Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
If by 'average person' you mean 'terminally online faggot' then yes
The thing is that many of the people who got doxxes and fired after celebrating his death were school teachers, medical staff, IT workers, fast food service workers etc. This is what he means, you wouldnt tell that these people hold the ideas of a deranged faggot just by merely seeing them irl. They look like seemingly normal people. Uni campuses and profs rn are even happy as fuck about this
I think the problem is that a big chunk of normies are now terminally online via their smartphones, so a lot of people who would otherwise be reasonable are being actively radicalized.

On the other hand, I have seen seemingly normal people, who probably don't live on their phones and just use social media for business or keeping up with associates, making very reasonable takes that people on neither side should be getting murdered over opinions. Of course, they then get flooded with messages from the radicals, and they become completely flabbergasted that they're now being called Nazis all of a sudden. If you talk to people irl, normal working people, not the campus cultists, they don't understand at all how extreme things have become and become confused when you try to warn them.
 
Stupid Jeet FBI won't release anything to the public. Stupid Indian nigger!

Saar, can not release name of my cousin from Shitapoopoowksina. He bribe me very good so I let him leave back to India if he promise not to kill Charbie Kurt again. He from very good family, they do not do these things.

Kash Patel Head Bobble.gif
 
It dawns on you that your "friends" would disturbingly celebrate your death if you were open about your "right of Mao" feelings and thoughts.

Fuck...

View attachment 7902567
There is no greater feeling that seeing all my friends agreeing at how fucked up this thing is and knowing I have people I can count on for what's coming.
You better find people who think its fucked up and make friends with them fast.
 
The New York Times reports that politicians in support of the moment of silence banged their hands on the table as a form of protest.
Guy asked for the rest of his time(they get allotted time to speak) to be spent on silence to reflect/pray, the dumb bitch said that they won't allow it and tried to move on so based members said fuck you and started disrupting the cunt.
Well it's still pretty immature, but it's miles better than "NO YOU CAN'T MAKE ME BE QUIET LALALALALA". It's also good to see so many Europeans willing to tell the speaker (or whatever she is) to go fuck herself. The man ceded his time to the dead, and it was his time to cede. Whether you agree or not, it wasn't her place to say "um no I'm taking away your time".
 
Canadian leftist Devon Cassidy, who worked at Legal Aid BC, has been fired. She posted a video of herself hysterically laughing and celebrating the killing of Charlie Kirk.

Legal Aid BC has released a statement calling her now a “former employee.”

 
Because why would it matter?
You have a few thousand phones in the area. They aren't tracking you in an amount of time that would actually matter. And in the US you don't have ID requirements for buying sim cards. Lurking the internet for updates probably helps more than it does harm when trying to run.

Seems like a liability and a missed opportunity to create a (weak) allibi.
 
Im going to have a MATI moment rn but; the hundereds of thousands of "people" you see celebrating this family man's death over harbouring literally the most milquetoast conservative opinions are people you walk by everday at work, in school, at the park, at mcdonalds etc. You can talk to them and have a good convo without even knowing they are a proponent of gay race communusm. A good portion of the western populace has been utterly indoctrinated into blatantly being foot soldiers for marxist rooted ideology thanks to academia and media. I miss when the average normal fag wasnt convinced that they could be an activist or a rebel for the oppressed and were politically retarded (albeit they still are). Funny how the quirky uwu faggots with trans flags and the watermelon emoji in their handle are the ones being the most vile about this. If America wants to survive, millions might actually have to die unironically. I mean, how can you have a country where almost half of the populace are retards who think this way? Someone on x wrote "If 9/11 happened today, half the country would celebrate", and that really is probably true, eerily enough

Spergout over
The number of people who are not only gleeful that this guy died but also saying that his wife and kids are better off without him is aggravating me. Not just Americans - that split is across different nations/nationalities. I'm aware that that these sites are not representative of the population and select left/the most insane people (which is why they get caught out when the right win an election). This is reaching some event horizon point I feel, and and you are now dealing with a group of rabid dogs that need to be purged.

It is somewhat depressing that what you hoped was a fringe group of weirdos or an establishment elite pushing some agenda is becoming mainstream ideology. Or maybe its just that everyone is terminally online and instead of writing things in a private they put that shit online.
 
I think it’s disingenuous to ignore some of his takes that are extremely leopards-ate-my-face level, as many seem to do. I’m not saying the man deserved to die, I’m not saying I like it, fuck it’s a horrifying situation that never should have happened. But some of his takes in the past couple years relating to how he views empathy and gun violence in America have aged about as well as milk in an Arizona heatwave.
I think your examples are a little disingenuous. The empathy thing is a quote buried deep in an episode of his podcast where he talks about the term sympathy vs empathy. Was it even in the zeitgeist prior to people like you bringing it up after his murder?

The thesis itself is uncontroversial and aligns with leftwing political theory. It was that: no, you don’t really feel their pain - you feel sorrow for their pain. Modern leftwing theory tacitly acknowledges this by emphasising listening to marginalised peoples - rather than concerned members of the dominant group merely speculating on their experience (i.e. emphasising).

The new communications strategy is not to do what Bill Clinton used to do, where he would say, "I feel your pain." Instead, it is to say, "You're actually not in pain." So let's just, little, very short clip. Bill Clinton in the 1990s. It was all about empathy and sympathy. I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that — it does a lot of damage. But, it is very effective when it comes to politics. Sympathy, I prefer more than empathy. That's a separate topic for a different time.

Even the gun death comment, if you read what he says, isn’t that controversial if you read the context. Again, was this in the zeitgeist? It’s not like it’s something he was using as a talking point, just a comment he had made to fans at a single conference. I don’t think it’s fair to portray him as going out there stirring the pot, whenever even those two “inflammatory” comments aren’t as “inflammatory” when you actually see the context - and weren’t regular talking points nor made to the “general public” in his debate events but rather to audiences of his fans.

Now, we must also be real. We must be honest with the population. Having an armed citizenry comes with a price, and that is part of liberty. Driving comes with a price. 50,000, 50,000, 50,000 people die on the road every year. That's a price. You get rid of driving, you'd have 50,000 less auto fatalities. But we have decided that the benefit of driving — speed, accessibility, mobility, having products, services — is worth the cost of 50,000 people dying on the road. So we need to be very clear that you're not going to get gun deaths to zero. It will not happen. You could significantly reduce them through having more fathers in the home, by having more armed guards in front of schools. We should have a honest and clear reductionist view of gun violence, but we should not have a utopian one.

You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won't have a single gun death. That is nonsense. It's drivel. But I am, I, I — I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe.
 
That's your answer, @Rekieta’s Broken Penis

They hate him bc Charlie was and had all the things they will never. Even when he wasn't a looker, he had a wife and kids, he was faithful, he had money, prestige, respect. People hating him will never have that ever and they know it.
I pity those who instead of trying to better themselves throw temper tantrums when their lives go down the crapper.
 
This pisses me off so much.
If you're going after a target make sure it's the right fucking target you absolute gorilla niggers!
This is why we can't have nice things.

I want those who review bombed and created trouble for the innocent people of this animal hospital to neck themselves. Not in Minecraft.
 
Every time I hear an explanation on his rethoric, I can't help but think that he didn't kill anyone, didn't assault or rape anyone, didn't touch kids, all he did was say some shit that would irk retards on the left and they weren't even that bad compare to the shit I would say or read on this site.

I don't want to live in the same country as these faggots.

He said words they disagreed with, and so he deserved to die

They sincerely think that him expressing opinions they don’t like was”dangerous”, “hateful”, “inciting violence” blah blah blah.

They care more about wrong words - woke blasphemy - than absolutely any real crime.
 
What the fuck is with this DEI FBI not releasing the whole security footage at once? Why are they dropping it in pieces like a movie trailer?
My guess is that the investigation doesn't want to be bothered by every armchair investigator lobbing in pet theories and dead-end rabbit holes, only tipsters who are serious about having something helpful based on limited information. There's also the matter that everything shown to the public can then be presumed to pass onto the perp who can then change course if he thinks he's being caught up to.

Oh, the investigation not showing all of their cards can also deter future crime by giving the impression of criminal investigation being all-knowing and concealing where holes are.
 
Back
Top Bottom