Is political violence acceptable? Is it hypocritical to gravedance on tranny suicides and then get upset about gravedancing on political violence?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
BarryBumfroyd said:
Those Muslim, Jihadi degenerates would kill you and rape your family as quick as look at you.

Palestinians do not care about you and never will, they hate you because you're a stupid white American.
Click to expand...
And? I am not planning to go to Palestinia ever, idgaf what they think of me. In fact the feeling is mutual so it really doesnt bother me.
Wake me up when they deny pilgrims their right to visit holy sites.
 
Saint Agustin said:
View attachment 7902055

Are people crying over this POS? He happily justified a genocide and gleefully talked about women and children being killed.

Fuck him.
Click to expand...
Nothing about that post is "gleeful" about the deaths, but again, since you're brown and lack basic reading comprehension skills, you would think that. Hamas had plenty of chances to accept a ceasefire, but refused. So, unfortunately, there are a lot of innocent people dead. As such, in the nature of war. More over, even if you don't agree with his takes on Israel, simply discussing politics shouldn't justify one's death. If that's the case, anyone could be killed for their politics. Anyone with common sense, unlike yourself, could see the implications of that.
 
Just Another Rando said:
Unlike a tranny I am not on a 1000+ meds to convince me that cutting my dick off is a good idea. You see God blessed me with this amazing gift of pattern recognition, this gift allows me to recognize that when someone says a variation of "I'm going to kill you" I recognize that they want to kill me. What else could they mean by it?

I am curious though, what bullshit am I buying into?
Click to expand...
The bullshit. That is going to lead to consequences neither side wants.

If the left rises up, they won't end up with a communist utopia, and if the right does it, they won't end up with the based society they want.

What you will get is a justification for the government to take away more of our freedom with security as the justification. Martial law, revocation of freedom of speech, and gun rights.

It will just give them the justification like they had when 9/11 happened. To pass the patriot act. That is what you are buying into.
 
Last edited:
SirThomasMaloryII said:
Absolutely agree. I am mainly referring to services like Bluesky that have started to ban and suspend accounts that have been grave dancing. Freedom of Speech comes with consequences, but I disagree with silencing them. It’s better to let them speak like a retard freely than to butcher everyone's 1st amendment rights. Maybe I sound retarded for thinking like that, but it’s something I have seen repeated multiple times as a criticism of Twitter pre-Elon.
Click to expand...
Promoting terrorism is a federal crime, and a lot of the gravedancing has been doing just that. Frankly I’m more concerned that people are being banned for this but weren’t banned for all the “why did you miss?!” Comments when Trump got shot
 
Saint Agustin said:
Imagine defending a pedo and degenerate like trump and being on kiwifarms where we expose pedos and degenerates.
Click to expand...
"But the bible says love thy neighbor"
"but jesus never said anything about gays"
"but bible says thou shall not kill"
"but bible says turn the other cheek"
"but you need to protect first amendment for child rape enthusiasts too"'
"but kiwi farms hates pedos and trump is TOTALLY a pedo, TRUST ME GUIS"

Getting real sick of people who hate my principles trying to use the same principles against me. That strategy doesn't work no more asshole
 
rapefugee said:
Why can't the same thing be said for jokes about Pelosi's husband?
Click to expand...
Because one was an absurd domestic altercation people were mocking, and the other is a political assassination people are cheering on. One is a joke the other isn’t.

Do you even remember the Paul Pelosi scenario? It was like 5 am or some shit, Pelosi was in his underwear with this younger man, the police were called, when they arrived Pelosi let them in and had a hammer in his hand, the two men continued to argue, and then the other guy took the hammer from Pelosi and attacked him with it, with the police already in the house and standing right next to them. That entire scenario is an SNL sketch that played out in real life. Pelosi was fine, made a full recovery, the optics made it very clear we would never get the true story, but it looked a lot like a gay dispute, and oddly his wife was nowhere to be found. This was not a political situation, it was a domestic one that happened to involve a politics adjacent person, and this is exactly the kind of situation people make fun of and parody, regardless of who it was.
Meanwhile, Kirk was doing what he always does, engaging in public debate on a university campus, and was randomly and needlessly assassinated by a gunman for the crime of having different political views and engaging in legal open discussion. This was a real, public, and brutal murder.
Yes, some are making fun of the situation. Those who say things like “ironic that guns killed the gun supporter” or “how weird that he was answering a gun question when he was shot” might he in poor taste, but they’re not blaming him for his own murder, nor are they celebrating and encouraging the act of political terrorism. They’re happy Kirk is dead because this silenced him. That’s all this is, and they aren’t joking. These are the same people who think just having an account on this site means you’re an evil fascist doxer, and they’d likely be happy that any of us, you and I included, were also shot and made a public example of.
They want the world to know that if you dare be conservative, you will get shot, they’re celebrating it like Christmas. It’s evil, it’s disgusting, and it needs to be stopped.
 
Last edited:
LiquidKid said:
Because one was an absurd domestic altercation people were mocking, and the other is a political assassination people are cheering on. One is a joke the other isn’t.

Do you even remember the Paul Pelosi scenario? It was like 5 am or some shit, Pelosi was in his underwear with this younger man, the police were called, when they arrived Pelosi let them in and had a hammer in his hand, the two men continued to argue, and then the other guy took the hammer from Pelosi and attacked him with it, with the police already in the house and standing right next to them. That entire scenario is an SNL sketch that played out in real life. Pelosi was fine, made a full recovery, the optics made it very clear we would never get the true story, but it looked a lot like a gay dispute, and oddly his wife was nowhere to be found.
Meanwhile,
Click to expand...
It's pretty absurd to be shot while advocating against gun control.
 
LiquidKid said:
Promoting terrorism is a federal crime, and a lot of the gravedancing has been doing just that. Frankly I’m more concerned that people are being banned for this but weren’t banned for all the “why did you miss?!” Comments when Trump got shot
Click to expand...
Yes, promoting terrorism is illegal. I just don't believe companies should have the say on deleting comments or posts like that. If anything, I think it is best to keep it up, that way the police can easily access the post and track down who said it. Deleting the post and banning the user doesn't really seem like the best thing to do when trying to report the crime.

As for the "why did you miss?!" comments, that was during the Biden-era, where companies were infested with selfish lefty fags and jews. Of course they wouldn't care.
 
Markorian said:
Because, Anthony Logatto, there's a difference between laughing that Chris Chan got banned from a game store for yelling in 10 year olds faces when they beat him at pokemon cards and comparing Chris Chan to Saddam Hussein.
Click to expand...
GameratePTSD said:
You can say that if you want but you'll sound retarded. Do you even believe that?
Click to expand...
Could you explain why? Are you sure it's not because you agree with Charlie Kirk and disagree with Nancy Pelosi?
 
rapefugee said:
Could you explain why? Are you sure it's not because you agree with Charlie Kirk and disagree with Nancy Pelosi?
Click to expand...
Because if Charlie Kirk got bonked on the head by his gay twink lover at 5 AM in front of the cops we'd be laughing at it.
 
rapefugee said:
It's pretty absurd to be shot while advocating against gun control.
Click to expand...
If he were randomly shot while walking in the streets of Chicago to buy a sandwich by some guy who had no idea who he was, I’d agree with you.

But that isn’t what happened. That gunman was there specifically to kill him. He knew where he was gonna be at what time. He also could have shot him at any moment but waited for specific gun control comments to come up. That’s the difference. This isn’t “man who advocates for Muslims killed by Muslims extremists.” This is “man who advocates for gun ownership killed by political opponent to silence him while trying to convince people that his message is wrong.”

The absolute only valid argument you could make is the Japanese man assassinating the communist being treated like a folk hero, and even then I wouldn’t agree with you
 
for me personally i see it like this. a guy like charlie kirk for example is just saying words. you can agree with him or not thats up to you but he does not deserve to die just because he says some shit. that being said there is a risk that comes with any political stance its rare in some countries but in others if you even dare say the wrong party is bad you wake up to a cartel member with a gun to your head.

if you want to laugh at charlie kirk getting shot you are free to do so but you should realize you are laughing at someone who could have very well been you and might even become you down the line. you might not have a huge crowd or fan base you could just be talking with a friend and offhandedly mention you are not a fan or the current president or some government rule or whatever and someone could overhear that and decide well you need to go away because that type of thinking needs to be removed before it spreads.

then they could come for your family and friends anyone else they can all to silence you dissenting thoughts and opinions. if you are cool with that type of a future then gravedance all you want. but know you are only encouraging the absolute scum of the earth and fueling their lust for the destruction of everything you hold dear.

all that being said what about troons? well troons did that to themselves. they made their own choices its tragic when they are groomed into trooning out and end up getting ditched by everyone they thought they could trust. its tragic when clearly mentally fucked people like chloe segal kill themselves because our mental health support systems are worthless to people who cannot just be fixed instantly.

but one way or another troons dug their own hole and chose their own fate laughing at them for being retarded is fine. i think the thing that bonds the two is empathy for lack of a better word. there was a time i believe in which you could mock someone while also realizing that that person you are mocking could have very well been you had things gone another way in your life.

the best example of this i can think of currently is chris chan. people trolled chris all the time but when actually harmful trolls like the idea guys came around the same people that would laugh at him also came together to put a stop to the bad actors. another example is kingcobrajfs many of us loved laughing at cobes but we got upset when reddit retards started sending him alcohol and duster all because they wanted him to die because they felt he was some harmful person deserving of such punishment.

if you cant see the difference between laughing at someone for doing or saying something stupid and dancing on the grave of someone who says things you dont agree with simply because "oh i think they were a bad person so they deserved to die" you have lost empathy and are no different than many of the people with threads on this very website. you are on the track to being the person to send a retard like king cobra crates of computer duster to huff just because you wanna watch him die on stream.

however in the end like null has said many times before if you have to try and convince yourself its right or okay to laugh at someone or something then just dont do it.

also i should also mention if trump or some high ranking political person were to die i would not care who laughs at it because they are a special type of public figure where as those on the lower ranks like the charlie kirks of the world are just people who say words at the end of the day. they have no actual power. they cant bomb countries they cant force a state to kill all the migrants they cant do shit but stand on a stage and say words. its like shooting a puppy just because it looks scary and one of its parents bit you.
 
LiquidKid said:
But that isn’t what happened. That gunman was there specifically to kill him. He knew where he was gonna be at what time. He also could have shot him at any moment but waited for specific gun control comments to come up. That’s the difference. This isn’t “man who advocates for Muslims killed by Muslims extremists.” This is “man who advocates for gun ownership killed by political opponent to silence him while trying to convince people that his message is wrong.”
Click to expand...
We currently don't know when the assassin got there and we don't know the motive.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom