💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.8%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%

  • Total voters
    699
If it wasn't for enemies sticking him with bayonets no one would even know he's alive.
He doesn't even have enemies anymore. The closest he has to one is his our wife who's BUSTED body bore him five FUCKING KIDS who he has to DRIVE EVERYWHERE, or his gay ex-lover who is trying to have the court system remove Nick from their life.

I wouldn't even call those of us who used to watch Nick and still post here to laugh about his well deserved suffering enemies. We're more of a peanut gallery.
 
. The horror comes from his mommy enabling it all with the money gifts. Hope they declared them all! (they didn't)
This endless cockteasing better produce results
Isn’t there supposed to be some general guideline against this cocktease trust-me-bro shit? There’s been so much “walls are closing in, you’ll all see!” nonsense from you, bud. No offense and I hope you’re right and have the goods but it’s all annoying fanfic without proof. I can’t be only one bothered by that.
 
A source within the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility informs me that they are investigating Rekieta, but that they cannot reveal more
I am informed of the following:
  • The matter is still under investigation
  • My earlier stated deadline of 90 days was based on inapplicable rule
  • Their file remains confidential
 
YT creatot RUNKLE of the Bailey just dropped a video of an Illinois lawyer suing Runkle and trying to maintain a RO against Runkle.

MY POINT
THE Illinois judge [BLUE State, like Minnesota Blue] analyzed how Runkle is NOT to be restrained WHILE DESCRIBING every action taken by junkie and whore wife as actual examples of STALKING and HARRASSMENT!

HOLY
FUCKIN
Shit
Illinois has exceptionally fair and effective RO procedures. This is why, for example, Ade's RO against Ralph is so strict.
 
Isn’t there supposed to be some general guideline against this cocktease trust-me-bro shit? There’s been so much “walls are closing in, you’ll all see!” nonsense from you, bud. No offense and I hope you’re right and have the goods but it’s all annoying fanfic without proof. I can’t be only one bothered by that.
There is some leeway, Rekieta has personally seethed on stream Rapt's actions, that can earn you a "part of the balldo lore" troll pass.
Also Rapt isn't being an attention-whore faggot about it, or causing the farms legal problems, which gets you further pass as well.

I think the “walls are closing in, you’ll all see!” talk has been relatively sparse, it only crops up every other month or so, and its based off known problems Nick is already having, such as his estate value woes and MSBA licence status. If it was wholesale "I've got something juicy only I can know", I'd call them a faggot too, but there is nuance here. (I presume) a lot of it is "through-the-grapevine" talk, which you don't want to make declarative statements unless its concrete.

tl;dr - it can be referenced while it coalesces, like letting wine ferment.
 
Last edited:
No, that is his argument.

If that works -- it completely destroys online verification in any way. The entire blue check/verified account system should crumble if "well you can't prove who was holding the phone at THAT EXACT MOMENT" argument works.
It's Nick's law student level of legal knowledge overconfidence. He acts as if something cannot be definitively proven then it can't be relied on.

He doesnt understand the real world application of standards of proof an reasonable inferences.

Its online debate bro attitude. It won't work in court, the only issue is whether it gets in the way of his substantive arguments.
 
No, that is his argument.

If that works -- it completely destroys online verification in any way. The entire blue check/verified account system should crumble if "well you can't prove who was holding the phone at THAT EXACT MOMENT" argument works.
Wait, did he really use that 'nuh uh, you can't verify if it were really me' argument for what was released on HIS account to dodge responsibility? 🧠

For comparison, let's recall that just last week, he funnelled through a last-minute gotcha to the prosecutor in Aaron's RP case for the whole 'Geno got recorded shit talking Kayla at Aaron's event, ergo Aaron is 100% responsible'.
 
Last edited:
It's Nick's law student level of legal knowledge overconfidence. He acts as if something cannot be definitively proven then it can't be relied on.

He doesnt understand the real world application of standards of proof an reasonable inferences.
He doesn't even have an overconfident law student level of knowledge. He reminds me way more of the jail-house lawyer types who read some books that are 30 years out of date and they didn't understand anyway, and thinks he can totally win now and anyone who tries to dissuade him of his "Great Idea" ™️ is actually trying to sabotage him.
 
Last edited:
Wait, did he really use that 'nuh uh, you can't verify if it were really me' argument for what was released on HIS account to dodge responsibility?
If I was Aaron's lawyer, my next question on cross-examination would be "Okay, arguendo, April Anderson did perform the intrusion, why did you publish it?" followed up with "Why did you brag about it?"

Nick will be forced into a position to state that publishing people's confidential data is funny or make some hack excuse that will make Judge Ovelten deeply suspicious.
 
Last edited:
Wait, did he really use that 'nuh uh, you can't verify if it were really me' argument for what was released on HIS account to dodge responsibility?

Let's recall that just last week, he funnelled through a last-minute gotcha to the prosecutor in Aaron's RP case for the whole 'Geno got recorded shit talking Kayla at Aaron's event, ergo Aaron is 100% responsible'. :ow:

It's funny and weird that you don't know how the Law Pope works. One day he will talk about it fully when he can.
 
I wouldn't even call those of us who used to watch Nick and still post here to laugh about his well deserved suffering enemies. We're more of a peanut gallery.
What people think we are.
akg_8-1932-1-0-a1_a3.jpg__1536x1.png
What we actually are.
latest (3).png
We're like "give em Hell" Harry Truman supporters said, and he said, "I never did give them Hell. I just told the truth, and they thought it was Hell."
It's funny and weird that you don't know how the Law Pope works. One day he will talk about it fully when he can.
He's definitely planning that. It's the day after he fulfills the 5K Grift.
 
Judge Ovaltine may not be the disciplinarian we're hoping for but Rekieta is such an incompetent colossal faggot that if anyone can convict HIMSELF, it's rat-snout Rekieta. Narcissism is a helluva drug.

ETA
I edited this post to just calm everyone's tits about cow tipping tee hee teasing and all related. I will not mention any of it again even if Rekieta does. He will spray out all the relevant information at some point anyway like the oversharing faggoty theater kid that he is anyway. Or some of it will end up in an Interesting New Matter Of Public Record or whatever.

Peace. Peace.
lol
 
Last edited:
Josie the Redhead Libertarian shows up on Tim Pool once in a while, she's active in the Right-wing griftosphere (a la the Laurens, Southern and Chen); hers and Nick's paths could've crossed during the Depp/Rittenhouse era.

Is she not married? (Not that Nick would care) Was she the one who did the conservative pin-up calendar? I cannot keep track of these 'influencers'...

But that was one of his defences - “someone else” had picked up his phone, presumably unlocked it, opened X and then posted the information which they had screengrabbed from Aaron’s account after illegally accessing it.

I didn’t imagine that, right?

Yes. Nick seems to think that he can lie and deny things until he is caught red-handed, then it was not a 'lie 'because you [didn't] have a right to the information'. He thinks that 'beyond a reasonable doubt' means that if you cannot rule out 'space aliens', you must acquit.

YT creatot RUNKLE of the Bailey just dropped a video of an Illinois lawyer suing Runkle and trying to maintain a RO against Runkle.

MY POINT
THE Illinois judge [BLUE State, like Minnesota Blue] analyzed how Runkle is NOT to be restrained WHILE DESCRIBING every action taken by junkie and whore wife as actual examples of STALKING and HARRASSMENT!

HOLY
FUCKIN
Shit

What does this mean?
 
Yes. Nick seems to think that he can lie and deny things until he is caught red-handed, then it was not a 'lie 'because you [didn't] have a right to the information'. He thinks that 'beyond a reasonable doubt' means that if you cannot rule out 'space aliens', you must acquit.
"It's all so tiresome" meme has never been so true. The people he fools are subnormals who would be fooled by anything and no one else is taken in so it is the saddest fucking spectacle of a performance in quite some time. His parents have a lot to answer for but so does ratwife Kayla. It's her job to tard wrangle her toddler of a husband.
 
Kayla is such a fucking joke.

She pumps out five retards from Nick. What does Nick do? Nothing.

Nick doses one of her kids with cocaine. What does she do? Nothing.

Her kids show up at school starving and stinking to the point mandatory reporters report them as starving and stinking and obviously neglected.

What does this stupid, evil whore do? Nothing.

Nick fucks an other woman publicly and boasts about it. What does this dumb cunt do? Nothing.

Nick fucks an other dude and then goes on a rampage when the dude no longer makes his dick available. What does this idiot cuckquean do about her homosexual husband?

NOTHING.

Anyone who excuses Kayla at this point should just neck. This dumb cunt is evil beyond belief and utterly worthless as a human.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom