US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's a very, very expensive to pay off poll. In the days and weeks before the election there was clearly a concentrated effort to make the betting odds look more favorable to Kamala Harris, but all that did was leave a massive hole in the campaigns pocket and enrich the wallets of everyday people who bet that Trump would win. My brother in law made a big chunk of change on that bet and I have little doubt part of that money came directly from the Harris campaign
All public polling exists to push narratives it’s just nonsense and has always been nonsense. The actual polling numbers would too valuable and expensive to collect to then just give away. It’s only other function is slop for political scientist nerds


Internal polling is probably real
 
Last edited:
"It's a very, very expensive to pay off poll."

its retardedly easy to rig polls. kamala ran out of money because she did retarded shit like giving beyonce half a million dollars to show up at her georgia rally. that's what her staffers were busy working on like it would be some groundbreaker.
turned out literally nobody gave a shit and it didnt matter.
 
Fuck off we don’t care about your autistic pet term for pozz

Stop trying to make your word vomit a thing
Maybe he doesn't think marxism can be an ideology because it's materialist? That's a new take for sure. Oh well, I've posted enough for now lol. Thanks guys for the talk, it's nice to not have some crazy emergency going on for a few days, but 3 days until the next senior hospice outdoor fest known as 'no kings' is soon.
 
What? I'm genuinely curious what you think "Marxist Idealism" is. Generally every form of marxism is materialist.
Its just a term I use for socialism or socialist policies in general, such as Obamacare. Their true Marxist influence is that of social issues, "equality of man" and whatnot. It isn't Godly in the least anymore. My politics aren't just about money, theyre centered around God.
 
Confederate worship by conservatives is fucking stupid.
I have a LOT of people in my family tree that fought for the south (and the north too) not a fan of stupid slogans, but heritage isn't hate friend. Then again you are a proud oil driller, so I'm not too surprised you come across as a bit of dumbass on this.

Actually it would be a coal burner not a oil driller :story:

Not true friend. Coal burner is a bitch that fucks niggers. An oil driller is a dude that fucks black women. Term been around a LONG time lol.
 
Last edited:
Even though you could make a pretty good case that Calvin Coolidge was a proto-libertarian (even though I've never seen a libertarian ever mention Coolidge or ever give him credit for this), Coolidge would strongly dispute being anything but a red blooded Republican. Of course, one of Coolidge's most famous quotes is

And a neat little example from his childhood that taught him his Republican values
I know, I meant he was a small-l (right-)libertarian ideologically rather than a big L Libertarian in the sense of actually being a member of that party (which IIRC wouldn't even exist for another five decades or so). Man opposed Prohibition, high taxes, agricultural subsidies, excessive economic regulations, police unions, the KKK and the League of Nations - he was probably the closest the US has had to having a genuinely libertarian (ideologically/philosophically) president since Grover Cleveland. Since the Democrats post-Cleveland had largely become the party of centralism & regulation (and would logically be even more into that shit in the Southern Victory timeline where the American political spectrum was dragged much further left with a successful Socialist Party) I really don't think he'd want anything to do with them, even setting his historical Republican partisanship aside.

Coolidge also makes people who fetishize an all-powerful central federal gov't seethe to this very day, so that makes him even more based as far as I'm concerned.
 
I have a LOT of people in my family tree that fought for the south (and the north too) not a fan of stupid slogans, but heritage isn't hate friend. Then again you are a proud oil driller, so I'm not too surprised you come across as a bit of dumbass on this.
I can get what @Hey Johnny Bravo is saying to an extent, it's something that easily gets twisted into "sports team" mentality. North vs South, where some people get emotionally invested in the war the same way people are about Ukraine or Palestine.

When history gets emotional it starts being less about history and more about narrative.
 
I know, I meant he was a small-l (right-)libertarian ideologically rather than a big L Libertarian in the sense of actually being a member of that party (which IIRC wouldn't even exist for another five decades or so). Man opposed Prohibition, high taxes, agricultural subsidies, excessive economic regulations, police unions, the KKK and the League of Nations - he was probably the closest the US has had to having a genuinely libertarian (ideologically/philosophically) president since Grover Cleveland. Since the Democrats post-Cleveland had largely become the party of centralism & regulation (and would logically be even more into that shit in the Southern Victory timeline where the American political spectrum was dragged much further left with a successful Socialist Party) I really don't think he'd want anything to do with them, even setting his historical Republican partisanship aside.

Coolidge also makes people who fetishize an all-powerful central federal gov't seethe to this very day, so that makes him even more based as far as I'm concerned.
Ok one more post. Libertarians are dying because economically they wanted Tariffs pay for government. Trump took that away.

The only other thing they care a DAMN about is weed. Just THC. They've mostly won that through the blue state force. Their only next move will be to legalize more drugs, that's all they care about. Drugs and getting high. They'll go like the druggie from weed to pills to 8balls, natural selection. They got beat out by both sides on their only issues.

Really all they cared about was THC being used by everyone like Brave new world soma, and they pretty much have that with gummies and cbd. Their time is over.

The LP has been the party of liberaltarian evil useless turds of the 'right'
 
I am going to keep saying it but race relations are going to take a fucking NOSE DIVE when white people get back their "in group" preference, which every other race in this country has by the way. lee kuan yew was right jar where are you.
If "race relations" are contingent upon granting minority groups overreaching political authority and exaggerated political impact in a nation or else they'll chimp out, race relations are already in the gutter and shouldn't be a deciding factor. These retarded sheboons and gibsmedats in these districts have been an embarrassing farce in a system implemented by old retards to try and appease people over shit that happened hundreds of years ago. "Oh well shucks, Shaneeq'ua is a distant cousin twice removed of some other negress who had an ancestor who picked cotton, better throw away the nation so that she can feel muh representation and turn Atlanta into a gang infested shithole."
 
When history gets emotional it starts being less about history and more about narrative.
That’s my issue with that type of talk and I am from deep unionist state.

This is why civil war history is just so difficult imo, everyone just wants to connect it to the present somehow.

Most old stock Americans actually decended from people who fought on either side in my experience don’t go full “ I wish the south would rise again or I wish Sherman killed every Georgia”

It’s carpetbaggers and Ellis islanders larping
 
Last edited:
Its just a term I use for socialism or socialist policies in general, such as Obamacare. Their true Marxist influence is that of social issues, "equality of man" and whatnot. [...]My politics aren't just about money [...]
The correct term for the struggle of socialists would be materialism, making humans materially equal; idealism would be your policy preference around God. Sorry if my autism around correct utilization of language triggers somebody, but manipulation of perceived reality starts with language and re-assigning meanings diametrically opposed to the original meaning of terms, the preferred technique of Neo-Marxists
 
Back
Top Bottom