Respectfully disagree. I'm already anti-free speech because I believe conscious dishonesty should be illegal, and if I'm going to be anti-free speech, I'm going to go all-in on credible threats of violence as well. I understand speech can be restricted to a degree I personally may not like, and I accept that. I don't believe there are any significant amount of free-speech absolutists that exist, if people were actually honest with themselves. The declaration of free speech absolutism is either being dishonest with one's self, or admitting that the person believes there is absolutely nothing they would take a moral stand against someone saying, which I find insane and cowardly.