US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If the clause they’re looking at is struck down, it means they won’t be obligated to keep districts existing solely for minority representation, which means a solid 19 democratic seats (and possibly more) are effectively gone.
Looking at this, CA can do whatever they want, Boss Nigger Thomas has this.

G3UUwSfbAAAESc2.jpg
 
So basically the Supreme Court is deciding if districts can be drawn on totally racial lines or not, and it's happening because Louisiana tried adding a new black-only district.

So if the SC strikes down the appeal, does that signal that all states will redraw their districts so they are no longer along racial lines?
 
ALL FRENS, BEST JEW PROTECTION PROTOCOL ACTIVATED, STAR OF DAVID FORMATIONS! HOLD!

KWI501.png

KWI502.png


"This isn't America"

KWI500.png



So basically the Supreme Court is deciding if districts can be drawn on totally racial lines or not, and it's happening because Louisiana tried adding a new black-only district.

So if the SC strikes down the appeal, does that signal that all states will redraw their districts so they are no longer along racial lines?

Yes, and you get at least 8 more GOP seats since only Georgia and a part of Florida actually have enough blue area cities to elect faggots. Just this alone would help the GOP in '26 but with the other redistricting it really fucks ups the democrats, and all while places like Ohio and PA have become enough red to stop any new dem gerrymandering.
 
Last edited:
So basically the Supreme Court is deciding if districts can be drawn on totally racial lines or not, and it's happening because Louisiana tried adding a new black-only district.

So if the SC strikes down the appeal, does that signal that all states will redraw their districts so they are no longer along racial lines?
The issue is that states were required to do so, which in practice forced republican states to have built in Dem strongholds. So a lot of republican states will redraw their districts, while the Dems gerrymander like hell to make up for the loss.

We are in for some wacky electoral shenanigans ahead.
 
ALL FRENS, BEST JEW PROTECTION PROTOCOL ACTIVATED, STAR OF DAVID FORMATIONS! HOLD!

View attachment 8043166

View attachment 8043167


"This isn't America"

View attachment 8043165





Yes, and you get at least 8 more GOP seats since only Georgia and a part of Florida actually have enough blue area cities to elect faggots. Just this alone would help the GOP in '26 but with the other redistricting it really fucks ups the democrats, and all while places like Ohio and PA have become enough red to stop any new gerrymandering.
What has to go wrong with your brain chemistry to want to be a journalist? Why would you want to hold a position that does nothing but lie and encourage people to hate and kill each other?
 
If the clause they’re looking at is struck down, it means they won’t be obligated to keep districts existing solely for minority representation, which means a solid 19 democratic seats (and possibly more) are effectively gone.
I believe it goes further than that. If racial-gerrymandering is ruled unconstitutional (it is) then all the districts drawn with race as a factor would be ruled illegal too. States wouldn't have a choice, they would be forced to redraw them all.

So basically the Supreme Court is deciding if districts can be drawn on totally racial lines or not, and it's happening because Louisiana tried adding a new black-only district.
Louisiana was *forced* by the courts to draw this black-dominated district so they drew it as stupidly as possible to trigger this exact SC outcome.


Louisiana-Congressional-Map-1.webp


The interests of the people in Shreveport are not the same as the interests of those in Baton Rouge. One person representing both in Congress is not what the Framers had in mind.
 
Last edited:
I believe it goes further than that. If racial-gerrymandering is ruled unconstitutional (it is) then all the districts drawn with race as a factor would be ruled illegal too. States wouldn't have a choice, they would be forced to redraw them all.
Oh boy, all 50 states redrawing districts before a high stakes midterm, I am excited for this clusterfuck.
 
Looking at this, CA can do whatever they want, Boss Nigger Thomas has this.

View attachment 8043160
Georgia and North Carolina are RINO country and close to flipping to blue due to both of those states RINOs aggressively courting tech and Jew dollars.

They wouldnt fix the maps because that would be "racist". (And more importantly endanger their controlled opposition consultancies in the future)
 
What has to go wrong with your brain chemistry to want to be a journalist? Why would you want to hold a position that does nothing but lie and encourage people to hate and kill each other?
Opportunism an the belief that you individually are going to be able to "influence" the trajectory of material history according to your individual beliefs with analogue 20th century methodology, ignoring that your market, analogue generations considering you an authority due to your "job" are dying and that every third worlder with an internet access and esl level of English can do your "job" for 99% cheaper with a larger potential reach among digital natives that consider 20th century propagandists lower and less trustworthy than a digital hobo screeching into the void

Journalism as a profession is dead
 
If California does this then Republicans will do it en mass in their controlled states as retaliation. Along with the fact that Newsom's plan is far more extreme in targeting the ERASURE of Republican seats, not just creating new ones ala Texas and that will be a huge black eye on Newsome come 2028 in terms.s of showing him to be crooked as fuck and can not be trusted to fuck over anyone in the country that doesn't support him.
That's how you get Civil War II: Electric Boogaloo
My ROTC leader always said it wasn't a 'civil war' but a 'war between the states'. It really sucks that it was the obviously dead end of slavery and the obvious need for a strong federal system that ended in such a nasty war. And what sucks MORE now is we have these retarded states NOW fighting about the same level for ILLEGAL ALIENS against the system. It's so fucked up now.
Don't forget that these illegals literally get used as slave labor as they get paid shit wages and have to meet all sorts of demands by their employers otherwise they get reported and deported
 
Is the RINO strategy now to be as unabashedly racist as possible to cater to Gen Z? If so, I don’t get it.
come on dude, youngish dudes blowing off steam and talking shit in a group chat seems pretty normal to me. it's not a big deal, not really. it's a smear job to try to downplay the shit jay jones said.

i dont' think jay jones should step down either. all this shit demanding people disavow statements pisses me off. compelled speech is bullshit, people should say whatever the fuck they want.
 
Oh boy, all 50 states redrawing districts before a high stakes midterm, I am excited for this clusterfuck.
I don't see any way districts get changed before the midterms regardless of the SC decision. There will be too many challenges to the proposed replacement maps among other things. Qualifying is only a few months away now and the state legislators who do the drawing will probably be busy with their own campaigns. Who gets to draw the new maps will be a huge issue in all those state races though.
 
I don't see any way districts get changed before the midterms regardless of the SC decision. There will be too many challenges to the proposed replacement maps among other things. Qualifying is only a few months away now and the state legislators who do the drawing will probably be busy with their own campaigns. Who gets to draw the new maps will be a huge issue in all those state races though.
How bad would it be if the Democrat States get redistricted in time but the Republican ones don't?
 
Back
Top Bottom