Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
What if he doesn't get the death penalty and his time in prison away from the tranny death cult rehabilitates him and he becomes a "why I left the left" grifter? It's more likely than you think.
At this point the authorities can't be soft with this shit, it's about sending a message. If he gets away with a relatively light sentence it signals that it's totally OK to kill people you disagree with if they have the wrong ideology.
 
1757933572749.webp
 
There was a video, I posted that was deleted. And seeing that Sam Hyde video, and what he is telling people really makes, me wish I could actually have it on the site.

What did it do to the people on the right when the leftists, and trannies cost them their jobs? What did it do to people like Count Dankula that got into legal trouble? Did it change his mind? Did Josh become more, or less radical after losing the ability to access payment processors? Or was that just a superficial victory for the left, that led to people on the right, becoming more convicted in their beliefs, and to feel more justified in hating the other side?

When the right is doing the same thing. To the ones making jokes specifically. I didn't like seeing them laugh and take joy in that shooting. But I do value freedom of speech more than my feelings. But even above that. The pendulum is going to swing back eventually (don't be a high time preference acting, nigger, and think about this). If instead of normalizing valuing freedom of speech, we just keep the same playbook they used, it's going to be a losing strategy for us in the end. That play book, only won the left Pyrrhic victories, really it just galvanized the right against them. And led to them losing the level of influence they had. Even if you aren't principled about freedom of speech, I think it's important to keep in mind, what we also lose when every side is doing that dirty, PUSSY, shit.
I don’t want a nurse who sees Charlie Kirk’s life snuffed out and says “Hell yeah fuck that guy.”

That is a base level of psychopathy and it’s just a disturbed individual. If the shoe were on the other foot and Hasan Piker or Destiny got their heads blown off I would condemn it and any right winger that thought that was such a good thing should be fired as well.

You deserve to be cancelled if you see a snuff film and get gratification off it.
 
I know Sargon is saying that.
Carl's a good kid but he's little slow. The time to say "cold civil war" was decades ago.

The '90s paleocons, who remembered all the leftist bombing/etc. campaigns of the previous decades, used to say that Clinton was trying to turn the cold civil war hot by remaking federal law enforcement as an "antifascist" death squad (Weaver, Waco, etc.), and that it was only unexpected sensibility-shocking terroristic resistance (McVeigh) that made the feds think it might not work out as planned and alter their approach.

Plausible. Psywar since then has greatly intensified. And all the world's "fighting age men" have been brought to your town to do something. They don't make number go up, so it's something other than that.
 
Further proof of trannies being satanic. Sorry for the horrorcow material.
View attachment 7918461
View attachment 7918454
And, no, this thing isn't a FtM like I thought.
View attachment 7918456
Holy shit, nothing female is out of dirty tranny's reach. Now they are larping as the tumblr true crime fangirls.

With many users whining about women again idolizing a mass shooter, please, do note the percentage of "women" there since the subject was an open tranny cocksucker and Ao3 is a known tranny homo dump.

The only kind of fans this fugly clown will attract are going to be fat fujoshits who romantisize faggot degeneracy and trannies who are known for not having any standards or shame. I am all for their "art" alongside their names and addresses becoming known at their universities and work places.
 
Hopefully this is the right place to post this. I don't really know where else to put my thoughts on the matter.

A lot of women-dominated spaces online are cheering on the death of Charlie Kirk. I didn't really know him until this happened. I personally disagree with some of the racier headlines he seems to be known for that are being passed around but all he did was say words.

I have disagreed with so much, so fucking much, that has been shared online by women over the last decade and more. From the benign to the political. Recently I thought, naively, things might have been getting better. That I had found places with more open minds or at least those willing to share space with women who didn't fall in line with their beliefs one hundred percent.

I was wrong. I was so, so fucking wrong.

That this man's assassination is something to be joyous over is heartbreaking. That women are happily stomping on his grave, his wife and children witness to all of this, is devastating.

People piss me off. People anger me. People disappoint me. I'd be lying if I said some figures on 'the opposite side of the aisle' being pronounced dead tomorrow wouldn't bring a smile to my face. I'm human, not a saint. I'm well aware of my sometimes murky sense of morality. But isn't there a difference between privately having a moment of 'hah' and moving on, realizing it's a nasty thought and acknowledging your ability to be better when it isn't just a thought that popped into your head, versus this shit?

I love the internet. I have internet-exclusive hobbies that I adore. And I stupidly fucking thought I could begin indulging in them in earnest again. I thought times were changing. I stopped feeling as fucking afraid of being 'wrong' in a left-leaning online world. Because that is, unfortunately, what most female spaces are.

But an entire culture demeans and belittles women and I'm meant to care for the people who would rather I be turned invisible and raped at their leisure. I'm meant to feel sorry for and champion men parading around as women, invading some of the only places in public women and children should feel safest, making a mockery out of me. I'm supposed to cry over the deaths of the lowest of society, people who choose to harm others - even their own kin - over and over and over again, because of their skin color or their genitalia. I'm supposed to ignore how women are routinely being offered up for slaughter to vile, disgusting assholes just because these men were born in the 'right' country and thus should be stripped of responsibility and blame for their choices.

But none of these women can find it in themselves to think, "Wow, I didn't like or agree with this guy, but that was a fucked up way to die. I hope his family's okay."

There are men physically harming women right now. Violating us, our rights, our spaces - private and professional. Raping, beating, abusing, and committing actual acts of violence against us. Our families, our children. There are men who want to take away our right to fucking exist in peace in a civilized world. There are men who want us dead and there are men who want us silenced.

And we cheer them on, raise them up, while demonizing Charlie Kirk?

Is this fucking empathy? Being happy some human being who spoke his mind and did nothing to you died because he said things someone didn't like? As if that doesn't happen every fucking day? As if that isn't the bare minimum amount of conflict one might have in an otherwise uneventful and happy life?

There is one quote I find myself agreeing with Charlie on. One that's been used as a punchline to his murder.

His death, like the death of innocent children, men and women, is a price that is unfortunately paid for access to guns. Because guns do not kill people.

People kill people.

People who look too much like the women in the comments saying this was deserved, too much like the women dancing that he's dead, too much like the women who think abolishing gun laws will make everything happy and safe and perfect.

People with rot in their brains who decide to do something horrible.

If it isn't a gun, it'll be a knife. If we ban those, they'll use their fists. If we separate every person on earth, they will use words, systems, and weaponize socialization. And once we get to a point of absolute isolation, can we even be considered human anymore? Is that a life any of us should live?

And the worst part is it's happening. Women don't need guns to hurt each other. We never have.

I'm too cowardly to say shit because I know exactly what will happen if I open my mouth and say the wrong thing. Because I've seen it happen, time and time again. Because I foolishly thought maybe we had turned a corner. But no. I guess everyone just learned to shut up and now feel comfortable enough to share their sickness in public again.

I first came to the Farms because I needed a place to help remind me the whole world wasn't crazy. I don't think it is. I know it isn't. I know that the internet isn't a one-to-one reflection of everyday life and the thoughts of everyone in the world right now.

But Kiwifarms isn't a replacement for a lot of the things I enjoy online. And I don't know how I'm supposed to keep doing that knowing what types of people I share these hobbies with. That their politics and hunger for violence invade and take precedence over hobbies I personally find apolitical.

Rest in peace, Kirk. He died doing what I'm too afraid to. Because he did what I am too afraid to. And he shouldn't have.
 
Why haven't I seen news outlets properly address the sexual nature and pornographic connections of the "OwO" engraving message? They usually just hand wave it away as being a "trolling meme" or something nebulous like that. Do they truly just not understand it? Are they shying away from being too graphic? Are they trying to hide the fact that this shooter, like so many others, is perverse and that degenerate sexuality is a big part of his overall identity? He may as well have engraved "girl dick" on one of his bullets. I think the only place I saw explain that it's a gooner thing was DailyMail, using the giant Astolfo image, which was pretty funny of them.
 
One thing is for certain- women have been corrupted and psyopped into something horrific by this EVIL system. Women's Rights aren't coming back after this is all over, I really do think that. Every time there's some example of a lib/leftist being/saying something disgusting online, it's always a woman.
 
One thing is for certain- women have been corrupted and psyopped into something horrific by this EVIL system. Women's Rights aren't coming back after this is all over, I really do think that. Every time there's some example of a lib/leftist being/saying something disgusting online, it's always a woman.
You have some sort of brain rot if you think this should be a fracture point between men and women. I don't know if what you're saying is true or not because I don't listen to women, but I have seen a substantial part of the gravedancing coming from men. Saying things like "Women's Rights aren't coming back" is post-ironic fuentes levels of homosexuality.
 
The sam hyde video started out solid-ish but then when it veered into talking about getting rid of the constitution "because it's old" and how people on the right should do the same BS as the left as if they aren't already he completely lost me and it became blatantly just politics video essayist garbage.

The entire thing stinks. OVER TEN YEARS AGO when this shit started with the people now just slathered as "the left" people on all sides of the political spectrum called out that they were behaving like the bush era annoying holier than thou types but with the team color swapped. Thing is those prior holier than thou types never went away, either. It just grew more, like a fucking cancer. Because everything is fake and gay as hell now we're supposed to ignore this I guess and cheer like fucking seals at pushing for more rights to be taken from people because maybe it'll hurt the "bad side" in he long run like EVERY IDEOLOGICALLY CAPTURED USEFUL IDIOT HAS DONE THE LAST SEVERAL DECADES.
That could just be his inner monarchist or whatever coming out. I agree it was the weakest part of the video but overall I thoroughly enjoyed the video
 
You have some sort of brain rot if you think this should be a fracture point between men and women. I don't know if what you're saying is true or not because I don't listen to women, but I have seen a substantial part of the gravedancing coming from men. Saying things like "Women's Rights aren't coming back" is post-ironic fuentes levels of homosexuality.
And I have seen a substantial part of the gravedancing coming from women. Many of us have. I'm not saying "women are evil" am I? I'm saying propaganda works better on women (even advertising agencies figured this out) and we've seen that pushed to heights where the average woman thinks mass abortions and men in dresses is normal, and that so is celebrating political assassinations from the comfort of their IG accounts.
 
A lot of women-dominated spaces online are cheering on the death of Charlie Kirk. I didn't really know him until this happened. I personally disagree with some of the racier headlines he seems to be known for that are being passed around but all he did was say words.
Not very many women have experience with violence, whereas most boys at some point in their lives will get in some kind of fight or violent sport. To alot of those women, violence is an abstract concept that is far removed from them, so it's just pressing the mute button on someone they didn't like. It would change very quickly if someone in their personal sphere was victimized. Social media culture especially has encouraged a vicious, callous selfishness under a feel-good veneer of 'kindness' and 'self-care'. It doesn't just affect women but they're the primary target.

It also should be noted that these women-dominated groups are likely ran by liberal women, who in turn push out and silence conservative ones. All of the women irl that I've spoken to about it, even fairly liberal ones, were in states of horror, whereas the more conservative mothers I've talked with are approaching full blown radicalization.
 
Blair's former mouthpiece joined the, "idiots who believe Kirk advocated stoning gays to death," bandwagon and had to backtrack.
Alastair Campbell has been forced to apologise after falsely claiming that Charlie Kirk advocated stoning gay people to death.
After Kirk’s assassination on Wednesday, the former Labour spin doctor said some of his views were “horrific” and that he had seen footage of him saying homosexuals should be killed.
On The Rest is Politics podcast, Mr Campbell said: “I remember one clip I saw of him saying... literal reading of the Bible, gay people should be stoned to death.”
He retracted these comments on Sunday in a post on X, writing: “Apologies for this. I had seen a clip on social media which did not have the full context, and had seen others making the same claim... Kirk did have views with which I strongly disagree but this was not among them.”

Mr Campbell appeared to be referencing an older clip of Kirk that circulated on social media in the aftermath of his death. It showed him referencing Leviticus 18 and saying those who “lay with another man shall be stoned to death... [this chapter] affirms God’s perfect law when it comes to sexual matters”.
Kirk was highlighting the problem of selectively quoting scripture, not calling for gay people to be killed, but the footage had been edited to remove that context.

The Turning Point USA founder had said on numerous occasions that he disapproved of the gay “lifestyle”, but that he respected personal choice and that gay people should be welcomed in the “conservative movement”.
In one viral interaction with a young gay conservative, Kirk says that the man’s sexuality is not the most important part of his identity and what he does “in the bedroom” does not mean that much to him.
In a post from 2019, he wrote that “as Christians we are called to love everyone” and he would always “stand against people who wish to establish their own personal values as a reason to kick others out of our movement”.

Other public figures have also repeated the same false claim about Kirk being in favour of stoning gay people.

Stephen King, the author, wrote in a now-deleted post that Kirk “advocated stoning gays to death. Just sayin”. He later apologised and vowed to fact-check what he reads on X in the future.
Terry Christian, the TV and radio presenter, made the same claim but did not apologise. When another X user pointed out it was false, he responded: “Who gives a f--k what he said.”
Kirk was killed by a single rifle shot fired from a rooftop during an outdoor event attended by 3,000 people at Utah Valley University on Wednesday.
Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old suspect who appears to have written “anti-fascist” messages on the bullet casings, is expected to be formally charged on Tuesday.
Credit to @Made In Wales for spotting it originally. The episode that this lie from Campbell was stated is over here for those bored
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom