What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
the great flood
great floods happen at the end of ice ages, depending on region hundreds of kilometers into the sea are land during heavy ice ages
atlantis might have been destroyed that way too
So now archaeologists have to come up with a reason why we sat on our arses for 1 million years
for the same reason niggers still sit on their arses, it was paradise with easy food around the year
archeology also cant find biological material after a certain time, except for rare circumstances of conservation like permafrost
they make a lot of assumptions anyways, and dress it as the state of science even tho its just one of many theories
they didn't have that cognition that put us at the top of the food chain from day 1.
this is just a theory, and i dont subscribe to it
there is nothing to really back this up
I can't imagine them having to admit we wuz abboz n shieet or Antarctician in origin
we are obviously not abbos, abbos are the only group further removed from us than africans
the only group somewhat related to abbos are dravidians, meaning low-caste indians, especially in southern india
i think there was likely a polynesian slave trade going on for some time in the past
west/middle eurasian origin seems most likely for white people, we might be highly mutated proto-east-asians too, american natives being so closely related to asians makes this a reasonable theory
The average Ashkenazi is 30 percent Italian but that assumes you consider Italians white.
italians are not white, they are mediterranean
but they are obviously our closest relatives, together with the other middle easterners & north africans
ancient greeks however where white, but modern greeks are turkish rapebabies
North Italians are true whites
north italians are german rapebabies
southern italians likely came from the middle east 3000+ years ago
 
I just figured out where the "3I Atlas has companions!" idea came from.

It's this picture:

1760372427269.png

Those are background stars showing motion blur due to the long exposure and movement required to capture an image of the comet. That's it.
 
Curious as to why these two? I’d go for Eurasian if I had to stick a pin in a map.
Abbos look like a mix between africans, chinks and chimps. They have apreserved ecosystem dating further back than most African tribes, while that doesn't prove much, we (white/europeans) look closer to africans than abbos.
Antarctica would be an option because it used to be a lush, tropical paradise and with the strict restrictions on visiting the place because of 'conservation' (don't make me laugh) it would stand to reason something is hidden in the permafrost that shows that we came from that way.

I think chinks/orientals are the ancestors of Innuits (both have pan heads and high intelligence) and are a divergent race of [unknown] + Abbo.

As for the pacific choice, there's 2/3rds of the worlds land mass under water on one whole side of the planet. It wasn't always that way and we see small island peninsulas peaking out of the ocean showing that there is a land mass hidden underneath the water. When we look at the Easter Island carvings and [I can't remember the name] massive stone monuments on islands in the middle of nowhere, inexplicable who carved them, why or how. There's a whole lot of history there, lost to the ocean and if I were a gambling man, that's where Atlantis is.
this is just a theory, and i dont subscribe to it
there is nothing to really back this up
There is. We are the only known living organism in the known universe to have the cognitive mind. Phrenology (debunked because it was racist) shows that the Neanderthals had a yuge mammalian brain capable of creating complex societies, but they lacked cognition.
Neanderthals' minds were akin to apes and dogs, just in humanoid form.
we are obviously not abbos, abbos are the only group further removed from us than africans
Exactly.

The trail of 'evolution'* would go something like [unknown race] > Abbos > Africans > Middle easterners > Europeans.

The climate changes us, our hair, skin colour, physical abilities. It's why spear chuckers are great at chucking spears but not so good at mathematics.
 
I learned about the link between Italians & Ashkenazis very recently. I also learned that the Jewish-American mob partnered with the Italian-American mafia to form a hilariously-cartoon-villain-esque named alliance named "Murder Inc".
Abraham "Kid Twist" Reles and Louis "Lepke" Buchalter were somewhat unusual since the stereotypical Jewish mobster was in on the accounting side of things, while the wops did the violence. Meanwhile Murder Inc. was both full of Jews and run by a Jew.
 
Technology exists which is beyond our very comprehension. If you extrapolate the premise of some hegemonic techno-feudal state existing,. observe how military technology has essentially plateaued c.1945. here is my argument:
  1. if publicly disclosed advances in nanotechnology are such that a piston can be built with an atom 1.
  2. if nanotechnology exists which can self-assemble and self-replicate, 2.
  3. if there are public patents for novel, feasible forms of propulsion and interplanetary travel from the 00's, 3.
  4. if neuro-interfacing has seen many classified programs for decades now, 4.
  5. if directed energy weapons were illegally tested on Iraqi civilians, 20 years ago 5.
  6. if there is evidence of advanced biotech enhancement being employed in civilian sectors 6.
Why exactly are men fighting wars still, much less in outmoded, repackaged technology like the F-35? it is utterly illogical.

i don't want to theorize about what technology does exist... it boggles the mind
 
Last edited:
Technology exists which is beyond our very comprehension.
well yeah, they have fully functional cloning technology and they sometimes use it just to fuck with us.
they cloned and artificial aged a god damn b-movie actor to fuck with us.

come on, look my in the eyes and tell me that Robert Bronzi is a real person and not a Bronson clone
 
Oh, it's that idiot. His Las Vegas shooting videos were full of wrong information like what kind of rounds were used, police helicopters shutting off their transponders during mass shootings being unusual, and hotels having bullet proof doors. He also thought he uncovered a CIA safehouse outside of Boston. He's trying to be baby's first conspiracy theory video and can't get basic info right.
 
This one makes me cross.

My ancestors didn't live in a house with large windows, controlled temperature year-round, near-infinite food options and a car. My ancestors didn't live as long as I probably will, with all of my children surviving infancy, early childhood and beyond. My ancestors didn't have access to the information and entertainment that would stun an empress.

Those are a few examples of what is commonplace for the vast majority of Westerners. Why would I eat insects? Why would I want to live as my ancestors?

Oh yeah, we're supposed to eat the bugs. Not them.

Yes, the kids at the fair or museum exhibit or festival ate the bugs. They'll also eat paste or other non-food items for the gross factor. They're children.

Sorry for the sperg.
 
"One mutation that is consistent between the Neanderthals and modern-day humans is a mutation on OCA2 that produces a blue eye color. The origin of blue eye color, however, does not arise solely due to the presence of archaic genes. Modern-day humans also have mutations causing a blue eye color that are not present in the Neanderthals, so the origin of blue eyes is likely due to a multitude of factors."
 
My ancestors didn't live in a house with large windows, controlled temperature year-round, near-infinite food options and a car. My ancestors didn't live as long as I probably will, with all of my children surviving infancy, early childhood and beyond. My ancestors didn't have access to the information and entertainment that would stun an empress.
my ancestors hunted the hog, the deer, the rabbit, the ox and the bear
my ancestors farmed the cereals and the vegetables
they ranched the chicken, the pig, the goat, the sheep & the cow
they drank the milk, and ate the eggs & dairy products
sure as hell they didnt eat the bugs, thats some niggermonkey shit

btw did you know that access to food which fits your culture is a human right?
https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures/sr-food/about-right-food-and-human-rights
to quantitatively and qualitatively adequate and sufficient food corresponding to the cultural traditions of the people to which the consumer belongs, and which ensure a physical and mental, individual and collective, fulfilling and dignified life free of fear.
now why would someone try to make you think your ancestors ate bugs, even tho this simply isnt the case?
Why exactly are men fighting wars still, much less in outmoded, repackaged technology like the F-35? it is utterly illogical.
the entire western arms industry is a racket to transform tax money into private capital
everything the western military pays for is overpriced by a factor of x5 to x20
except for pens, those are overpriced x500 for whatever reason
 
Last edited:
if there are public patents for novel, feasible forms of propulsion and interplanetary travel from the 00's, 3.
Patents don't really mean much. They certainly don't need to be feasible per se. You can patent all sorts of unproven bullshit as long as it's novel and you're willing to pay the fees.
Two anecdotes: A guy and his company claim to have developed a novel optical microscope that can somehow resolve down to the angstrom level. Company claims somethingsomething treating light as particles yaddayadda, and cites their patent on the device. The patent, of course, involves none of that, and is frankly nonsense, it claims a superresolution optical microscope but has zero explanation on why it would work, and in reality it simply doesn't work. Guy claims there's proprietary technology involved, but given that he has been trying to peddle his magic tech for decades and yet his tech that outright revolutionizes physics hasn't caught on. What I'm saying is that it's bullshit and the patent means nothing.
I myself once patented a process before it was proven to work. It has been since proven to work, but we filed for the patent before even filing for the research grant simply to protect the idea beforehand. It was completely untested yet the patent was granted. Patents mean nothing, and frankly, many of such patents are the basis of scams and frauds.
And of course patent-trolling by companies.
 
Now I preface this with the fact that I have little knowledge of the topic. So this is more of an open question/request

Why is it that almost all 'nazi' or 'fascist' accelerationist groups in America have the following characteristics:
  • Full blown satanist or satanist affiliated
  • Weirdly obsessed with rape, pedophilia and marginal types like Charlie Manson
  • Almost always their founders are intelligence types or are affiliated with intel types
  • Weirdly bold, considering that everybody knows that any political group outside of the Democrat/Republican dichotomy is infiltrated to the gills with feds.
The KF thread on them demonstrates this. The thing that strikes me as particularly bizarre is the satanism aspect. If we were to assume that this is a fed operation to create a strategy of tension of a political scapegoat for more law enforcement the satanist aspect is completely unnecessary. Being a fascist terrorist is enough to do the trick.
 
Curious as to why these two? I’d go for Eurasian if I had to stick a pin in a map.
I would say he is mostly right, except neanderthals being non sentient. Races likely evolved more parallel than a strict line. White-med-asian-nigger-abbo.

Phrenology may not apply to that well to a different human species. Its like trying to apply lion measurements for cats.

His weird fixation on how only one hominid was sentient seems odd to me, as if it is an insecurity complex. As outlined below, just bad luck can drive a subspecies to extinction.

Specialists are more vulnerable than generalist animals. Our brand of human was just more generalist than the Neanderthals.

They simply got outcompeted for thousands upon on thousands of years, this eventually lead them to go extinct. It is not like there was a Neandercaust. Neither was there a Dodocaust, yet human pressure drove the dodo to extinction.

We didn't plan to or want to wipe dodos out, we just ate them all.
Our distant ancestors could have eaten all the game neanderthals needed and they slowly withered away.
The average Ashkenazi is 30 percent Italian but that assumes you consider Italians white.

Full Neanderthal Jews lecture:


I can't download bc internet is out and I would rather not use my hotspot on retarded shit
Romans, ancient Greeks and even ancient egyptians were much fairer. They are extinct now, like Neanderthals. Funnily, the askenazi are less related to ancient jews than palistanians.

This also makes neanderthals an unlikely joo suspect. Jews come from the sandy armpit of the planet. Neanderthals lives in the cold north and never went that far south.

This would only make sence either if all semites were descendants of Neanderthals, or if jews mixed too much with romans and greeks who were neanderthals.

I don't know, but Abdul doesn't look like a red haired dwarf to me. The big nose redhead would be better blamed on Mics, maybe Irish had more neanderthal dna?

Seeing the jew Ron Pearlman does give it some credence but it could be from his non jew side.
Ron_Pearlman.png
"One mutation that is consistent between the Neanderthals and modern-day humans is a mutation on OCA2 that produces a blue eye color. The origin of blue eye color, however, does not arise solely due to the presence of archaic genes. Modern-day humans also have mutations causing a blue eye color that are not present in the Neanderthals, so the origin of blue eyes is likely due to a multitude of factors."
Blue eyes tend to be better at low light levels. Dark eyes are better for sunshine bright places.

This does raise the question why Eskimos haven't evolved it. Perhaps snow glare?
Now I preface this with the fact that I have little knowledge of the topic. So this is more of an open question/request

Why is it that almost all 'nazi' or 'fascist' accelerationist groups in America have the following characteristics:
  • Full blown satanist or satanist affiliated
  • Weirdly obsessed with rape, pedophilia and marginal types like Charlie Manson
  • Almost always their founders are intelligence types or are affiliated with intel types
  • Weirdly bold, considering that everybody knows that any political group outside of the Democrat/Republican dichotomy is infiltrated to the gills with feds.
The KF thread on them demonstrates this. The thing that strikes me as particularly bizarre is the satanism aspect. If we were to assume that this is a fed operation to create a strategy of tension of a political scapegoat for more law enforcement the satanist aspect is completely unnecessary. Being a fascist terrorist is enough to do the trick.

Easy, you outlined it yourself. They are astroturfed by CIA and the CIA fucking loves Satanism. A religion about generating pizza, faggotry and all sort of deeds the CIA can leverage.

Satanism is the hedonist religion that is tailor made to create kompromat (blackmail material) on their agents and stooges. It is perfect for CIA types. It is built in degeneracy.

OG nazis were interested in esoterics, but that was mostly stuff like Vril or paganism.

Satanism is just feds poisoning the well to have blackmail material for sure.

This doesn't even get contained to skinhead glowops. Satanism is everywhere in the USA's powerful and rich. Since the CIA came to power, it is in universities, politics, hollywood.

Drugs, pizza, general sexual degeneracy that would make a hentai artist blush, is just what the CIA needs and loves, with helpings feom their butt buddy Mossad.

Western intelligence and pizza are conpletely intertwined. A society that runs on noncery.
 
Last edited:
Abbos look like a mix between africans, chinks and chimps. They have apreserved ecosystem dating further back than most African tribes, while that doesn't prove much, we (white/europeans) look closer to africans than abbos.

I think we have a pretty good idea when the Aborigines arrived in Australia because the mass extinction of Australia's megafauna was almost certainly due to the arrival of humans hunting them to extinction and burning down forests. And fossil records seem to put that at around 46,000 with reasonable accuracy. Unless there have been subsequent waves of settlement and the current Aborigines displaced some earlier form of humanity from there. So that would place any divergence at being not later than around 50,000 years ago.

phrenology (debunked because it was racist) shows that the Neanderthals had a yuge mammalian brain capable of creating complex societies, but they lacked cognition.

You said things along these lines a couple of times and I'm a little unclear how you see the Neanderthals as being capable of sophisticated intelligence and complex societies but lacking "abstract thought" or "cognition". What do you mean by that precisely? What would the difference be?
 
i believe the slavs have the biggest neanderthal admixture, i have nothing to back that up except that they look like strong hardy cavemen with big brow bones
the jews that look neanderthal-esque might be the result of interbreeding with poles
Phrenology (debunked because it was racist) shows that the Neanderthals had a yuge mammalian brain capable of creating complex societies, but they lacked cognition.
there is no reason to believe thats true
skulls of a race you've never seen a real brain of dont give you exact values for how big each part of the brain truly was, inner structure can be different compared to known humans
brains differ in complexity in more ways than just size too, the most important quality for abstract thought seems to be the amount of interconnections between synapses, and this varies widely from person to person, and while this can be achieved by a larger brain, it can also be achieved my a more densely interlinked one
The thing that strikes me as particularly bizarre is the satanism aspect
this is indeed really crazy, but there are basically two kinds of satanists, with overlap between them
  • edgy teenagers
  • powerhungry psychos
o9a is both of it at the same time
with that in mind it makes sense why they would larp as nazis
Satanism is everywhere in the USA's powerful and rich. Since the CIA came to power, it is in universities, politics, hollywood.
mkultra had some satanic programming in it, pizzagate leaked satanic child sacrifices, and even secular american culture is deeply influenced by satanic values
i have read in another thread that apparently there is a pseudochristian wealth-church which has a strong growth, claiming that the wealthy are wealthy because god loves them and the poor are poor because they deserve it
this is of course a direct satanic inversion of christs teachings
 
Last edited:
It could be Satanic or just Protestant, both put value on your greed. This is best asked from the Catholic thread or such, I am no theologian.

I checked, Denisovan ancestry is around 0,5 with slight variations. Abbos have the highest. But it is all half a percent something universally.

Neanderthal is very structured.
Asians and Injuns got 3%
Whites and Arabs got 2%
Niggers got very little.

However niggers do have their unique genes from an "unidentified" source, a hominid we don't have the bones of they say. I am betting it is erectus or chimps kek.

Abbos clock in at a respectable 2.7% nd they got the highest Denisovan too.

So in fact, Chynamen are the Neanderthal master race, joos only got 2/3rds of it oy vey!
 
Now I preface this with the fact that I have little knowledge of the topic. So this is more of an open question/request

Why is it that almost all 'nazi' or 'fascist' accelerationist groups in America have the following characteristics:
  • Full blown satanist or satanist affiliated
  • Weirdly obsessed with rape, pedophilia and marginal types like Charlie Manson
  • Almost always their founders are intelligence types or are affiliated with intel types
  • Weirdly bold, considering that everybody knows that any political group outside of the Democrat/Republican dichotomy is infiltrated to the gills with feds.
The KF thread on them demonstrates this. The thing that strikes me as particularly bizarre is the satanism aspect. If we were to assume that this is a fed operation to create a strategy of tension of a political scapegoat for more law enforcement the satanist aspect is completely unnecessary. Being a fascist terrorist is enough to do the trick.
Just sounds like being as edgelord as possible for the edgelordiness of it. Or they are just rolling stones fans. They combined most (or maybe all) of that.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom