Debate Woggie's child bride on the role child molestation victims have in their molestation

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Woggie's child bride

Banned
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Aug 8, 2022
Not too much sympathy for the victim given that she was all on board with it at least at the start, she was an active enabler of child molestation. It's exactly that sort of evil action that enabled his crimes in the first place. Still sickens me that murderous niggers are able to pull girls while hard working men end up with nothing.
 
Not too much sympathy for the victim given that she was all on board with it at least at the start, she was an active enabler of child molestation. It's exactly that sort of evil action that enabled his crimes in the first place. Still sickens me that murderous niggers are able to pull girls while hard working men end up with nothing.
Nigga? she was a child ? are you dense?
 
Not too much sympathy for the victim given that she was all on board with it at least at the start, she was an active enabler of child molestation. It's exactly that sort of evil action that enabled his crimes in the first place. Still sickens me that murderous niggers are able to pull girls while hard working men end up with nothing.
Are you referring to Celeste? She was a child what the fuck are you talking about?
 
Nigga? she was a child ? are you dense?
Yes and? I'd be less pissed off at her if she wasn't. She enabled this to happen. Willing "victims" of kidnapping and statutory rape should be treated as accomplices and charged themselves. The way I see it it she was just another child kidnapper and rapist, even if she is a bit young. There need to be harsher penalties to discourage minors from allowing themselves to be victimized. Victim and perpetrator are not mutually exclusive positions to be in.
 
Yes and? I'd be less pissed off at her if she wasn't. She enabled this to happen. Willing "victims" of kidnapping and statutory rape should be treated as accomplices and charged themselves. The way I see it it she was just another child kidnapper and rapist, even if she is a bit young. There need to be harsher penalties to discourage minors from allowing themselves to be victimized.
what the fuck are you talking about? my nigga she was 11-13 how could she possibly be enabling when she has a mind of a literal toddler? you should actually just kill yourself sick freak
 
Yes and? I'd be less pissed off at her if she wasn't. She enabled this to happen. Willing "victims" of kidnapping and statutory rape should be treated as accomplices and charged themselves. The way I see it it she was just another child kidnapper and rapist, even if she is a bit young. There need to be harsher penalties to discourage minors from allowing themselves to be victimized.
She was groomed at 11 years old. She didn't "enable" anything. You are genuinely fucked in the head if you think she did anything wrong here.
 
what the fuck are you talking about? my nigga she was 11-13 how could she possibly be enabling when she has a mind of a literal toddler? you should actually just kill yourself sick freak
"11-13" "literal toddler" two very different statements, and even toddlers are taught not to wander. I'm sick and tired of people defending evil actions just because they're technically non criminal and often work out poorly for those doing them. I'd happily hang a kid that age for murder so why not charge them as accomplices of statutory rape?

She was groomed at 11 years old. She didn't "enable" anything. You are genuinely fucked in the head if you think she did anything wrong here.
You're more fucked in the head if you think she DIDN'T do anything wrong to get herself put into that position in the first place. Merely by associating enough to be "groomed" in the first place she has already shown herself to be engaging in wrong doing. Children are meant to be locked up or at their caretakers side even if the parents aren't doing a good enough job forcing them to be. No different than kids not being expected to murder or steal.

You cant actually expect prepubescent children to actually understand that right? You are actually rage baiting rn.
11 is already a few years into puberty for a nonwhite female child in the modern day, besides that yes, I absolutely can expect prepubescent children to understand that they should treat themselves as subservient to their parents and stick by them whenever possible. I see no reason not to impose criminal punishment on children who fail that basic requirement.
 
nigger blabber 101
"11-13" "literal toddler" two very different statements, and even toddlers are taught not to wander. I'm sick and tired of people defending evil actions just because they're technically non criminal and often work out poorly for those doing them. I'd happily hang a kid that age for murder so why not charge them as accomplices of statutory rape?


You're more fucked in the head if you think she DIDN'T do anything wrong to get herself put into that position in the first place. Merely by associating enough to be "groomed" in the first place she has already shown herself to be engaging in wrong doing. Children are meant to be locked or at their caretakers side even if the parents aren't doing a good enough job forcing them to be. No different than kids not being expected to murder or steal.


11 is already a few years into puberty for a nonwhite female child in the modern day, besides that yes, I absolutely can expect prepubescent children to understand that they should treat themselves as subservient to their parents and stick by them whenever possible. I see no reason not to impose criminal punishment on children who fail that basic requirement.
 
Your 13 year old girl isn't partying with, fucking and dating an 18 year old without maliciously negligent parenting on your end.
I disagree, parents can't be everywhere and we don't have the means to prevent every crime before it can happen so I think it's important that we outlaw underage sex in all forms and prosecute harshly wherever it is found.
 
"grooming" is a two way street
I don't think that I've heard of a good kid that got groomed. It's always kids that are up to no good that hang out on Instagram and groomcord at 11. But I don't think that there is any other outcome when you are black, poor and your parents don't give a shit and your favorite emo faggot gives you attention.
 
I disagree, parents can't be everywhere and we don't have the means to prevent every crime before it can happen so I think it's important that we outlaw underage sex in all forms and prosecute harshly wherever it is found.
You just sound bitter because growing up you didn't get pussy and all the girls you liked where fucking older dudes instead.
 
I disagree, parents can't be everywhere and we don't have the means to prevent every crime before it can happen so I think it's important that we outlaw underage sex in all forms and prosecute harshly wherever it is found.
I know you're fucking with me but the expectation isn't that the parent should be present at all times (also didn't you say that they should be attached to their caretaker?) but that the child has been raised well enough to act within a bounds of expectation even when a parent isn't around.

If the range of unexpected negative actions for your kid, when you're not around, varies from "might spend all his pocket money on Minecraft plushies" to "might rape and kill someone" then you've failed to instill proper behaviour in them.

The parent is literally never faultless. If you never knew that your kid was making videos of himself and his friend shooting watermelons with his classmates' faces on them, then you weren't close enough to be doing a good job. I shit on the notion of "there's only so much you can do." I hold the parents responsible in this situation the same way I do when it comes to shit like school shooters.
 
If the children faced legal consequence if found to have enabled statutory rape they'd be a lot less inclined to engage in these activities. As is they view it as completely risk free to themselves and as a way of gaining blackmail on those they are having sex with.
This is written like someone that got busted for statutory rape seething about it. How old was the teenager you diddled?
 
If the children faced legal consequence if found to have enabled statutory rape they'd be a lot less inclined to engage in these activities. As is they view it as completely risk free to themselves and as a way of gaining blackmail on those they are having sex with. It's actually incentivized for them to be groomed with the way our laws work now because they get money, drugs, alcohol sex, AND the ability to extort the man for more in the future while being at no legal risk themselves. If they view a man as a push over who wouldn't kill them to kill them silent why WOULDN'T they want to take that opportunity?
The grand majority of middle-school age girls are in fact not Machiavellian schemers trying to leverage their position to blackmail adults.
 
I don't think that I've heard of a good kid that got groomed. It's always kids that are up to no good that hang out on Instagram and groomcord at 11. But I don't think that there is any other outcome when you are black, poor and your parents don't give a shit and your favorite emo faggot gives you attention.
That's because they face no consequences for doing so because they know they'll be treated as the victim and can use that as blackmail. They actually have more reason to seek out older men specifically because they typically have more money and their entire lives can be destroyed in mere seconds with one report.
This is just blatant racialized pedophile apologia and I'm not responding to this anymore.
No? This is provably true, The word you were probably looking for is pubescent because I'm not denying that she was yet to be fully sexually developed, but to claim it hadn't started by that time would be an anomaly.

You just sound bitter because growing up you didn't get pussy and all the girls you liked where fucking older dudes instead.
More that I'm just bitter because I know that girls are having sex well before they're legal and it's not even treated as a crime despite the fact that it actively makes the lives of men who did not have sexual success while we were younger worse. We'll never be able to experience what it's like to lose our virginity with someone similarly inexperienced.
I know you're fucking with me but the expectation isn't that the parent should be present at all times (also didn't you say that they should be attached to their caretaker?) but that the child has been raised well enough to act within a bounds of expectation even when a parent isn't around.
Impossible, you can't rely on children being "raised well" when they have no reason to fear the consequences of their actions. The only way to raise your kids well enough to prevent them from being groomed is to make them so utterly terrified of the outside world that they'll be nonfunctional when they reach adulthood similar to how I am.

This is written like someone that got busted for statutory rape seething about it. How old was the teenager you diddled?
Very funny, I'm a virgin and even if I tried to commit statutory rape I would never be able to succeed knowing my luck with women, I'd just end up being entrapped and losing my virginity to some prison nigger.

I can't be the only one who reads this and thinks you're speaking from experience, right?
I've never had a female express interest in me but I'm just thinking about things logically
Another example half of the kids on groomercord all have absent parents or have horrible unstable relationships with their parents. If you don't raise your kid someone else will.
Why act like online is any worse than the degenerates they'd be going to school with? I always fucking hated my peers as a kid and the internet was the only place where I could find people with a similar level of distain for their evil hedonistic practices that I never had the chance to partake in. At least if your kids are online they're be stuck at home rather than doing drugs or having sex.

The grand majority of middle-school age girls are in fact not Machiavellian schemers trying to leverage their position to blackmail adults.

I call bullshit on that just from what I've heard them casually and openly admit to. They have no moral qualms about any evil no matter how great and they are fully aware of the destructive power their word carries.

Edit: I should probably shut up before I look even more retarded and autistic
 
If the children faced legal consequence if found to have enabled statutory rape they'd be a lot less inclined to engage in these activities. As is they view it as completely risk free to themselves and as a way of gaining blackmail on those they are having sex with. It's actually incentivized for them to be groomed with the way our laws work now because they get money, drugs, alcohol sex, AND the ability to extort the man for more in the future while being at no legal risk themselves. If they view a man as a push over who wouldn't kill them to kill them silent why WOULDN'T they want to take that opportunity?

Absolutely fucking retarded take, please do us all a favor and kill yourself. Otherwise, this is 0/10 ragebait. Grown adults should know not to rape little kids. It's not In a matter that they're being "led on" it's that these grown niggas are willingly fucking kids while damn well knowing the consequences should they ever get caught. Their dumbasses absolutely fucking deserve to be blackmailed and extorted for their shitty choices in life.
 
Very funny, I'm a virgin

1000001767.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom