it's through outside forces that they became that way. And sex crimes are greatly different from other crimes. Anyone who disagrees with any of those points are highly suspicious to me
That's not true, they have one but it's incumbent upon adults to ensure nobody takes advantage of minors, and to punish those who do. What they do not have is the ability to consent.

What if you use the 20 dollars to pay for a 13 year old girl?
Then I'd think you're taking advantage not only of a child but of a mentally disabled child, because $20 is not much in this economy.

if you answer the question

i wont kill myself

but ill consider it before rejecting it
That's good enough. My response is your question's phrasing is purposefully intended to be provocative and is made in bad faith.

I mean, there would be no debate if you said what you said here: that the girl was a victim, not a slut. Everybody would agree and we would've moved on hours ago.
You can be both at once, but as explained above it's incumbent upon adults to protect minors from themselves and punish adults who prey upon them. That doesn't mean denying a behavioral issue which is in need of rectification by parents. I see no benefit to pretending minors cannot have disordered desires which should be suppressed, you can't even teach them to suppress them without acknowledging them. If sex ed should exist at all it should be to that end, to teach abstinence which would address the problem, but it only exacerbates it.

All my enemies are retarded.
View attachment 8051684
You are your own worst enemy if you don't think lolicon should be banned.

It’s not about defending the man, it’s what you said about the girl and you refuse to understand this.
I've addressed it 100x, if you want to have a Lidl tier meltdown over this then be my guest. Maybe run off and throw a fit, and leave forever with tears in your eyes.
 
You can be both at once, but as explained above it's incumbent upon adults to protect minors from themselves and punish adults who prey upon them. That doesn't mean denying a behavioral issue which is in need of rectification by parents. I see no benefit to pretending minors cannot have disordered desires which should be suppressed, you can't even teach them to suppress them without acknowledging them. If sex ed should exist at all it should be to that end, to teach abstinence which would address the problem, but it only exacerbates it.
The problem is that the discussion of the child's behavior issues is far less important when compared to everything else, and the perception it gives when you do so is not a positive one
 
Then I'd think you're taking advantage not only of a child but of a mentally disabled child, because $20 is not much in this economy.
Oh shit we got Reagan over here, if you’re gonna complain so much about libtards (specifically HHH) being pedophiles then you shouldn’t be doing this kinda dumb shit
 
The problem is that the discussion of the child's behavior issues is far less important when compared to everything else, and the perception it gives when you do so is not a positive one
I do not see how, it's not as if I'm arguing she can consent, that the guy did nothing wrong, or anything controversial. You just don't like the term I used for these behavioral issues. Like I said, get schools to teach abstinence and send kids to church. Or I guess yell at me and let them get condoms from school and watch twerking TikToks all day, then surprisedpikachu.jpeg when they run off with men. You're fools.
 
Which part is disingenuous, how? I assure you I do not pleasure myself to Sonic's lithe, spikey, blue body.
You know what I meant, I was talking about that high brow anime humor you laud over, I didn't think you jerk off to Sonic, but I do now.
That's not true, they have one but it's incumbent upon adults to ensure nobody takes advantage of minors, and to punish those who do. What they do not have is the ability to consent.
Is a fruit ripe when it's off the plant? No, it takes time, 18 is the standard we've set for them to be sexually active. 13 year olds are not built to bear children.
 
Back
Top Bottom