You should not support Harry Potter at all at this point.
They got SO mad that he's reprising his role as Malfoy ON BROADWAY. To the point that when you go to their website for tickets, he's literally the main selling point. He just seems to be genuinely grateful and likes the role plus the reaction he still gets to it.
It’s literally a book series for children. Reading it and finding it profound as an adult is fucking embarrassing, especially since the prose is beyond simplistic, because, again, it was written for children.
well, that's her... job?
yep, the saying "the left always eats itself" isn't used as some shitty motivational quote, it's a fucking fact, one she chose to ignore.
He looks fine for a near 40 year old father, but he's the most normal of the bunch, and asides from a few comments "she's like my aunt and i love her but i can disagree with her in some views''' from the height of trannygate supporting trannies back in 2022, he hasn't said anything mean to JK since.But that's a hard 37, he's on the Steven Segal diet/camo scheme where they think wearing black will hide 150lbs of
Are all of these new accounts with the dumbest fucking opinions just weirdo troons themselves or something? Yeah, good point. Women don't have their priorities on sexism sorted out, evidenced by them hyper-focusing on the world collectively erasing the word "woman" from their uniquely held reality.
This is better than the Harry Potter books.
They just look British to me.They all aged poorly, the ginger kid was starting to look haggard by the final moviesand he's the most normal of the three
But that's a hard 37, he's on the Steven Segal diet/camo scheme where they think wearing black will hide 150lbs of
Daniel Radcliffe was born with incurable gayface and spent the last 15 years looking like either a tragically ageing twink of doubtful HIV status,
Or, a lil pooner dood (he's 5'5" in his Cuban heels)
Also he can't act and isn't funny, so he's lucky to have a career and it's all thanks to the woman he denounced as "tainting" her own creation but whatever.
This response makes no sense, are you saying that criticizing trans people and defending the meaning of a word makes up for the euro women who are going to be raped by the hoard of migrants for whom Rowling advocates?
If I were as rich as her I would buy an island and charge people to hunt sex pests like big game animals.
Are you too retarded to not understand that just cause you hold one good view doesn't mean you can also hold a bad one?
this is how Ron Weasley snaked JK:
Firstly, your honor, everything that guy just said is bullshit. But look at the rhetoric ginger English guy who is not Ed Sheeran uses. There are "sides" and he's with the trannies, not the mean ol TERF who paid for his houses.
) to get Rowling cancelled irl (lol, remember when libs could cancel people?) and starting to get some traction (they cancelled a school named after her, putting pressure on studios to distance themselves from her) so the ginger Judas could have just shut up, or said something neutral, or grown a pair of tangerine-pubed balls and accept JK was right. But nuh uh.
I've seen him pop up in a number of different B-action movies and comedies over the years and I'll say to his credit he at least seems to have a much better sense of self awareness and humor than Emma Watson.
