💰 Grifter "Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I did find a way to sub to the register updates. I'll fine tune it over time. Cheers
Hey Josh did you forget to read the Neal Mohan (Youtube) superchats?
 
:null: was asking if RangerBoo/PaladinBoo was fat. She's posted pictures of herself to OnionFarms before, thinking Keffals was e-stalking her or something.
1758490109713.webp
I wouldn't say she's fat, she just looks like Mumkey Jones.
 
:null: was asking if RangerBoo/PaladinBoo was fat. She's posted pictures of herself to OnionFarms before, thinking Keffals was e-stalking her or something.
View attachment 7946965
I wouldn't say she's fat, she just looks like Mumkey Jones.
That was posted over a decade ago o algo. Consider the copious amount of psyche meds she's now on for her schizophrenia+bipolar, the metabolism from now being middle-aged and the terminally online sedentary lifestyle. Plus she's engaged to a teenager she definitely wasn't chatting up while underaged, she doesn't have to try anymore
threema-20250920-145902416 (1).webp
 
For anyone genuinely angry over Patel using 'Valhalla' instead of 'heaven', remember: Christianity is the creed of the enemy, a vehicle that serves only the ends of traitors.
Just this year, the clerus proved yet again where they stand, by condescending towards Trump and his electorate and preaching from their ivory towers on how you actually need EVEN MORE tranny shit and EVEN MORE immigrants.
Remember, that it was a tranny chaser, a gay man, who killed Charlie Kirk. And the church endorses gays.
If it weren't for christianity pacifying the righteous, the momentum for the right would have been much stronger in the past and the very issue that got Kirk killed, would have been fixed ages ago. The sooner this wretched creed dies for good, the better.

Patel had the option to use this as an opportunity to dunk on christcuckery. A god that hasn't abandoned you, wouldn't have let one of his most ardent worshipers die like this. Kash still making a positive statement pronouncing his condolences and simply swapping in Norse elements was the most diplomatic option.
 
Null’s interests on Americana gets me to read about American stuff online and I thought about my favorite Patriotic song “Stars and Stripes Forever” by Sousa. It’s just a really happy playful melody. Reading about it on Wikipedia it talks a famous rendition from pianist Vladimir Horowitz which he made in celebration of becoming a US Citizen.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=rAZ2I08CkP8I just love that 75 years ago Americans would go to a concert and a Russian Jew would finish his performance with American March music. I’m not going to claim I’d love all immigrants if they just learned how to play American songs but that clear appreciation goes a long way.
Edit: Damn I love seeing expert level piano played.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=zO03N2JLOaM
 
The greatest threat to Christianity and normalcy in general is those that call themselves Christians but continue to live in their hedonistic animal ways where life is all about maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain.
Homosexuality is absolutely not the way of Christianity. Most point to the Catholic church for all negative examples of Christianity, but they should know that Catholicism suffers the fate most degenerate ideologies and cultures fall for: they worship the word of (a) man as the word of God.
Slight digression; this is the main reason Christians are against ideologies such as National Socialism, while there are many positives in alignment, it is still socialism. Christians will refuse to worship the state or a man as their god.

When dealing with Christians you should remember this:
If a man says the bible is insufficient, incorrect, or requires clarification, that is not a Christian.
 
Last edited:
As regards Adum/Yourmoviesucks being a furry and saying "no, I don't want to do unspeakable things to the lion because he's a lion, I want to do it because of his personality" (as if being infatuated with Scar because he's an evil bastard would be much better), perverts very frequently do this whenever their perversion is under any scrutiny. Take for example this guy who was caught by Chris Hanson, who told the fictional child "it's not about the age, it's about the person", and insisted to the police that he was talking to the kid because "he seemed like a nice guy", despite not being able to remember any of the life details or interests that he talked to the decoy about. Even if they've convinced themselves that their perversion is okay (which is not the case for all perverts), they know that everyone else recognizes it as immoral, and that it's difficult to persuade someone against their moral reasoning, even if it's only a low level moral reasoning (everyone has some inkling of the fact that sex is only meant for procreation, and therefore it's against nature to enact sex upon an animal).
Also, some people have chosen to give their opinions on matters of religion in this thread, just realize that, if you actually believe that what you're saying is important, the least effective way of convincing someone to agree with you is to annoy them. By the fact that you have posted it here, you have made it less likely that anyone who read your posts will agree with you in the future.
 

There is a lot going on in the world right now. But please. Let's not forget to hate advertisers. They have earned their hatred, and you probably don't hate them enough.

They will not stop, until everything you own can somehow sell your data, and shove an ad in your face. Your bed, will show you advertisements before you lay down at night, your door will play advertisements before you open it. If they have it their way you will never be able to escape the advertisements.


Holy shit lol. At 3:30 nuxtaku of all people brings up "except Nick Fuentes". Talking about the jan 6 guided tour and how everyone involved in it was arrested and faced consequences.
 
Last edited:
Most point to the Catholic church for all negative examples of Christianity, but they should know that Catholicism suffers the fate most degenerate ideologies and cultures fall for: they worship the word of (a) man as the word of God.
You can't be a Christian without worshiping the word of man as the word of God.

Firstly, the words of God that are written in the Bible were not written by Jesus, they were written by man.
The traditional, "Christian" belief is that Matthew was written first, by Matthew, ~10 years after Jesus's death. So in order to be a Christian, you have to believe the word of Matthew is the Word of God.

Matthew and Jesus spoke Aramaic, but the Gospel is written in Greek, so you also have to believe the Word of Matthew's Translator is the word of God. You can't go back and check the original Aramaic, it doesn't exist.

If you try to do any research on this at all, you'll come across some actual evidence that Mark came first, ~50 years after Jesus died. You can say that you don't believe the evidence because it's "of man," which is fine, but if your only evidence for Mark being first is because it comes first, remember that it's only in that order because the Catholic church liked it that way. Again, this is believing that the Word of the Catholic Church is the Word of God.

Either way, the literacy rates of the time were so low that more likely than not you also have to believe that the word of every scribe that touched it is also the Word of God.

Maybe you want to ignore all that, and say that the entire Bible is the Word of God regardless of what human hands wrote it because God would have struck them dead if they lied, or something. Fine.

Unless you speak Kione Greek, you're not reading the Word of God, you're reading a translation of the Word of God. You have to believe that the word of your translators are the Word of God. Kione Greek is a dead language, so if you want to read the original you have to believe that the word of your Kione study material is the Word of God. It's worth noting here that "Jesus" wasn't even Jesus's name, because Jesus was a Jew and Jesus is a Greek name. Yeshua is what his mother named him, Jesus is Greek for "Joshy."

Maybe you want to ignore that, and say that translations are also divinely inspired. If that's the case, then you've got to figure out why the translations conflict with each other so much that people have to keep writing new ones. Maybe only the first translation is divinely inspired? The Bible obviously doesn't say anything about which translations of itself are divine, so you're treating your own word as Word of God, and that goes for whichever translation you decide is the divine one.

Let's ignore all that. I assume that you actually meant that the concept of a Pope is non-Christian. Fine. Are we throwing out every belief that came out of the Catholic Church, or just the Pope? Here's a brief list of beliefs that were ruled "canon" by the Catholic Church:

Which books belong in the Bible
The Trinity as a concept
Hell as a place of Eternal Suffering
Jesus was born to Mary and God, as opposed to having been born to Mary and Joseph and then adopted by God
Jesus's divinity
That Jesus had a physical body at all
That Christianity is open to Non-Jews
That the Old Testament is canon
That Christianity is a continuation of Judaism and not it's own independent religion
That Christianity isn't the continuation of Zoroastrianism instead
That the Old Testament's God is the same entity as Jesus's Father, as opposed to a Demiurge.

All of those strange, non-christian beliefs were around before the Catholic Church set up councils to argue about them and eventually decide on. Being a Christian at all means that you believe that the word of those councils formed of man is the word of God.

Slight digression; this is the main reason Christians are against ideologies such as National Socialism, while there are many positives in alignment, it is still socialism. Christians will refuse to worship the state or a man as their god.

"Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God's wrath on the wrongdoer. Therefore one must be in subjection, not only to avoid God's wrath but also for the sake of conscience."

The bible literally commands you to follow the state's law, and says that the state's sword deals out God's wrath.

He also says to "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's." You need to obey your government or face divine wrath, and He reiterates that that includes taxes. "And they marvelled at Him."

So there's this guy who goes around and tells people that God enforces state laws, pay your taxes, tells you to keep in the closet with your prayers, the love of money is evil, the only time he ever gets pissed is when he flips a table because of payment processors and banks, and ends up killed and made an example of by the government literally because of greedy Jews.
I mean he wasn't a Marxist or a Nazi because those weren't around yet, but he was a hell of a lot closer to those then Libtardian or whatever.

If a man says the bible is insufficient, incorrect, or requires clarification, that is not a Christian.
And yet, here you are, clarifying that the Bible is incompatible with socialism, and presumably saying that all the very possible readings of the Gospels as the story of a socialist advocate that ends with death by capitalist Jews bribing the government and his own followers are incorrect.

Side note: Has anyone noticed that Jesus and Joshy have a similar lifepath, down to having the same name, very similar Nationalist Socialist viewpoints, screaming at the payment processors, and their relationship with the Jews? He's even got a false prophet claiming to be the Christ and calling him Judas, despite the breaking of ties being because of sketchy shit with money.
 
And yet, here you are, clarifying that the Bible is incompatible with socialism, and presumably saying that all the very possible readings of the Gospels as the story of a socialist advocate that ends with death by capitalist Jews bribing the government and his own followers are incorrect.
You make a good point. I should have left the digression out.
I've read the whole post but I am only responding to this part. I really do appreciate the effort, thoughtfulness and courtesy. Though I do have some disagreements that I'm not sure how to put forward intelligently. Either way, most people go nuts when they disagree on topics like this.

Really it all boils down to people needing to stop considering the people pleasing "gay churches" the baseline for Christians. I say it all stems from those bodies being willing to compromise the adherence to scripture for the sake of outreach.
 
The ghost of Lidl Drip continuing to haunt people is funny to me. I sort of miss her being around, getting mad at her is a skill issue imo.
Once I realized that she was a single viewpoint poster, she became very fun to read. Sad that she spilled her spaghetti, but seriousness was what made her fun to begin with. A sincere troll.
 
You make a good point. I should have left the digression out.
I've read the whole post but I am only responding to this part. I really do appreciate the effort, thoughtfulness and courtesy. Though I do have some disagreements that I'm not sure how to put forward intelligently. Either way, most people go nuts when they disagree on topics like this.

Really it all boils down to people needing to stop considering the people pleasing "gay churches" the baseline for Christians.
That's okay, I disagree with parts of it myself. I was just trying to say that either you have a central authority like a Pope or it's basically a free for all. If you think the gay churches don't qualify for Christians, that's your specific faith and you can't be wrong about it (and I agree, personally). At the same time, the gay churches have their own faith that probably disqualifies you and me. Either you're both right and wrong with respect to each other, or you're relying on a third party (which is how the Pope came to be in the first place). It's kind of the same argument as the world is having about free speech right now, you either have to say "all speech is free speech" or you have to pick out a Censor to listen to, or an Arbiter of Truth.

If you want to keep sperging with me we can move it to DMs.
 
Back
Top Bottom