US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
>show us your ID, fascist!
>no
>well, shit


God damn this shit just keeps getting funnier.

Funnier would be Trump issuing them all official Officer Badass IDs that they can whip out in cases like this. Imagine the seethe when one of the protesters is handed an ID that lists A. Patriot as the name of the officer.
 
It also over simplifies the causes of the war into "Americans just simply didn't like the Axis/Central powers political systems", which is beyond retarded.
Yea, how do they grapple this world view with the years of appeasement? Lol
 
I’m hopeful for the future of America, especially if we handle leftist terror effectively and deportations pick up (both of which look likely). I wish I could say the same for the rest of the Anglosphere. It makes me sick to my stomach seeing these good, kindly people being abused and raped by migrants with the express permission of their governments. We should militarily intervene, but since Trump is a noted Anglophile I doubt anything will happen until 2029 at the earliest. Maybe Erik Prince?
It's probably worth discussing the British ideal of fairness being singularly unique, since that is the instinct that's being weaponized against the Anglos. Complaining about fairness in most places will just get you laughed at, but the Brits really care about that shit and have since the Magna Carta.

The idea of fairness to a Chinaman is "pay shit prices, get shit goods.". It doesn't matter that he's the one offering you the price. If you're stupid enough to believe his lies, that's your own fault for being greedy. That's fair. That's the Temu principle.

The idea of fairness to a Spic is "you have enough". It's like the idea of Catholic charity, but non-consensual. If a Spic wants or needs something and you aren't going to die from the lack of it, then he'll take it. That's fair.

Fairness to an African is "you give me.". If an African wants something he will take it. Wanting and taking are what's fair. You can see it in how they fight, how they negotiate the world. Wanting something is all the justification they need to do it.

Jeets are even worse than niggers because they actively justify any cruelty or abuse with an argument of cosmic justice. Not only will they take from you whatever they can, because they can, they'll tell themselves that it's your fault for something you did in a previous life, aka some bullshit they made up. That's fair. That's karma.

The Anglos, simple bastards they are, think that fairness is living up to agreements that other people made in your name. They think that fair is treating everyone the same, like family. It's obvious why they get rolled all over the globe..

Edit: almost forgot Arabs and other Semites. They have a rather strong sense of fairness, but it's far from universal. If you qualify, you're golden. If not, you're fucked.
 
Last edited:
How can a fish tell its wet? This is a bit of a problem with winning too hard, or otherwise baking a core concept into the Zeitgeist of a country and the citizens. At some point it will either become: a cargo cult, lost to history, or rediscovered as a "something new".

Uber is a taxi service with an app, but go tell that to someone in the 2010s who knows nothing of the taxi fights in NYC back in the 1930s. Time isn't a flat circle, but history does seem to rhyme. The whole "80 years to forget the lessons of the past" seems to be a part of it.
It really is like that. People hear about "The Union" from history class about the American Civil War, but there isn't the connection made that "The Union" is still around. In fact its all around us because we are living in it. With all that entails. History really does rhyme with how the Democrats are once again using secessionist talking points about the supremacy of their local communities over the national authority.
 
Five years ago I would have agreed with you but now it just seems like bullshit wishful thinking designed to passify whites well they import more warring tribes. We are a sea of colonies, those colonies generally hate each other and are constantly fighting to dominate each other. The worldview you are espousing is good and noble but it only works in a homogeneous society.
Just because we fight doesn't mean America isn't one people or it isn't worth fighting for. The rest of the world wouldn't accept us any other way anyways.
 
It's provably worth discussing the British ideal of fairness being singularly unique, since that is the instinct that's being weaponized against the Anglos. Complaining about fairness in most places will just get you laughed at, but the Brits really care about that shit and have since the Magna Carta.

The idea of fairness to a Chinaman is "pay shit prices, get shit goods.". It doesn't matter that he's the one offering you the price. If you're stupid enough to believe his lies, that's your own fault for being greedy. That's fair. That's the Temu principle.

The idea of fairness to a Spic is "you have enough". It's like the idea of Catholic charity, but non-consensual. If a Spic wants or needs something and you aren't going to die from the lack of it, then he'll take it. That's fair.

Fairness to an African is "you give me.". If an African wants something he will take it. Wanting and taking are what's fair. You can see it in how they fight, how they negotiate the world. Wanting something is all the justification they need to do it.

Jeets are even worse than niggers because they actively justify any cruelty or abuse with an argument of cosmic justice. Not only well they take from you whatever they can, because they can, they'll tell themselves that it's you're fault for something you did in a previous life, aka some bullshit they made up. That's fair. That's karma.

The Anglos, simple bastards they are, think that fairness is living up to agreements that other people made in your name. They think that fair is treating everyone the same, like family. It's obvious why they get rolled all over the globe..
I don't think it's necessarily something exclusive to Anglo peoples, perhaps the root of the issue is trying to see the entire world through the lenses of Enlightenment and Enlightenment-inspired ideals when in reality those ideals were could only ever properly exist in European descended cultures. It's a similar situation to trying to impose concepts of democracy upon places that have no history or experience with it which often results in calamity, corruption or failed states. People are trying to merge seemingly incompatible beliefs together and it just isn't working or if it does it functions in a strange way.
 
Governor JB Pritzker has declared Trump’s Administration Authoritarian (again) and Called Upon Illinoians to Ask ICE Agents for Their IDs

>show us your ID, fascist!
>no
>well, shit


God damn this shit just keeps getting funnier.
The Jewish head of a state government demanding a specific group of people "show their papers?"

 
I can't believe there isn't more discussion of the speech. It was amazing and I now find Pete very attractive. No, but seriously, go watch it.

Key points:

- No more fatties allowed, at every rank people must be in shape. Will be tested on this twice a year
- No more beards or weird hairdos, men must be clean shaven and military haircut at all times
- No more easy fitness tests, they will be harder and women must be able to do the same as men
- No more easy bootcamp, drill Srgts are allowed to yell, throw things, and even put their hands on new recruits
- No more hiring based on race, gender etc. All merit based
- No more punishments for leaders taking risks
- No more stupid educational and pointless meetings, wants to instead focus on being in shape and ready for combat
- Pete was blunt and said that the war department must instill fear into enemies and that the military is not meant to defend but to win

There was way more but that's the main points that stick out, it was a very inspiring and patriotic speech.

edit: No offense, but Trump is kind of killing the momentum of that great speech. He seems low energy today.

Anyway, I do wonder why everyone was called for this in person, my only thought is maybe it's to demoralize and encourage the fat woke losers to resign after being told to their face that the military won't put up with their bullshit.
 
Last edited:
I like this speech so far. Didn't catch Pete, but Trump is doing well. He's laying down the law for his command staff, which is important. And why not a zoom call or whatever? You can goof off during Zoom. You are stuck in your seat during this.
Pete's speech was way better and IMO Trump's portion is killing that momentum after Pete's great and energizing speech.

I'm also wondering why everyone was needed to be called in person, only thing I can figure is it was meant to encourage those that care and demoralize the woke fatasses so they will resign.
 
I love this country:

>"There are two n-words, and you can’t use either of them."

ENOAAvAxIYuHmKKw.mp4
I guess "The 'N' word" (newscaster gasps) "By that I mean Nuclear" stopped working, so now he has to liven it up.

Pete's speech was way better and IMO Trump's portion is killing that momentum after Pete's great and energizing speech.

I'm also wondering why everyone was needed to be called in person, only thing I can figure is it was meant to encourage those that care and demoralize the woke fatasses so they will resign.
Cover for the real reasons for the meetings?
 
Pete's speech was way better and IMO Trump's portion is killing that momentum after Pete's great and energizing speech.
It is early in the morning lol.
I'm also wondering why everyone was needed to be called in person, only thing I can figure is it was meant to encourage those that care and demoralize the woke fatasses so they will resign.
If you actually want to keep your job, you show up. It's also nice to see just who is under your command instead of having them across the world all the time. Gets a chance to meet and talk with them 1 on 1 too after the speeches
 
If you actually want to keep your job, you show up. It's also nice to see just who is under your command instead of having them across the world all the time. Gets a chance to meet and talk with them 1 on 1 too after the speeches
I wonder how many were stupid enough to show up looking obviously woke and unprofessional, I hope Pete sees them and fires them on the spot.
 
Back
Top Bottom