Sure but I think releasing a song titled "Charlie Kirk Dead at 31", and making tweets saying "something big will happen tomorrow" or "be careful what you say online" moments in advance kind of implies you *knew* it was going to happen for real and that it wasn't all talk.
you need to lurk moar and learn how to use the site
It’s like listening to a Parrot. “Bawk, you’re a Nazi, you’re a Nazi! Bawk, Fascists are bad Fascists are bad.”
The answer is often just garden variety stupidity. We always want to find a more satisfying and interesting reason, but as this thread proves, we are surrounded by the cognitively impaired.
Jesus Christ, these people are legit retarded. They can't de-escalate.
Common Filth doesn't post here. I don't even disagree with you but you're acting like a skitzo(Cf)
You really might. If I may >politisperg, look up how Hitler got into power in the first place. The Weimer let Germany become a hive of brothels and sexual degeneracy (as the left is pushing today) and one of Hitler's primary goals was to purge the jewish commies from his country. Hitler came into power as a reaction to not just the hellish economic depression that came about from losing WW1 and being hit with insane reparations (USA's niggers love that word, modern equivalent would be DEI) but also as a reaction to the subsequent insane leftoid vultures that started infesting Germany afterwards. Leftoids clearly have a behavioral phenotype that keeps popping up throughout history.
Because he's American and law enforcement is investigating him. Lawyer up. Always. Automatically.
FWIW, one of the accounts people were looking at made it a habit of posting this on a regular basis. It was covered previously in the thread but not sure if it was highlighted.
I mean like the headlines and stuff. Specifically, 90% of comments just go by the blurb and headline, people aren't even reading the slop.
It's been said that 'individuals are smart, groups are dumb' but I think this is incomplete. I think individuals can be smart, Parties and mobs are dumb, but in the wider population above parties there can be aggregate wisdom. Parties have agendas, funders, and leadership personalities that always distract and derail from stated aims and goals.
Possible.
How does a person even survive getting up in the morning when they actually believe something as incredibly stupid as this?My grandma cried and told me not to get a procedure I needed because "They" will start throwing women in prison for having periods.
It’s a huge fucking problem and this thread is crawling with people who want so badly to believe certain storylines that they’re shitting it up with garbage based on debunked bullshit. The Daily Mail story headline was originally how Robinson’s boyfriend was a Jordan Peterson fan — burying deep in the piece that the messages it was based on were five fucking years old. The headline and piece were edited after pressure was applied to the right editors.
Right? You fags will fall for anything.
Being white.
Seeing their tranny lovers face is fucking haunting. If you were to tell me that this was the shooter I would believe it just because they look Audrey Hale. The fact that ABC wants to normalize that unholy relationship they had is disgusting by itself.