Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Seriously fuck Governor Cox. “Get off the Internet, don’t look at the horrific images.” People need to see them. They need to see the reality of what the animals in this country are doing. When you see Charlie die in the way he did you understand the kind of monsters that exist on the other side.
 
Wine em Dine em 69 em said:
Go ahead and take at face value what you are being told pepes. Wiser heads wait for more info you disrespectful little shit.
Click to expand...

Yes his family members, including his parents, are clearly trying to frame him to get the death penalty by falsely telling the FBI that he told them he hated Kirk for his political views.

Nothing gets by you, o wise one.

I'm sorry you've been cursed with Lissencephaly, but please don't take it out on the rest of us.
 
Unlike most of you neets or laptop class autist. I have a real job. Does anyone have the tdlr confirmed world view guy's rationale or political views or whatever the motivation is????
 
Tom Nook's Gloryhole said:
So going from what we know the entire story is proof that truth is stranger than fiction.

Dude straight up hit the perfect shot (don't give me shit about "anyone could do it", he nailed him in a place where he died pretty much instantly. Could many people hit the target from that distance? Sure. Could they nail that combo of key artery AND severing the spine on a moving target? No.) while being undetected and probably could have gotten away with it if not for the crushing guilt of what he did. All it would have taken was that shot of him being a little blurry and he'd have been impossible to find.

Meanwhile a tranny musician ends up with the FBI knocking on their door because their trash shock music had a title that came true. Keep that in mind retards who come up with music with names like "JD Vance's head on a pole" or some shit that if shit does happen you have to have a very uncomfortable conversation with the feds and will likely be on a watchlist for life.

So it wasn't the Jews, the CIA, Trannies or interdimensional time police. It was literally some dude who went undetected enough to hit the perfect shot.
Click to expand...
Right. Just you normal Mormon family next door. Family was conservative and ironically his father was in law enforcement. One thing I'll add is that at least the dad had a good relationship with his son. Because his son trusted his dad enough to confess. If this was a loner then I doubt we would have ever known who he was.
 
Gamergate Retiree said:
What's Palantir, some Snowdin NSA program?
Click to expand...

Palantir was a private company that set up cameras in New Orleans to face scan people using software pioneered in Afghanistan where people would need to submit to facial scans to be provided water or protection from the armed forces. It shows who you are, it can identify your level of stress, can even predict violent intentions. When the company showed the US Govt, they quietly took them over and all that technology is software, it's not special cameras, so you can apply it to existing CCTV infrastructure. The US government uses it all day long, every single day in every single city but they won't use it to produce a conviction 'until it's important enough.' They did this in the 70's with phone tapping technology, they used it to produce convictions but never used it as evidence because they would've had to admit they had software / hardware that could tap any phone on the planet.

cams.webp

It's basically this, but it monitors your face, your stand, whether or not you are hunched, if you are carrying anything rigid under your clothing, your mood, your level of frustration. They have this technology and have had it for 10+ years but I'm almost certain they've never used it to produce a conviction because to submit it to evidence, they'd need 1-2 professionals to explain how it works and that is just a bridge too far because they'd have to admit, 'Yes, we use this on the general public relentlessly and we're monitoring everyone, all the time, not just in security instances.'
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom