The purpose of Critical Theory, Critical Race Theory, and Queer Theory is essentially to deconstruct language to the point that words become untethered from their actual meanings.
With language disentangled from the reality the words represent, society can then be rewritten without the previous "constraints" in place. The constraints being things like safeguarding for women and children and laws against pedophilia, necrophilia, beastiality, etc.
For example, you ladies have certain sex-exclusive rights for your protection. One of those is your right to incarceration in a women's prison, free from men. We separated prisons by male/female to prevent men from raping women.
If society can somehow disentangle the word "woman" from the reality it represents, an actual woman--you--the sex binary dissolves, taking the safeguarding with it. Since no man can ever be a woman, no actual biological test can be used. So, something else is required to collapse the demarcation line between men and women.
In this case, the concept of "gender identity" was created. It's an unfalsifiable mind state, solely used to "validate" the "trans" identity. Neither "trans" or "gender" exists, much less identities for them, but that didn't stop the Democrats from enshrining "gender identity" into codified law.
Biology is the only way to differentiate male/female since that's what MAKES us male/female. Unfortunately, queer theorists have gotten enough adults to cosign "labels" as "social constructs" for "gender", i.e., "trans-woman", etc.
So, with "gender identity" on the books, anyone who says they are a woman is now a woman, legally of course. It reduces women to a feeling in a man's head. Worse, legislation gives him the sex-exclusive rights you once enjoyed as a woman. It has collapsed the safeguarding by dissolving any distinction since the reality, an actual man, is now represented by a different word; "woman."
Legally, there is no difference now. And violent male rapists now self-identify into women's prisons, where they've already raped the females.
I've been trying to explain the dangers of anti-reality beliefs that corrupt our language for a while now. I often cite these obvious examples, men in women's prisons, but my friends assure me not enough women have been raped yet to care.
Or that assigning their "labels" to men is actually harmless. I disagree, but only a handful of women seem to agree that "woman" should remain exclusive to them. Rest assured. I'm told this won't lead to a slippery slope. *rolls eyes*
With Queer Theory, normalizing sexual relationships with kids seems to be the goal. It views the prevention of such a thing as "oppressive." Destroying heteronormativity is a goal: anti-family, anti-white, anti-heterosexual, anti-monogamy, anti-consensual relationships, etc. It's exactly what the indoctrination/grooming in our public schools strives for.
It's a very dangerous movement that genuinely threatens our society's upheaval. And their radical ideologues are EVERYWHERE on the left, including MSM, universities, etc. It sucks to see it happening in real time because my lug head friends are leftist dipshits who can't conceive of such a thing.
Critical Theory and Critical Race Theory have similar mechanisms with language corruption. You've seen what happens when the youth associate civil discourse with "fascism" and Nazis, haven't you? If we don't shift to objective reality and soon, our society is easily collapsible. Men = women should've been the wake-up call, but I'm told it's NBD. My friends are fucking idiots.
Anyway, here's some of the curriculum from the queer theorists in our state that are 100% sexually grooming children. These are internal reviews for the sex ed material they teach. The website of this group supplying materials describes infants as "sexual beings."
The glossary they use has tons of inappropriate sexual terms, including where they can find child sex abuse material, which should never be told to kids (wtf).
Of all the perverted, unnecessary sexual terms in the glossary, one useful one is noticeably absent:
No results for
grooming. You know, because it would describe their entire course. Some of their linked academic papers are written by actual pedophiles in Europe, too.
Anyway, sorry for the information dump. If you or friends have kids in public schools in lefty states, pull them out, for sure. It's not some baseless conspiracy or something I'm guessing on. The left is infested with these people and they are actively sabotaging our society.
But every leftist source will run cover for it, obviously. Leftist friends can be shown or told all of this, but will revert to validating "trans", which then strengthens the collapse of the binary.
Some of their statements on their site. If you read between the lines, it seems clear what they're hinting at. Hint: they're sexual groomers who want to normalize pedophilia.
Other materials they promote for 10-year-olds and under. You'll notice they only stress that sexual activity must be consented to. No sexual activity should be forced! No sexual activity without consent!
It may sound like safeguarding, but notice how they never say, "Actually, it doesn't matter if you consent because you're 10 or younger." It should explicitly say, "You CAN'T consent because you're a kid!" Instead, it introduces the idea that if the child consents, it's all good.
This is sexual grooming.
Same shit. Classic weirdo groomer shit. And these materials are ALL throughout the U.S., not just in our state. The scope of the problem can't be understated. You can Google the pioneering names of "Queer Theory" like Foucalt, Rubin, etc., and many are still alive.
Many fought for age-of-consent laws to be dropped in their countries, several advocated for pedophilia, others molested/raped underage children, etc. Notably, none EVER publicly denounced pedophilia.
Anyway, all of this is possible through the deconstruction of language. By turning meaningful, important words that represent our objective reality into "social constructs", we give these fucking lunatics the ability to overwrite and replace them with whatever.
The "transgender" movement is the master key to the children. Society has already affirmed children as "knowing who they really are" and validating their unfalsifiable (and nonsensical) "gender identity", barring any doctors, parents, or teachers from second-guessing it.
I've asked my friends how a society can affirm a little boy as truly knowing they're a little girl, but invalidate any future claim of their "internal age identity" as that of an adult. I'm told it's somehow different (it isn't) or won't happen (it is
happening).
Age Construct.mp4
Let's hope I'm wrong. My friends sure seem confident I'm just "anti-trans" or a "bigot" or something, despite having never shown myself to hold hateful views on marginalized folks.
Perhaps the understanding they've built from zero hours of researching this is more robust than I'm giving credit for. We shall see. Me thinks the issue is them validating something called "trans" that doesn't exist, but only time will tell.
Either way, adults in charge of the kids "sex ed" in our state are upset not enough masturbation, BDSM, and "alternative sexualities" are being discussed (sounds like pedophilia to me). I'd be worried.
