- Joined
- Aug 22, 2020
like you cant present any evidence or reasoning for why you think this 13 year old girl wanted to be molested by a 67 year old man?Lotta words for "I can't"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
like you cant present any evidence or reasoning for why you think this 13 year old girl wanted to be molested by a 67 year old man?Lotta words for "I can't"
I understand where you're coming from, but to me, anyone who threatens or engages in violence automatically makes whatever illegal behavior they're worse. If someone borrows $20 and never repays me I find that a preferable position to be in than being mugged at knifepoint. I'm sure a young girl would very scared and scarred potentially for life much worse if forced to endure that kind of abuse. Again, I should restate we're just arguing degrees of wrongdoings, I don't want more people twisting this as some kind of defense for anything it's not.I think it's just a matter of being smart. Why risk violent encounter - very disadvantageous situation that can easily alarm other people or get you stabbed - when you can get what you want using nothing but words and always resort to violence if things don't go your way? It's a matter of intellectual superiority, not of moral superiority and in my opinion does not lessen the weight of this pedophile's actions.
Kill yourselflike you cant present any evidence or reasoning for why you think this 13 year old girl wanted to be molested by a 67 year old man?
You are either very naïve or very disingenuous, that's all I have to say.It could be sexual if someone perceives it that way, and though I don't feel like the director intended it to be viewed that way
Have nothing else to say?Kill yourself
What if you use the 20 dollars to pay for a 13 year old girl?I understand where you're coming from, but to me, anyone who threatens or engages in violence automatically makes whatever illegal behavior they're worse. If someone borrows $20 and never repays me I find that a preferable position to be in than being mugged at knifepoint. I'm sure a young girl would very scared and scarred potentially for life much worse if forced to endure that kind of abuse. Again, I should restate we're just arguing degrees of wrongdoings, I don't want more people twisting this as some kind of defense for anything it's not.
Kill yourself
if you answer the questionKill yourself
I mean, there would be no debate if you said what you said here: that the girl was a victim, not a slut. Everybody would agree and we would've moved on hours ago.I'm sure a young girl would very scared and scarred potentially for life much worse if forced to endure that kind of abuse. Again, I should restate we're just arguing degrees of wrongdoings, I don't want more people twisting this as some kind of defense for anything it's not.
Obviously Ness thinks she’s a slut for being raped by an ugly fat white man instead of the ideal Aryan man.I mean, there would be no debate if you said what you said here: that the girl was a victim, not a slut. Everybody would agree and we would've moved on hours ago.
Kill yourself
I fully expect a lolicon to use this at some point in the near futureAll my enemies are retarded.
View attachment 8051684
It’s not about defending the man, it’s what you said about the girl and you refuse to understand this.I don't want more people twisting this as some kind of defense for anything it's not.
No one likes your kind either, you probably want to fuck eeveeAll my enemies are retarded.
View attachment 8051684
All the people you want to never see again will sadly never get banned, just put them on your block listI sense some incoming clitty leakage
View attachment 8051714
Do you read Mass Debates? Half of the threads here are something like "Debate @username on pedophilia \ age of consent".I sense some incoming clitty leakage
View attachment 8051714
Which part is disingenuous, how? I assure you I do not pleasure myself to Sonic's lithe, spikey, blue body.You are either very naïve or very disingenuous, that's all I have to say.
True.In the world of adults scamming is less severe of a crime than extortion, but that's because adults are expected to not be gullible. Children are different, their reasoning hasn't developed yet, and their opinions do not matter.
That's not true, they have one but it's incumbent upon adults to ensure nobody takes advantage of minors, and to punish those who do. What they do not have is the ability to consent.They don't have a developed sex drive either, when children are "sluts" it's through outside forces that they became that way. And sex crimes are greatly different from other crimes. Anyone who disagrees with any of those points are highly suspicious to me
Then I'd think you're taking advantage not only of a child but of a mentally disabled child, because $20 is not much in this economy.What if you use the 20 dollars to pay for a 13 year old girl?
That's good enough. My response is your question's phrasing is purposefully intended to be provocative and is made in bad faith.if you answer the question
i wont kill myself
but ill consider it before rejecting it
You can be both at once, but as explained above it's incumbent upon adults to protect minors from themselves and punish adults who prey upon them. That doesn't mean denying a behavioral issue which is in need of rectification by parents. I see no benefit to pretending minors cannot have disordered desires which should be suppressed, you can't even teach them to suppress them without acknowledging them. If sex ed should exist at all it should be to that end, to teach abstinence which would address the problem, but it only exacerbates it.I mean, there would be no debate if you said what you said here: that the girl was a victim, not a slut. Everybody would agree and we would've moved on hours ago.
You are your own worst enemy if you don't think lolicon should be banned.All my enemies are retarded.
View attachment 8051684
I've addressed it 100x, if you want to have a Lidl tier meltdown over this then be my guest. Maybe run off and throw a fit, and leave forever with tears in your eyes.It’s not about defending the man, it’s what you said about the girl and you refuse to understand this.
The problem is that the discussion of the child's behavior issues is far less important when compared to everything else, and the perception it gives when you do so is not a positive oneYou can be both at once, but as explained above it's incumbent upon adults to protect minors from themselves and punish adults who prey upon them. That doesn't mean denying a behavioral issue which is in need of rectification by parents. I see no benefit to pretending minors cannot have disordered desires which should be suppressed, you can't even teach them to suppress them without acknowledging them. If sex ed should exist at all it should be to that end, to teach abstinence which would address the problem, but it only exacerbates it.
Oh shit we got Reagan over here, if you’re gonna complain so much about libtards (specifically HHH) being pedophiles then you shouldn’t be doing this kinda dumb shitThen I'd think you're taking advantage not only of a child but of a mentally disabled child, because $20 is not much in this economy.
I do not see how, it's not as if I'm arguing she can consent, that the guy did nothing wrong, or anything controversial. You just don't like the term I used for these behavioral issues. Like I said, get schools to teach abstinence and send kids to church. Or I guess yell at me and let them get condoms from school and watch twerking TikToks all day, then surprisedpikachu.jpeg when they run off with men. You're fools.The problem is that the discussion of the child's behavior issues is far less important when compared to everything else, and the perception it gives when you do so is not a positive one
I don't check out Mass Debates, happenings is better.Do you read Mass Debates? Half of the threads here are something like "Debate @username on pedophilia \ age of consent".
You know what I meant, I was talking about that high brow anime humor you laud over, I didn't think you jerk off to Sonic, but I do now.Which part is disingenuous, how? I assure you I do not pleasure myself to Sonic's lithe, spikey, blue body.
Is a fruit ripe when it's off the plant? No, it takes time, 18 is the standard we've set for them to be sexually active. 13 year olds are not built to bear children.That's not true, they have one but it's incumbent upon adults to ensure nobody takes advantage of minors, and to punish those who do. What they do not have is the ability to consent.